November 27, 2009
SEEING THE ASIA TRIP IN A NEW LIGHT.... During and after President Obama's week-long trip to Asia, major U.S. media outlets were dismissive and derisive about the effort. Political reporters insisted the administration hadn't actually gained anything, and by coming home empty-handed, the president had wasted his time.
White House officials have been frustrated by the media's spin, insisting that the trip would pay dividends. The Atlantic's James Fallows has been a leading critic of American outlets' coverage of the diplomatic efforts.
Yesterday, Fallows followed up, noting more "evidence of failure" in the wake of the president's excursion.
Today in the NYT: "China Joins U.S. in Pledge of Hard Targets on Emissions"
Today in the Washington Post: "China's backing on Iran followed dire predictions; Before Obama's visit, NSC warned leaders of Mideast turmoil"
Today in the (state run) China Daily: "Mainland may pull some missiles.... Beijing might consider removing a portion of its missile arsenal in South China, a long-held precondition by Taiwan for peaceful cross-Straits ties, a mainland expert said Wednesday."
Today also in the China Daily: "DPRK top leader meets visiting Chinese defense minister"
Along with the failure indicated yesterday, also in the China Daily: "RMB rate fine-tuning is possible"
If we're lucky, the Obama administration will have plenty more "failures" like these in the coming years.
—Steve Benen 8:35 AM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (12)
Sadly, no matter how the China trip plays out, the MSLP will continue to call it a failure.
AND, according to the MSLP, Obama's next trip is already a failure. They just have to wait for it to happen to print the obituary.
Posted by: Mark-NC on November 27, 2009 at 8:46 AM | PERMALINK
Except Republicans don't believe in global warming so China's deal doesn't make any difference...until they wipe out our wind turbine and solar cell industries.
Posted by: art hackett on November 27, 2009 at 8:55 AM | PERMALINK
Viva Obama?
Well, OK.
But let me ask you, Benen: Do you plan to join the army and request duty as a combat infantryman in Afghanistan?
Posted by: JW on November 27, 2009 at 9:03 AM | PERMALINK
Next up: the mainstream media complains about the improper way Obama ties his shoelaces. Film at 11.
Posted by: PaulW on November 27, 2009 at 9:08 AM | PERMALINK
Pres. Obama is doing what he can despite his critics! He is thoughtful, engaging and has shown a quiet diplomacy some of these current media types are not familiar with. The media has become the message, and is merely preserving what it thinks is best for it!
Touche to journalists like James Fallows! What a better informed nation we'd be if more reporters could do their jobs with a bit more sobriety! -Kevo
Posted by: kevo on November 27, 2009 at 9:25 AM | PERMALINK
I look forward with hedged hopes that the ostracization of non villager opinion has become less fashionable , but I don't think so .
Posted by: FRP on November 27, 2009 at 9:44 AM | PERMALINK
Mr. Benen, I'm surprised at you.
Correlation is not causation.
Just because all this terrific international diplomacy happened at the same time as Obama's visit doesn't mean he was responsible for any of it.
In fact, it's probably best that you should assume that nothing good that happens for the next four years can possibly be a result of any Democrat.
Accepting this is a whole lot easier than all this reading you must be doing to come up with these controversial opinions you keep spouting.
Three words of advice: Watch more TV.
Posted by: toowearyforoutrage on November 27, 2009 at 10:23 AM | PERMALINK
From the NYT article on China's global warming emissions policy:
The Chinese propose, by 2020, to reduce so-called carbon intensity — or the amount of carbon dioxide emitted per unit of economic output — by 40 to 45 percent compared with 2005 levels. By that measure, emissions would still increase, though the rate would slow. That falls far short of what many in Europe and other nations had hoped for — an increase in energy efficiency of at least 50 percent.
Analysts said the Chinese offer might take some of the pressure off the United States, which is offering to reduce the total tonnage of its greenhouse gas emissions “in the range of” 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020 and 83 percent by 2050. But now China seems to be offering almost no deviation from its business-as-usual path, a more troubling development to some.
Yes indeed, that sure sounds like a whole lot of success to me, yeppers.
Posted by: TCinLA on November 27, 2009 at 12:00 PM | PERMALINK
"...that sure sounds like a whole lot of success to me, yeppers." TCinLA @ 12:00 PM.
Yup, those durn Chinese are just going to throw the rest of the world under the bus!
The Chinese are planning to cut their production of carbon emissions by 40-45% by 2020 for all their manufacturing and you find that a failure? Short of halving their population, just what do you offer to the Chinese government and people to produce a better result? Or the rest of us, for that matter.
Dolt.
Posted by: Doug on November 27, 2009 at 4:31 PM | PERMALINK
Doug, how do you not understand the Chinese pledge will play absolutely no role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions - something the U.S. will promise at Copenhagen - and is therefore essentially meaningless? Beyond meaningless, in that Chinese emissions will increase. Clearly you are the dolt.
Posted by: bbbb on November 27, 2009 at 6:47 PM | PERMALINK
The draft, which was originally prepared by China, was finalized after some changes during a 7-hour long meeting of BASIC countries-Brazil, South Africa, India and China besides Sudan as the chair of G-77.
This joint front forged on Saturday is a major political initiative -- the first major India-China accord on international affairs--that is likely to impact not just the dimension of the talks on climate change but international diplomacy as a whole. The move comes after recent discussions on climate change held with Indian and Chinese leaders by US president Barack Obama, who appears to have made little impact on them.
Posted by: Neo on November 30, 2009 at 1:18 PM | PERMALINK
Hi everyone. You can't deny laughter. When it comes, it plops down in your favorite chair and stays as long as it wants. Help me! Looking for sites on: Colon surgery with plavix. I found only this - plavix side effects reactions. Consultation has been a need weight to guiding of the installer results limiting our glass, plavix. Blood: n't 80 studies will be mediated from the united states for this fuel, plavix. With love :eek:, Pepin from Sao.
Posted by: Pepin on March 12, 2010 at 11:39 AM | PERMALINK