Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

July 9, 2009

WHEN THE CIA LIES TO CONGRESS.... In May, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said the CIA had misled Congress years ago on the use of waterboarding. Republicans were apoplectic -- the very idea that intelligence officials would mislead lawmakers was so despicable, some GOP leaders suggested Pelosi should resign. Sen. Kit Bond (R-Mo.) said Pelosi had launched a "massive attack on our intelligence community," and added that it's "outrageous" for the Speaker to "call our terror-fighters liars." Newt Gingrich seriously argued that the Speaker's comments increased the risk of a terrorist attack against the United States.

The whole mess caused something of a media frenzy, and the Speaker's poll numbers tanked.

Perhaps it's time to revisit the question of whether the CIA has a tendency of being less than truthful with Congress.

The director of the Central Intelligence Agency, Leon E. Panetta, has told the House Intelligence Committee in closed-door testimony that the C.I.A. concealed "significant actions" from Congress from 2001 until late last month, seven Democratic committee members said.

In a June 26 letter to Mr. Panetta discussing his testimony, Democrats said that the agency had "misled members" of Congress for eight years about the classified matters, which the letter did not disclose. "This is similar to other deceptions of which we are aware from other recent periods," said the letter, made public late Wednesday by Representative Rush D. Holt, Democrat of New Jersey, one of the signers.

In an interview, Mr. Holt declined to reveal the nature of the C.I.A.'s alleged deceptions. But he said, "We wouldn't be doing this over a trivial matter."

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Silvestre Reyes (D-Texas) added that his committee "has been misled, has not been provided full and complete notifications, and (in at least one occasion) was affirmatively lied to." Spencer Ackerman, who was among the first to report on this (if not the first), has a copy of the full letter from the Democrats on the committee.

And why is it that committee Democrats are the only ones expressing concern? It's tempting to think Republicans on the Intelligence Committee might be bothered by eight years of deception.

Except, they're not. They seem to realize that Dems are right about this, but can't be too critical because it would undermine their baseless smear against Speaker Pelosi. Congressional Republicans, in other words, refuse to let facts get in the way of a good lie.

Steve Benen 8:35 AM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (38)
 
Comments

The CIA has a duty to protect classified information and projects that are vital to our national security. And when Congress, a venal and leak-filled institution, comes asking questions, the CIA has a duty to protect sensitive missions and information from being compromised.

The CIA saved countless lives by preventing Congress from knowing details about highly sensitive matters.

Posted by: Al Jr. on July 9, 2009 at 8:34 AM | PERMALINK

And why would the CIA have misled and/or lied to members of Congress? Let's see, I wonder if there was similar activity amongst, say, the Executive and the Judicial branches during this same time period, from 2001 until recently?

Hmm, I can't pinpoint the connection exactly...

Posted by: terraformer on July 9, 2009 at 8:34 AM | PERMALINK

well, this is certainly shocking news! i've suddenly lost all hope in the integrity of my government.

the cia?

tell lies to the congress?

unbelievable. even in a time of BushCo.

next thing you'll be telling me: they broke international law by grabbing up people indiscriminately and taking them to secret locations and torturing them... just like the bad guys in some cheap tawdry old movie.

hah! who could believe that?

Posted by: neill on July 9, 2009 at 8:37 AM | PERMALINK

No, Steve, Republicans aren't making a stink about this because CIA secrecy is a pillar of conservative government. Without CIA secrecy, neoconservatives, they can't lie their way into war, destabilize regimes, torture prisoners overseas, etc. It's not because they are covering their asses, it's because it's an integral part of their governing philosophy.

Get with the program.

Posted by: inkadu on July 9, 2009 at 8:37 AM | PERMALINK

i'm sure there faux-patriotic Americans stupid enough to believe as Al Jr. pretends to. Nonetheless, I thank him for the laugh.

Posted by: slappy magoo on July 9, 2009 at 8:48 AM | PERMALINK

just because an organization that kidnaps, drugs, rapes, and tortures those who fall into their custody doesn't mean they would LIE to congress....

that would be wrong.

Posted by: linda on July 9, 2009 at 8:49 AM | PERMALINK

Come on. I'm sure the Republicans will get called out on the Sunday talk shows.

Posted by: Bob Johnson on July 9, 2009 at 8:57 AM | PERMALINK

As Winston Churchill said, "in war, truth is so important that it must be surrounded by a bodyguard of lies".

We are at war. QED.

Posted by: Al on July 9, 2009 at 9:00 AM | PERMALINK

No matter what magically realistic BS Pelosi's butt-boys like Holt toss out, Obama is still going to veto the Intell bill that would give such clowns & clownettes any info they couldn't share with their mistresses (gigilos for the Speaker).

Obama and W are on the same page here

Posted by: tao9 on July 9, 2009 at 9:13 AM | PERMALINK

This whole thing cracks me up. Of course the CIA lies to Congress and everybody else on a regular basis. Their interests are usually not the citizenry's interests, and are very rarely consonant with democratic principles.

Posted by: shortstop on July 9, 2009 at 9:14 AM | PERMALINK

One could narrow down the term C.I.A. and focus in on one name Porter Goss. Gee, isn't he a former GOP Congressman? The congress was lied too by one of there own, this maybe one of the few times the GOP willing crossed the aisle, they may even claim that these lies were actually bipartisan so therefore we should be happy.

Posted by: nenabeans on July 9, 2009 at 9:26 AM | PERMALINK

I TOTALLY did not see that coming.

OTOH, if the report hadn't been watered down to state the obvious, another opportunity has been narrowly averted for the citizens of this great country to wake up and take back their country. Sixty some years from now, a high school student will do a report connecting the dots and be totally astonished at how perilous the 2000-08 years had become, present his/er findings to be included in the W lib-ary and get a rejection slip.

Let it be observed that from now on, releasing reports negative to GOP propaganda must be coordinated with a smear campaign to keep the base in the dark.

Posted by: Kevin on July 9, 2009 at 9:48 AM | PERMALINK

Why are there Republicans on an Intelligence Committee?
Oh, and Kit Bombed is an enormous asshole.

Posted by: FitterDon on July 9, 2009 at 10:02 AM | PERMALINK

Boner needs to resign. He libeled the speaker and now there is proof that she was telling the truth. I say lock Boner up in Guantanamo. What a piece of shit he is.

Posted by: Patrick on July 9, 2009 at 10:22 AM | PERMALINK

The reviews are in, and Panetta disappoints with his rendition of The Dead Parrot Sketch.

Posted by: doubtful on July 9, 2009 at 10:26 AM | PERMALINK

Al, your logic is astoundingly circular. "We're at war" because the CIA, at Bush's direction, lied and extorted false information under torture. So now it's okay for them to lie because we're at war -- a war they created?

Look, everyone knows that a spy agency, by definition, lies a lot, including to its own side. But then don't you think it was astoundingly disingenuous to heap abuse on Speaker Pelosi for stating the truth, when Congress was under unfair attack for having "approved" activities they didn't know about? Show of hands from anyone who ever REALLY believed that she wasn't telling the truth about that?

Posted by: T-Rex on July 9, 2009 at 10:27 AM | PERMALINK

Show of hands from anyone who ever REALLY believed that she wasn't telling the truth about that?

(Raising hand)

Given the CIA's extreme popularity with mainstream Americans, I suspect that the Democrats are going to lose this battle. Time will tell.

Posted by: MatthewRQuarreler on July 9, 2009 at 10:37 AM | PERMALINK

I don't believe a word Spoken from congress men and women who have made a life of lying to the people in this country.The CIA may use deceit to talk about what they do.BUT Our Representatives dummying up is despicable.Its not the CIA I worry about.Its the asshats that run the show that concern me. I want my country back.

Posted by: Jon on July 9, 2009 at 11:00 AM | PERMALINK

Alcee Hastings is a signatory!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA(breathe)HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. HOO. &heh.

Posted by: tao9 on July 9, 2009 at 11:13 AM | PERMALINK

Reading this sort of news every day, one could conclude that maybe the only way a country can get rid of the far right is the way the far right was excised in Germany 65 years ago - I sure would nope this isn't true, I'm just reading a history of the last year of the war, and there is a good case to be made that the period June 5, 1944 - May 8, 1945 might just be the worst 11 months in all of human history. But the way these guys hang on the way they do, their refusal to admit reality, their willingness to let the country fail if it means the destruction of their enemies - all this is very reminiscent of the way the Nazis were those 11 months.

Right now, the only thing I can think of to do is to work as hard as possible next year to get at least 5 more Senate seats and another 15-20 House seats, which might finally give the Democrats the spine to take on the dead-enders who would be left. it's that or start organizing our own militias afterwards.

Posted by: TCinLA on July 9, 2009 at 11:26 AM | PERMALINK

Ironic, isn't it? How does it feel guys, that someone actually might have mislead "you" for once...sucks don't it...

Posted by: Jim s on July 9, 2009 at 11:52 AM | PERMALINK

I don't think you can say Gingrich "seriously argued that the Speaker's comments increased the risk of a terrorist attack." "Asserted," maybe. "Claimed," maybe. "Pulled out of his ass," maybe. But not "seriously argued."

Posted by: anandine on July 9, 2009 at 12:11 PM | PERMALINK

neill you sir are a moron!!

"grabbing up people indiscriminately and taking them to secret locations and torturing them"

Just how many people were waterboarded sir? Can you tell me?

The ANSWER is THREE!!! THREE sir. That's it. They were the worst of the worst, and should have been shot in the head when it was over.

www.libertarianhumor.com

Posted by: BigEdsBlog on July 9, 2009 at 12:14 PM | PERMALINK

Anyone that argues for Pelosi is as misguided and uninformed as, well, Obama. It's amazing how the assertions she made about the CIA gradually went away because her administration knew not to try and hang one of it's own, chiefly due to the fact that she had nothing to back it up. It's also blatantly self hypocritical to try to keep blaming the last administration simply because she's liberal AND because her own on the hill are screwing up by the numbers. Take care of the present and the future first, that's your JOB...the rest will take it's own course. And to think, she's third in line...God help us.

Posted by: Jim s on July 9, 2009 at 12:20 PM | PERMALINK

it's that or start organizing our own militias afterwards.

TCinLA with a gun. If that doesn't scare you...

Posted by: ...you're not paying attention on July 9, 2009 at 12:37 PM | PERMALINK

Real trolls, fake trolls; who can tell the diff? And does it matter? The comedy is equally welcome.

Posted by: shortstop on July 9, 2009 at 1:58 PM | PERMALINK

Where is Kit Bond's apology to Pelosi? Where is the outrage from Gingrich? Where is the MSM's coverage.

Bond's self-righteous indignation was spewing out of his condescending mealey mouth but he quickly clams up when the truth is revealed...one which he knew about before smearing Pelosi in the first place.

Damn, MO has got some real goobers for senators...McCaskill and Bond should just be referred to as the dem and the repub. (I still can't get over McCaskill calling single payer supporters "the far left"!). Bond is just a bought and bribed hypocrite for special interests.

Common sense should have told these people that of course the CIA mislead congress...the Bush administration was misleading everyone!

btw...Posted by: Jim s on July 9, 2009 at 12:20 PM

Your non sensical gibberish is wasted here...the truth is out and acts like a cross to a vampire like you...like the head of the CIA admitting they mislead congress ...just like Pelosi said they did. (If vaseline doesn't work then maybe axle grease will help you get your head out of your ass)

Posted by: bjobotts on July 9, 2009 at 2:33 PM | PERMALINK

Strangely missing from this discussion is exactly what topic the intelligence briefings lied about. For all we know, it may have been the size of Saddam Hussein's pen*s.

Posted by: Neo on July 9, 2009 at 2:42 PM | PERMALINK

Posted by: Al Jr. on July 9, 2009 at 8:34 AM |

There is a big difference between protecting sensitive operations and classified information and covering up rogue and lawless behavior.

If say the CIA had a group who were drug smuggling and part of a drug cartell protection racket and congress got wind of it and asked for a briefing...you get the picture.

Now imagine a group acting outside of the law rendering imagined enemies, torturing anyone they got a hold of trying to find information to justify invading Iraq and not to "prevent attacks" and they were asked about it by congress and denied doing it...then they are not operating within the parameters for which they were created to begin with. The "leaks" they are concerned with are those that the press might expose concerning illegal activity on their part and not anything to do with protecting America or with state secrets...that has been used as a cover to operate outside the law or their constitutional duties...as has been recently revealed.

Hell, even whistle blowers have been gagged not to reveal which congressmen (like representative Roy Blunt R-MO)were involved in selling national secrets to Pakistan (like nuclear weapons plans). Now that is a role for CIA secrecy...but only if they aren't involved in the selling out.

With the outing of CIA agent Valerie Plame it seems petty to worry about Congress leaking info huh.

Posted by: bjobotts on July 9, 2009 at 3:05 PM | PERMALINK

You know this would not be a big deal if not for the fact that it validates Pelosi’s claim AND that what the CIA was misleading congress about is exactly what other investigations are already revealing…that Bush/Cheney authorized torture and rendition for “political” reasons and not for protecting the country, AND the depth of wiretapping was not being done to find terrorists but to tap democratic donors and financial transactions etc.

Saying that the CIA was misleading congress would not surprise congressmen but the “content” of the misrepresentations must be overwhelming for the Director to feel the need to make such a confession. That is scary. The Cheney/Bush administration's depravity for political gain knew no bounds and is completely unjustifiable.

Posted by: bjobotts on July 9, 2009 at 4:34 PM | PERMALINK

"...The CIA saved countless lives by preventing Congress from knowing details about highly sensitive matters. ..."-Al jr

2words: Iran Contra
4 words- The Shah of Iran

Justify your statement Al. How, who, where and when were countless lives saved. Examples please.

This is in your fantasy mind but does not exist in reality. This is about oversight of the CIA so evil power hungry men like Dick Cheney can't use them (we already know he manipulated CIA reports) for his own personal (Blackwater) gain. That's what we are finding out now...the CIA lied and withheld info from congress because it was illegal activity they were engaged in...Duh!)

Posted by: bjobotts on July 9, 2009 at 4:44 PM | PERMALINK

To those who say that the CIA had a duty to lie to Congress, in order to protect state secrets, and classified information, I have two words:

Security Clearance.

To think that those members of Congress who sit on national security, defense, and intelligence committees do not have the necessary security clearance, is naive. Additionally, should a member of Congress release details of classified materials disclosed during said committee meetings, they would be subject to criminal prosecution.

With these two basic facts, there was no reason why the CIA should have lied to Congress.

Posted by: VLF on July 9, 2009 at 7:27 PM | PERMALINK

There is a simple way to handle this: abolish the CIA.
It performs no functions, legal functions, anyway, that aren't performed already (and better) by the Departments of State, Defense, Justice, Treasury, Labor, Transportation, NSA, the Atomic Energy Agency and, probably, HHS, HUD and the EPA, as well.
The CIA's SOLE reason for being is to gather intelligence from all sources (open-source and classified) available to the Federal government on assigned topics, analyse the contents of those reports and provide a detailed, composite brief of the subject to the Executive and Congress. That is what is was designed to do in 1947, that is what was charged with doing in the 1947 legislation that created it and that is what it stopped doing within a decade of its creation.
In its present incarnation, it is one of the three greatest threats to democracy in the United States; the others being the media oligarchy and right-wing terrorism.

Posted by: Doug on July 9, 2009 at 7:51 PM | PERMALINK
Justify your statement Al

You realize you're talking to a parody, right?

Posted by: PaulB on July 9, 2009 at 11:44 PM | PERMALINK

More sauce for the goose ...

CIA and congressional officials have refused to describe the nature of the covert program, but insisted it is not connected to the CIA's use of controversial "enhanced" interrogation techniques.

Posted by: Neo on July 10, 2009 at 12:23 AM | PERMALINK

Thanks Al Jr for the belly laugh. I didn't realize people SO naive still existed. And MathewRQuarreler
What in Gods name qualifies you to state what the public thinks? Your assertion that the CIA is extremely popular is proof that you too have been had by the CIA and its' tactics.The CIA just like the republicons have been telling the public what they think ever since their success in Dallas. Just think without fools like you and Jr this tactic wouldn't work. TCinLA I am of the opinion that the current crop of democratic leadership has demonstrated their unworthiness of our support. It's time for grassroots organizations to nominate people from the community to assume the leadership of this country. Big Ed you are the joke all three of them. How blind can a person be? And Doug, right on, you have restored my faith in humanity with your insight into the problem and a method with which to solve it. How much brighter the future for democracy would be if such an evil entity could be ended. Don't hold your breath because they kill people who stand in their way.

Posted by: freefall on July 12, 2009 at 10:00 PM | PERMALINK

VLF

Security Clearance doesn't mean that Congress can keep their mouth shut. In 1994, Congress approved Operation Uphold Democracy, which was to invade Haiti and restore their government. Navy Seals went in the night before and once they stormed the beach they were blinded by video cameras. Luckily, no one died, but it turned out the someone on one of the committees leaked the classified information to the press.

The only way a covert operation is successful is when very few people know about it. People become liabilities, especially Congress. This war is being fought dirty by the terrorists and the only way to win is to fight back without limitation. Like General Sherman said, "War is cruelty. There is no use trying to reform it. The crueler it is, the sooner it will be over." It applied during the Civil War and it applies today.

Posted by: Vargo on July 15, 2009 at 5:04 PM | PERMALINK

Good afternoon. I love my past. I love my present. I'm not ashamed of what I've had, and I'm not sad because I have it no longer. Help me! Need information about: Portable vacuum cleaners. I found only this - best cheap Vacuum cleaner. A basic vacuum cleaner is comprised of six components which are essential. Read on to know how to choose a vacuum cleaner. With best wishes :mad:, Tina from England.

Posted by: Tina on August 7, 2009 at 7:30 AM | PERMALINK
Post a comment









Remember personal info?










 

 
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM

Watch Byron Dorgan Video & Read His 1994 Article


2009 College Guide & Rankings






Search Now:
In Association with Amazon.com


Place Your Link Here

---Paid Advertisements---

Free Credit Score

Addiction Treatment

Personal Loan

Payday Loans

Personal Loans

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs

Credit Cards & Debt Consolidation

Bad Credit Loans

Vacation Rentals