July 31, 2009
THEY'RE NOT ABOVE CHEATING.... Oh my.
As U.S. Rep. Tom Perriello was considering how to vote on an important piece of climate change legislation in June, the freshman congressman's office received at least six letters from two Charlottesville-based minority organizations voicing opposition to the measure.
The letters, as it turns out, were forgeries.
"They stole our name. They stole our logo. They created a position title and made up the name of someone to fill it. They forged a letter and sent it to our congressman without our authorization," said Tim Freilich, who sits on the executive committee of Creciendo Juntos, a nonprofit network that tackles issues related to Charlottesville's Hispanic community. "It's this type of activity that undermines Americans' faith in democracy."
The faked letter from Creciendo Juntos was signed by "Marisse K. Acevado, Asst Member Coordinator," an identity and position at Creciendo Juntos that do not exist.
The mailing apparently came from a staffer at Bonner & Associates, a D.C. lobbying firm working in opposition to the American Clean Energy and Security (ACES) Act.
But wait, there's more. After being notified of the scheme, Perriello staffers went through other correspondence the Virginia Democrat received on ACES. They found five more forged letters, purportedly from the local branch of the NAACP.
M. Rick Turner, president of the local NAACP branch, said he checked his organization's roster and found none of the five people who signed their name to the five faked letters.
"I am very appalled as the president that our organization has been misrepresented in this way by this bogus ... letter," Turner said. "I hope that whoever's behind this will be brought to justice."
There are some key, unresolved issues here. Someone at Bonner & Associates was responsible for the fake "Acevado" letter, but we don't know who the firm was working for when the letter was sent, and the firm apparently isn't talking to the media about the incident. The fake NAACP letters were sent by fax from the D.C.-area headquarters of Professional Risk Management Services Inc, but we don't know its clients, either, and the company hasn't taken responsibility for the fraudulent correspondence. We also don't know what other lawmakers may have been sent bogus letters.
Tim Fernholz added a good point: "Members of Congress are already very skeptical of constituent communications in this day of Internet-organized communications blitzes; the possibility that they may take these messages even less seriously due to fraud is a very disheartening one."
Postscript: Perriello, by the way, did the right thing and voted for ACES.
—Steve Benen 2:15 PM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (26)
This is the very essence of what a Repiglican is: their entire 'reality' is based on lies, deceit, deceptions, slight of hand, manipulations, and utterly unable to accept the responsibility in their own actions. They are dependent on being victims so that they can create scapegoats so they never, ever , have to look at themselves. And then using God as their justification of everything. What a sick bunch of putrid pigs they really are. Their 'souls' have been replaced by nothing more than a rancid abscess.
Posted by: stormskies on July 31, 2009 at 2:21 PM | PERMALINK
gee, stormskies, i think they just got a little carried away, s'all...
naaah... they're all of satan, every one of them...
Posted by: neill on July 31, 2009 at 2:26 PM | PERMALINK
Wow, imagine that, Repigs lying and cheating. Who wudda EVER thunk it?! Long-hand letters written by constituents in ink are probably the best way to go, as has always been the case. If this is not investigated and prosecuted and stopped, then our Democracy is rotting from the inside out, compliments of the repigs. Way to go piggies.
Posted by: In what respect, Charlie? on July 31, 2009 at 2:26 PM | PERMALINK
Setting aside outrage for a moment, it's useful to remember that publicly traded fossil-fuel concerns bear a fiduciary responsibility to protect their shareholders and maximize profits if possible.
When push comes to shove, it's reasonable for fossil-fuel outfits to conclude they're -required- to deceive us if they believe their shareholders are threatened by legislation. Not because they're evil, only because that's part of the job description.
I'm not saying this excuses them or makes deception acceptable. Rather, by understanding the motivation to practice deceit it is actually becomes more plausible to accept that we're being lied to on an industrial scale.
Posted by: Doug Bostrom on July 31, 2009 at 2:28 PM | PERMALINK
Fiduciary responsibility to shareholders does not extend to breaking the law. Falsely representing a communication as coming from an organization when it does not is fraud, and is against the law.
Posted by: Mithrandir on July 31, 2009 at 2:32 PM | PERMALINK
I would argue Doug that that very motivation itself is evil. Lying and deceiving others for one's own needs or 'profits' is , to me, evil.
Posted by: stormskies on July 31, 2009 at 2:32 PM | PERMALINK
If they didn't have lies and fear, what would they have? "We are greedy bastards who are afraid of brown people and uppidy women."
Posted by: Go, Sestak on July 31, 2009 at 2:35 PM | PERMALINK
Well, what crimes did the lobbyists commit? Conspiracy to commit mail fraud? Making false statements to government agency (§ 1001)? Any other ideas? One would hope the Justice Department was looking into this.
Posted by: David in NY on July 31, 2009 at 2:46 PM | PERMALINK
I agree with David in NY. I would hope that the US DoJ is already on this. Or would that not be "bipartisan."
Posted by: Greg Worley on July 31, 2009 at 2:50 PM | PERMALINK
I'd lay odds that the forgery mailer is/was a member of the young Republicans and his idol is Karl Rove.
Posted by: Richard on July 31, 2009 at 2:51 PM | PERMALINK
Mithrandir, stormskies I agree with you.
Yet we end up needing to build a case to take to the public to help them understand why, how and even more importantly -if- they're being lied to.
I believe it's easier for many if not most people to understand and accept that they're being deceived not in pursuit of abstract "evil" or "greed" but instead individual decision makers applying overzealous and ultimately unscrupulous methods in operating a business.
Posted by: Doug Bostrom on July 31, 2009 at 3:04 PM | PERMALINK
His idol may be Karl Rove, but this actually sounds more like a Richard Nixon tactic.
And yes, I hope they can pin mail fraud on this a$$hole.
Posted by: short fuse on July 31, 2009 at 3:04 PM | PERMALINK
This is GOP SOB's SOP, like fake bulletins in black neighborhoods about voting the wrong day, etc. Isn't there a way to do real criminal prosecution on this? Write the ripp-ees and ask them to press charges and/or sue.
Posted by: N e i l B on July 31, 2009 at 3:11 PM | PERMALINK
Rove worked for Nixon it'where he learned his craft.
Posted by: Gandalf on July 31, 2009 at 4:03 PM | PERMALINK
"Members of Congress are already very skeptical of constituent communications." But they're not skeptical of generous donations.
This defines the complete corruption of Congress; the nod-and-wink bribery that accompanies the 'message' that lobbyists sell. The ability of vested interests to stall meaningful legislation such as health care or constructive energy policies is merely complimented by this kind of fraud.
The oligarchs are winning.
Posted by: -jlinge- on July 31, 2009 at 4:09 PM | PERMALINK
The guy who wrote the letters idolized Richard Nixon, the guy that told him to write the letters (leaving no evidence of the directive) idolized Karl Rove.
Posted by: rk on July 31, 2009 at 4:21 PM | PERMALINK
Criminal in so many ways. Bust the punks and roll up the conspiracy.
Posted by: robert on July 31, 2009 at 4:24 PM | PERMALINK
Tim Fernholz added a good point: "Members of Congress are already very skeptical of constituent communications in this day of Internet-organized communications blitzes; the possibility that they may take these messages even less seriously due to fraud is a very disheartening one."
But, for organizations that lobby directly and participate in forgery, its win-win. Either the communications are taken seriously, and they win, or the forgery is revealed, and mail from organizations not backed by direct, in-person, lobbying is discounted generally, and the lobbyists still win.
Posted by: cmdicely on July 31, 2009 at 4:34 PM | PERMALINK
Mail fraud. Wire fraud. Jail time.
Posted by: Andrew J. Lazarus on July 31, 2009 at 4:50 PM | PERMALINK
It is well known that republicans think cheating is perfectly acceptable since the only goal is winning at all costs. It is wide spread and fits right in with the party of hypocrisy, the obstructionist party...whose hypocrisy is apparent in its slogan "Country First" when they clearly demonstrate the most important thing to them is "Party First".
They would sell the entire nation down the drain for political gain (hey, that rhymes).
Posted by: bjobotts on July 31, 2009 at 5:03 PM | PERMALINK
I recommend looking for ties between Bonner & Associates and Virgil Goode (who was unseated by Perriello) and/or Eric Cantor (Republican whip) for starters. Or try Massey Energy, Dominion Virginia Power and every rich guy in the Shenandoah Valley.
Posted by: VaLiberal on July 31, 2009 at 5:26 PM | PERMALINK
Mail fraud. Wire Fraud. Criminal Conspiracy. (That is to say, everyone at the lobbying firm who knew about the plan, and everyone at the client ditto.)
Oh, and identity theft and whatever the tort is that involves unlawfully damaging someone's reputation by claiming to be them. Once again with John Does as the defendants until discovery has disclosed all the names of those who knew of the unlawful plan.
Posted by: paul on July 31, 2009 at 6:44 PM | PERMALINK
I am seriously so fucking sick of this bullshit. Can we PLEASE start the re-education camps soon? I want a job as a political officer.
(shhhh, don't tell the Reprobaticans I'm joking. I'm hoping a couple have aneurisms.)
Posted by: Singularity on July 31, 2009 at 6:45 PM | PERMALINK
What is even worse is that these @sshats were forging letters from MINORITY advocacy groups that were formed, in large part, to counteract the historic disenfranchisement of their members.
Posted by: mjohnso27 on July 31, 2009 at 7:42 PM | PERMALINK
"Members of Congress are already very skeptical of constituent communications."
That's the point. To muddy the waters and lessen the impact of any grassroots organizing actions. They are traitors out to destroy democracy.
Posted by: Always Hopeful on August 2, 2009 at 1:09 AM | PERMALINK
I agree with that, political ways they're using someone just to make them a good to people's eyes, but deep inside, They are not what they show us.
Posted by: SEO Company on August 25, 2009 at 7:22 AM | PERMALINK