Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

November 29, 2009

TORA BORA.... Towards the end of the 2004 presidential campaign, John Kerry tried to raise public awareness of an issue Americans hadn't heard much about. In December 2001, the U.S. had pinned down Osama bin Laden in the mountains of Tora Bora, but the Bush administration decided not to send additional troops.

George W. Bush, just two weeks before Election Day, was incensed by the criticism, and tried to characterize this as attacks on the military. "Now my opponent is throwing out the wild claim that he knows where bin Laden was in the fall of 2001 -- and that our military had a chance to get him in Tora Bora," the then-president said. "This is an unjustified and harsh criticism of our military commanders in the field."

It was an odd thing to say. Far from being a "wild claim," the Bush administration itself came to the same conclusion Kerry did -- two years beforehand.

Five years later, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, which Kerry now chairs, has completed a thorough analysis of the national security failure, documenting for history exactly what transpired.

The report, based in part on a little-noticed 2007 history of the Tora Bora episode by the military's Special Operations Command, asserts that the consequences of not sending American troops in 2001 to block Mr. bin Laden's escape into Pakistan are still being felt.

The report blames the lapse for "laying the foundation for today's protracted Afghan insurgency and inflaming the internal strife now endangering Pakistan." [...]

The showdown at Tora Bora, a mountainous area dotted with caves in eastern Afghanistan, pitted a modest force of American Special Operations and C.I.A. officers, along with allied Afghan fighters, against a force of about 1,000 Qaeda fighters led by Mr. bin Laden. [...]

The new report suggests that a larger troop commitment to Afghanistan might have resulted in the demise not only of Mr. bin Laden and his deputy but also of Mullah Muhammad Omar, the leader of the Afghan Taliban. Mullah Omar, who also fled to Pakistan in 2001, has overseen the resurgence of the Taliban.

Like several previous accounts, the committee's report blames Gen. Tommy R. Franks, then the top American commander, and Donald H. Rumsfeld, then the defense secretary, for not putting a large number of American troops there lest they fuel resentment among Afghans.

This is not to say that success at Tora Bora would have eliminated the threat posed by al Qaeda, but the fiasco allowed the terrorist network's top leaders to escape and continue with their efforts.

The events at Tora Bora was largely ignored by major media outlets -- perhaps because they were too embarrassing to the administration soon after 9/11 -- but for the record, Kerry was right, and Bush was wrong.

Steve Benen 8:00 AM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (30)

Bookmark and Share
 
Comments

Yet more proof that Bush ranks among the most incompetent presidents of our history. Almost everything he touched turned into a turd pile.

Posted by: sjw on November 29, 2009 at 8:19 AM | PERMALINK

Tragic for the country, think where we would be now if Bush, Rumsfeld & Co had been competent, John Kerry should have been, and was truthfully elected on 04.

Posted by: JS on November 29, 2009 at 8:24 AM | PERMALINK

We tend to give the "warrior" military leadership a free pass. In these wars as in Vietnam they've been poorly trained and led. Their learning curve is, in every way, expensive. What's up with that?

Posted by: Cycledoc on November 29, 2009 at 8:25 AM | PERMALINK

Capturing Bin Laden and Mullah Omar wouldn't have defeated Al Qaeda, but it would have allowed us to leave Afganistan and may have avoided the pretext for invading Iraq. Of course, that's not what the neocons wanted (hence, the decision not to send more troops).

That's a lot of lives and money saved.

Posted by: bdop4 on November 29, 2009 at 8:43 AM | PERMALINK

They didn't want to catch Bin laden. They needed him to serve as a bogeyman to get us into Iraq. With the Bush administration, it's often hard to separate the incompetence from the corruption, but I believe this was more the latter than the former.

Posted by: ChicagoPat on November 29, 2009 at 8:56 AM | PERMALINK

ChicagoPat, you beat me to it. I was thinking exactly the same thing. Also, Bush wanted to invade Iraq, and he would have had a harder time whipping up the right brew of paranoia and fear in the public that would give him enough support to do it if he'd captured Bin Laden.

Posted by: T-Rex on November 29, 2009 at 8:59 AM | PERMALINK

I'm trying to decide what to expect NOW from the MSLM.

Option #1 - It's Obama's fault.

Option #2 - We don't care.

Posted by: Mark-NC on November 29, 2009 at 8:59 AM | PERMALINK

". . . for the record, Kerry was right, and Bush was wrong."

And the sun rises in the east, and water is wet.

Posted by: The Caped Composer on November 29, 2009 at 9:01 AM | PERMALINK

Have been saying this for years; people treat you like you are crazed. Not only that, but I understand that the ISI was allowed to evacuate their personnel in helicopters. (American pilots said that there was a no-fly and no-fire zone between Tora Bora and Pakistan.) That's how Bin Ladin's crowd made it out.

Posted by: UnEasyOne on November 29, 2009 at 9:08 AM | PERMALINK

As was evident at the time...

Posted by: Joseph on November 29, 2009 at 9:16 AM | PERMALINK

Towards the end of the last Presidential debate, Bush said he didn't care about Bin Laden, but Kerry didn't follow up on that. Kerry was a fool, and unfortunately his blunders led to Junior's second term.

Posted by: bob on November 29, 2009 at 9:34 AM | PERMALINK

Isn't the bin Laden family friends with the Bush Family?

Could this be part of why Bush ordered the military to look away from their target and let him escape into Pakistan?

I think I remember reading reports that immediately after 911 when all air traffic was ordered grounded, an airplane with some members of the bin Laden family were allowed to leave/escape the US.

Posted by: wbn on November 29, 2009 at 9:43 AM | PERMALINK

Let's say the situation were turned around, ie., it was a Dem president at the time. Who doubts for a moment that EVERY GOP elected official from Mitch McConnel down to Asst. Director Water Services in Tarboro, NC would be repeating it over and over....and over. There would be calls for investigations.

On the other hand...

Who doubts for a moment that we will NOT here more than, maybe, one or two Dems at ANY level mention this. It'll pop up on a few liberal sites, then go away. MSM will ignore it because the Dems will ignore it.

Posted by: Ohio Rick on November 29, 2009 at 9:55 AM | PERMALINK

Typical.

1) Shoot off ignorant mouths
1a) Believe NYTimes, Benen, and John K. Christmas/In/Cambodia -- for Gods sake.

2) Smear some good people to get to Bush (Secula seculorem. Amen) and cover some President Obama butt.

3) Don't read actual report:

"CentCom went so far as to develop a plan to put several thousand U.S. troops into Tora Bora.
Commanders estimated that deploying 1,000 to 3,000 American troops would have required several hundred airlift flights by helicopters over a week or more.
DeLong defended the decision not to deploy large numbers of American troops. "We didn't have the lift," he told the Committee staff. "We didn�t have the medical capabilities." (Page 18)

Delong was THE ranking HELI-logistics expert. When he says "lift" he means the physical capacity to get actual people there without getting most of them killed.

A##hatzzz.

Posted by: tao9 on November 29, 2009 at 10:17 AM | PERMALINK

"We didn't have the lift," he told the Committee staff. "We didn�t have the medical capabilities."

That's what happens when you go to war with what you have and not with what you wish you had. Shades of Rumsfeld, huh? Just more incompetence from the A##Hat in chief.

Posted by: Dave on November 29, 2009 at 10:31 AM | PERMALINK

Shoot off ignorant mouths

oh you poor dear. let's see: twice we didn't bomb the al qaeda convoy of 1000 cars driving across the desert at night with no cover, we "surrounded" tora bora on just three sides, we bombed only one of two escape routes, we had bin laden's voice on the radio so we knew he was there. i personally know a captain who was at tora bora who retired afterward as he realized the bush white house was not serious about capturing bin laden and intentionally let him literally walk away.

because if you had bin laden in custody, the person responsible for the 9/11 attacks, how could you possibly make the case for invading iraq?

Posted by: kee-rist on November 29, 2009 at 10:41 AM | PERMALINK

but for the record, Kerry was right, and Bush was wrong.
Was Bush ever right?

Posted by: LewScannon on November 29, 2009 at 11:08 AM | PERMALINK

"...i personally know a captain who was at tora bora..."

Of course you do, my dear.

Was he one of these 90 guys?:

"A major with the Army's Delta Force, who is now retired and uses the pen name Dalton Fury, was the senior U.S. military officer at Tora Bora, commanding about 90 special operations troops
and support personnel." (Page 5)

Where's his book?

Posted by: tao9 on November 29, 2009 at 11:10 AM | PERMALINK

Forever and ever , a long time . It feels even longer when the two faced liars who defend booschie come up with an attack of the day . Never mind the complete lack of sensible or even plausable thinking its just attack baby , attack .
Thanks for playing !

Posted by: FRP on November 29, 2009 at 11:14 AM | PERMALINK

Oh, gosh, no! The Bushies would never have allowed members of Bin Laden's family to just scoot out of the US right after 9/11! How could you say such a thing?!

It wasn't right after 9/11, it was on 9/20.

Posted by: Fleas correct the era on November 29, 2009 at 11:15 AM | PERMALINK

Where's his book?

he didn't write a book. he successfully fought off pressure to get reactivated for iraq and now works for [x] intelligence.

if you want his take however, you can read gary bernstern's book. he led the cia special activities paramilitary team in afghanistan and had pinpointed bin laden's position and begged for troops. the decision ultimately came from the white house not to provide any.

also, you should reread that report. not only does your cherrypicked quote not agree with the report findings, it does not agree with the analysis of the other specialists and supporting data showing that while challenging, capturing bin laden was clearly achievable, and every element of the plan (mountain airlifts, etc) had been proven out in other live and training scenarios.

p.s. your reference to delta force commander dalton fury precisely proves my point. he not only confirms that we had pinpointed bin laden but also confirms that he was denied permission to go in and take him and wasn't given a good reason not to. perhaps you should do a little more reading before quoting blindly.

Posted by: kee-rist on November 29, 2009 at 11:48 AM | PERMALINK

what exactly is your point, tao9: that it is defensible that we failed at tora bora?

or is it simply that you're a stupid jerk and can't resist demonstrating same? i mean, here we go again: the asswipes playing games about john kerry being in cambodia. typically, anyone who says that isn't worth attending to on any other matter.

Posted by: howard on November 29, 2009 at 12:18 PM | PERMALINK

btw, bob, kerry was hardly the greatest campaigner ever, but he lost because it's very, very difficult to defeat a sitting president. just look at the record.

Posted by: howard on November 29, 2009 at 12:19 PM | PERMALINK

Ehhh, I can't swallow this one, Steve. The suggestion that the Bushies deliberately blew a decent shot at bin Ladin doesn't square with the electoral benefits of such a strike -- Republicans would have ruled the world for a generation had it been successful. A fuckup, especially one fueled by arrogance, seems perfectly in character, however.

Posted by: beejeez on November 29, 2009 at 12:40 PM | PERMALINK

Lindsey Graham on ABC's This Week:

"With this new surge of forces, the Taliban will never take over Afghanistan again"

Ah, too late.

By the time Chimpy Bush left office, the Taliban was already back in control of 62% of Afghanistan.

Posted by: Joe Friday on November 29, 2009 at 12:44 PM | PERMALINK

The suggestion that the Bushies deliberately blew a decent shot at bin Ladin doesn't square with the electoral benefits of such a strike.

You don't want a bounce at the polls, you want to transform the political landscape for a generation.

Bin Ladin's capture would have played hob with the plans to 'do Iraq', though, and for using wartime powers and wartime rah-rah to neuter Democratic opposition at home, ensure Republican control of the White House and both Houses of Congress in virtual perpetuity.

Good thing they screwed that up, too, while there were still a few scraps of the Constitution left. Too late for the economy, though.

Posted by: Davis X. Machina on November 29, 2009 at 1:33 PM | PERMALINK

My thoughts also agree that USA didn't want to catch Bin laden but use him to get into Iraq.

Posted by: r4i software on December 4, 2009 at 4:04 AM | PERMALINK

Virtual memory is something that I seemingly will never have enough of. It's as if megabytes and gigabytes have become an inseparable part of my every day existence. Ever since I bought a Micro SD Card for my NDS flash card, I've been on permanent watch for high memory at cheap prices. It's driving me absolutely nuts.

(Posted by Nintendo DS running R4i NetPostv2)

Posted by: bandsxbands on February 8, 2010 at 4:20 PM | PERMALINK

Sorry. The greatest thing in the world is to know how to belong to oneself. Help me! Need information about: Cf stock trading course. I found only this - best online stock trading. Stock trading, participants like by range of market suits and understand down to a earth reason, who gives to the order trading work class for that auction to become the question. Fundamental prices incredible as instinet were simply major to small-scale problems, because they attended to trade high advantages better efforts than were exceptional to the ", stock trading. With best wishes :eek:, Gavriel from Palau.

Posted by: Gavriel on March 11, 2010 at 5:57 PM | PERMALINK




 

 

Read Jonathan Rowe remembrance and articles
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM



buy from Amazon and
support the Monthly


Place Your Link Here

--- Links ---

Boarding Schools

Addiction Treatment Centers

Alcohol Treatment Center

Bad Credit Loan

Long Distance Moving Companies

FREE Phone Card

Flowers

Personal Loan

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs