Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

November 23, 2009

WHEN AND WHY DID LINCOLN CHANGE HER MIND?.... Back in July, we talked about an op-ed Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D) of Arkansas wrote for the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette. It wasn't perfect, but the center-right senator struck some encouraging notes:

Individuals should be able to choose from a range of quality health insurance plans. Options should include private plans as well as a quality, affordable public plan or non-profit plan that can accomplish the same goals as those of a public plan. [...]

Unfortunately, opponents of reform, who have no real plan for improving health care, are already using the tired arguments of the past. They say that Congress is trying to create "more government" or a "Washington takeover" of health care, which will raise your taxes, get between you and your doctor, and eliminate private insurance. It's a strategy that spreads misinformation and generates fear to preserve the status quo. Arkansans should not be misled by those who oppose real reform.

Of course, that was several months ago, before Teabaggers went berserk in August. But as Igor Volsky noted, as recently as yesterday, Lincoln's own website argued, "Individuals should be able to choose from a range of quality health insurance plans. Options should include private plans as well as a quality, affordable public plan or non-profit plan that can accomplish the same goals of a public plan."

That was the senator's official position a day after Lincoln stood on the floor of the Senate, "promising" to join a Republican filibuster of health care reform "as long as a government-run public option is included" in the bill.

After Volsky's post, Lincoln's office changed the senator's official position, scrubbing the page of any references to allowing consumers to choose among competing plans.

But given that the reasoning behind Lincoln's conservative position on reform has gone largely overlooked, perhaps, the next time the senator is addressing reporters, someone can ask her, "So, why were you for giving consumers the choice of a public option before you were against it?"

Steve Benen 10:45 AM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (18)
 
Comments

I hope someone is following the money on this one.

Posted by: rabbit on November 23, 2009 at 10:57 AM | PERMALINK

Yeah, someone can ask her that...and a lot more. But of course they won't. They are all working for the same company, they all have the same script.

If there was real journalism instead of corporate journamalism, there could be a huge headline, screenshots, queries, mocking humiliating humor...shame, guilt, forced accountability...

instead, here we are in the tiny type sayin'

HEY, LOOKIE, BLANCHE LINCOLN IS AN ASSHOLE!!1!!

Posted by: neill on November 23, 2009 at 10:59 AM | PERMALINK

I just don't follow Lincoln's political strategy on this. If the Arkansas voters want a Democrat, why is she acting like a Republican? And if they want a Republican, why would they vote for a Democrat who is acting like a Republican? It makes no sense.

Posted by: Jack Lindahl on November 23, 2009 at 11:03 AM | PERMALINK

Hmm... I read blogs on a similar topic, but i never visited your blog. I added it to favorites and i'll be your constant reader.

Posted by: Bunker on November 23, 2009 at 11:03 AM | PERMALINK

One can also contribute to TV ads against her:

http://www.actblue.com/page/healthcarechoice

Posted by: rabbit on November 23, 2009 at 11:03 AM | PERMALINK

Odds are she is going down next year regardless of how she votes due to the political climate, state of the economy, and the fact she represents a blood red state. Therefore why doesn't she just do the right thing and vote for cloture (at least) so the rest of the caucus can pass a bill with a public option by majority vote? If instead she either joins the Republican filibuster or forces removal of the public option, then good riddance to her and let's hope that Landrieu, Nelson, and Lieberman follow closely behind out the door should they persist in acting like asses too.

Posted by: Ron E. on November 23, 2009 at 11:10 AM | PERMALINK

Her corporate masters told her to change.

Posted by: Obama Won on Change on November 23, 2009 at 11:14 AM | PERMALINK

Lincoln is simply pathetic. She is somebody's tool, the only question is, who is actually pulling the strings today.

As a political or re-election strategy, all she has done is make a spectacle of herself, making it less likely that anybody who really cares about the issue (pro or con) would vote for her.

Too craven to vote her conscience, she is simply not worthy of trust by anybody.

And to think she went around Arkansas trumpeting her faith as a basis for her commitment to the welfare of her constituents.

She's the main reason I told the guy from the DSCC that I was waiting to see how HCR turned out before I would renew my donations. I don't want any of my money going to support her at this point.

Posted by: Barbara on November 23, 2009 at 11:21 AM | PERMALINK

It's not like her constituents in Arkansas need better healthcare coverage. Oh, except for all of these people: http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_11/021118.php

Posted by: Basilisc on November 23, 2009 at 11:22 AM | PERMALINK

I had some hope that Democrats may have learned the right lessons from the campaign when Tim Kaine talked about Creigh Deeds loss:

In a meeting with editors and reporters of the Washington Post, Kaine (D) said Deeds squandered the opportunity to sell his own appealing life story as a guy who had overcome long odds and economic disadvantage. Instead, the rural state senator took the advice of campaign consultants who wrongly assumed Deeds's Democratic support was solid and believed he should instead focus on wooing independents by attacking Republican Robert F. McDonnell.

"After the [June] primary was done, his advisers basically said, distance yourself from the president. We think we have our base locked down, we've got to win independents. And we're going to win by being negative about McDonnell," Kaine said. "That was the basic strategy they pursued, despite some significant urging to the contrary."

Asked about his own advice to Deeds, who lost to McDonnell on Nov. 3 by 17 percentage points, Kaine said: "I'd rather not talk about my personal conversations. But what I will say is that I always believed from the very beginning that the paradigm in Virginia had changed and that the way to win the race was to energize voters who had demonstrated they would vote for Democrats. That I did advise him very, very early. I advised all the candidates, prior to the primary, that was a path to victory."

I guess Lincoln is going down the failed Creigh Deeds path. Well, good luck with that one. If Lincoln kills the public option she'll manage to unite Democrats and Republicans in opposition against her.

Posted by: Unstable Isotope on November 23, 2009 at 11:33 AM | PERMALINK

Pie meet face...

Benen: After Volsky's post, Lincoln's office changed the senator's official position, scrubbing the page of any references to allowing consumers to choose among competing plans.

Joe's acerbic puss fairly begs for a lemmon pie...
But what flavor does Blanche deserve?

All comedy aside...

Using Occam's razor there is really only one way to explain the behavior of Lieberman and Lincoln: They have been promised a ton of money under the table. I suspect its several millions to each of them. A truly substantial sum that will make both their families never have to worry again. The money will be put aside, and will be secretly transferred to them years from now.


Posted by: koreyel on November 23, 2009 at 11:39 AM | PERMALINK

Lincoln has been trying to straddle the issue, but now she will have to pick a side.

As was mentioned, if she goes the Creigh Deeds path, she's gonna lose to a Republican.

Posted by: Joe Friday on November 23, 2009 at 12:01 PM | PERMALINK

Joe Lieberman is certainly a factor.

After all, "he is with us on everything but the war."

Posted by: AlphaLiberal on November 23, 2009 at 12:25 PM | PERMALINK

Isn't WalMart based in Arkasas? How much will it cost WalMart to pay for it's employees health care or to pay the tax if even part time employees are included?

I wonder what changed Blanche Linclon's mind about the bill?

Aren't there alot if insurance companies based in CT?
I wonder why Lieberman would risk his career to derail this bill?

I wonder if it is possible to pay attention to politics today without becoming completely cynical?

Posted by: atlliberal on November 23, 2009 at 12:48 PM | PERMALINK

She just needs to tell her redneck voters that she forced the other Dems to make their plan more conservative. It doesn't matter what the specific issue is. Public option is in the news, so that's it.

Posted by: anon on November 23, 2009 at 2:45 PM | PERMALINK

"So, why were you for giving consumers the choice of a public option before you were against it?"

Why was she for it WHILE she was against it?

Posted by: Ross Best on November 23, 2009 at 3:05 PM | PERMALINK

Walton family money will take care of former-Senator Blanche Lincoln in 2011. Watch her take a well paying position at University of Arkansas. The university will be happy to launder the funds and get a distinguished guest lecturer.

And who knows, she could probably pick up some "lobbying" on the side as a "second job".

None of these perks of former-Senatedom are as predictably assured if BLL makes a "vote of conscience" to implement HCR over the wishes of industry. (Most politicians have a "conscience" but actual existence of a conscience -- sans quote marks -- is not so regularly seen in ConservaDems.)

Posted by: fred on November 23, 2009 at 5:29 PM | PERMALINK

Blanche Lincoln hasn't got a prayer in her next election. Even if she voted to sustain a GOP filibuster and voted against HCR in final passage, whatever mouth-breather the GOP puts up against her in Arkansas next year will accuse her of everything from Communism to Satanism and she'll be clobbered.
Either:
a. she's too dumb to realize this and thinks shifting right will get her re-elected (not likely)
b. she opposes the public option out of honest conviction (yeah, sure)
c. the insurance industry has promised to make a generous contribution to her retirement fund (bingo!)

Posted by: Chaim Rosemarin on November 23, 2009 at 6:50 PM | PERMALINK
Post a comment









Remember personal info?










 

 

Watch the Video -- Read the Report

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM

Contribute to Washington Monthly


View Understanding REDD




buy from Amazon and
support the Monthly


Place Your Link Here

--- Links ---

Loans

Moving Companies

International call for FREE

Engagement Rings

Promotional Products

Flowers

Slimming and diet pills

Free Credit Score

Personal Loan

Personal Loans

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs

Credit Cards & Debt Consolidation

Vacation Rentals