Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

September 13, 2009

RUN, RICK, RUN.... Rick Santorum's presidential ambitions probably should have ended in November 2006, when he lost his Senate re-election bid by a humiliating 18 points. The far-right lawmaker had made some behind-the-scenes moves before the campaign about a run for the White House, but those efforts quickly ended when Santorum was roundly rejected by his home-state voters.

They were not, however, ended permanently. Rick "Man on Dog" Santorum is apparently taking the possibility of a presidential campaign seriously.

Speaking to a room full of prominent US Catholic leaders Friday night, Senator Rick Santorum was challenged to run for President. Responding to a room already thick with applause, Santorum revealed that he was indeed "thinking about it" but asked for prayers and detailed his thinking on the matter. [...]

The last consideration in favor of his run was on the practical level. He said: "Six months ago I would not have spent ten seconds on your question, but it's not six months ago. I see that, I hate to be calculating, but I see that 2012 is not just throwing somebody out to be eaten, but it's a real opportunity for success."

Assessing President Obama's chances of re-election just seven months into his first year in office strikes me as a mistake, but Santorum's comments suggest he's actually considering this. Indeed, in three weeks, Santorum will be traveling to Iowa for some events, as part of a pre-exploratory exploring.

As for the merit behind the former senator's thinking, Mark McKinnon, a former aide to George W. Bush and John McCain, recently explained, "A Rick Santorum presidency would be very, very dangerous for America."

There's no reason to think that would stop him from trying. In fact, it would probably be part of Santorum's pitch to the GOP base.

Steve Benen 9:20 AM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (22)

Bookmark and Share
 
Comments

Santorum's problem is that he's not nearly extreme enough for the current GOP, but he's still way too insane for the average voter.

Posted by: Domage on September 13, 2009 at 9:22 AM | PERMALINK

Domage writes: "t he's not nearly extreme enough for the current GOP,"

-And that's exactly why, at the GOP conrention, ex senator (In)Santorum picks, as his Vice President. . .wait for it. . .ex-governor Sar-. . .

Posted by: DAY on September 13, 2009 at 9:33 AM | PERMALINK

i'm a duck man myself -- how they do against purdue last night?-- but that beaver could probably take out santorum nicely...

Posted by: neill on September 13, 2009 at 10:00 AM | PERMALINK

The highlight of the 2006 election for me (a Pa. resident) was the networks calling Casey the winner over Santorum at 8:30 p.m., a mere half hour after the polls closed. The thought of little Ricky being the GOP nominee in 2012 is hysterical. He won't be able to win his home state or his hometown. I'm sure the fact that he ripped off his home school district outside of Pittsburgh for his homeschooled kids living in Virginia will be brought up during the campaign. As a Democrat, I look forward to a Santorum campaign. The GOP just gets crazier.

Posted by: Arlene on September 13, 2009 at 10:02 AM | PERMALINK

My personal prediction: Santorum's (potential) run will end as well as Palin's. The actual heavy hitter GOPer, come 2012, will be (former) Gen. Betrayus.

The impetus will be thus: Iraq is degenerating fairly nicely of late but the REAL kicker will be Afghanistan, which is a total lost cause. It is going to be a big anchor tied to Obama (it really is going to be for him LBJ's Vietnam). The fact is that Afghanistan is NOT going to go well. The other fact is that the GOP is going to blame Obama for "losing both wars". The automatic magic GOP candidate will be Betrayus and it will be under the argument that "Obama lost the wars that Betrayus won!"

It will only be 50% accurate but that is going to be the argument and Obama is stuck with it. BUSH lost both wars by 1) Blowing off Afghanistan almost immediately so he could go off and 2) initiate an illegal and total bullshit war in Iraq. BUSH'S doing this produced the inevitable result that both wars would quagmire and go south regardless of who was subsequently in office. Obama blew both by making both his own. In spite of running in opposition to the Iraq Debacle, he has taken full ownership of it and as the violence escalates with US withdrawal, he is inevitably going to take the heat.

As for Afghanistan, Bush totally destroyed any chance of any real claim of success there by blowing it off to begin with and then simply stretching it out, which now Obama is happy to do indefinitely. Obama COULD simply declare "victory" in Afghanistan because Al Qaeda is not a big player there anymore but he wont because he has now placed the Taliban on an equal target pedestal with Al Qaeda. We cannot win against the Taliban anymore than we could the combatants in the CIVIL war in Vietnam.

Obama is going to eat lots of shit on both Iraq and Afghanistan and this will play, falsely and unfairly, in Betrayus' favor. Obama will have "lost the war(s) that Betrayus won" and that will be that. Combined with Obama's neoliberal love affair with Wall Street, big bankers, big pharma, and big insurance, and he has nothing of value to stand head and tail above his future opponent. Obama is (deservedly) fucked.

Posted by: Praedor Atrebates on September 13, 2009 at 10:13 AM | PERMALINK

Goody two goody two goody goody two shoes
Goody two goody two goody goody two shoes

Don't drink don't smoke - what do you do?
Don't drink don't smoke - what do you do?
Subtle innuendos follow
There must be something inside

We don't follow fashion
That would be a joke
You know we're going to set them set them
So everyone can take note take note

When they saw you kneeling
Crying words that you mean
Opening their eyeballs eyeballs
Pretending that you're Al Green Al Green

Goody two goody two goody goody two shoes
Goody two goody two goody goody two shoes

Posted by: FRP on September 13, 2009 at 10:13 AM | PERMALINK

I hope that Republicans either entertain us wonderfully with the entire asylum running for president or let one of their three or four sane folks become the nominee. I'm not worried either way. Republicans are doing everything possible to assure Obama's re-election.

Posted by: freelunch on September 13, 2009 at 10:15 AM | PERMALINK

I hope that Republicans either entertain us wonderfully with the entire asylum running for president or let one of their three or four sane folks become the nominee.

Not gonna happen! Since the party is now down to the Rush Limbaugh/Glenn Beck core, it is no longer mathematically possible for a non-insane Republican to win the primaries and thus become the candidate.

Posted by: Domage on September 13, 2009 at 10:28 AM | PERMALINK

Sanctorum is just what the coalition of theocrats and plutocrats want.

Posted by: delver on September 13, 2009 at 10:32 AM | PERMALINK

ex-senator frothy mix to run for president?
he'd have my prayers... if i prayed.

Posted by: mellowjohn on September 13, 2009 at 10:36 AM | PERMALINK

Gotta have a real religious whack somewhere in the ticket, maybe Coburn for VP behind Romney

Posted by: TulsaTime on September 13, 2009 at 10:37 AM | PERMALINK

Overlooked in this analysis of the serious party , i.e. , the republican party , may be the freedom they now possess . No longer will they need to cage their attempts to reach out to other's with careful hedging . The deep philosophical commitment to excellence may proceed now and it will fly , free as a bird .
The sassy grasp of facts , the surly bonds of gravity , the tasty treat of 100% accuracy , are all now in the grand old parties quiver . Tremble , oh wicked reality , for you now face the hinge !

Posted by: FRP on September 13, 2009 at 10:48 AM | PERMALINK

Mackinnon says Santorum represents much of what's wrong with the Republican party today--which implies that he has many potential supporters in its ranks, He also says that he's concerned most about Santorum's lack of character. But that's a deficiency that didn't stand int the way of the nomination of a presidential candidate in 2000 nor a vice-presidential in 2008.

In today's Republican party, especially among those likely tot turn out today to demonstrate and in spring 2012 to vote, Santorum may have a pretty good shot.

Posted by: Solon on September 13, 2009 at 11:03 AM | PERMALINK

Of COURSE Santo's keeping his terminally-silly presidential election hopes alive--after all he's the guy who brought the corpse of his still-born child home for a few days so the family could get to know it.

Posted by: Jamey on September 13, 2009 at 11:06 AM | PERMALINK

The "hate-mongering" style embraced by the Republicans in the August town hall meetings must have turned Rick on again.
He would fit in well with those wack-jobs.
He should bring Palin back as his VP candidate.
I once wrote a letter to his office on a serious issue. I received the most wordy response avoiding the whole issue.
Rick gives religious beliefs a bad name.
I could NEVER understand how he was elected Senator in the first place.
Rick STAY with your right wing job; that is where you belong !

Posted by: ParityFanatic on September 13, 2009 at 11:22 AM | PERMALINK

Of course santorum is dangerous -- who knows what kind of bacteria is in that frothy mix?

Sorry, I couldn't resist!

Posted by: dp on September 13, 2009 at 12:20 PM | PERMALINK

Oh come on...Santorum may have some chance of getting the nomination, I don't have a clue what goes on in wingnut-land, but worrying about him actually being elected president is absurd. He has a trail of crazy so long that even the average voter would find him suspect.

Posted by: jrw on September 13, 2009 at 12:30 PM | PERMALINK

Speaking to a room full of prominent US Catholic leaders Friday night, Senator Rick Santorum

So man-on-dog was talking to men-on-boys.

Posted by: Dale on September 13, 2009 at 1:29 PM | PERMALINK

The man brought a miscarried fetus into his home in order that his children be "permitted" to say goodbye to it. Not even republicans could fail to be creeped out over that.

Posted by: JW on September 13, 2009 at 5:30 PM | PERMALINK

I wonder if he buckled it in a car seat.

Posted by: officer pup on September 13, 2009 at 8:20 PM | PERMALINK

Santorum is very scary. He's stupid, amoral, in love with himself, and incapable of holding a real job, not to mention his negatives.

Posted by: stevenz on September 13, 2009 at 9:07 PM | PERMALINK

Hi everyone. You cannot make a man by standing a sheep on its hind legs. But by standing a flock of sheep in that position you can make a crowd of men. Help me! Help to find sites on the: Veramyst vs flonase. I found only this - flonase eyes. If you are using to understand it, you better have a common hubit of some performance, flonase. I have been existing tool for 25 reservations too, flonase. Thank :-( Vera from Hungary.

Posted by: Vera on March 12, 2010 at 10:58 AM | PERMALINK




 

 

Read Jonathan Rowe remembrance and articles
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM



buy from Amazon and
support the Monthly


Place Your Link Here

--- Links ---

Boarding Schools

Addiction Treatment Centers

Alcohol Treatment Center

Bad Credit Loan

Long Distance Moving Companies

FREE Phone Card

Flowers

Personal Loan

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs