"When I took my oath of office to serve as your Governor, remember, I swore to steadfastly and doggedly guard the interests of this great state like a grizzly with cubs, as a mother naturally guards her own. Alaska, as a statewide family, we've got to fight for each other, not against and not let external, sensationalized distractions draw us off course."
"Palin veiled her announcement as something much more noble, but the fact is that she's quitting less than three years into her tenure. And, given her meteoric rise to national political stardom last fall, Alaskans are shocked and appalled by her decision to quit midstream.
We say good for her, however, because it's been nearly a year since the first-term governor has acted like she actually wanted the job."
On reflection, what bothers me most about Sarah Palin resigning is how fundamentally unserious it is. Being a governor is a real job with real responsibilities. It gives you a tremendous opportunity to affect your state, for better or for worse. In some ways, you can do more as a lame duck than at other times: you don't have to worry about re-election, fundraising, and so forth, so you can spend all your time trying to make your state government more effective.
Often it's clear what a governor ought to focus on: crises happen, issues reach a point where they have to be dealt with. At other times, a governor gets to be more proactive: giving some troubled agency the attention it doesn't normally get and trying to really turn it around, trying to put programs on solid foundations before their problems become urgent, making government work better and more efficiently for all your citizens.
But to do that, you'd have to actually care about governing. Sarah Palin plainly does not. If she did, she would never, ever have resigned her position, especially not in order wander around giving speeches.
As an example of what she might have done if she cared about governing, consider Alaska's foster care system. As of 2007 (the most recent data I could find), Alaska was the fourth worst of 45 states reporting when it came to keeping kids from being abused in their foster homes -- the homes they're given to keep them safe from abuse and neglect. Alaska's child protective services were the fifth worst in the nation at keeping kids from undergoing repeat abuse, the third worst in response time, and the sixth worst in terms of the time from an initial report of child abuse to receipt of services.
Alaska was 42nd in the country in the percentage of foster kids who had two or fewer placements, which means that a lot of kids spent a lot of time bouncing from one home to another. It doesn't have enough caseworkers, and the turnover among those it does have is too high. (It does do a good job at placing siblings together and maintaining community ties, though.)
Moreover, services for kids who age out of foster care are not very good:
"Nearly 38 percent of foster care alumni in Alaska said they were homeless at some point after leaving their foster homes, according to a 2005 study from the UAA School of Social Work -- much higher than the 12 to 25 percent for foster care alumni in other states."
Foster care is one of those issues that liberals and conservatives ought to agree on. Kids are not responsible for being abused or neglected. They can't just take care of themselves. And someone like Sarah Palin, who is forever talking about fighting for our children, might be expected to work at this. If she was looking for a way to spend her time other than taking junkets at taxpayer expense, it might have occurred to her to fix Alaska's foster care system so that it really took care of Alaska's kids.
But no. Here's the legislator who has worked hardest for Alaska's foster kids on Palin's record:
If anything ought to count as a higher calling, taking care of kids who need help should. Sarah Palin was in a position to really do right by Alaska's foster kids. Instead, she walked away.
These are not original observations, but Sarah Palin is a gutless narcissist. Alaskans should be thanking her for leaving, and many of them probably are.
Posted by: Daddy Love on July 5, 2009 at 6:08 PM | PERMALINK
On reflection, what bothers me most about Sarah Palin resigning is how fundamentally unserious it is. Being a governor is a real job with real responsibilities.
But as you may recall, she is of that generation of politician that creates history rather than studying it. (For further reading, see under Bush, G.W., administration of.)
And what matters most to those politicians and their believers -- especially those with strong faith -- is not being constrained by "seriousness," or "responsibilty," or facts, or any of those silly things, but rather believing and acting strongly on that belief. That's what distinguishes the real leaders of out time.
Posted by: bleh on July 5, 2009 at 6:26 PM | PERMALINK
And this was the person who in a national spotlight ridiculed community organizers. Wow. Just...wow.
Posted by: bubba on July 5, 2009 at 6:29 PM | PERMALINK
Sarah Palin, like most pro-life advocates, should really take an active part in working for all of our children languishing in the system.
Posted by: appletree on July 5, 2009 at 6:31 PM | PERMALINK
bleh: "she is of that generation of politician that creates history rather than studying it."
And what a contrast to Obama who has clearly studied history so that when he creates it, he has already thought about some of its lessons.
Posted by: Johnny Canuck on July 5, 2009 at 6:38 PM | PERMALINK
Sarah Palin has created a new motto (in my mind, anyway) for the Repulic party, 'the party of dead fish'.
Posted by: Bill on July 5, 2009 at 6:44 PM | PERMALINK
Her daily affirmation,
When the going gets thick, the thick get going.
Posted by: alan on July 5, 2009 at 7:00 PM | PERMALINK
Are there any Republicans who are genuinely interesting in governing? (That's not snark, btw.)
I think a lot of this harkens back to Reagan's insulting remarks about how the government is the problem. Virtually every single Republican elected to office since (& some not elected, like George W. Bush) have taken those words to heart to the extent that, yes indeedy, when Republicans are in charge, sure as heck the government is the problem.
Palin is clearly not fit for any sort of public office. She misuses power. And she is stupid. So it sort of begs the question, what was the Republican brain trust in Alaska thinking when she rose through the ranks?
Posted by: zhak on July 5, 2009 at 7:02 PM | PERMALINK
She wants the freedom and power given to Rush Limbaugh. It is very obvious that he doesn't actually work, just spouts words which, like hers, often don't make any sense.
Posted by: mlm on July 5, 2009 at 7:08 PM | PERMALINK
Palin thinks being a leader means having followers. And, although Alaska is a seriously weird place, it is not known for breeding people who are happy with loving the Dear Leader.
Posted by: MattF on July 5, 2009 at 7:10 PM | PERMALINK
what was the Republican brain trust in Alaska thinking when she rose through the ranks?
The same thing the Republican party was thinking when they promoted Bush -that he would be a figurehead while decisions were made behind the scenes, and that his primary responsibilities would be cheerleading and raising money.
Posted by: Danp on July 5, 2009 at 7:10 PM | PERMALINK
I really don't understand why she had to quit. Couldn't she have just taken a few "personal days" in Argentina?
Posted by: zeke on July 5, 2009 at 7:15 PM | PERMALINK
Sarah Barraquitter
is the the quitter from Wasilla
The quitter from Wasilla
is Sarah Barraquitter
Been explaining this to the dog all day.
Posted by: anan on July 5, 2009 at 7:18 PM | PERMALINK
Kids are not responsible for being abused or neglected. They can't just take care of themselves.
If a thousand legislative battles from S-CHIP to and Title I, back through Head Start, and segregation, back through compulsory education and life-and-death stuff like child labor laws and chattel slavery teach us anything, they teach us that there are always enough Americans who can't see why should they, who as children chose the right parents be punished by having their stuff be taken away from them and given to kids who chose the wrong parents, to create a political party, and often enough to form a government.
Posted by: Davis X. Machina on July 5, 2009 at 7:23 PM | PERMALINK
like a grizzly with cubs, as a mother naturally guards her own.
I think her parental instincts more closely resemble a salmon.
Posted by: Danp on July 5, 2009 at 7:23 PM | PERMALINK
Palin's arguments for quitting are offensive to everyone else who holds political office.
Imagine if a college teacher gets tenure and then quits because "tenure allows professors to slack off and do nothing important...and a lot of them do exactly that".
Yes, it is possible to do less with tenure, it is also possible to do more. What Palin doesn't get, apparently, is that elected officials get tenure for the period of their term. They can't be fired, and their constitutional powers can't be taken away.
My opinion is that there is no larger scandal, because that would require some ability to plan and to come up with believable lies. Palin does't have that skill. So my guess is that she got burned by the stimulus bill and she knows that an additional bill will be coming along before she leaves office, and she will have to accept it.
Her only chance to avoid that is to quit now.
Posted by: tomj on July 5, 2009 at 7:28 PM | PERMALINK
DanP: HAH! I almost did a spit-take.
Posted by: auntieslats on July 5, 2009 at 7:32 PM | PERMALINK
Hilzoy:
I just reread "Barracuda The resentments of Sarah Palin," Noam Scheiber, The New Republic, published: Wednesday, October 22, 2008. This article explains Palin's mind better than any other analysis I have read. I have also reread All the King's Men, Robert Penn Warren's classic on Huey Long. The politics of resentment can catapult a person to political office, even president, I fear, if the times are right. FDR feared Long more than any other politician. I keep seeing Evita Peron when I see Palin. Fascism lite.
Posted by: E L on July 5, 2009 at 7:37 PM | PERMALINK
You libs are just obsessed with her, aren't you?
You can't stop talking about her.
Feel the fear here.
Posted by: Myke K on July 5, 2009 at 7:48 PM | PERMALINK
@Myke K
It is more like 'Feel the mocking' buddy. Palin is obviously certifiable.
And Hilzoy...an excellent post as usual. The point you made is a good example of Palin's hypocrisy and narcissism.
Posted by: Trinity on July 5, 2009 at 7:56 PM | PERMALINK
Palin is obviously certifiable.
Just keep telling yourself that.
I'm really going to enjoy her inauguration in 2012 while all of you sit around wondering what happened to your golden boy. Since I'm a top donor to SarahPAC I'll probably even have tickets.
Don't worry, I'll post photos for you to enjoy.
Posted by: Myke K on July 5, 2009 at 8:04 PM | PERMALINK
"If anything ought to count as a higher calling, taking care of kids who need help should."
False. Many things are more important than this, particularly on a national scale.
Thus the entire post is reveled as a strawman and is simply more in an endless stream of infantile propaganda which seeks to prevent its readers from actually thinking about the issues.
Posted by: a on July 5, 2009 at 8:10 PM | PERMALINK
Keep that $20 Myke, you top donor you! You might need it for her new book!
Posted by: drosz on July 5, 2009 at 8:16 PM | PERMALINK
We dems can't stop wondering about her because she has such a fanatical, non-logical base, which gives her more power than the quality of her ideas or the extent of her integrity deserves. One danger is she could probably help raise a LOT of money for Repubs, and she might enjoy doing that if she got enough press and it led to fame, fortune, influence, and nice clothes. She could do even more if she would work well with some of the leaders of the Rep party. Tony Blankley said he would love to harness her energy and be able to unite and grow her supporters. Hopefully, she is too much a "maverick" to do that however. Much as I think she has huge flaws, I do worry about her power to incite an angry mob and get them to give up their wallets (remember those rallies near the end of the campaign?!)
Posted by: PEA on July 5, 2009 at 8:17 PM | PERMALINK
Myke raises a good question: which Republican politicians are worth a liberal's fear these days?
Not Palin, certainly. Huckabee still strikes me as a fairly clever campaigner. And if he weren't named "Bush," I think Jeb would be pretty formidable.
Other than that...my goodness, what a crew. I'm 37 years old, and I can't remember the Republicans looking more inept than they do now. I think you'd have to go back to the 1930s to find a comparable period.
Posted by: mrsaturdaypants on July 5, 2009 at 8:21 PM | PERMALINK
Alaska was 42nd in the country in the percentage of foster kids who had two or fewer placements, which means that a lot of kids spent a lot of time bouncing from one home to another.
I'm proud that Sarah subscribes to the Republican philosophy of "if a child is hungry, he'll be more motivated". If these kids are placed in comfy, safe home, what's to get them on track to be productive members of society? Plus, I'd hate to increase my taxes 0.01% on my income over $250,000 to pay for it. That's money I could use to start a business and employ Americans, or buy another summer home I could flip.
Posted by: MynameisAL on July 5, 2009 at 8:23 PM | PERMALINK
a: The quote wasn't "If anything ought to count as the highEST calling...", it was "... highER calling". Many things can be more important without the statement being false. Thus your entire comment is revealed as a strawman and is simply more in an endless stream of infantile propaganda which demonstrates that the writer has not thought about the issues. Or can't you count past one?
Posted by: john on July 5, 2009 at 8:24 PM | PERMALINK
"The people get the government they deserve"-Alexis de Tocqueville.
Posted by: DAY on July 5, 2009 at 8:26 PM | PERMALINK
Alright folks - you've spent (wasted, really) far too much time & too many column inches on Sarah Palin.
Time to start treating her like the non-entity she is & move on to the difficult & challenging work we read you for.
Health care anyone?
Posted by: sidewinder on July 5, 2009 at 8:27 PM | PERMALINK
Most of the stuff that governors can do to improve the lives of the people whom they govern involves spending money. Improving foster care for children, which Hilzoy identifies as a potential way Palin could have improved the lives of Alaskans, would involve increasing expenditures and therefore runs counter to the basic conservative desire for small government.
Conservatives have difficulty solving problems because solutions often involve spending money. In fact, long ago conservatives adopted the argument that liberals are ineffectual because we try to solve problems by "throwing money" at them, even though conservatives themselves have no problem throwing money at "problems" such as Iraq and terrorism.
As a conservative, Palin was ideologically unable to solve any social problem that confronted her state. If she were a mainstream Republican, she would have been able to argue for the benefits of improving foster care, for example. However, she's a rightwinger and as such is beholden to dogma and ideology.
Posted by: castanea on July 5, 2009 at 8:29 PM | PERMALINK
The wretched Coulter said it all made sense, Sarah needs to quit being Governor to be a rabble-con/Christianist demagogue like Coulter herself. (And too picked-on by photo-shopping little bloggers etc., purveyors of "baseless" charges yadda yadda ...) Just think of the complete irresponsibility to the people who elected Palin, the Oath of office and her statement quoted top post. This means nothing to Coulter/Palin - just do what you need as a political demagogue. Promises and obligations; "real responsibilities" are for chumps.
Note also, the hypocrisy of a conservative like Palin siccing (sp?) lawyers on people who pick on her - from the people who hate the "whiners" who want to sue those who really, literally hurt them in physical ways by malpractice, unsafe working conditions, etc.
BTW, Levi Johnston's book ought to be real interesting! And his writing can't be any worse than hers. See and the comments too at http://www.nypost.com/seven/07042009/gossip/pagesix/levi_vs__sarah_palin_battle_continues_177489.htm.
Posted by: N e i l B on July 5, 2009 at 8:30 PM | PERMALINK
Re Eva: Yeah, Sarita Palon!
Posted by: N e i l B on July 5, 2009 at 8:35 PM | PERMALINK
"We dems can't stop wondering about her because she has such a fanatical, non-logical base, which gives her more power than the quality of her ideas or the extent of her integrity deserves...."
***
Palin reinforces the lesson we should have learned over the eight years that Bush was in the White House: There is a segment of the American electorate that puts no value on rationality or logic or discussion as a means to identify problems and find solutions.
No matter how much we try to engage this segment in debate, it will not change its attitudes. It self-defines its opinions as correct and therefore anyone or anything who holds a different viewpoint is wrong.
The best we can do is recognize that this segment will continue to exist in America and to do whatever we can to marginalize it.
Posted by: castanea on July 5, 2009 at 8:41 PM | PERMALINK
The question Palin should have asked: "Can someone tell me what it is exactly that a governor does every day?"
Posted by: Hoken on July 5, 2009 at 8:42 PM | PERMALINK
Thus the entire post is reveled as a strawman and is simply more in an endless stream of infantile propaganda which seeks to prevent its readers from actually thinking about the issues.
Quite the contrary. By comparing Sarah Palin's rhetoric (on her commitment to her job, to family values, and to her Alaskan "family") with her dismal record in all of these areas, Steve's post connects the dots and raises questions about Palin's honesty, integrity, and efficacy as an executive.
Conversely, your attempt to ignore the legitimate issues raised in this post by trying to pretend it away with a little semantical fakery is the very definition of trying to prevent people from thinking about the issues.
Posted by: trex on July 5, 2009 at 8:46 PM | PERMALINK
It's possible that she cares about governing, but has realized that she's simply no good at it.
Posted by: TW Andrews on July 5, 2009 at 8:56 PM | PERMALINK
Excellent!
Posted by: Marnie on July 5, 2009 at 9:12 PM | PERMALINK
They hate frivolous lawsuits don't they?
Careful Hilzoy...
Sarah and her lawyers might sue you for defamation.
Posted by: koreyel on July 5, 2009 at 9:16 PM | PERMALINK
WHO IS HER PUPPET MASTER???
Posted by: az gal on July 5, 2009 at 9:21 PM | PERMALINK
WHO IS HER PUPPET MASTER???
Posted by: I AM THE QUEEN on July 5, 2009 at 9:23 PM | PERMALINK
"You libs are just obsessed with her, aren't you?"
Sure we are. Wouldn't you be with a vacuous, stupid individual who has Faustian ambitions, with none of the class.
We're obsessed because she is an idiot and you seem to think she's the second coming of Christ.
We're obsessed because we've experienced 8 years of an empty suit, incompetence, and lies. And we all know where that lead.
Amazingly enough, we actually care about this country and the world.
Posted by: dms on July 5, 2009 at 9:31 PM | PERMALINK
We're obsessed because (s)he is an idiot and you seem to think (s)he's the second coming of Christ.
Could be talking about Obama.
She's Gone Oh I, Oh I'd
better learn how to face it
She's Gone Oh I, Oh I'd
pay the devil to replace her
She's Gone - what went wrong
Posted by: tehee on July 5, 2009 at 9:38 PM | PERMALINK
She has done a pretty nice end run around everyone,all the way to the bank :) It's totally scary sitting back here and watching it all play out, day after day..Sounds like she accomplished EXACTLY what she wanted, and everyone just played into her hands , negative attention, is better than no attention at all!!!I'd check her out real good people...Rumor has it........
Posted by: I AM THE QUEENc on July 5, 2009 at 9:42 PM | PERMALINK
But still, people are talking about Sarah, Sarah, why she did this etc. - we need more answers about her advisors! Like asked above, who put her up to this, who is the puppet master/s?!
The bloggers need to dig more! Too much psycho-anal-isis of Sarah Palin, not enough digging around for the men or women behind the curtain! Do your jobs, pls.
Posted by: delver on July 5, 2009 at 9:48 PM | PERMALINK
Sarah Barrascoot-a!
Posted by: Neil B ☺ on July 5, 2009 at 9:50 PM | PERMALINK
She's threatening to sue a blogger who was mean to her.
Tuff as nails.
Posted by: alan on July 5, 2009 at 10:01 PM | PERMALINK
>"...only dead dead fish go with the flow..."
They didn't even get that part right. Many species of fish swim both up and down stream.
Posted by: Buford on July 5, 2009 at 10:09 PM | PERMALINK
Sara, you done put lipstick on your last pig, honey. Say 'buh bye' now.
Posted by: Sara Pallin around with secessionists on July 5, 2009 at 10:18 PM | PERMALINK
Can't wait to hear how Letterman and Jon Stewart and company work this one.
Posted by: Insanity on July 5, 2009 at 10:33 PM | PERMALINK
Hilzoy,
Of course, Sarah doesn't give a rat's ass about foster children. They are already born! She's ProLife! Once they are born, they have no value. Unless it is to learn that hunger is a good motivator.
Posted by: jcricket on July 5, 2009 at 10:38 PM | PERMALINK
Sarah Palin is "Typhoid Mary," and ignorance is the disease with which she has infected her supporters, and they are as satisfied as hogs in slop being told what to think, what to do, who to hate, how much $ to donate to her legal fund, etc. They have no idea that Palin has no governing skills, and think that as long as she pushes family values, pro-choice, dominionist Christianity, and does a little pageant-walking, she can do anything. Fools.
Posted by: majii on July 5, 2009 at 10:42 PM | PERMALINK
but isn't perversion of the whole political process and the function of governing exactly what today's republicans/conservatives are all about. palin isn't an exception, she is the epitome of the unserious, hyper-greedy, self-aggrandizing, power obsessed dolt that is the republican/conservative personality.
Helping people, improving the nation have NOTHING to do with today's republicanism.
Posted by: pluege on July 5, 2009 at 10:58 PM | PERMALINK
What a joke - this lady made defamatory remarks about our newly elected prez - yet, she wants to bring suit against any media outlet.
I'd say, people need to leave this lady alone. No media attention, even when she wants it. I never had any intention of buying her book anyway.
If people ignore her, her books, magazines, tv spots - she won't garner any more publicity because the she won't be newsworthy, not that she is now!
Posted by: annjell on July 5, 2009 at 11:04 PM | PERMALINK
Unserious.
As unserious as Arnold Schwarzenegger.
As unserious as George W. Bush.
As unserious as Mark Sanford.
As unserious as John McCain, or for that matter, Huckleberry Graham.
Face it, Sarah Palin had half the game down, but being on the wrong side of The Village Mentality wasn't in her playbook and didn't sit so well. I have to give her credit for standing up to the graceless McCain staffer-insider DC backbiting. Palin put a good face on eating the shit that got dished out, and when that grew tiresome, she bolted.
Also, with investigations apparently bringing an end to Palin's privileged ride, it's time to get off the merry-go-round.
Not impressed by:
a) the near-total free ride John McCain's gotten from the talk-show hosts and from the groundlings, esp next to Palin; and
b) As much as I'm no Palin fan, the sexist bashing by nominal feminists and supposed liberals is pretty revealing. Yeah, I hate her politics. Sure, it's cynical and based on exploiting the political tropes of her day! That's what makes good politicians so annoying! Palin's only misstep was in being 4-to-6 years behind the country's changing political tides sentiment.
Seriously, the teflon media would've just eaten her up if she'd been George Bush's protege.
Posted by: johnsturgeon on July 6, 2009 at 2:17 AM | PERMALINK
The simplest and most obvious expalnantion is right in front of us. The big fish in the little pond is bored. She's drawn to the national stage like a moth to flame - and there's a boat-load of money to be made. Sarah Palin has been seduced by fame and fortune. Any surprise here?
Posted by: ellie on July 6, 2009 at 7:21 AM | PERMALINK
Palin just wants money. She doesn't like the confines of public life and the scrutiny it has been to her life so she is getting out. She will be a TV commentator - she is pretty to look at, spouts nonsense, is aggressive, like money, likes the spotlight....basically a Rush-lite person.
Rush should watch out because she is out to compete with him and the money he gets spouting his crap.
The Repugs would be smart and cut all ties with her - but no they are not that smart. McCain has said she will be a leader of the party now --- where can I throw up now......sad.
Posted by: wom45 on July 6, 2009 at 7:43 AM | PERMALINK
Palin wants to "tell" us how to run our government, instead of rolling up her sleeves and "showing" us how to actually govern. It's a much easier job, always telling people what they're doing wrong and not being expected to step up and fix the problems.
Posted by: Jane on July 6, 2009 at 8:28 AM | PERMALINK