Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

August 31, 2009

MCDONNELL'S THESIS IN VIRGINIA.... For most of the year, Democrats in Virginia have hoped to characterize former state Attorney General Bob McDonnell, the Republican gubernatorial hopeful, as far more extreme in his ideology than he lets on. Dems haven't had much luck, though, and McDonnell leads in all available polls.

With about two months left until Election Day, the Democrats' efforts just got a little easier.

At age 34, two years before his first election and two decades before he would run for governor of Virginia, Robert F. McDonnell submitted a master's thesis to the evangelical school he was attending in Virginia Beach in which he described working women and feminists as "detrimental" to the family. He said government policy should favor married couples over "cohabitators, homosexuals or fornicators." He described as "illogical" a 1972 Supreme Court decision legalizing the use of contraception by unmarried couples. [...]

In his run for governor, McDonnell, 55, makes little mention of his conservative beliefs and has said throughout his campaign that he should be judged by what he has done in office, including efforts to lower taxes, stiffen criminal penalties and reform mental health laws. He reiterated that position Saturday in a statement responding to questions about his thesis.

McDonnell's master's thesis ran 93 pages, and was part of his post-grad work at Regent University -- an evangelical school in Virginia created by radical televangelist Pat Robertson. The paper went on to call for undermining the concept of church-state separation, public funding for private schools, and protections for parents who spank their children.

Now, in general, I'm inclined to cut candidates quite a bit of slack on the work they did as students. I don't doubt that when I was in grad school at age 22, I wrote some papers that I'd disagree with now, and I wouldn't want it to be held against me. McDonnell wrote some pretty radical stuff, but it was 20 years ago.

But the circumstances with McDonnell are a little different. For one thing, he was 34 when he wrote, among other things, that working women and feminists are "detrimental" to American families. It's harder to dismiss bizarre ideas as a youthful flight of fancy when the author is 34 years old.

More importantly, though, this was not just an academic exercise for a student at a TV preacher's college. McDonnell's thesis included a 15-point action plan he wanted to see Republicans follow. Soon after, McDonnell was elected to the Virginia House of Delegates, where he "pursued at least 10 of the policy goals he laid out in that research paper."

Responding to questions about the thesis, McDonnell said his "views on many issues have changed" as he's "gotten older." He added that his criticism of women in the workplace "does not reflect my views."

That's the right response, I suppose, but given how offensive the paper was, it may require some further explanation. As for the larger campaign dynamic, Dems have been waiting for a chance to characterize McDonnell as part of the Robertson/Falwell wing of the GOP. Watch to see how aggressively they take advantage of this opportunity.

Postscript: By the way, did Democratic opposition researchers dig up this dirt on McDonnell? Nope -- the WaPo learned about the thesis when McDonnell brought it up during a recent interview.

Steve Benen 9:25 AM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (25)

Bookmark and Share
 
Comments

Maybe we need to petition Regents to take back McDonnell's degree. I'm sure Pat would love the publicity.

Posted by: martin on August 31, 2009 at 9:29 AM | PERMALINK

" Virginia created by radical televangelist Pat Robertson"

The right are NOT radicals. They are reactionaries.

Posted by: JoyZeeBoy on August 31, 2009 at 9:31 AM | PERMALINK

Radicals wish things to change, reactionaries want to keep things the 'way they have always been' even if the dream they protrait never truely existed, such as the canard about our nation being founded as a "Christian Nation" by avoid dietst none the less......

Posted by: JoyZeeBoy on August 31, 2009 at 9:33 AM | PERMALINK

To prove his moderate bona fides he should put a paper out that lays out his opposition to himself from an earlier age! He's submitted his thesis, now we'd like to see his antithesis! Just to be clear about any transformation that may have taken place from then to now! -Kevo

Posted by: kevo on August 31, 2009 at 9:33 AM | PERMALINK

i just loves the way principled fundamentalist assholes -- once they get a taste of real worldly power -- turn into them thar 'moral relativists' (why, just like dick cheney!11!! -- god damn his shit-filled soul to hell).

especially in contrast to their categorical scheme of faith-based truthiness.

i can't imagine, however, this hurtin' this mcdonald asshole south of the james river... they are fer sure "wink wink nudge nudge" folks ever since the civil war...

Posted by: neill on August 31, 2009 at 9:37 AM | PERMALINK

Why can't youthful flights of fancy occur when people are 34? After all, George W. Bush's youthful indiscretions took place when he was 40.

Posted by: Old School on August 31, 2009 at 9:38 AM | PERMALINK

If it were up to me, mere attendance at Regent would be disqualifying for government service at any level. But hey, I'm a radical.

More seriously, the GOP hasn't let passage of time stop them from any line of attack they feel will help them. Remember all the crap about "wise latina?" About Bill Clinton's dope smoking? As for McDonnell, have at him.

Posted by: jimBOB on August 31, 2009 at 9:57 AM | PERMALINK

Although I support Deeds I have to say Terry McAuliffe would be having a field day all over the news with this masters thesis revelation. McDonnell would be on his heels.

Posted by: pj in jesusland on August 31, 2009 at 9:58 AM | PERMALINK

As a Virginian, McDonnell scares the ever-loving shit out of me. He's easily worse than George "Macaca" Allen was. And threatens to be as bad as Jim "Roads Be Damned, Let's Kill the Car Tax" Gilmore was.

Regent University, and Liberty University, are prime examples of why the church and state MUST be separate. The application to either school asks for a short essay [can these people write any other kind?] explaining how you will use your degree to spread the Word and call more people to God.

McDonnell is that most dangerous of Republicans: the Christian Fundamentalist masquerading as a tax-fighting conservative. He's got that god-look about him. The plastic hair. The silver tongue. And ultimately, when it comes to God and politics among the low-info voters, looks and words are everything.

Posted by: chrenson on August 31, 2009 at 10:16 AM | PERMALINK

Technically, he's right.

"He described as "illogical" a 1972 Supreme Court decision legalizing the use of contraception by unmarried couples. [...] "

As long as adultery/fornication are illegal, making contraception legal IS illogical. You don't need contraceptives if you aren't breaking those blue laws.

I suppose unmarried women can go on the pill with no intention to fornicate for some reason that makes perfect sense, but I forgive McDonnell if it seemed silly to make laws based on suych peculiar circumstances.

That said, voting for McDonnell is a gesture of approval for theocracy and I ask laissez-faire conservatives this: does it make sense to want to "keep more of your money" with lower taxes, only to be told by some church you don't belong to what you are allowed to spend it on?

Posted by: toowearyforoutrage on August 31, 2009 at 10:19 AM | PERMALINK

Tooweary: The standard excuse back in my college days was that girls needed to take the Pill to "regulate their periods." As an excuse, it works at least as well as drinking red wine for the antioxidants and the beneficial effects on cholesterol levels.

JimBob, I agree that sauce for the goose should be sauce for the gander. After all, right wingers have been trying to convince us for over a year that Obama is guilty by association of radical extremism because of a paper his wife wrote when she was an undergraduate.

Posted by: T-Rex on August 31, 2009 at 10:23 AM | PERMALINK

As long as adultery/fornication are illegal, making contraception legal IS illogical. You don't need contraceptives if you aren't breaking those blue laws.

WHAT?! It's called family planning, you idiot.

Posted by: dob on August 31, 2009 at 10:30 AM | PERMALINK

I haven't read the whole thing of course, but at most universities, MS theses are not exercises in political advocacy or polemics. I guess it is not surprising, but it is revealing that Regent "university" allows this to go on as an intellectual activity. A wee insight into the shallowness of these institutions.

Posted by: bigwisc on August 31, 2009 at 10:44 AM | PERMALINK

"Postscript: By the way, did Democratic opposition researchers dig up this dirt on McDonnell? Nope -- the WaPo learned about the thesis when McDonnell brought it up during a recent interview."

The VA Dems wanted to paint McDonnell as an RW extremist but didn't know about this? Why TF not? Do their oppo researchers get paid?

Posted by: Jeff S. on August 31, 2009 at 10:55 AM | PERMALINK

As long as adultery/fornication are illegal, making contraception legal IS illogical. You don't need contraceptives if you aren't breaking those blue laws.

This is either subtle parody or one of the all-time classic comments ever to appear on the history of the IntarWebs. In either case, congrats, tooweary! You're special.

Posted by: Jeff S. on August 31, 2009 at 11:00 AM | PERMALINK

Sounds like he is savvy enough to be dangerous.

Get this out there now when nobody is paying attention, and after Labor Day he can then give it the old "asked and answered" dodge.

Posted by: snoey on August 31, 2009 at 11:01 AM | PERMALINK

He wrote that stuff in 1989? I would not cut him any slack unles he's repentent? Anyone who believed that stuff in 1989 was so reactionary that any movement to the left would bring them to the level of your average john bircher.

Posted by: Kurt on August 31, 2009 at 12:04 PM | PERMALINK

Ninety-three pages for a Masters thesis? My undergraduate senior thesis for my technical communication major was longer! Sheesh...

Posted by: Tony on August 31, 2009 at 12:46 PM | PERMALINK

Kurt, the problem is that during his 14 years as a state legislator, he tried to carry out 10 of the 15 policy goals. If he was 34 when he wrote the thesis, and began his first term as a state legislator 2 years later, he was a legislator until he was 50. He's now 55 now.

McDonnell hasn't changed a bit.

I'm a Virginian, and I've been telling my friends that no one who graduates from Pat Robertson's school is a moderate. I'd never vote for ANYONE who attended Regent.

BTW, McDonnell beat Deeds in the VA attorney general's race 4 years by 325 votes. The "recount" was a joke.

Posted by: pol on August 31, 2009 at 1:59 PM | PERMALINK

Married couples have Griswold v. Connecticut to thank for their legal use of contraceptives! Even married forincation was regulated up until the mid-1960s! The SCOTUS ruled in favor of the right to privacy - the foundation to the Roe v. Wade decision eventually to come in 1973! -Kevo

Posted by: kevo on August 31, 2009 at 5:57 PM | PERMALINK

Kevo,

44 years after Griswold what rich irony to now hear Sarah Palin saying, "Keep the government away from my body!"

I'll bet if you asked Sarah Palin about Griswold she'd say in that sing-songy voice, "Oh, I'd hafta say I agree and disagree with a lotta those supreme court decisions." Her twitter followers would say she's "deep thinker" and "profound" just for uttering the words, "Supreme Court."

Posted by: pj in jesusland on September 1, 2009 at 1:07 AM | PERMALINK

Bob McDonnell just lost the crucial Virginia fornicator vote.

See:

http://notionscapital.wordpress.com/2009/09/01/gop-scholarship-loses-crucial-virginia-fornicator-vote/

Posted by: Mike Licht on September 1, 2009 at 6:11 PM | PERMALINK

How is feminism good for the family? If you can't make that argument, then I don't see how the converse is "offensive."

Posted by: Dennis Pemberton on September 10, 2009 at 7:04 AM | PERMALINK

Feminism isn't good for the family, Dennis. It's good for everyone's freedom. The "traditional famly" assumes that men will work and women will clean, cook, bear children, and rear them. If that's the life you want to live, great. However, what if a man wants to cook? I know many men who would love to have more time with their children, spend less time at work, cook for their families, etc. Feminism isn't some radical hatred of men and families. Feminism is one simple idea: no matter what your gender, we should ALL be paid a equal wage for equal work, we are all individuals who should be able to choose our life path for ourselves-whether to have a family or not, whether to have a career or not. Often, our cultural norms about gender roles and what is "proper" get in the way, which is when you start seeing feminists get angry. I'm a college educated 25 year old CPA. I have the ability to support a family better than many men. Why should I be forced to quit my job and stay home with kids when I become a mom? If your answer to that hypothetical is that I should have the right to choose whether or not I continue my career, then you're a feminist.

Posted by: Sarah on September 11, 2009 at 2:52 PM | PERMALINK

Good morning. I must create a system, or be enslaved by another man's. Help me! Please help find sites for: Table pads in detroit mi. I found only this - diaper changing table pad. Healthcare game systems vhc for lot ester produces the service for table, table pads. Individually the models will prevent, table pads. Thanks for the help ;-), Carr from Verde.

Posted by: Carr on March 21, 2010 at 3:53 AM | PERMALINK




 

 

Read Jonathan Rowe remembrance and articles
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM



buy from Amazon and
support the Monthly