September 25, 2009
100 DAYS ALREADY?.... In the latest New York Times poll, respondents were asked, "So you think the Republicans have clearly explained their plans for changing the health care system? The vast majority -- 76% -- said they have not, while 14% said they have.
I have no idea what those in the 14% minority were thinking.
As regular readers know, House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) told reporters in July that GOP lawmakers were putting "the final touches on our bill," which, he said, would hopefully be available "soon." That was 64 days ago.
As it turns out, Dems on the Hill have been using a different baseline, and consider today a milestone.
House Democrats are marking today as the 100-day anniversary of House Republicans promising to produce their own alternative health reform bill as part of their larger effort to shed the Party of No label.
"I guarantee you we will provide you with a bill," said Rep. Roy Blunt (R-MO), the point man on the alternative plan, on June 17.
Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chairman Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) tells POLITICO, "It's been 100 days since they promised they would unveil their own proposals -- where are they?... What positive alternatives have they come up with?"
Well, actually none. Their "guarantees" are about as reliable as their policy prescriptions.
Asked for an explanation, a spokesperson for House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-Va.) blasted Van Hollen, but didn't answer the question. Two weeks ago, House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) was asked where the Republican plan is, and he dodged it, too.
That said, on Monday, Cantor said a GOP reform alternative is on the way. If you believe that, I have some death panels I'd love to sell you.
To be sure, I don't necessarily blame Republicans for refusing to unveil an alternative health care plan. Producing a GOP reform proposal would not only give Democrats a target, it would offer people a chance to compare the two approaches. In a side-by-side match-up, it's hardly a stretch to think the Dems would come out on top.
What's more, the Republican track record on alternative solutions is truly abysmal. The GOP budget alternative was a humiliating failure (you may recall, it lacked numbers). The GOP stimulus alternative -- tax cuts and a five-years spending freeze -- was so ridiculous, even some conservatives labeled it "insane." With this in mind, there's no need for the party to humiliate itself with a health care plan.
But this route is not without costs. For one thing, it's now that much easier to characterize the minority as the "party of no."
For another, in light of the "guarantees" that Republicans would produce a bill, it's further evidence that the GOP isn't to be trusted to keep its word.
—Steve Benen 11:20 AM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (21)
Yeah, but I hear word from David Broder today that a shiny new conservative policy periodical is coming out that is really gonna provide edgy, and sexy Republican policy discussions.
I'm hoping Newt Gingrich -- The Future of the Republican Party -- will have a regular column in the rag...
Posted by: neill on September 25, 2009 at 11:30 AM | PERMALINK
I think Obama should have challenged Mitch McConnell -- his coming main opponent when the Senate eventually decides to vote -- to a series of televised debates about health care reform.
It's good to have the President explain to voters why reform is necessary on the TV shows...it's a complicated subject after all. But one third of the country still refuses to listen, and the GOP continues to spread misinformation. A good prime time TV debate or two might alleviate the problem.
MARCU$
Posted by: MARCU$ on September 25, 2009 at 11:33 AM | PERMALINK
Despite all that the GOP is actually closing in poling with the democrats.
Possible reasons why:
Because they are attacking the democrats. And the Democrats are not really attacking the GOP.
Because the Democratic base seems really unenthused. How many promises can be missed? Gays, torture, prosecution of Bush, etc.
Because each time Dems move to the GOP they move closer to positions people don't like - and erase the distinction between the parties.
People say they want bi-partisanship, but they then they say there's no difference between the parties.
Posted by: Samuel Knight on September 25, 2009 at 11:35 AM | PERMALINK
So what was it they were waiving in the air during President Obama's speech to congress?
Posted by: Winkandanod on September 25, 2009 at 11:38 AM | PERMALINK
My Morning Murdoch Moment
So when does Murdoch's mouthpieces (O'Reilly and Chris Wallace) start the countdown calendar going?
Posted by: koreyel on September 25, 2009 at 11:39 AM | PERMALINK
"I have no idea what those in the 14% minority were thinking."
I do. They are thinking they support anything Republicans say or do (even if the DO part has to be imagined).
I just don't understand why this is 14% instead of the 24% or so that thought GW Bush was a good President.
Posted by: Mark-NC on September 25, 2009 at 11:40 AM | PERMALINK
"To be sure, I don't necessarily blame Republicans for refusing to unveil an alternative health care plan. Producing a GOP reform proposal would not only give Democrats a target, it would offer people a chance to compare the two approaches."
Not even the ShamWow guy could sell a Republican healthcare plan.
Posted by: Joe Friday on September 25, 2009 at 11:42 AM | PERMALINK
I have no idea what those in the 14% minority were thinking.
Some of that 14% probably understand that the Republican plan is to oppose any meaningful positive reform.
Posted by: qwerty on September 25, 2009 at 11:46 AM | PERMALINK
"I have no idea what those in the 14% minority were thinking."
They were thinking "tax cuts" and "tort reform" because that's the Republican response when pressed for answers.
Posted by: Atlliberal on September 25, 2009 at 11:48 AM | PERMALINK
Well, now, isn't this a confused mess.
When I just now called the office of the minority leader and asked about their health care plan, I was directed to the "health care" section at the "solutions" tab at GOP.gov. There are links to a variety of articles published between May 13 and July 30, and a summary of Boustenay's comments following the President's address to Congress, but nothing about a plan.
Funny thing is, when I called Boehner's Congressional office and asked about their health care plan I was told they are "still working on it."
Posted by: karen marie on September 25, 2009 at 11:50 AM | PERMALINK
@ qerty:
Yes. I'd count myself among that 14%. The Replicants have fully and clearly explained that they don't want any reform whatsoever.
Posted by: Cap'n Chucky on September 25, 2009 at 11:52 AM | PERMALINK
Republican Health Care Plan
1. Cut taxes.
With charts!
Posted by: stinger on September 25, 2009 at 11:58 AM | PERMALINK
I have no idea what those in the 14% minority were thinking.
They were thinking about pie.
Posted by: Roddy McCorley on September 25, 2009 at 12:03 PM | PERMALINK
I'm sure the GOP could get a plan if they wanted to. However, if you wanted anything from them more detailed than an "Underpants Gnomes" type of plan, good luck.
Posted by: gf120581 on September 25, 2009 at 12:17 PM | PERMALINK
I thought Cantor explained the plan very clearly--sell everything and go on Medicaid or ask for charity.
Problem solved.
Posted by: Allan Snyder on September 25, 2009 at 12:46 PM | PERMALINK
the republicans have a reform bill. they named it harvey.
Posted by: mudwall jackson on September 25, 2009 at 1:08 PM | PERMALINK
I am not a big proponent of the "wisdom of the American people" line of thinking, but generally speaking, many are not nearly as fooled as are the networks and political operatives.
Posted by: ET on September 25, 2009 at 1:52 PM | PERMALINK
I can think of two GOP plans. The first is, of course, YOYO, or 'you're on your own.' The other one is, and you knew this was coming...
1) Keep private companies in charge
2) ?
3) PROFIT!
-Z
Posted by: Zorro on September 25, 2009 at 2:28 PM | PERMALINK
Their "guarantees" are about as reliable as their policy prescriptions. -- Steve Benen
That's because... They started working on the plan but, on day two, they reached the doughnut hole. And they're still trying to swim to the other end of it. Hard work, there being a lot of sh.. in that hole, an'all.
Posted by: exlibra on September 25, 2009 at 3:41 PM | PERMALINK
My rent is $1600 a month or $19000 a year.
My rental contract is 20 pages long
The US spends $2,000,000,000,000 a year on health care
The Republican health care plan is 4 pages long.
My rental contract is 5 times longer than their entire healthcare proposal.
That's a joke!!!
Why is it taking so long to come up with a comprehensive plan?
Maybe it's because they never thought much about health care. They've never proposed it. They've never lobbied for it. Many of them even claim that the US health care system that excludes 30 million people ...is the BEST IN THE WORLD.
Face it. Republican's are as happy as punch with leaving heath care just the way it is. The only reason they are trying to "come up" with something is because the rest of America disagrees.
It's really difficult to write a health care plan when you don't think there needs to be any changes
Posted by: Norris Hall on September 26, 2009 at 10:42 AM | PERMALINK
"Republican Health Care Plan
1. Cut taxes.
With charts!"
Posted by: stinger on September 25, 2009 at 11:58 AM |
Y'know, that really is unfair.
It does our side no good to misrepresent the other side's points; that's something they'd do. We're supposed to be better than that. And surely you know that there's much more to their plan than just that one point:
"Republican Health Care Plan
1. Cut taxes.
With charts!"
2. Immunize all doctors, hospitals, and insurance firms from exposure to any civil or criminal action resulting from any action or failure to act, intentional or otherwise, that results in injury or death of any patient except pre-born children.
3. Charge any doctor, hospital, or insurance firm involved in any way with the death of a pre-born child (commonly referred to as "abortion") with murder.
4. Extend patent protections for pharmaceuticals, medical and surgical procedures, and any and all genes, human or otherwise, to eternity or the heat-death of the universe, whichever comes first.
5. Provide cash subsidies to insurance companies to process applications for health coverage from any individual not currently covered (applications may, of course, be denied for any cause, or none).
6. Permit any insurance firm to market and sell policies in any state subject only to such regulations as are applicable in the jurisdiction in which the firm is chartered and headquartered.
7. Endow Lesotho with the right to charter insurance firms."
See? MUCH more.
Posted by: smartalek on September 26, 2009 at 12:25 PM | PERMALINK