November 20, 2009
CLOTURE WATCH.... Senate Democrats need 60 votes to bring health care reform to the floor for a debate. As of this morning, three Dems -- Ben Nelson (Neb.), Mary Landrieu (La.), and Blanche Lincoln (Ark.) -- had not yet committed to letting the Senate consider the legislation.
As of this afternoon, one of the three made the right call: Nelson will vote with the majority. In a statement, the conservative Democrat concluded:
"In my first reading, I support parts of the bill and oppose others I will work to fix. If that's not possible, I will oppose the second cloture motion -- needing 60 votes -- to end debate, and oppose the final bill.
"But I won't slam the doors of the Senate in the face of Nebraskans now. They want the health care system fixed. The Senate owes them a full and open debate to try to do so."
Nelson may, in other words, slam the doors of the Senate in the face of Nebraskans some other time, just not tomorrow night.
Landrieu hasn't made any official announcements, but she made some comments that suggest she's already looking ahead to the next stage of the debate. "I have leverage now, I'm using it to the best of my ability, I'm going to use it on the Senate floor," Landrieu said. If the senator doesn't think the bill is going to the Senate floor, she probably wouldn't say this.
Lincoln continues to be the most cryptic of the group. Earlier today, Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) told reporters that Lincoln had told Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) how she intends to vote. Lincoln's office quickly said that wasn't the case, and that the senator was still reviewing the bill.
Truth be told, especially after Nelson's statement, it's hard to imagine a lone Democratic senator siding with Republicans to block a debate on health care reform, effectively strangling reform in the crib. But when center-right Dems feel panicky, they become unpredictable.
—Steve Benen 1:30 PM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (12)
Meanwhile, there are signs that the senate bill itself is setup with little spiderholes for hidin' little delights for the medical insurance corporations...
Posted by: neill on November 20, 2009 at 1:49 PM | PERMALINK
There's just something inherently wrong with a system that allows a few people to not only have the power to deny debate of a bill, but to also have the power to thwart the will of a clear majority in denying a vote for cloture (i.e., a vote to allow a vote).
There's got to be a better way or, more correctly, a way to get there that doesn't require the very people who comprise the body in question to vote against their own power to make things right.
Posted by: terraformer on November 20, 2009 at 1:49 PM | PERMALINK
The Honorable Senators on the left side of the aisle need to be reminded a vote to carry out debate in the highest legislative body of our nation is a vote to reinforce more than 200 years of our representative democratic heritage. A vote with the Republicans at 8:00 eastern time on Saturday is a vote against small r and small d reprentative democracy.
The party of No needs to be challenged in the same way: Republicans need to be shown the wisdom of allowing a debate so they can articulate to the rest of us in the nation from the well of the Senate what their ideas are to fix the broken status quo!
This may be an insurmountable challenge as most Republicans have no ideas save the ones delivered to them in talking points form from the insurance gianst who are grotesquely profiteering on the fear and anxiety of common Americans of all strips! The world will be watching! -Kevo
Posted by: kevo on November 20, 2009 at 1:53 PM | PERMALINK
Let these attention whores vote against cloture. They'll get lots of attention, all right, and it will all be negative. If they truly want to see what a shitstorm feels like, then bring it!
I'm tired of hearing about these a**holes.
Posted by: bdop4 on November 20, 2009 at 2:05 PM | PERMALINK
Where is Lieberman on this. I haven't seen his committment, but I'm assuming from the 60 count here that he is for cloture to introduce.
Posted by: mburke on November 20, 2009 at 2:23 PM | PERMALINK
1. The fact that Collins and especially Snowe are in the party of no camp says volumes about how ultimately craven they are. Snowe voted a bill out of committee, and now she doesn't want a floor debate? What are they supposed to do - keep it in the hallway?
2. And, does all the angst mean that for some future bill, if some R wants a debate, on anything, the D's cannot hold a 60 vote group together to restrict their bills? That is, the D's cannot threaten a quid pro quo in the future a block on some R-supported piece of crap? OR do the R's even bring bills forward? It it because Lierberdork, or Nelson, cannot be whipped on a vote to prevent other bills?
Posted by: bigwisc on November 20, 2009 at 3:04 PM | PERMALINK
Snowe voted a bill out of committee, and now she doesn't want a floor debate? What are they supposed to do - keep it in the hallway? -- bigwisc, @ 15:04
Bathroom; keep it in the bathroom.
Posted by: exlibra on November 20, 2009 at 3:10 PM | PERMALINK
Joe Lieberman isn't really a mystery. His name says it all.
Liebe: A German word for love, if memory serves.
r: "R" stands for republican.
man: Man, or men (plural).
If you put it all together, you have Joe loves republican men (like John McCain or George Bush, which explains the kiss). It all makes sense in a Glenn Beck kind of way.
Posted by: Broken Arrow on November 20, 2009 at 6:58 PM | PERMALINK
At this point, I can only conclude that Reid actually supports the GOP. I really don't think he is so stupid that he doesn't understand how to use parliamentary tactics to undercut the obstructionists, or to support his party's agenda. He couldn't have become the majority leader if he didn't know how to work the rules.
He could put an end to this with just a bit of effort, and he must know that. Instead, he lets it continue. The only reasonable conclusion is that he supports it.
Posted by: Shade Tail on November 20, 2009 at 8:55 PM | PERMALINK
Now, Blanchie is in a bit of a quandry. On one hand, the people and common sense are telling her to vote for health care reform and are threatening her job if she doesn't.
On the other hand, Arkansas Blue Cross and every other big medical interest in Arkansas is telling Blanche that she had better not vote for health care reform or she won't get her dream job as a lobbyist.
What's a girl to do!
Posted by: Brenda Helverson on November 21, 2009 at 1:13 AM | PERMALINK
Thank you, Broken Arrow. The Name Game has truly outed Joe the Blow(hard).
Posted by: Sarah Barracuda on November 22, 2009 at 12:14 AM | PERMALINK
Lots of talk tonight from Mary and Blanche about "exchanges."
And re small businesses being able to buy from exchanges.
Funny, but I'm kind of with them. Requiring businesses to buy health insurance, and NOT allowing them to buy from a "public option" is BAD.
Allowing small businesses and the self-employed to buy from exchanges would, it seems to me, to make many, many customers available to exchanges.
Posted by: Sarah Barracuda on November 22, 2009 at 12:25 AM | PERMALINK