October 21, 2009
THE 'BRIDGES' HAVE BEEN GONE FOR A WHILE NOW.... It's quite a turnaround. As recently as Sunday, the political pundits were debating whether President Obama is "tough" enough. Now, the discussion has turned to whether Obama is an overly aggressive street fighter bent on destroying his political opponents.
As part of the latter case, Jim VandeHei and Mike Allen report today on White House efforts to marginalize its political critics. Common sense suggests this is a) a good idea; and b) what every White House tries to do.
President Obama is working systematically to marginalize the most powerful forces behind the Republican Party, setting loose top White House officials to undermine conservatives in the media, business and lobbying worlds.
With a series of private meetings and public taunts, the White House has targeted the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the biggest-spending pro-business lobbying group in the country; Rush Limbaugh, the country's most-listened-to conservative commentator; and now, with a new volley of combative rhetoric in recent days, the insurance industry, Wall Street executives and Fox News.
Obama aides are using their powerful White House platform, combined with techniques honed in the 2008 campaign, to cast some of the most powerful adversaries as out of the mainstream and their criticism as unworthy of serious discussion.
These sounds like the kind of communications strategies effective White House teams have utilized for quite some time. The White House is a political entity in a political system run by political players seeking political ends.
So, what's the downside? Aside, of course, from reporters and Republicans making silly claims about Nixon?
Dana Perino, former Bush press secretary, argued, "The more they fight, the more defensive they look. It's only been 10 months, and they're burning bridges in a lot of different places."
And which "bridges" would those be, exactly?
As Greg Sargent explained, "[W]hether it's powerful interests running multi-million-dollar ad campaigns attacking Obama's agenda, or leading conservative media figures attacking Obama as a "racist" who wants to brainwash the nation's schoolchildren, Obama's foes never seemed all that interested in maintaining cordial relations with the White House to begin with.... Seems like whatever bridges that existed were blown to bits and sank to the bottom of the river long ago."
I do wish the establishment would pick a theme and go with it. President Obama can be a weak, risk-averse, overly-conciliatory neophyte, or he can be a ruthless, cut-throat, political-machine boss out to destroy anyone who gets in his way. But he can't be both.
—Steve Benen 2:20 PM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (34)
Obviously the Republicans are trying to fight back because the Obama White House is succeeding in unmasking them and the vested interests. And no doubt its discomfiting to the establishment media types as well.
Keep up the fight, White House!
Posted by: Vicki Linton on October 21, 2009 at 2:23 PM | PERMALINK
In support of the establishment's new claim that Obama is punishing enemies is the WaPo.com sub-headline on the article about the House committee vote on repealing McCarron:
Move signals determination by Democrats to punish insurers for criticism of Obama's agenda. Sen. Reid also plans repeal as part of Senate bill.
Sheesh!
Posted by: howie on October 21, 2009 at 2:26 PM | PERMALINK
This article in the WaPo is on target.....Who's afraid of the free market? The GOP fighting tooth and nail....good read... No wonder Obama is being smeared so badly.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/20/AR2009102003073.html?hpid=opinionsbox1
Posted by: avahome on October 21, 2009 at 2:30 PM | PERMALINK
Taking positions 180 degrees from the positions you took yesterday -- See GOP Operations Manual, page 2.
Page One.....Whatever Democrats are for, you are against.!
Posted by: dweb on October 21, 2009 at 2:30 PM | PERMALINK
You are obviously forgetting that wingnuts make their own realities where apparently ruthless wuss's are normal :)
Posted by: dave on October 21, 2009 at 2:32 PM | PERMALINK
BHO is turning American political discourse into something that resembles the tribal warfare in his native Kenya.
Posted by: Al on October 21, 2009 at 2:36 PM | PERMALINK
Dana Perino had her 15 minutes used up when she said, as WH press secretary, that girls like her didn't understand missile defense. Too complicated.
Al needs to reexamine his eyeglass script, this is just organized politics. Which is why it seems so unexpected to some, coming from Democrats.
Posted by: J. on October 21, 2009 at 2:39 PM | PERMALINK
Obama's foes never seemed all that interested in maintaining cordial relations with the White House to begin with...
Dead on. Between calling Obama a racist Nazi and praying that he die in the White House, Obama isn't burning any bridges with these assholes. He's just piling more rocks on top of the rocks they live under.
Posted by: chrenson on October 21, 2009 at 2:40 PM | PERMALINK
"he can't be both".
Sure he can.
And Hitler.
And the antichrist.
And a terrorist.
etc. etc. etc.
Get with the program, Steve.
Posted by: Chopin on October 21, 2009 at 2:44 PM | PERMALINK
SO... the Obama admin is supposed to take all these smears lying down? And if they do pipe up to defend themselves they're 'burning bridges"
Goddamn we live in a FUCKED UP country.
Posted by: citizen_pain on October 21, 2009 at 2:45 PM | PERMALINK
I guess we'll know the right is getting organized when they're able to hold a thought for longer than a news cycle.
Posted by: nerd on October 21, 2009 at 2:46 PM | PERMALINK
the gregg judd bridge is probably one of the most regretable of the burned bridges.
but it is remarkable how obama could burn it completely down with the big gregg judd knife stuck in his back...
Posted by: neill on October 21, 2009 at 2:47 PM | PERMALINK
Steve says "President Obama can be a weak, risk-averse, overly-conciliatory neophyte, or he can be a ruthless, cut-throat, political-machine boss out to destroy anyone who gets in his way. But he can't be both."
It is not one or the other -- they don't care. For the the wingnuts, the fundamental problem with Obama is that he is black. They oppose him because he is black. They will cry "socialist," "Nazi," "Communist," "Kenyan"; but at the heart of it all is that a black man is president. That is why they cry about "getting their country back." Sorry -- the Fifties are over.
Posted by: Michael Carpet on October 21, 2009 at 2:53 PM | PERMALINK
albedo business details incognito decade energy
Posted by: cherrellco on October 21, 2009 at 2:55 PM | PERMALINK
Obama can be anything the right-wing smear artists want to be the flavor of the week:
Week 1 -- Hitler/Nazi
Week 2 -- Stalin/socialist
Week 3 -- Ineffective waffler
Week 4 -- jack-booted thug, showing an "amazing lack of bi-partisanship."
Week 5 -- ???
The right-wing never worries about consistency or logic or having a message that actually makes sense.
All these criticisms boil down to: Obama - Bad! Big gummimint socialist/facist/nazi/welfare-ite!
Progressives just assume slogans ought to have some intellectual content so we underestimate what the right-wing is doing. They're whipping up the froth.
Obama is now so "evil" they don't even have to say what he's done. It's just "Obama! Grrrr!"
You see evidence of that in this very thread:
"BHO is turning American political discourse into something that resembles the tribal warfare in his native Kenya."
See how easy that was? Look how many lies and smears are in one short sentence?
1. Obama is from Kenya. This is just assumed on right-wing blogs regardless or logic, truth or common sense. No need to even argue it.
2. If Obama attacks his political enemies that's "tribal warfare." -- Note the racist tone. "Tribe" = black = primitive = foreign = "Not-American" = not legitimate.
Posted by: Cugel on October 21, 2009 at 2:56 PM | PERMALINK
Those bridges Obama is accused of burning are just as real as the Republicans' alternative health care plan and just as substantial as their alternative budget plan.
Posted by: Dennis-SGMM on October 21, 2009 at 3:00 PM | PERMALINK
I do wish the establishment would pick a theme and go with it. President Obama can be a or he can be a ruthless, cut-throat, political-machine boss out to destroy anyone who gets in his way. But he can't be both.
—Steve Benen 2:20 PM
Yes he can. He can be "a weak, risk-averse, overly-conciliatory neophyte" on Mondays, Tuesdays and Fridays, and he can be "a ruthless, cut-throat, political-machine boss out to destroy anyone who gets in his way" on Wednesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. And he can swing either way on Sundays depending on the questions asked Sunday President John McCain.
Never underestimate the ability of the noise machine to talk convincingly out of both sides at the same time.
Posted by: Ron Byers on October 21, 2009 at 3:00 PM | PERMALINK
Anybody who can be a Fascist Marxist can be anything!
But, see, he can only be a Fascist AND a Marxist because he's such a celebrity and the media are so in the tank for him.
Posted by: bleh on October 21, 2009 at 3:20 PM | PERMALINK
Bleh: Actually, Obama is a Fascist because he can't speak without a teleprompter and a Marxist because he's black.
Posted by: chrenson on October 21, 2009 at 3:36 PM | PERMALINK
President Obama can be a weak, risk-averse, overly-conciliatory neophyte, or he can be a ruthless, cut-throat, political-machine boss out to destroy anyone who gets in his way. But he can't be both.
Why not? That would only make him human -- and what's wrong with having a real human being in the WH?
Posted by: majun on October 21, 2009 at 3:36 PM | PERMALINK
Dana Perito is a little yap dog, ignore her, it's easy.
Posted by: Trollop on October 21, 2009 at 3:45 PM | PERMALINK
It's only been 10 months, and they're burning bridges in a lot of different places." -- Dana Perino
Them bridges ain't been burnt, dear heart. Them's *pontoon* bridges, which have just been moved into different -- more useful -- positions. Like, instead of dealing with the traitorous Chamber of Commerce, we're now extending them directly to the doctors and other *productive professionals*. You, middlemen, had had your chance and blew it.
Posted by: exlibra on October 21, 2009 at 3:55 PM | PERMALINK
It's really quite simply for "we" Obama supporters. Change "WE" can believe in. Obama never asked McCain supporters to believe in it. They believed in Country "club" First.
Posted by: Dave on October 21, 2009 at 4:06 PM | PERMALINK
He'd better marginalize his critics. The trillion dollar deficits that he quadrupled and the 10% unemployment aren't going to go away by themselves and he's completely incapable of dealing with them so he better silence his critics.
Posted by: bandit on October 21, 2009 at 4:14 PM | PERMALINK
The only bridges that are burning are the Bridges to Nowhere!
Posted by: Marko on October 21, 2009 at 4:15 PM | PERMALINK
"at the heart of it all is that a black man is president."
I don't think this is true. If Hilary was in the WH there would be similar accusations; and even for any white male. I suspect they would even launch attacks on Democrats as conservative as Bayh.
Posted by: Johnny Canuck on October 21, 2009 at 4:28 PM | PERMALINK
The GOP's strategy here is simple: they figure if they fling enough shit against the wall, some of it is bound to stick. So far, the wall has proven fairly shitproof.
You see evidence of that in this very thread: "BHO is turning American political discourse into something that resembles the tribal warfare in his native Kenya." See how easy that was? Look how many lies and smears are in one short sentence?
Al is a parody troll, and a pretty obvious one at that. Has been since the days of Kevin Drum. You look like an idiot when you respond to him.
Jeebus, I get tired of having to tell people this.
Posted by: Screamin' Demon on October 21, 2009 at 4:51 PM | PERMALINK
Jeebus, I get tired of having to tell people this.
Then stop expending so much energy on it and just focus on something else. There's no "have to" about it.
Posted by: shortstop on October 21, 2009 at 5:33 PM | PERMALINK
Obama can be portrayed as anything his adversaries want him to be, and that can change on a dime. Right-wing opinion manipulators assume the mainstream media and the public have an effective memory span of maybe 72 hours -- and, sadly, they seem to be right, at least about the MSM. A further advantage is an alternative media universe (Faux News, Limbaugh, et al.) that happily pounces on new memes and pretends the old ones never existed.
Posted by: allbetsareoff on October 21, 2009 at 5:34 PM | PERMALINK
The trillion dollar deficits that he quadrupled ...
Ah, Republican math. Why the heck did anyone ever think of these guys as the "fiscally responsible" ones when they can't even figure out basic decimals and fractions?
Posted by: Mnemosyne on October 21, 2009 at 6:16 PM | PERMALINK
The Republicans are trying exactly the strategy that lost Kerry the White House. He accused Bush of various different, contradictory things and none of them stuck.
Now it seems to be the Republicans' turn to make the same mistake.
Posted by: Peter S. on October 21, 2009 at 6:20 PM | PERMALINK
Republican President Reagan raised the US debt by 260%.
By the time Republican Presidents Reagan and Bush I were out of office they had raised the US debt by 400%.
Republican President Bush II more than doubled the US debt.
And Republicans always blame someone else for their indebting of America.
-----
For the record, only Democratic President Clinton paid down the US debt as a percentage of GDP.
http://HavenWorks.com/us/debt
Republicans Are Debtors.
Posted by: Republicans Are Debtors. on October 21, 2009 at 7:03 PM | PERMALINK
Steve sez:
President Obama can be a weak, risk-averse, overly-conciliatory neophyte, or he can be a ruthless, cut-throat, political-machine boss out to destroy anyone who gets in his way. But he can't be both
majun asks:
why not?
Have to go with commenter majun on this.
These are by no means mutually exclusive, even on the same issue.
Posted by: lobbygow on October 21, 2009 at 7:56 PM | PERMALINK
The ability for the White House to achieve any success in the "War with FoxNews" is roughly equivalent to the "War on Team America" that North Korean leader Kim Jong Il attempted after it's creators made him look like a fool in the movie, "Team America: World Police".
It was said that Kim Jong Il had ordered that the writers, Trey Parker and Matt Stone (still alive), be assassinated, a step that I don't think Obama is ready to take, but of course like Nancy Pelosi said, the war of words could inspire terrible violence which could reflect badly on the President.
Posted by: John Q Public on October 21, 2009 at 11:20 PM | PERMALINK