Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

November 9, 2009

THAT'S WHY THEY CALL HER 'SPEAKER'.... When you listen to House members talk about House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's ability to set the legislative calendar and count votes, they speak with a certain reverence. There's an implicit understanding: the Speaker knows what she's doing.

Ezra Klein had a good item this afternoon on this point, highlighting the fact that Pelosi oversaw House passage of a cap-and-trade bill back in June.

Many considered it a huge, unforced error. The Senate wouldn't consider the bill for many months, if it ever took it up at all. Health-care reform was in full swing. And Pelosi had just forced her most vulnerable members to take an incredibly difficult vote. The House legislation would languish as it waited for the Senate, and angry House Democrats would be less willing to take a second hard vote on health-care reform.

Talking to congressional Democrats over these past few months, Pelosi's decision to push cap and trade came up in almost every conversation. Coaxing support from vulnerable members who hadn't yet forgiven the leadership for cap and trade had, according to some of these sources, become one of the biggest obstacles to health-care reform.

But health-care reform passed the House. And so, too, did cap and trade, all the way back in June, when most eyes were on health care and the Republicans hadn't yet found their voice in opposition (eight Republicans, in fact, voted for cap and trade). Pelosi's decision to move on climate change as soon as she had the votes now looks, well, a little bit genius: It's virtually impossible to imagine the House passing cap and trade in the coming months, not after the exhausting health-care reform battle and not as the midterm election draws closer.

Likewise, it's hard to imagine the House trying to pass health care reform next year, when nervous lawmakers feeling that much more jittery. But Pelosi put together a plan, stuck to it, and assembled a majority. There have been a lot of House leaders who've come and gone over the decades since health care reform became a national priority, but Nancy Pelosi is the first to actually bring a reform bill to the floor and pass it. Getting it and energy reform onto the floor and finished in the span of less than five months is no small task.

In the larger context, it helps to lead a caucus with 258 members. It gives a Speaker some leeway and room for error. Nevertheless, Pelosi doesn't have the biggest majority ever, and leading a very diverse House Democratic caucus is about as easy as herding cats. Blind, stubborn cats.

Time will tell what future cycles hold, but let no one doubt that Nancy Pelosi wields that Speaker's gavel as effectively as anyone in quite a long time.

Steve Benen 3:10 PM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (18)
 
Comments

Don't forget the fact that the house voted out all the appropriations bills - in June and July, I think, and most have at least some R votes... compared to the senate, this is really damned impressive.

Count the noses and go to vote before the snot runs ...

Posted by: bigwisc on November 9, 2009 at 3:19 PM | PERMALINK

Pelosi might be good, and I htink she is terrific -- but a genius wouldnt a'had to give into Stupak and the Stupak coathanger brigade...

Posted by: neill on November 9, 2009 at 3:24 PM | PERMALINK

I am a big admirer of Nancy Pelosi. I can't understand it when I hear Democrats bash her. I think she is amazing. She looked beautiful in her red dress the other night as I sat in the House Gallery watching the healthcare debate and voting. She does a great job and looks good doing it. I can't believe she is 67. It was a great testament to her leadership getting those bills passed. It was a wonderful feeling when the House errupted in cheers when they got to 218 votes and then again when the gavel came down.

Posted by: Patrick on November 9, 2009 at 3:25 PM | PERMALINK

I'll admit I questioned the strategy of pushing the climate bill through the House before building up public support for it. But in retrospect, it's looking like a great call, especially given how the centrist Dems are a bunch of scared rabbits.

And Pelosi's adroitness on health care has been a thing of beauty. It's really hard to see how she could have gotten 218 votes for a better bill.

Can't forget Pelosi's great response when asked when she was going to take up Social Security Deform back in 2005: "Does never work for you?"

She's become one of my heroes.

Posted by: low-tech cyclist on November 9, 2009 at 3:33 PM | PERMALINK

She is GREAT! And Steve? When everyone talks about the 'close margin' (it IS a GOP talking point) just remember that we never KNOW how close it is. That Speaker Pelosi have Dems permission to vote against the bill to save their districts is not in doubt. We just don't know how MANY got permission...but that's not as FUN as the media proclaiming...IT WAS SO CLOSE!!! NO ROOM TO SPARE!!!

Posted by: SYSPROG on November 9, 2009 at 3:46 PM | PERMALINK

One need look no further than the chronic and grotesque displays of GOP loathing to understand her effectiveness.

Posted by: Jon on November 9, 2009 at 3:49 PM | PERMALINK

jeez, where'd all these Dim congressional staffers come from???

Posted by: neill on November 9, 2009 at 3:50 PM | PERMALINK

but a genius wouldnt a'had to give into Stupak and the Stupak coathanger brigade...

1) No one called her a genius. The quote was that her decision to move on climate change as she did was "a little bit genius."

2) What would a better speaker have done about the Blue Dogs? How would that person have gotten the numbers to pass the healthcare bill? Be specific. Show your work.

Posted by: shortstop on November 9, 2009 at 3:56 PM | PERMALINK

Well said, shortstop.

Posted by: Scott F. on November 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM | PERMALINK

The climate bill is much needed, we can no longer sit back and pass on the problems to the following generation.
www.goinggreenhome.com

Posted by: going green home on November 9, 2009 at 4:21 PM | PERMALINK

can Reid just abdicate and let Pelosi run the Senate, too? I'd fell mcuh better about our chances.

Posted by: zeitgeist on November 9, 2009 at 4:30 PM | PERMALINK

I sometimes wish Reid paid more attention to Pelosi and learned from her how to actually run a legislative body. Granted, Pelosi doesn't have to deal with Lieberman, but keeping the Blue Dogs in line is no easy task.

I also appreciate Pelosi for one simple reason; her presence as the first woman ever to hold the post. Especially because it must drive the misogynists on the GOP side absolutely berzerk to have to call a woman "Madame Speaker."

Posted by: gf120581 on November 9, 2009 at 5:02 PM | PERMALINK

Nancy Pelosi is da man!! Ok, da woman but you get the general idea. We could have used her on the house floor when the Republicans were shouting down female Democratic house members.

Posted by: Winkandanod on November 9, 2009 at 5:18 PM | PERMALINK

The Speaker of the House Pelosi has more guts and political savy than most of the Democrats and Harry Reid. The GOP is afraid of her. She has gotten done what President Obama asked of her. The only bad deal she made was with the Congressman from the Upper Penn. of Michigan. He went back on his word making sure that the 26 Democrats that were allowed to vote for the Right to Life ammendment also voted for the Health Care Reform Legislation. Pelosi should bring punish him and the 26 Democrats that went back on their word. The Congressman from the UP of Michigan I guess didn't want to go back to Michigan and face all of his people that doesn't have health care of a job.

Posted by: AZWildCatsRWings on November 9, 2009 at 5:24 PM | PERMALINK

Yes I agree Pelosi is totally smart and gutsy and gets things done....it's time we either got rid of the Senate or turned it into the American version of the House of Lords.

Posted by: fred on November 9, 2009 at 5:52 PM | PERMALINK

Likewise, it's hard to imagine the House trying to pass health care reform next year, when nervous lawmakers feeling that much more jittery

I wish what I'm about to say weren't so, but this is pretty clearly an issue with moving forward on any equality legislation for LGBT people. It's an issue--and of course it shouldn't be, it's about basic rights and that ought to be that--that provokes jitters and acrimony in Congress, and Congressional jitters and acrimony compound like unpaid credit card bills.

Posted by: FlipYrWhig on November 9, 2009 at 6:21 PM | PERMALINK

What would a better speaker have done about the Blue Dogs? How would that person have gotten the numbers to pass the healthcare bill?

Yeah, with BHO and Rahm undermining him or her at every turn?

Posted by: Econobuzz on November 9, 2009 at 8:07 PM | PERMALINK

I wouldn't call Pelosi a genius, but genius isn't what's needed when you lead a majority. No, you only need what Pelosi has: a backbone and a pair of balls that His Flaccidness Harry Reid can only fantasize about. Reid wouldn't be able to get a bill passed with 99 Democrats if the lone Republican so much as hinted he'd filibuster.

Posted by: bluestatedon on November 10, 2009 at 12:53 AM | PERMALINK
Post a comment









Remember personal info?










 

 
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM

View Understanding REDD


2009 College Guide & Rankings


Watch Byron Dorgan Video & Read His 1994 Article






Search Now:
In Association with Amazon.com


Place Your Link Here

---Paid Advertisements---

Flowers

Slimming and diet pills

Free Credit Score

Addiction Treatment

Personal Loan

Payday Loans

Personal Loans

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs

Credit Cards & Debt Consolidation

Vacation Rentals