October 5, 2009
MONDAY'S CAMPAIGN ROUND-UP....Today's installment of campaign-related news items that wouldn't generate a post of their own, but may be of interest to political observers.
* With just one month to go before Virginia's gubernatorial race, the DNC is directing an additional $1 million to support Creigh Deeds' (D) campaign. "We see a real strong opportunity here,'' said DNC communications director Brad Woodhouse. "We're real pleased with the direction of the race."
* Interesting historical trend: for the last 32 years, Virginia has sided with the gubernatorial candidate whose party had lost the presidential race the year prior.
* In yet another setback for Meg Whitman's (R) gubernatorial campaign in California, it appears the former eBay CEO, who recently described herself as a "darned good" conservative Republican, endorsed Sen. Barbara Boxer's (D) re-election campaign in 2004. Whitman also contributed $4,000 to Boxer.
* In his latest ad targeting Sen. Arlen Specter in Pennsylvania, Rep. Joe Sestak is, not surprisingly, reminding voters about Specter's 30-year career as a Republican and his support for the McCain-Palin ticket.
* Rep. Kendrick Meek's (D) Senate campaign in Florida continues to enjoy the enthusiastic backing of former President Bill Clinton.
* And in Arizona, Sen. John McCain (R) is expected to do pretty well in his re-election bid next year, but might he have to worry about a GOP primary? Anti-immigration activist Chris Simcox is already running, and apparently, former Rep. J.D. Hayworth is "weighing a candidacy." Hayworth, a right-wing former sportscaster, was booted from Congress in 2006 after more than a decade on the Hill.
—Steve Benen 12:00 PM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (15)
You know, these daily "campaign round-up"s are so terribly surreal... with teh Repugnant Party being so insane and all...
...i hate readin' 'em -- even when teh Dims are goin' pretty good...
Posted by: neill on October 5, 2009 at 12:09 PM | PERMALINK
Meg Whitman's (R), who recently described herself as a "darned good" conservative Republican, endorsed Sen. Barbara Boxer's (D) re-election campaign in 2004. Whitman also contributed $4,000 to Boxer.
Hey, bribes aren't supposed to count. There are an awful lot of health insurance executive who've given money to Democrats (well, DINOs anyway) who I'm sure consider themselves good Republicans.
Posted by: SteveT on October 5, 2009 at 12:29 PM | PERMALINK
So, I wonder if Whitman can list the significant ideological/policy shifts Boxer has made in the last 6 years which has caused her 180 degree reversal?
ROFLMAO.
Posted by: bdop4 on October 5, 2009 at 12:33 PM | PERMALINK
Re: Whitman's so-far misfiring campaign:
Bigshot corporate types are inevitably bad campaigners, and if they manage to win, such lousy elected leaders you have to wonder how they earned their reputations in the first place.
It's as though they're hot stuff only when pushing around the folks whose paychecks they sign.
The minute they have to deal with other politicians, journalists and ordinary voters, all of whom are able to pushback, the bigshot lustre wears off and disappears.
Remember when Jack Welch and Lee Iacocca were supposed to be the answer to everything that ailed the American political system?
We're better off having Trent Lott wheel and deal with Ted Kennedy.
I predict Whitman will not go far.
Posted by: Cash on October 5, 2009 at 12:44 PM | PERMALINK
There's actually a reason that lawyers tend to be more successful politicians, and it's because, whatever ill you can say about them, they rarely work in a top down environment, and have to navigate all kinds of conflicts and competing priorities -- whether it's negotiating with a prosecutor or an opposing counsel, or getting consensus of the management board of the law firm. Executives who are used to giving orders and judging people based on how well they were carried out by their minions don't tend to succeed in politics.
Posted by: Barbara on October 5, 2009 at 1:30 PM | PERMALINK
Kendrick Meeks is alright but probably won't outpoll Crist. Now Alan Grayson for Senate on the other hand...
Posted by: Heimyankel on October 5, 2009 at 1:37 PM | PERMALINK
I'm having a really good time laughing loudly at Meg Whitman.
Posted by: shortstop on October 5, 2009 at 1:39 PM | PERMALINK
Meg Whitman really seems to have the political instincts of a log. What Republican primary voters are looking for is fire breathing and not fraternizing with the enemy. My prediction would be that within a week or two Meg Whitman will discover that she hasn't spent anywhere near enough time with her family.
Posted by: SRW1 on October 5, 2009 at 1:52 PM | PERMALINK
Interesting historical trend: for the last 32 years, Virginia has sided with the gubernatorial candidate whose party had lost the presidential race the year prior.
As with most such "trends," the data set is way too small for a statistically meaningful trend. That said, yet another reason I hope we win this one is so I never have to hear that statistic again.
Posted by: Redshift on October 5, 2009 at 2:35 PM | PERMALINK
That said, yet another reason I hope we win this one is so I never have to hear that statistic again.
It would be almost as good as when we finally put to bed that "As Missouri goes, so goes the nation" yawner last year.
Posted by: shortstop on October 5, 2009 at 2:40 PM | PERMALINK
Au contraire, Shortstop-- Missouri went decisively for Obama last year. It was Missourah that went for McCain.
Posted by: The Caped Composer on October 5, 2009 at 3:32 PM | PERMALINK
My prediction would be that within a week or two Meg Whitman will discover that she hasn't spent anywhere near enough time with her family. -- SRW1, @13:52
You mean all those minutes she spent with her family instead of wasting them on registering and voting aren't enough?
Posted by: exlibra on October 5, 2009 at 4:33 PM | PERMALINK
Interesting historical trend: for the last 32 years, Virginia has sided with the gubernatorial candidate whose party had lost the presidential race the year prior.
I have no opinion about which way Virginia will go this year, but these "historical trend" stories are extremely annoying and lazy journalism.
Here's Politico (the same site you link to) writing in 2007 about the pointlessness of Senators running for president.
Senators, like the soap star with the longest losing streak in Emmy history, keep coming back for more. They pooh-pooh the historical record. They tune out the colleagues sitting beside them who've tried and failed before. They dream about reversing the curse of the Senate and lunge toward the presidency.
The article went on like that for more than 800 words.
Congratulations to president Romney, I guess.
Posted by: Jinchi on October 5, 2009 at 6:28 PM | PERMALINK
Good evening,
(J.D.) Jim Deakin www.jimdeakin.com is already challenging John for Arizona's Senate seat. I announced and filed on January 7,2009. I am a Navy Veteran, resident of the Grand Canyon State for 20 years and, by popular request of the TEA Party and 912 groups, NOT a current or former politician. I own and operate design and construction companies in the Fire Protection and Security industry.
I look forward to the opportunity to be interviewed by all bloggers and reporters.
Jim Deakin
Posted by: Jim Deakin on October 7, 2009 at 8:54 PM | PERMALINK
Hey. The problem with people who have no vices is that generally you can be pretty sure they're going to have some pretty annoying virtues. Help me! Need information about: Virtual stock trading account. I found only this - cf stock market day trading. Jake bernstein is a combination to equities, tools, call, big contracts, sober brokerages, uptrend containers and first bankers, stock trading. Stock trading, first buyer is blown with an corporation news. Best regards :cool:, Marcella from Great.
Posted by: Marcella on March 12, 2010 at 7:16 PM | PERMALINK