Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

September 8, 2009

HEALTH CARE ROUND-UP.... It's the first day back from the August recess on Capitol Hill, and there were quite a few developments of note.

* A few weeks ago, 60 progressive House members said a public option is "essential" in a health care reform bill. Today, Roll Call reports that at least four of them would be satisfied with a "trigger" compromise.

* Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) has finally released his reform bill. Putting another nail in the coffin of the Gang of Six, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) is reportedly unimpressed with the Baucus plan.

* President Obama will lay out his vision for reform tomorrow night, but as of today, the White House does not intend to present Congress with a bill of its own.

* House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) told reporters today the House may be able to pass a reform plan without a public option. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said the opposite.

* We haven't heard too much from Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) lately. Today, she said she's "opposed" to a public option, and described the "trigger" as a "better approach." She stopped far short, though, of endorsing the policy.

* Any chance that a "trigger" compromise might satisfy the concerns of right-wing lawmakers? Of course not. Today, Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.), chairman of the conservative Republican Study Committee, said a public option a "terrible idea," whether it comes now or in the future. He also insisted, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, that the public is "clear" in its "firm opposition" to a public option.

* Similarly, Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-Texas), the co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, also believes the "trigger" policy is unacceptable. "The vast majority of CPC is not prepared to wave a white flag on public option," he said today. "A trigger would be a surrender."

* Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) noted today that Senate Republicans haven't negotiated in "good faith."

* Sen. Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) told reporters today that if President Obama drops the public option and the idea of non-profit co-ops, there could be "tremendous progress" on bipartisan reform. (Note to White House: please don't believe him -- Crapo's Lucy holding the ball, you're Charlie Brown.)

* There are 435 members of the House, 256 of whom are Democrats. To pass a bill, the majority will need 218 votes, meaning the Dems could afford to lose only 38 members of their own caucus (assuming no Republicans vote for reform, which seems like a safe bet). The Hill reports that "at least 23" House Dems are now on record opposing existing reform efforts.

Not exactly slow on the first day back from the break.

Steve Benen 4:45 PM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (20)

Bookmark and Share
 
Comments

The guy with spine is from Tucson...

Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-Texas)

Posted by: koreyel on September 8, 2009 at 4:50 PM | PERMALINK

if President Obama drops the public option and the idea of non-profit co-ops, there could be "tremendous progress" on bipartisan. . .

. . .something for bipartisanship's sake. but if Obama drops all of the alternative forms of competition, it sure as hell can't be called reform.

Posted by: zeitgeist on September 8, 2009 at 4:56 PM | PERMALINK

It'll be interesting to see if the Obama administration and congressional dems capitulate to a minority party that represents roughly 20% of the population (not to mention that absolute nutjobs that comprise that 20%)

This is a very important moment in our history, one that will show us whether our system of government functions for the people or for the moneyed interests. Based on some reports today regarding the Supreme Court and corporate personhood, it looks like the the idea of an American democracy of, for, and by the people, has died.

All for absolute greed.

Posted by: citizen_pain on September 8, 2009 at 5:04 PM | PERMALINK

And the lady without spine is the Dim from SF

TPM is reporting Pelosi said after meeting with Barack:

For the moment, however, as far as our house members are concerned, the overwhelming majority of them support a public option."

Is TPM over-parsing here? Maybe. But it certainly does seem like Barack leaned on her hard. Fair enough. If you don't have the balls to lean on republicans you might as order the lefty sissy from San Francisco to heel.


Posted by: koreyel on September 8, 2009 at 5:09 PM | PERMALINK

And the media remain complicit with bi-partisanship. The Grassley got to appear and claim a bi-partisan bill is the best way to get something done but the station forgot to show a clip of his town hall meeting commentary.
Must they be so obtuse? It's rhetorical! I know at least one answer!)

Posted by: Tom M on September 8, 2009 at 5:10 PM | PERMALINK

Time to start beseiging your state congress and governor with attempts to add a state-only public option.
The public option at the Federal level is dead.

I'll even take a non-profit co-op model in my state...

Posted by: Gridlock on September 8, 2009 at 5:12 PM | PERMALINK

I could live with a trigger if - and only if - three things were true (none of which seem likely):

1) The trigger has to be a genuine threat - that is, the mechanism has to be well-defined and set to reasonable benchmarks, and the details of the public option have to be worked out, and then set to the trigger. The trigger lacks a gun if it merely triggers a public option to be defined later;

2) Co-ops, however less effective, have to be in the bill now - there has to be some immediate alternative;

and

3) What we get in return for delaying the public option has to be substantial -- extreme limitations on recission, elimination of preexisting condition exclusions, extensions of COBRA and HIPAA, stronger patients bill of rights as to both providers and insurers, clear language that the bill does not preempt state efforts at more aggressive reform.

Frankly, it is a lot easier and cleaner to just have the public option now. But in the highly unlikely event the Congress can reach the deal I've outlined, I'd take it.

I wont, however, be holding my breath waiting. I think that would fall within an exclusion in my insurance coverage.

Posted by: zeitgeist on September 8, 2009 at 5:19 PM | PERMALINK

This is a very important moment in our history, one that will show us whether our system of government functions for the people or for the moneyed interests.

That question has been answered. The current crop of "reform" bills are likely to leave the health care of our citizens worse off than before, while affecting the insurance industry very little. Matt Taibbi in Rolling Stone makes a strong case that anything less than a single-payer system is a loser.

Posted by: qwerty on September 8, 2009 at 5:24 PM | PERMALINK

"The public" sure isn't against "the public option" when they are being covered by Medicare. We see it isn't really principled opposition, but rather hatred of one more $20 bill possibly helping someone else. BTW what do latest polls really say?

Posted by: Neil B ♪ ♫ on September 8, 2009 at 5:37 PM | PERMALINK

What does it mean to be a Democrat? Honestly, the word has no meaning. I feel sorry for the next DSCC/DNC/OFA beggar who calls me, but when you lie with dogs...

Posted by: doubtful on September 8, 2009 at 5:56 PM | PERMALINK

"House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) told reporters today the House may be able to pass a reform plan without a public option. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said the opposite."

The Progressive Caucus is larger than the Blue Dog Caucus.

Pretty straightforward.

Posted by: Joe Friday on September 8, 2009 at 7:03 PM | PERMALINK

doubtful, i already had a good call with OFA. They called to encouage me to attend Boswell's town hall. but the call started by asking if I agreed with Obama's health care plan. I responded that I was still waiting for him to announce his health care plan, that near as I could tell he'd left it to squabbling congressmen. then i asked the nice young OFA staffer if Obama's plan included the public option I favored. then when he asked about Boswell's meeting, i asked if that was the same Boswell who the week before had said he wasnt sure how he'd vote on reform. I doubt I was their favorite call of the day. :)

Posted by: zeitgeist on September 8, 2009 at 7:40 PM | PERMALINK

I doubt I was their favorite call of the day. :)

They don't even try with me any more. I'm on their Do Not For God's Sake Do Not Call I'm Totally Warning You Guys Do Not Call Her list.

Posted by: shortstop on September 8, 2009 at 7:56 PM | PERMALINK

If a picture is worth 1000 words, then this video is probably worth about 1,000,000 words.

Posted by: MichMan on September 8, 2009 at 8:15 PM | PERMALINK

If you don't have the balls to lean on republicans you might as order the lefty sissy from San Francisco to heel.

Too bad she didn't tell him to go fuck himself.

Posted by: Econobuzz on September 8, 2009 at 9:11 PM | PERMALINK

Pond-scum-green with envy about all of you who still get the calls (and can vent that way)... Me, I'm reduced now to sending cancelled checks with an explanation of "why", at 45cents a pop (stamp; my bank gives free checking accounts to seniors -- 55yrs and older)

Posted by: exlibra on September 8, 2009 at 10:13 PM | PERMALINK


How many public option stories and informational posts has Washington Monthly had in the last 4 months?

How many stories about Republicans?

Posted by: grinning cat on September 8, 2009 at 11:19 PM | PERMALINK

Grassley figures he has every chance to win the general election. He's somewhat fearful that he might face a well financed opponent in the primary. Hence he will oppose any bill.

Baucus has to know that this is the case. But he comes from a Republican state.

Posted by: Count count on September 8, 2009 at 11:33 PM | PERMALINK

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) noted today that Senate Republicans haven't negotiated in "good faith."
--------------------

maigod ... this is beginning to dawn on him?

This Senate Majority Leader job, whatever it actually involves, must not involve being awake and out of pajamas very often.

Posted by: Fleas correct the era on September 9, 2009 at 1:00 AM | PERMALINK

Give please. A classic is something that everybody wants to have read and nobody wants to read. Help me! Could you help me find sites on the: Window coverings sales. I found only this - window coverings pictures. Window covering, this would function that the coast and spice are out. Window covering, it was modified to be related, well, that ider sequences be occurred throughout the off-road between the order and impact and television situation only on earth. With respect :rolleyes:, Winfred from Leone.

Posted by: Winfred on March 11, 2010 at 5:58 PM | PERMALINK
Post a comment









Remember personal info?










 

 

Read Jonathan Rowe remembrance and articles
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM



buy from Amazon and
support the Monthly


Place Your Link Here

--- Links ---

Boarding Schools

Addiction Treatment Centers

Alcohol Treatment Center

Bad Credit Loan

Long Distance Moving Companies

FREE Phone Card

Flowers

Personal Loan

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs