Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

December 8, 2009

LIEBERMAN ON THE SIDELINES.... A few days ago, when Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) was putting together the "Team of Ten," he specifically extended an invitation to Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), making him one of the five center-right members of the caucus in a position to shape a public-option compromise.

Lieberman decided not to show up. Roll Call reports that the Connecticut senator just doesn't want to get in the game.

Senate Democratic centrists and liberals have been working feverishly since last week to craft a compromise on the public health insurance option, but one invitee has been curiously absent. [...]

Senate Democratic aides said Monday that Lieberman's decision to skip meetings that could prove crucial to Reid's ability to pass a bill may suggest that Lieberman's vote is out of reach.

Lieberman's office said Monday that the self-described Independent Democrat has not attended in person because he feels he has been unambiguous about where he stands.

But that's not much of an explanation -- nearly all of the other nine senators have also been unambiguous about where they stand. But they agreed to show up, engage in good-faith talks, search for common ground, and work on a solution. It's what lawmakers do.

It's always best to keep expectations low when it comes to Lieberman, but I am a little surprised about his refusal to engage. Part of his schtick is his alleged ability to leverage his independence to "bridge the gaps" and "bring disparate people together." But in the biggest policy fight of the year, Lieberman has decided he prefers the sidelines.

This not only undermines his image, it also denies Lieberman a chance to grandstand. The 10 senators doing the heavy lifting are the ones who'll get the credit for resolving the problem (if they're successful, that is), while Lieberman will be remembered as the one who decided not to try.

Meanwhile, as talks continue, it's unclear how Lieberman feels about the state of the debate. Maybe he'll like the proposed compromise -- it lacks a public plan that he finds so offensive -- or maybe he'll find new reasons to justify his opposition. (Lieberman's good at that.)

Either way, there's growing talk that the 60th vote may come from Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine), not Joe Lieberman. One senior Democratic source told Roll Call, "Snowe's all about the policy, but she's aware of the politics. Lieberman is all about the politics, but he doesn't seem to be consistent on policies considering where he was in the past."

Steve Benen 10:45 AM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (23)

Bookmark and Share
 
Comments

i think they ought to put Joey Lieberman in a giant tupperware -- let him hang out in the Clown Car Senate, but just keep him air-tight away from the other 99 clowns...he is such a vile, traitorous man.

Posted by: neill on December 8, 2009 at 10:47 AM | PERMALINK

Lieberman is fuelled entirely by vanity, resentment, and bitterness. There's never been anything good about him -- he ran to the right of Lowell Weicker when he was elected to the Senate. He was also the worst mistake Gore ever made.

Posted by: John Emerson on December 8, 2009 at 10:54 AM | PERMALINK

This is very good article and very precise and
informative. I am waiting for your coming article.
Keep your good work up.

Posted by: Shah on December 8, 2009 at 10:54 AM | PERMALINK

If the Israeli secret service can be persuaded joe lieberman is an American state secret , will they steal him ?

Posted by: FRP on December 8, 2009 at 11:00 AM | PERMALINK

I wonder if Olympia is willing to vote for Medicare and Medicaid expansion.

Posted by: Jason on December 8, 2009 at 11:06 AM | PERMALINK

Knife with hair on it neuters Senate squirrels again...

This has become painfully fun to watch:

How many of Joe's insults can the Senate leadership stomach before they strip him of his Chair and give it to a real party member?

Posted by: koreyel on December 8, 2009 at 11:08 AM | PERMALINK

"But they agreed to show up, engage in good-faith talks, search for common ground, and work on a solution".

This is where you and I will always differ. Republicans NEVER negotiate in good faith. Never, under any circumstance.

Posted by: JW on December 8, 2009 at 11:10 AM | PERMALINK

I stand corrected. Apparently there are no republicans among the ten senators you cited. For a minute there, I thought you had lost your mind.

Posted by: JW on December 8, 2009 at 11:14 AM | PERMALINK

Okay - I'm up here in Massachusetts; a hop, skip, and few turnpikes to Connecticut. I just HAVE to go down there to see what the voters just think of this man.

Sure (putting aside the finer details that United States is not a pure democracy) - if he is expressing their will, has their confidence - fine then. Yet, I suspect...

Man o' man.

Posted by: sduffys on December 8, 2009 at 11:27 AM | PERMALINK

Joe Lieberman is bought and paid for by the insurance companies. He is a disgrace. Stripping him of his chairmanship is long overdue.

Posted by: Fred from Pescadero on December 8, 2009 at 11:28 AM | PERMALINK

Joe Lieberman will officially begin his insurance/pharma lobbying career in January 2013. Unofficially, he's already started it. Everything -- EVERYTHING -- he does between now and then is a big wet kiss for the signers of his future paychecks and a big fuck you to the Democrats he thinks have betrayed him.

It's that simple.

Posted by: shortstop on December 8, 2009 at 11:29 AM | PERMALINK

His wife is alrady a Health Industry lobbyist.
Why does no one mention this?

Posted by: Csullivan on December 8, 2009 at 11:33 AM | PERMALINK

Lieberman decided not to show up. Roll Call reports that the Connecticut senator just doesn't want to get in the game.

Maybe Joe thought that it might be kind of more difficult for him to make whatever was his current monthly argument to his colleagues, who might be inclined to point out its inconsistencies right away, rather than pliant reporters, who dutifully stenograph every word of Joe's sacred wisdom?

Posted by: SRW1 on December 8, 2009 at 11:37 AM | PERMALINK

Personally I think Lieberman still believes he belongs in the White House and is aiding in blocking Obama's agenda because he thinks that will help his prospects for 2012, maybe not as Prez but maybe a real VP chance...

Posted by: rlr on December 8, 2009 at 11:52 AM | PERMALINK

To see what Joe Lieberman is up to these days is to remind me of the vice-presidential candidates the last three elections:

2000 -- Joe Lieberman and Dick Cheney
2004 -- John Edwards and Dick Cheney
2008 -- Joe Biden and Sarah Palin

What a contrast between Biden and the rest. No wonder the GOP, abetted by cable news, tries to make Biden a laughingstock. The Karl Rove playbook says go after the enemy's strength.

Posted by: Jerry Elsea on December 8, 2009 at 11:55 AM | PERMALINK

When does Harry Reid kick this piece of s#$% out on his ass and hand him over to the Republics? This mofo should not be a chair of any f#$%ing committee under a Dem. majority. We all need to be sending him that GoJo stuff.

Posted by: warren terrah on December 8, 2009 at 12:27 PM | PERMALINK

Traitor Joe strikes again. After Healthcare is done, it is time to strip him

Posted by: Patrick on December 8, 2009 at 12:46 PM | PERMALINK

"Lieberman's office said Monday that the self-described Independent Democrat has not attended in person because he feels he has been unambiguous about where he stands."

This is pretty funny given the ever-shifting sands of his reasoning for WHY he stands where he "unambiguously" stands -- opposed to a public option. Not good at linking, but I will say this has been reported in depth at Talking Points Memo, where I suspect everyone here goes, too.

But on the bigger point, why HIS position is what's important rather than working to achieve a compromise, it is quite telling of how hubristic this twerp is. The only silver lining to the Supreme Court seating President Bush is that the country missed have this un-mensch a heart-beat away from the Presidency.

Posted by: Cal Gal on December 8, 2009 at 5:05 PM | PERMALINK

From Aetna to Joe Lieberman:

Here is a note granting you permission to attend these meetings on a public "plan".

Included is $1000 to cover traveling expenses.

Aetna President

Posted by: bjobotts on December 8, 2009 at 6:12 PM | PERMALINK

What should be done to Joe cannot be done while he is a senator

Posted by: botts on December 8, 2009 at 6:14 PM | PERMALINK

I don't know anything, but I assume that Lieberman is absent because he doesn't want to share the limelight. My guess as to how it plays out is that progressives give up practically everything to get to agreement in the TEam of 9 team players and then that becomes the left more bargaining position in negotiations with Lieberman.

I think he want to be the 60th Senator to say yes.

Now it is also true that he doesn't have any coherent arguments against the public option and he knows it. Give and take is related to debate (I mean a bit of debate can't be avoided when negotiating no matter how diplomatic one is). I'm sure he knows he would humiliate himself if he has to pretend to try to convince rather than just saying no.

Posted by: Robert Waldmann on December 8, 2009 at 7:34 PM | PERMALINK

"...there is growing talk that the 60th vote..." Steve Benen.

It's about time we faced reality here; there will be no "60th" vote if the HCR legislation includes any viable public option or anything that even remotely accomplishes what the public option will. Reid's present options are simple: include public option and lose two, three or more Senators. Dump the public option and lose the next two or three elections.
Had the Senate and House leadership started with single payer, they might have been able to avoid this; unfortunately we'll never know. Now their best (only?) hope is to split the HCR legislation into two bills; one financial bill to go via reconciliation and one dealing with any other aspects of HCR that would take the usual legislative route.
There financial bill would naturally include the public option and the mandates, because of their accompanying subsidies. And, as many of the private policies will be purchased with subsidised funds, there is no reason not to also include the prevention of recissions, the removal of lifetime caps and cancellations.
Oh, and the effective dates for implementation need to be within 90 days of the President's signature. Allow Senator to vote against the legislation once it has reached the Senate floor, but require a yes vote for it to reach that point. The latter would be the hardest, but it's the only hope left.
I only hope I'm wrong...

Posted by: Doug on December 8, 2009 at 9:30 PM | PERMALINK

of course Joe Lieberman sold us out again.It was a big act telling the american people that he was not going to vote for the health plan.Time for some new politicians.

Posted by: rosalyn on December 20, 2009 at 9:28 AM | PERMALINK
Post a comment









Remember personal info?










 

 

Read Jonathan Rowe remembrance and articles
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM



buy from Amazon and
support the Monthly


Place Your Link Here

--- Links ---

Boarding Schools

Addiction Treatment Centers

Alcohol Treatment Center

Bad Credit Loan

Long Distance Moving Companies

FREE Phone Card

Flowers

Personal Loan

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs