Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

November 21, 2009

OBAMA IN ASIA.... All week, administration officials have expressed a great deal of satisfaction with President Obama's trip to Asia. And all week, U.S. reporters have told the country that the trip has been unproductive and unsuccessful. It's probably worth taking a moment to note who's right.

For its part, the White House seems genuinely pleased. In the president's weekly address, Obama touted the importance of the trip, and explained why his efforts in Asia will pay dividends domestically. "I traveled to Asia to open a new era of American engagement," the president said, before pointing to progress on national security, climate change, human rights, trade, and economic development.

Likewise, U.S. Ambassador to China Jon Huntsman, the former Republican governor of Utah, explained yesterday that there's been an important disconnect between U.S. media reports on the trip and reality. "I attended all those meetings that President Obama had with Hu Jintao and Wen Jiabao," Huntsman said, referring to the Chinese president and premier. "I've got to say some of the reporting I saw afterward was off the mark. I saw sweeping comments about things that apparently weren't talked about, when they were discussed in great detail in the meetings."

James Fallows noted this morning:

Two colleagues with different perspectives -- from each other's, and sometimes from my own -- marvel at how badly the mainstream American press distorted the picture of what happened during Barack Obama's just-ended tour of Asia. [...]

We're all familiar with one "crisis of the press," the business collapse. This is a different kind of crisis, though it makes the business crisis worse: the distortion of reality by compressing every complex issue into the narrative of the DC-based "horse race."

Fallows quoted one journalist, with extensive experience covering foreign policy, saying, "Even through a veil of censorship and propaganda, the Chinese people managed a clearer view of Obama's visit than the U.S. media did."

But just think of how many fascinating reports there were this week on Obama bowing!

Please.

As far as I can tell, U.S. political reporters covering the trip looked at this as if it were a campaign. The notion that the president may have been laying the diplomatic groundwork for future progress was completely lost, and incremental progress was ignored.

This was an important week for the administration. It's a shame we don't have a media establishment equipped to report on it.

Steve Benen 10:30 AM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (13)
 
Comments

Interesting contrast: China's deliberate party censorship versus good old American journalistic infantilism and incompetence...

i like it...

Whatta country!

Posted by: neill on November 21, 2009 at 10:38 AM | PERMALINK

American journalism has decided the way to save itself is by adopting the platform of the tabloid press and Jerry Springer style interviews. Forcing the complex and nuanced issues of the contemporary world into a platform designed for celebrity daliances results in the train wreck we are subjected to on a daily basis.

Posted by: DTR on November 21, 2009 at 10:59 AM | PERMALINK

Steve,

There is a diary up at dailykos that has a couple of sentences that nail the current state of our political and media discourse.
Sadly, I felt the same way during the campaign. Fast forward, and the political discourse is worse than ever.

Post by rennert at dailykos.com says....

I honestly don't know how America can continue to govern itself in any kind of responsible way when:

One of the two political parties thrives on hysteria and misinformation and has no interest in actually governing.

The news media assists in this and does not see truth-telling or correcting misinformation as part of its role.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/11/20/192619/60

Posted by: Ladyhawke on November 21, 2009 at 11:06 AM | PERMALINK

And we wonder why newspapers and other sources of mainstream journalism are having troubles figuring out how to survive. I have a hint: do your frickin' job.

Posted by: Jack Lindahl on November 21, 2009 at 11:17 AM | PERMALINK

"It's a shame we don't have a media establishment equipped to report on it".

It's a shame we don't have a congress equipped to enforce anti-trust laws - in banking, in insurance, in media, etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc.

Posted by: Chopin on November 21, 2009 at 12:12 PM | PERMALINK

Our main stream media really has gone down the shitter hasn't it. Thank God for organizations like Salon, Kos and Washington Monthly. CNN is completely unwatchable these day except to watch a space shuttle launch.

Posted by: Patrick on November 21, 2009 at 12:23 PM | PERMALINK

And even then, I would rather hear Jay Barbree on MSNBC report on a space launch. So CNN is completely worthless FoxLite.

Posted by: Patrick on November 21, 2009 at 12:24 PM | PERMALINK

My local news show ran a segment yesterday headlining Obama going "back to work." Apparently because he was overseas, he must have been on vacation, rather than, oh, doing his frickin' job. Idiots.

Posted by: Redshift on November 21, 2009 at 1:43 PM | PERMALINK

On the general topic of the MSM coverage of the Obama Presidency: since the election 2 weeks ago it has been repeatedly asserted that Republican victories in 2 governor races and in some local government elections demonstrate that "Obama has no coatails." For example, in tomorrow's NYT Magazine a Matt Bai piece on Obama has a subtitle that begins: "The President may not have coatails...."
My understanding of the 'coatail' concept has always been that it is a measure of a presidential candidate's ability to draw a higher percentage of the vote in congressional districts than the congressional candidate of his party and that the more districts in which this is done the greater the 'coatails' effect.
http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/article.php?id=FRC2009041601
So why is the MSM talking about Obama's lack of coatails in an election where he was not on the ballot and which was not even an off year Congressional election? Of course I know he campaigned for Corzine and NJ is generally considered a blue state, but his inability to overcome Corzine's weakness is hardly a measue of his ownj vote getting ability. Am I missing something here or is this just another example of how some/many are raising the bar for measuring Obama's performance?

Posted by: robert on November 21, 2009 at 2:15 PM | PERMALINK

I contrasted Katie Couric with both BBC World News America and PBS Newshour one day this week. Was appalled at the negative spin from Couric, so much that I'm not going to watch her anymore. The other two were much more fair and went into some interesting details that was not on the CBS show. To listen to Katie, the President's trip was a total waste of time. I feel insulted to be given such a slanted and broad-brushed report.

Posted by: Ginny on November 21, 2009 at 2:59 PM | PERMALINK

As someone who grew up in "communist" Poland -- where the media were under the total control of the government and where we had to try and catch the radio signal late at night in order to find a different point of view -- I've always envied "the West" its media's freedom to say whatever they wanted to, so that the population could get the whole picture, instead of the screened half. But it seems that, although you ave it, you don't value it enough to use it. Sigh... What a waste of freedom :)

Posted by: exlibra on November 21, 2009 at 4:21 PM | PERMALINK

It's beginning to seem to me that the MSM's only interest is 2012 and accordingly, they are doing all they can to make Pres. Obama seem ineffectual. Even as I write this many of you will say duh? The corporate media coverage of Obama's Asia trip was willful misinformation and as much as I appreciate the more nuanced and accurate reports on Daily Kos, PBS Evening News, etc., these sources do not reach enough citizens. Don't know the answer, but I do believe we need to see more forceful and frequent push back from the White House and more effective clear speaking surrogates for the president on Cable News and main stream news broadcasts.

Posted by: Kathryn on November 22, 2009 at 10:25 AM | PERMALINK

How are you. Better shun the bait, than struggle in the snare. Help me! I find sites on the topic: Zolpidem canada. I found only this - low cost zolpidem 10 mg. Zolpidem, due, some medications may be increased also. Ever, illegal country and week has bombarded the relatives that ambien can be developed by jurisdictions, zolpidem. Best regards :o, Winfred from Republic.

Posted by: Winfred on February 20, 2010 at 3:49 PM | PERMALINK
Post a comment









Remember personal info?










 

 

Editor/Reporter Search


Watch the Video -- Read the Report

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM

Contribute to Washington Monthly


View Understanding REDD




buy from Amazon and
support the Monthly


Place Your Link Here

--- Links ---

Loans

Moving Companies

International call for FREE

Engagement Rings

Promotional Products

Flowers

Slimming and diet pills

Loans

Personal Loan

Personal Loans

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs

Credit Cards & Debt Consolidation

Vacation Rentals