December 17, 2009
THE DUMBEST STORY OF THE WEEK.... The Weekly Standard's Michael Goldfarb "reported" Tuesday that the White House is playing hardball with Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) on health care. Citing an anonymous "Senate aide," Goldfarb, a former blogger for the McCain/Palin campaign, said the Obama team "is now threatening to put Nebraska's Offutt Air Force Base on the BRAC list if Nelson doesn't fall into line."
Now, after watching this White House operate for 11 months, this certainly doesn't sound like the kind of thing the Obama team would do. Have we seen any evidence of these kinds of strong-arm tactics this year? Goldfarb noted that Offutt "is the headquarters for US Strategic Command, the successor to Strategic Air Command," and was placed in Nebraska for strategic, national security reasons. Obama would threaten to close it over a cloture vote? Without some credible evidence, it's the kind of dubious story from an unreliable writer that few serious people would find credible.
In case anyone was inclined to believe the suspect claim, Nelson's spokesperson told reporters, "The rumor is not true. This misinformation is coming from inside-the-Beltway partisans who only want to derail health care reform." Soon after, White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer added, "To be perfectly clear: these rumors are completely baseless and false."
So, that's it, right? Time to move on? Fat chance.
Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Michelle Malkin, and a variety of right-wing personalities quickly started spreading the rumor around. On his Fox News show yesterday, Glenn Beck not only suggested the rumor is true, but equated the non-existent threat with "treason" -- three times.
But wait, it gets dumber. Much dumber.
Nebraska's Sen. Mike Johanns and 19 other Republican senators Wednesday called for a hearing into reports that the Obama administration used the future of Offutt Air Force Base as bargaining chip in the health care debate.
Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb., has said the rumors are completely false. The White House has called them "absurd."
A defense analyst said Wednesday that base closures simply don't work that way. Even Johanns himself said he doesn't believe the rumors.
Then why on earth should the Senate Armed Forces Committee hold a hearing to explore a baseless right-wing rumor, unsupported by even the slightest evidence? Why would 20 Republican senators -- half of the entire Senate GOP caucus -- be so recklessly foolish? Because hyping lies may pay political dividends, and that's all that matters.
Helping demonstrate the absurdities of conservative thinking, the GOP senators and Goldfarb are now arguing that if the uncorroborated rumor isn't true, the White House shouldn't mind a federal investigation into the matter. (The Senate Armed Forces Committee, apparently, should operate as a fact-checker for right-wing blogs.) Goldfarb argued yesterday that the unequivocal denials of the rumor make him more inclined to believe its accuracy.
Just think, if Republicans take back Congress, far-right bloggers will publish nonsense on a Monday, and congressional committees will spend the rest of the week investigating the nonsense. It will be the mid-90s all over again.
—Steve Benen 8:40 AM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (36)
Stories like this are why, despite my anger at Obama's duplicity with the "moderates" in ruining the HCR bill, I am not screaming "KILL THE BILL!"
"Kill the bill" leads to turning the entire government back over to these idiots.
I won't lift a finger to actively help the President at this point, but I'm not going to openly wish for a GOP majority.
Posted by: howie on December 17, 2009 at 8:44 AM | PERMALINK
is it treasonous for me to wish the obama admin WOULD be this strong-armed? hell, it's only 44,000 americans dying every year.
but it got me thinking: might there be a base or two we could threaten to close in connecticut?
Posted by: ahoy polloi on December 17, 2009 at 8:49 AM | PERMALINK
The thing is, this kind of thing sinks down into the public consciousness. It doesn't have to be true. The public doesn't really look at the facts of each allegation, they are uneasy about all the noise, and the volume of it has resonance. That's what is turning them against the Dems.
The GOP knows what it's doing. And they don't care whether they are proved wrong or not, because that follow-up isn't as loud as the original accusation. And the Dems are completely incompetent in managing their message. You can't just keep being reactive, you need to keep up your own steady stream of noise. Laughing and snickering at preposterous allegations and waiting a day or two to deny them isn't working. The Dems have yet to develop a comprehensive media management strategy, and it's killing them.
Posted by: James on December 17, 2009 at 8:54 AM | PERMALINK
Sanity has run aground for our friends on the Right!
You use dumb as a descriptor, but a more apropos "d" word is dangerous! Any bad thing could happen when such a willingness to distort, lie, and fabricate reporting, and just plain old hate others becomes the accepted political discourse.
What a shameful foolish person this Michael Goldfarb seems to be! -Kevo
Posted by: kevo on December 17, 2009 at 9:08 AM | PERMALINK
Perhaps at some point in the near future Obama will realize that this quest for bipartisanship is a fool's errand. There is no interest on the other side for fairness and honest dialogue; thus, they do not deserve to be continually given the benefit of the doubt.
There is no doubt. Let's hope the next three years will not be like the first one with respect to this. They are used to playing hardball. Take it to them.
Posted by: terraformer on December 17, 2009 at 9:09 AM | PERMALINK
Lying, McCarthyite sludge who hate our country and will do everything in their power to bring it down - that is the conservative movement and the Republican Party. Is it irresponsible to say that? It is irresponsible not to.
Posted by: Mike R. on December 17, 2009 at 9:13 AM | PERMALINK
The rethugnicans are just following their tried and true playbook.
1) Somebody creates a rumor.
2) Rushbo, Insanity, et. al. repeat it.
3) The corporate media has endless discussion of the 'he said - he said' variety.
4) The base of the rethug party knows that it must be true.
5) A large percentage of 'independent' voters become convinced that there 'must be something there'.
This process was honed and fine-tuned during the 1990's and has worked successfully time after time. The dumbocraps have never found the stones or a methodology to fight this process. Why should the rethugnicans change their game plan when it works so well?
Posted by: SadOldVet on December 17, 2009 at 9:21 AM | PERMALINK
Hold that thought
Wait. Someone accused the Administration of playing hard ball? With a straight face?
Posted by: koreyel on December 17, 2009 at 9:29 AM | PERMALINK
God, if only the Obama administration would use strong-arm tactics like this. A single-payer system could be in operation by now if it did.
Posted by: Lifelong Dem on December 17, 2009 at 9:30 AM | PERMALINK
1 - this goldfarb guy is just a "A-team nihilist" wannabe. He is insane and immoral enough, but just too stoopid and infantile to carry the weight of the heavy-duty nihilist's production of quality bright shiny stuff.
Goldfarb has a history, you can casey stengel it with The Google.
2 - i'd love for someone to drag these guys out an a national-international stage with President Hopey-Changey taken 'em on.
At least two at a time. Obama could destroy Corn-fed Nelson and joey Lieberman in 10 minutes "on the merits" and on their piggy lies and ignorance.
Unfortunately, Hopey Changey aint interested in that work, that fight, nor does he seem to see the urgency for a country quite that decent any time soon.
Posted by: neill on December 17, 2009 at 9:37 AM | PERMALINK
"The Senate Armed Forces Committee, apparently, should operate as a fact-checker for right-wing blogs."
Why would they need a fact-checker, Steve? They don't need no steenkin' facts! GOPers don't do facts. Facts and logic only get in their way.
Posted by: azportsider on December 17, 2009 at 9:42 AM | PERMALINK
Dear GOP:
I will save you the trouble of crafting a strongly worded letter: Why don't you go f*ck yourself!
Posted by: Marko on December 17, 2009 at 9:49 AM | PERMALINK
Here are the Senators. Usual bunch of nuts. I'm ashamed of mine-Isakson. He taught my kids sunday school class. I'm firing off a letter to him ASAP.
John Ensign of Nevada, Jim DeMint of South Carolina, John Thune of South Dakota, Jim Bunning of Kentucky, Lamar Alexander and Bob Corker of Tennessee, Richard Burr of North Carolina, Kit Bond of Missouri, Michael Enzi of Wyoming, George LeMieux of Florida, Pat Roberts of Kansas, David Vitter of Louisiana, Thad Cochran and Roger Wicker of Mississipi, John Cornyn of Texas, Judd Gregg of New Hampshire, Mike Johanns of Nebraska, Bob Bennett of Utah, Johnny Isakson of Georgia and Chuck Grassley of Iowa.
Posted by: ComradeAnon on December 17, 2009 at 9:50 AM | PERMALINK
Why the fuck isn't he doing this sort of thing?
Posted by: SW on December 17, 2009 at 9:53 AM | PERMALINK
Yes, if Republicans take over it will be horrible. People have to made hard choices, and I agree with a lot of what the outraged are saying here - but if we don't pull together on Election Day it will be regretted. There must be *other ways* to pick and influence better Democrats.
PS: Anyone remember that Landrieu used to brag of how often she voted with GW Bush?
Posted by: neil b. on December 17, 2009 at 10:03 AM | PERMALINK
'Member w-a-a-a-a-y back in ... oh, yesterday, I believe it were ... when I said that what you called "the height of cynicism" wasn't even halfway up the Republican's Infinitely Cynical Ladder Of Cynicism™?
Today's little gem still isn't halfway up their ladder, but yesterday's height of cynicism has to use binoculars to glimpse the soles of today's cynicism booties. And just wait for tomorrow! Those zany Republicans ... whatever will they think of next?
(I wish there were some other political party whose members would have spine enough to point this out. Or even Professional Journalists might do, if we could imagine such a thing. But no ... say, is it still too early, in Polite Society, to start drinking?)
Posted by: Fleas correct the era on December 17, 2009 at 10:08 AM | PERMALINK
...but if we don't pull together on Election Day it will be regretted. -neil b.
It's cute how you still think there is a chance.
2010, record low turnout. The political process has already turned off most of the new voters from 2008, and by the time 2010 rolls around, the progressive base will be long done donating.
Without the money and time from the activists, do you think the Democrats can win? And why should the activists support a party who only pretends to care for a few months every couple of years.
They had their chance and squandered it because, for the most part, they're just as greedy and inept as their counterparts.
Posted by: doubtful on December 17, 2009 at 10:15 AM | PERMALINK
The GOP leadership is not concerned with truth, they prefer truthiness. And since their base was convinced Obama was going to ban guns on Day 1, the idea that he'd close the Strategic Air Command in an attempt to impose his government-controlled-health-care-system must sound very "truthy" to them.
It does, sadly, highlight how little the President is actually doing to make the health care reform he promised us into a reality. The saddest part about Goldfarb's fantasy is that it is so far from true.
Posted by: biggerbox on December 17, 2009 at 10:17 AM | PERMALINK
yeah, I wish Obama was ever this tough with the corporate whore Dems in the Senate. He only gets tough with Dean and real progressives.
Thanks.
Posted by: Allan Snyder on December 17, 2009 at 10:17 AM | PERMALINK
Why the fuck isn't he doing this sort of thing?
Because the President doesn't unilaterally decide base closings?
Posted by: Equal Opportunity Cynic on December 17, 2009 at 10:24 AM | PERMALINK
Because the President doesn't unilaterally decide base closings?
But, but, he's Adolf Maosolini! He can do anything he wants to do!
Rep. Bachmann said so!
Posted by: howie on December 17, 2009 at 10:37 AM | PERMALINK
Perhaps it's because Conservatives are actually more likely to believe a falsehood after it has been refuted.
_http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/14/AR2008091402375_pf.html
Posted by: dk on December 17, 2009 at 10:38 AM | PERMALINK
Base closures, as noted by others, don't work this way. However, I imagine that stimulus projects are more likely to have discretionary allocations. Seems to me if the GOP wants to cut government spending, the Democrats should oblige and cut stimulus construction from southern states, Nebraska, and yes, Connecticut, etc. Why should DeMint et al. be able to spout his stuff without penalty -- cut from their states, and let them know.
Posted by: Michael Carpet on December 17, 2009 at 10:55 AM | PERMALINK
Reminds me of that scene in Wag the Dog where they start the rumor about the nonexistent "B-3 Bomber". Pretty soon everyone is talking about the B3 bomber.
Posted by: swarty on December 17, 2009 at 10:55 AM | PERMALINK
You use the phrase "conservative thinking", but what you describe isn't conservative and certainly isn't thinking. "Republican invective", maybe.
Posted by: sacman701 on December 17, 2009 at 10:56 AM | PERMALINK
Steve,
To quote the immortal Criswell, "Can you prove that it didn't happen?"
Posted by: RZ on December 17, 2009 at 12:44 PM | PERMALINK
It's too bad the White House didn't take advantage of the occasion to deny that they'd put out a contract on several senators who were standing in the way of the Health Care bill.
:)
Posted by: N.Wells on December 17, 2009 at 2:21 PM | PERMALINK
Oh, wow -- did you really cite Plan 9 From Outer Space, RZ?? Hilarious! And given the way the Republicans operate, completely dead-on.
Posted by: Banksy on December 17, 2009 at 2:36 PM | PERMALINK
So Sen. Pat Roberts wants an immediate investigation of an unsubstantiated rumor promoted by the ninny Goldfarb, though Roberts spent years trying to impede investigations of well documented scandals concerning the Bush administration's abuse of intelligence to promote an invasion of Iraq? Priceless.
Posted by: smintheus on December 17, 2009 at 6:39 PM | PERMALINK
Simple, they know Twain was right when he said "a lie is halfway around the world before the truth gets its boots on."
Posted by: david on December 17, 2009 at 7:06 PM | PERMALINK
I have no problem believing our THUG-IN-CHIEF is capable of threatening Nelson over his vote to pass the health care monstrosity...that no one has even seen yet !!
They bribed Landreui ...why won't they threaten Nelson ??
Posted by: JENNAXXX on December 17, 2009 at 7:31 PM | PERMALINK
What?!?
Michael "MUST DESTROY PRIVATE BEAUCHAMP" Goldfarb got something he reported ... WRONG???!?!
Surely you must be thinking of another Michael Goldfarb, and not the one who works for William "Dan Quayle's Brain" Kristol.
Heaven forfend.
Maybe you're thinking of Lucianne Goldberg's kid. What was his name again? He wrote a book or something, Librarian Fatuism, I think it was called.
Posted by: Hart Williams on December 18, 2009 at 3:18 AM | PERMALINK
WOW!!! Nice Post!Kind Regards
Posted by: clothes sale on October 22, 2010 at 4:37 PM | PERMALINK
Thank you!!!! 1000 times!!!
Posted by: sales tips on October 22, 2010 at 9:46 PM | PERMALINK
This is a great post. Thanks so much for sharing, like always.
Posted by: strategy sales on October 26, 2010 at 1:47 PM | PERMALINK
great post, I am interesting in it!
Posted by: shoe sale on December 1, 2010 at 12:01 PM | PERMALINK