Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

October 20, 2009

CHRISTIE'S NEW HEADACHE.... Over the summer, struggling badly, New Jersey Gov. Jon Corzine's (D) campaign settled on a specific line of attack against Republican Chris Christie: he applies one set of rules to the public, and applies a different set of rules to himself.

Thanks to a barrage of negative ads, and some unfortunate revelations, the criticism started to stick and the polls improved for the incumbent. Now, with just two weeks left before Election Day in the Garden State, a story like this one may prove devastating.

When news broke in August that the former United States attorney, Christopher J. Christie, had lent $46,000 to a top aide in the federal prosecutor's office, he said he was merely helping a friend in need. He also said the aide, Michele Brown, had done nothing to help his gubernatorial campaign.

But interviews with federal law enforcement officials suggest that Ms. Brown used her position in two significant and possibly improper ways to try to aid Mr. Christie in his run for governor.

In March, when Gov. Jon S. Corzine's campaign requested public records about Mr. Christie's tenure as prosecutor, Ms. Brown interceded to oversee the responses to the inquiries, taking over for the staff member who normally oversaw Freedom of Information Act requests, according to federal law enforcement officials in Newark and Washington. The requested information included records about Mr. Christie's travel and expenses, along with Ms. Brown's travel records.

In mid-June, when F.B.I. agents and prosecutors gathered to set a date for the arrests of more than 40 targets of a corruption and money-laundering probe, Ms. Brown alone argued for the arrests to be made before July 1. She later told colleagues that she wanted to ensure that the arrests occurred before Mr. Christie's permanent successor took office, according to three federal law enforcement officials briefed on the conversation, presumably so that Mr. Christie would be given credit for the roundup.

Gabriel Winant noted that the story is so embarrassing for Christie, "you'd think the governor wrote it himself."

It's not especially complicated. Christie extended a $46,000 loan to his friend Brown, and neglected to report it on his tax returns and ethics filings. That's bad. When the story broke, Christie said Brown hadn't helped his campaign, which was false. That's worse. And Brown not only played a role in supporting the campaign, but seems to have played fast and loose with her authority. That's much worse.

With two weeks remaining, this isn't what Christie needed to help get back on track.

Steve Benen 12:40 PM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (14)

Bookmark and Share
 
Comments

... and Christie is just as FAT as Michael Moore !

Posted by: wilson46201 on October 20, 2009 at 12:45 PM | PERMALINK

This absolutely wraps up my decision on who to vote for!

I am voting for Chris Christie! It is better to have a known crook in office than one who you suspect is a crook.

Posted by: A Jersey Resident on October 20, 2009 at 12:52 PM | PERMALINK

Christie is a garallous, self-important boob--he reminds me of one of the corrupt pols from an episode of The Sopranos. He's an embarrassment to himself and the GOP. If possible, I'd like to limit the damage to just those parties, rather than the state of NJ itself.

Please, GOP: Better candidates. I'd like a choice other than Corzine--not just someone else, someone better.

Posted by: Jamey on October 20, 2009 at 12:56 PM | PERMALINK

Nice to see the Alternate Reality Republican Chowder and Marching Society out busy so early in the day. You two morons are to be commended for your ceaseless efforts to prove that Homo Sap the biped that lacks frontal lobes and opposable thumbs can use computers just like a real person.

Posted by: TCinLA on October 20, 2009 at 12:57 PM | PERMALINK

"With two weeks remaining, this isn't what Christie needed to help get back on track.'
But it's exactly typical of the GOP mindset: The rules are for the bad guys, the others; we're the good guys,ipso facto We Can Not Break Rules...we transcend them. More here:
http://lancemannion.typepad.com/lance_mannion/2005/07/why_conservativ.html
and here:
http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/2005/07/scarred.html

Posted by: Stewart Dean on October 20, 2009 at 1:05 PM | PERMALINK

George Soros!

MoveOn.org!

Socialism!

Have some apple pie!

Posted by: Li'l Mikey Steele on October 20, 2009 at 1:10 PM | PERMALINK

Christie is the perfect rep for the GOP, to paraphrase Peter Griffin, "a fat white guy who fears change".
Oh, and he's totally corrupt, which makes him the perfect rep for the NJ GOP. Zing.

Posted by: Allan Snyder on October 20, 2009 at 1:11 PM | PERMALINK

The voters understand that the necessity to constantly battle the forces of creeping nazi-based liberalism sometimes results in Republicans suffering routine ethical and moral lapses in judgement and character, and will vote accordingly.

Posted by: qwerty on October 20, 2009 at 1:13 PM | PERMALINK

Jamey...I find it amusing that you have no problem using a sterotype against italian-americans when referring to Mr Christie. Are all Italians in the MOB?

Posted by: johnnj on October 20, 2009 at 1:24 PM | PERMALINK

LMAO,, another CHRISTie nailed.

Posted by: olo on October 20, 2009 at 1:37 PM | PERMALINK

So when does the illicit sexual relationship between Christie and Brown get revealed?

Posted by: Bobo Teh Clown on October 20, 2009 at 2:08 PM | PERMALINK

As a federal government employee who like all of us is repeatedly indoctrinated about the very strict ethics laws in regard to federal employees....this $46K loan to an employee, who on top of it you have promoted twice, strikes me as suspect on the face of it and possibly illegal. Although of course we know by now that the concept of government ethics, even to (particularly to?) Republican lawyers who were Bush administration political appointees was "Ethics rules? What ethics rules?" Any experts in this out there? If this woman had an asset - her house - couldn't she have gotten a loan for a slightly higher interest rate on the open market and avoid ethics problems, or trade in her Mercedes for a Focus or something? Why not? I'm thinking that there's a lot more fire connected with this smoke.

Posted by: emjayay on October 20, 2009 at 3:56 PM | PERMALINK

I think Bobo is on to something. A $46k POA seems about right.

Posted by: st john on October 20, 2009 at 4:27 PM | PERMALINK

From his Wikipedia entry

Christie has also been criticized by some Democrats for what they say are attempts to tarnish candidates facing election; they point, for instance, to Christie's well-publicized subpoenaing of Senator Robert Menendez during his contested 2006 campaign, just two months before the election.

Wow... It's almost as if what goes around, comes around...

Posted by: Mary Contrary on October 21, 2009 at 1:17 AM | PERMALINK




 

 

Read Jonathan Rowe remembrance and articles
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM



buy from Amazon and
support the Monthly


Place Your Link Here

--- Links ---

Boarding Schools

Addiction Treatment Centers

Alcohol Treatment Center

Bad Credit Loan

Long Distance Moving Companies

FREE Phone Card

Flowers

Personal Loan

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs