November 1, 2009
A COMPELLING SALES PITCH MIGHT NOT CUT IT.... We learned on Monday that the Senate health care reform bill will include a public option. We learned on Tuesday that a contingent within the Senate Democratic caucus may not be willing to stomach public-private competition, even for a small segment of the population.
The Hill reports that some reform advocates think they can change skeptics' minds.
Though public option supporters have not secured commitments from the 60 senators they need to even begin debating the healthcare reform bill on the Senate floor, they are just a few votes shy and believe their reticent colleagues can be brought around with reassurances that the proposal on the table already meets their demands.
"I've spent a lot of time talking to the moderate members about what a level-playing field public option is and I think as they learn about it, they become more and more relieved," said Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), a prominent supporter of the public option. [...]
"As the members learn the details of what's in it, they're going to see that it is a true attempt to be a level playing field, not some covert way of getting single-payer, which as you know is what the right-wing drumbeat has been, and they're going to be very comfortable with it," Schumer said.
Richard Kirsch, the national campaign manager of Health Care for America Now, added, "A lot of things that people are objecting to, isn't necessarily what's being proposed in the Senate."
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) added, "Once the actual text of the bill is out, I think we'll be able to successfully make the case to Sen. Lieberman that there is not a subsidy here and that it is not an entitlement."
This sure does sound great, doesn't it? All we have to do is sit Nelson, Lieberman, Lincoln, and Landrieu (let's call them N3L) down, explain to them what the policy is, what it would do, and why their specific concerns have already been addressed. Once they get all the facts, the argument goes, everything will work out fine.
Maybe, maybe not. This approach is predicated on the assumption that the N3L quartet are simply confused. The only thing stopping them from reaching the right conclusion is uncertainty driven by a misunderstanding.
But I'm not convinced N3L is comprised of dumb senators -- these four have been around for a long while; they've been part of the health care debate for years; and they've had ample time to learn the basics. The problem isn't a lack of information; it's a lack of will. After watching Joe Lieberman change his mind a half-dozen times on why he opposes the idea, one starts to wonder if he'll really be swayed by reason.
Some of these center-right skeptics are excessively concerned about shielding insurance companies from competition; some are worried about public misperceptions; and some just aren't committed to reform. But as much as I'd love to believe a presentation of facts and reason will turn them around, it's likely to take a lot more than a compelling sales pitch.
—Steve Benen 10:45 AM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (28)
Oh, ya think?
Posted by: Dancer on November 1, 2009 at 10:55 AM | PERMALINK
happy talk kabuki..
what these 4 'stoopid' puppet senators need is to be threatened within an inch of their political lives that they will be buried alive in their next election unless they loose the grip of the medical insurance thug-money from their decision-making.
Posted by: neill on November 1, 2009 at 10:55 AM | PERMALINK
Good post, Steve. You should re-run it during the week, so more see it.
Posted by: Go, Sestak! on November 1, 2009 at 11:02 AM | PERMALINK
Shouldn't it be NL3?
Posted by: ColoZ on November 1, 2009 at 11:04 AM | PERMALINK
these 4 senators already know their supposed concerns are addressed in the bill. Either they're angling for something more, or they will flat-out never be interested in real reform and will latch on to any reason besides "we're obstructionist douchebags." What makes it lose-lose is that, by latching on to so many different & false reasons why they won't support the bill, it potentially gives their constituents cause for concern - my, there must be a lot wrong with this bill - making these senators not only obstructionist douche bags but lying scumbags as well.
Posted by: slappy magoo on November 1, 2009 at 11:09 AM | PERMALINK
OK, I realize it may be my own naivete, but isn't knowing what's in the bill the least we can expect of a Senator? Isn't it a bit insulting to suggest that the reason these people are against it is that they have no idea what's in it?
I mean, sure they've made comments that criticized it for things that aren't in it, but do people believe they really don't know better? I mean, I generally trust Senator Whitehouse, so maybe he's right. But wow, it really says something pathetic about the quality/laziness/stupidity of those misguided Senators, doesn't it?
(And Joltin' Joe's just makin' stuff up to disguise his desire to join the GOP. You can't convince me otherwise about him.)
Posted by: biggerbox on November 1, 2009 at 11:10 AM | PERMALINK
GOOD for Jarrett telling that piece of wasted space (George W on TWWGS) to wait for final analysis WHEN there is a FINAL BILL!!!! The pre-judging, opining, whining, lying, obfuscation (love that word - I know I'm being redundant), and misinforming has done the process NO GOOD and will ultimately probably derail any real opportunity for meaningful health care reform...thereby DEFEATING that "not-white" guy in the WH as REPUGS want to do...AMERICA and the PEOPLE be damned!
Posted by: Dancer on November 1, 2009 at 11:10 AM | PERMALINK
Senators who oppose the public option on grounds of unfair competition should be asked to square the circle that is the CBO analysis: they estimate that the premiums for the PO will be greater than your average private ins. premium.
That's right: the PO is going to be more expensive than your average private insurance plan. See Ezra Klein's analysis/comments on this score.
Posted by: Comrade Jake on November 1, 2009 at 11:11 AM | PERMALINK
yeah, just great. we will PROVE to you that our bill is a sham that entranches the insurance predators even further in our lives...
Posted by: sue on November 1, 2009 at 11:17 AM | PERMALINK
What will work best for Lincoln is to have it explained by thousands of her so-called "constituents" that they'll be voting for someone else if she doesn't support cloture. She's already heard from this one. There's no amount of explaination from fellow senators that will make her understand what she is being paid very well by Blue Cross/Blue Shield to not understand. Ms. Pacman really only "understands" anything when there is a large check attached - or fear.
Posted by: Jennifer on November 1, 2009 at 11:30 AM | PERMALINK
Now that CBO has said that these basic bills can reduce the deficit, is reconciliation even a remote possibility?
Posted by: jhm on November 1, 2009 at 11:30 AM | PERMALINK
Watching Lieberman change his justifications concerning health care is like watching Bush work through his reasons-of-the-week for invading Iraq. (And for that matter for supporting his tax cut for the wealthy, first because the economy was so good, and then because it was so bad.)
Posted by: N.Wells on November 1, 2009 at 11:35 AM | PERMALINK
it's kinda funny -- funny in the holy shit! way not the ha ha way -- that thug, criminal, bought politicians can blatantly defend the completely unnecessary private insurance companies from any accountability for their massive fraud and destructive profit-making LITERALLY from the dead and dying in this country.
the fucked-up nature of this country is so obvious 1) because these monsters get away with it and are defended by paid-off elected officials; and 2) because there is no powerful authority in any institution of this land -- media, religion, education -- doing anything to shine the light on this vast corruption.
The spectacle of this year's attempt at health care reform is a sickening indictment on the vile, corrupt, monstrous collapse of democracy and decency in this country.
but, hey, whats' comin' on the teevee tonight?
Posted by: neill on November 1, 2009 at 11:37 AM | PERMALINK
Reconcilliation is the only way to actually handle this.
The CBO also said that the reforms held within this bills won't work. That's the entire basis of claiming that insurance company plans will be cheaper than the public option. The CBO is essentially stating that Rescission will continue and guaranteed issue won't exist, so Insurance companies won't have to charge more to cover the sicker patients.
Never vote for a Democrat again. At least when the Republicans were in power, the Obama sycophants had to fight. Now they lay down and make excuses for why Obama is such a shitty President.
Posted by: soullite on November 1, 2009 at 11:40 AM | PERMALINK
Lieberman's hypocrisy is so evident, and especially revolting! He condemns the minute public option as entitlement and subsidy when he himself has fed from the health insurance lobby's corporate trough his entire political career, while receiving the type of health care he wants to deny to American citizens.
Lieberman is a whirlwind of confused allegiance, a veritable who's who of political whoring! -Kevo
Posted by: kevo on November 1, 2009 at 11:41 AM | PERMALINK
There is no competition in the 'public option' at all. The rates will actually be higher in that option compared to private plans. It is a total fucking sham.
Posted by: stormskies on November 1, 2009 at 11:49 AM | PERMALINK
Here's the only message they'll ever listen to. Filibuster this, and the President, the party, and your fellow Democratic Senators will do whatever it takes to end your careers. That includes, by the way, informing companies and businesses who might be inclined to hire you as a lobbyist that that would be a good way to make powerful enemies.
The only thing these people care about is themselves. You have to make it personal.
Posted by: JMG on November 1, 2009 at 11:51 AM | PERMALINK
"Never vote for a Democrat again."
Okay, so then what is your Plan B? Fleeing the country? Holing up in a mountain cabin?
Politics is slow, messy and contradictory. Why is it that the right has much more fortitude than the left, which is all too quick to take its bat and ball and go home when things don't go as planned?
Perhaps we spend too much time in coffee houses arguing about policy and not enough time actually making it happen.
Posted by: Dr Lemming on November 1, 2009 at 11:53 AM | PERMALINK
Okay, so then what is your Plan B? Fleeing the country? Holing up in a mountain cabin?
I have no Plan B. Cursing the darkness is my full time job. Get that candle away from me.
Posted by: souldark on November 1, 2009 at 12:00 PM | PERMALINK
(let's call them N3L)
Shouldn't it be NL3? - ColoZ @ 11:04
n3anderthals who haven't seen a $ufficient $iphon prior to voting.
Posted by: Kevin on November 1, 2009 at 12:05 PM | PERMALINK
Well, looks like my sen (Bayh) has changed his mind and won't support a filibuster. Let's hope that sticks. There was a poll that showed a plurality would vote AGAINST him if he supported a fil, and maybe he remembered his dad losing a "Safe" seat (to Dan Quayle!). Plus maybe he thinks he has to put a bit of distance between himself and his wife's overlords at Wellpoint (she's gotten a million dollars as a "boardmember"-- yes, that all comes out of our premiums).
Posted by: Antial on November 1, 2009 at 12:10 PM | PERMALINK
The real reason they oppose the public option is that they are more than likely in to pocket of the health insurance industry.
Posted by: DK on November 1, 2009 at 12:53 PM | PERMALINK
The country is deeply corrupt. The Democratic party is deeply corrupt. Obama has sadly surrounded himself by the people who made the mess and listens to them -- like Summers, who is deeply corrupt.
That the press doesn't even point out the conflict of interest of both Lieberman and Bayh whose wives are shills for the health care 'industry' is just another sign of that corruption.
The country is ungovernable. And Obama doesn't have the courage to lead -- he seem enthrall to people like Emmanuel and Summers who long ago sold out.
Posted by: Artemesia on November 1, 2009 at 12:58 PM | PERMALINK
Improving HCR is necessary if they want my time, bucks and vote.
I've already sent the letter to my Representative, Senators and President to let them know I will no longer work, donate, or vote for them.
Posted by: Glen on November 1, 2009 at 1:07 PM | PERMALINK
I voted for Obama. I now know he's a coward.
He may also be a crook. I haven't decided yet.
Posted by: Econobuzz on November 1, 2009 at 3:01 PM | PERMALINK
One word: reconciliation.
Posted by: Chris on November 1, 2009 at 3:05 PM | PERMALINK
"As the members learn the details of what's in it, they're going to see that it is a true attempt to be a level playing field, not some covert way of getting single-payer, which as you know is what the right-wing drumbeat has been, and they're going to be very comfortable with it," Schumer said.
Ok, ya got that everyone? PO's biggest pusher in the Senate has confirmed that it will not bring us closer to SP.
Can you all stop drinking the PO koolaide now, and get behind real SP?
Posted by: Disputo on November 1, 2009 at 3:19 PM | PERMALINK
"There is no competition in the 'public option' at all. The rates will actually be higher in that option compared to private plans. It is a total fucking sham."
It is a fucking sham. It's all a fucking sham. Obama could have taken the fight directly to the lobbyists as he promised in his campaign. He hasn't. He hasn't had the stomach to confront them. He's got some Wall Street lobbyists right there with him.
The incoherence of all of this is staggering. We really are incapable of solving ANY major problem anymore.
Except of course if it comes to giving us poor suckers money to Wall Street or Too Big to Fail Banks.
No wonder the Tea Party set is all fired up in confusion.
Hillary would have fought this battle for Health Care to a bloody end if needed. How do we really, really, hurt Liebershit, Bayh, Lincoln, Landrieu and the other Health Care Cartel whores?
Hmm. Grayson for President in 2012? I'd like to see him call Bayh a whore. That's what we need in a President.
Posted by: manfred on November 1, 2009 at 8:43 PM | PERMALINK