Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

October 29, 2009

IF BAYH IS SWAYED BY PUBLIC OPINION.... It became apparent yesterday that Sen. Evan Bayh (D) of Indiana, one of the Senate Democratic caucus' more conservative members, is one of a handful of Dems whose support for health care reform is in doubt.

If the senator is at all interested in public opinion -- and with Bayh's re-election bid coming next year, he should be -- he may want to at least consider a new poll from Research 2000, as commissioned by the Progressive Change Campaign Committee.

Bayh, to be sure, remains quite popular with Hoosiers*. But residents also prefer a fairly progressive approach to health care. Using the same wording as a recent NYT/CBS poll, a 52% majority in Indiana support the public option, and 53% believe the plan would help people in the state.

Looking ahead, 27% of residents said they'd be less likely to vote for Bayh if he opposed the public option, and 29% said the same if Bayh joined with Republicans on a filibuster. Among Democrats exclusively, a 54% majority said they'd be less likely to vote for Bayh in a Democratic primary if he joins with the GOP in blocking consideration of the bill.

What's more, the insurance industry -- which has rewarded Bayh with about $1.5 million in contributions -- is not at all popular with Hoosiers. A 77% majority -- more than three out of four -- believe insurers care more about "making a profit" than helping patients.

Something for Bayh to keep in mind.

On a related note, Bayh endorsed Republican rhetoric yesterday, saying he doesn't see "much difference between process and policy at this particular juncture." In other words, if he's not satisfied with the bill, then Bayh has no problem voting with Republicans on the procedural vote to stop the bill from coming to the floor for a vote.

Tim Tagaris found that Bayh has not always felt that way.

Example 1: In 2008, Evan Bayh voted in favor of a cloture motion on the bill to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, though he opposed the bill itself. "Bayh voted with most Democrats to stop the filibuster because, he said, it was preventing amendments that could have improved the bill."[Gannett, 6/12/2008; Vote 145, 6/6/2008]

Example 2: In 2005, Senator Bayh voted for cloture on Judge Owen's nomination, but against final confirmation. Vote 127, 5/24/05: Senate.gov ; Vote 128, 5/25/05: Senate.gov. Judge Owen, you might recall, was the first nominee to reach the floor after the "Gang of 14" agreements.

Example 3: In 2004, Senator Bayh voted for cloture on the conference report to H.R. 1047, a $388 billion spending bill, then voted against final passage the next day. Vote 214, 11/19/04 ; Vote 215, 11/20/04

So, in short, when Senators take to the floor and vote for "cloture," they are saying that it is time to move beyond obstructing a health care bill and on to an "up or down vote" on the substance of the legislation.

Something else for Bayh to keep in mind.

* fixed

Steve Benen 8:35 AM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (19)
 
Comments

Something else for Bayh to keep in mind.

Alas, something else for Bayh to keep in mind is his wife's position on the board of Wellpoint, so his support of health insurance reform would likely diminish his family's wealth.

It's astonishing that Bayh is making his corruption so unmistakably obvious.

Unfortunately, I'm not voting for Bayh no matter which way he moves on health insurance reform, so my opinion carried even less weight with him than a Democrat's usually would.

Posted by: Gregory on October 29, 2009 at 8:42 AM | PERMALINK

Expanding on Gregory's comment, Glenn Greenwald was on Maddow last night and had this to say:

"Well, let’s look at Sen. Bayh. His wife sits on the Board of Directors of WellPoint, one of the largest health insurance companies in the nation. They own, by their own disclosures, between $500,000 and a million dollars just of WellPoint stock alone. And as I think you reported yesterday, when Sen. Lieberman threatened to filibuster the public option, as one would expect, the value of the stock of the health care industries and the health care companies skyrocketed—which directly benefited, personally benefited the finances of the Bayh family."

You'd think the Bayh family would divest themselves of this huge conflict of interest before any health care legislation comes up for a vote, but I guess that kind of integrity doesn't exist in Washington these days, even amongst many Democrats.

Posted by: 3reddogs on October 29, 2009 at 8:50 AM | PERMALINK

Here is a novel idea. Whatever the politicans have done to health care reform should reflect on their taxpayer paid insurance premiums Any increase by any insurance company will be paid out of pocket by all the politicians for all Americans. This will defray the monumental costs spent on lobbyists for the insurance and pharmaceutical companies.Because of America's politicians the Taxpayer will pay for Federal Employees insurance and will be charged for the lobbying , raping and pillaging of American people.

Posted by: MLJohnston on October 29, 2009 at 9:07 AM | PERMALINK

Hey you don't work so hard to be elected Senator just because you believe in public service. If you are a Senator like Bayh you are in it for the money and the fancy vacations. Having fools fawn all over you and your family doesn't hurt either. Hell, do you think his wife wants to stay in Washington baking cookies when she can be skimming directors fees from one of the largest health care providers? You nuts or something.

Posted by: Ron Byers on October 29, 2009 at 9:09 AM | PERMALINK
"You'd think the Bayh family would divest themselves of this huge conflict of interest before any health care legislation comes up for a vote, but I guess that kind of integrity doesn't exist in Washington these days, even amongst many Democrats."

Glenn also use the word(s) "corrupt" or "corruption" at least twice in reference to Bayh and Lieberman. More of that please.

And Bayh and Lugar are my senators, and I won't vote for either of them. In fact, I will campaign and donate against them.

Posted by: msmolly on October 29, 2009 at 9:19 AM | PERMALINK

How many other senators own Wellpoint or Cigna or other health insurance stock in significant amounts or is a member of a board of directors? Shouldn't they all recuse themselves or be held liable by voters?

WaPo reports "almost 30" senators are in this ethically dubious condition as Bayh, including Harry Reid (D-NV),Judd Gregg(R-NH), Johnny Isakson (R-GA), John Kerry (D-MA),Michael Crapo (R-ID)and Chris Dodd (D-CT).

I'll believe they have the interests of the American people foremost when they have divested their holdings.

Posted by: Charlie on October 29, 2009 at 9:29 AM | PERMALINK

Senators like Lieberman and Bayh are such self-serving, grandstanding bozos. Shameless fuckers. My hope is that both get trounced when they are up for reelection. I also hope that progressives never forget what these two have wrought.

Posted by: sjw on October 29, 2009 at 9:34 AM | PERMALINK

Steve, slightly off-topic, but just a pet peeve of mine:

"Hoosier," rather than "Indianan," is the official term for Indiana residents. It's not just a colloquial nickname.

Oh, and you know who would be all about the public option if he was in the Senate today? Birch Bayh.

Posted by: Hoosier Paul on October 29, 2009 at 9:47 AM | PERMALINK

Bayh's wife is a whore for Wellpoint, raking in millions off the plight of the sick.

So I'm not expecting much from this jerk. He'll probably join Sunny Joe in fellating the Repubs.

Someday, probably due to the existence of the netroots more than anything else, we will have real Democrats as Senators....

Yes, slowly but surely. Somewhere many years from now we might have real health care reform. And Senators who really believe in making a difference for the average guy, not pimping their wives to line their pockets.

Posted by: manfred on October 29, 2009 at 10:01 AM | PERMALINK

Let's not forget the personal profit generated for many years by Lieberman's wife's job as a pharma/insurance lobbyist.

Posted by: shortstop on October 29, 2009 at 10:14 AM | PERMALINK

If Sen. Bayh supports the Republican filibuster, and this causes health care reform to fail, how is he going to win re-election next year in the face of an electoral tsunami favoring the GOP?

Think about it:

1. Fired up conservative base.
2. Demoralized liberal base seething with anger over Bayh's betrayal.
3. No Obama on the ballot.

Not exactly a formula for victory.

Posted by: Moonlight on October 29, 2009 at 10:15 AM | PERMALINK

I'm all for criticizing Dem senators who oppose the public option when their reasons for doing so have specific weaknesses. They shouldn't cite false information, they should be consistent, and there shouldn't be any hints of corruption or conflicts of interest.

However, I'm not for enforcing party discipline in ways that mirror the Republicans. One of the good things about the Democratic national party is that they allow diverse viewpoints. Someone can be a social liberal and a fiscal conservative and still be a faithful, loyal Democrat. If the cost of a government program to address a particular social issue is too high, opposing the program should be allowed.

From what I've seen so far, the public option should lower overall expenditures on health care nationwide. Hopefully, the CBO's analysis will verify that. If it does, then the public option shouldn't be opposed by Lieberman, Bayh, et al.

SRS

Posted by: Steven R. Stahl on October 29, 2009 at 10:23 AM | PERMALINK

Bayh does not care about polls. The people who respond to those polls to not vote in midterm elections. The people who vote in midterm elections are the hyperpolitical. Bayh knows who those people are and he knows how they vote. He has them covered.

Posted by: Bill H on October 29, 2009 at 10:39 AM | PERMALINK

Steven,

It is the Democrats who are the outliers here. Every political party in the Western world enforces party discipline in some manner except for the Democrats. On some votes, it is typical to declare a "free vote" if it isn't key to the party's program, but on key votes the members are expected to either support or, if conscience insists, abstain. In the Senate, it would be allowable to vote against the final bill, but to support a filibuster is to align with the opposite party.

A dissenting member, in almost any democracy, at least becomes a back-bencher, losing any leadership position like a committee chair. In more extreme cases, it's common to expel a member from the caucus.

Posted by: Joe Buck on October 29, 2009 at 10:43 AM | PERMALINK

Gregory said:

Alas, something else for Bayh to keep in mind is his wife's position on the board of Wellpoint, so his support of health insurance reform would likely diminish his family's wealth.

It's astonishing that Bayh is making his corruption so unmistakably obvious.

Bayh's corruption has been obvious to observers since he was first elected. As soon as he was elected (and before he even took the oath of office) his wife was in touch with several health insurance companies "testing the waters." As was pointed out on Rachel last night, when he came out and said he would vote against cloture, the stock of Wellpoint and others went up, thus his wife's investments increased in value. As they pointed out, everything he is doing on this is enriching his wife directly, as well as his own campaign contributions.

I think he might just be the most obviously-corrupt of the Democrats.

I'm sure Obama, Schumer, Durbin, et al, are celebrating their "party loyalty" from 2006 - when they actively sabotaged Ned Lamont, the official Democratic candidate for Senator in Connecticut - to play a nice corrupt game with their scumball buddy Joe Lieberman, who promised them then (and then again last year after he crossed the line for McCain against Obama) that he would vote loyally for the party. Just think, they wouldn't have had to worry about loyalty with an actual loyal Democrat like Lamont in the office.

Of course, this would have meant Emperor Obummer would have had to support an actual liberal, something he appears unable to do.

Posted by: TCinLA on October 29, 2009 at 11:20 AM | PERMALINK

Look up H.R. 3183 and tell us how Bayh voted. This vote was only two weeks ago.

Posted by: flounder on October 29, 2009 at 12:27 PM | PERMALINK

According to David Plouffe's new book, Obama's veep pick finalists were Biden and Bayh.

So next time Biden makes some stupid gaffe, we should all be happy and say, 'Well at least he's not anti-middle-class like Bayh'.

Posted by: Ohioan on October 29, 2009 at 12:44 PM | PERMALINK

Look up H.R. 3183 and tell us how Bayh voted. -flounder

Aye.

Posted by: doubtful on October 29, 2009 at 2:14 PM | PERMALINK

The senate of the United States is a fraud.

Posted by: rbe1 on October 29, 2009 at 4:50 PM | PERMALINK
Post a comment









Remember personal info?










 

 
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM

Understanding REDD Washington Monthly/New America Event


Watch Byron Dorgan Video & Read His 1994 Article


2009 College Guide & Rankings






Search Now:
In Association with Amazon.com


Place Your Link Here

---Paid Advertisements---

Slimming and diet pills

Free Credit Score

Addiction Treatment

Personal Loan

Payday Loans

Personal Loans

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs

Credit Cards & Debt Consolidation

Vacation Rentals