December 22, 2009
STEELE'S SWEET RACKET.... Michael Steele was able to parlay a series of failures and fiascoes into becoming the clownish chairman of the Republican National Committee. After securing the gig, Steele was able to parlay his chairmanship into becoming a surprisingly well paid personality on the speaking circuit.
Michael S. Steele, Republican National Committee chairman, is using his title to market himself for paid appearances nationwide, personally profiting from speeches with fees of up to $20,000 at colleges, trade associations and other groups - an unusual practice criticized by a string of past party chairmen.
Mr. Steele, elected in January to the $223,500-a-year RNC post, is working with at least four outside agencies in Washington, New York, Boston and Nashville that book the speaking engagements. He charges between $8,000 and $20,000 for an address, plus first-class travel and lodging expenses.
The Republican National Committee has been awfully tolerant of Steele's incompetence, mismanagement, and humiliating gaffes this year. But this is a revelation that may put Steele's job in jeopardy.
Several former RNC chairmen said on the record that Steele's lucrative little scheme is hard to defend. Frank J. Fahrenkopf Jr., RNC chairman under Reagan, said, "Holy mackerel, I never heard of a chairman of either party ever taking money for speeches.... The job of a national chairman is to give speeches. That's what the national party pays him for."
Jim Nicholson, RNC chairman under W. Bush, said the job "demands so much of your time that you can work 24/7 and not get everything done, so taking time out to speak for the benefit of one's own bank account is not appropriate."
Rich Bond, RNC chairman under Clinton, said, "It just doesn't look right using RNC resources and trading on the title of chairman to make outside money." Bond added that if he received honoraria after a public appearance, he donated it to charity.
For what it's worth, the Democratic National Committee said it knows of no DNC chairs who've ever made speeches for personal gain the way Steele is doing now.
And what kind of personal gain are we talking about here? According to the Washington Times reported, "it potentially adds up to hundreds of thousands of dollars."
Stepping back, I suspect RNC members may be reluctant to switch chairmen less than a year from the midterm elections. It would be disruptive and embarrassing. On the other hand, is the party really prepared to keep an incompetent chairman who's using his title to line his own pockets?
—Steve Benen 8:30 AM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (25)
Sounds to me like the Republicans have a party chairman that perfectly reflects the Republican philosophy.
Posted by: RepubAnon on December 22, 2009 at 8:39 AM | PERMALINK
Another gift from the state that brought you Spiro Agnew. Sorry about that...
Posted by: beep52 on December 22, 2009 at 8:41 AM | PERMALINK
Who on earth would pay Michael Steele anything to hear him speak? Let alone $20,000. Seriously.
Posted by: brent on December 22, 2009 at 8:44 AM | PERMALINK
This is from the party that thought the ideal solution to having too small an army for their wars was to hire a couple of hundred thousand mercenaries. And, of course, they have leaders like Tom Delay who basically brag about their skills in peddling influence.
They rant about the Christian god a lot, but what they really worship is the almighty buck. Steele fits right in.
Posted by: Midland on December 22, 2009 at 8:52 AM | PERMALINK
I will pay whatever it takes to keep his brave new vision before the public ear .
Umm , except listen . There are even in these stout ears tedium beyond the grain that will suffer no polish
Posted by: FRP on December 22, 2009 at 9:01 AM | PERMALINK
I find Steele's sweet racket one hell of a lot less offensive than Ben Nelson's incestuous insurance racket.
Posted by: Chopin on December 22, 2009 at 9:01 AM | PERMALINK
Like FRP, I think we all benefit from keeping Steele. Given the coming mid-term elections, don't we want an incompetent as head of the RNC? Don't we want someone who enables any possible further splintering and dissolution of Republican efforts?
Keep the joker in place.
But find still stronger Democratic leadership, at all levels.
Posted by: miscellanneous on December 22, 2009 at 9:05 AM | PERMALINK
On the one hand, I say stop attacking Steele, he's doing such a good job of losing.
On the other hand, if we want to keep him, we should start attacking him more! Nothing makes the Conservatives circle their wagons like an attack from the left!
Posted by: DR on December 22, 2009 at 9:07 AM | PERMALINK
Steele is really just plain stupid, isn't he.
Posted by: Tom Johnson on December 22, 2009 at 9:07 AM | PERMALINK
Steele-azar, I think your party has a great chairman.
Posted by: PQTaggart on December 22, 2009 at 9:07 AM | PERMALINK
"I don't do work."
Posted by: ComradeAnon on December 22, 2009 at 9:21 AM | PERMALINK
I've got a new respect for Steele. I'd be too embarrassed to ask for $20,000 for a speech even if I were the new Carl Sagan. But this guy takes failure and embarrassment and gets rich!
Posted by: tom on December 22, 2009 at 9:24 AM | PERMALINK
What a delicious paradox the Republicans have gotten themselves into. The choice of Steele was clearly motivated by the fact that Obama is a person of color. Steele has few useful skills such as message articulation, fund raising capabilities (except for himself), and verbal skills. He lurches about making stabs at crafting Republican policy and then denies any role in policy development. Steele’s attempts at appealing to younger people of color is just plain embarrassing. He is the antithesis of President Obama and has shown himself to be a buffoon. But, that fits smoothly into the apparent beliefs of the party. In their rush to find a Black man as a counter to Obama, they got stuck with a man of severe limitations. Now they are in a corner and there is no solution that doesn’t expose their biases. I am enjoying the irony.
Posted by: DTR on December 22, 2009 at 9:30 AM | PERMALINK
What does he charge to shut the fuck up?
Posted by: hells littlest angel on December 22, 2009 at 9:42 AM | PERMALINK
RepubAnon nails it in the first post.
These are just free market forces at work. It would be unethical to stop that. If Steele wants to use his chairmanship to moonlight as a celebrity and make moolah, that's his God given American right. Besides, the true leader of the GOP makes no obfuscation to the fact he is in it for the money. He even jokes about not running for President because he'd have to take a pay cut.
Republican values- blurring the line between ethics and $$$$ since 1854.
Posted by: about time on December 22, 2009 at 10:11 AM | PERMALINK
Steele's message to the GOP: I got mine, fuck you!
Posted by: Marko on December 22, 2009 at 10:37 AM | PERMALINK
Sounds to me like the Republicans have a party chairman that perfectly reflects the Republican philosophy.
Posted by: RepubAnon on December 22, 2009 at 8:39 AM
Exactly! And really, any organization flat-out dumb enough to pay this clown $20,000 for a "speech" he likely didn't write and puts him up in a "first-class" hotel deserves him.
Posted by: electrolite on December 22, 2009 at 10:48 AM | PERMALINK
@ Marko - Steele's message to the GOP: I got mine, fuck you!
Yeah baby, it the Magic of the Marketplace!
Just who do these Commies think they are. Steele should be able to sell his labor on the open market for what ever he can get.
Posted by: johan on December 22, 2009 at 11:06 AM | PERMALINK
Yeah baby, it the Magic of the Marketplace!
What goes around, comes around.
Karma's a bitch, ain't it?
What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
If you live by the sword, you die by the sword.
Sweet irony is bliss.
Be careful what you wish for...
Of course, this is all about the GOP getting caught up in its own hubris. Steele is just a symptom of what is wrong with the entire caucus.
Posted by: Marko on December 22, 2009 at 11:39 AM | PERMALINK
"an incompetent chairman who's using his title to line his own pockets"
Which part would they object to? Incompetent? Lining his own pockets? Seems more like a twofer for them.
Posted by: The real a on December 22, 2009 at 12:47 PM | PERMALINK
It would be disruptive and embarrassing.
Steele is distruptive and embarrassing on a daily basis! I'm not sure that anyone pays attention to who manages the national parties other than us poliical junkies, or whether the chairs themselves have a significant impact on inidividual races. But the man isn't just a clown, he's a disruptive and embarrassing clown.
Posted by: pinson on December 22, 2009 at 1:13 PM | PERMALINK
"For what it's worth, the Democratic National Committee said it knows of no DNC chairs who've ever made speeches for personal gain the way Steele is doing now."
Of course not, because if they were focused on money instead of public service, they would be ReThuglicans.
Personally, I think this just puts Steele right in line with the mainstream of the ReThugs, whose primary philosphy is "Money, money, mo' money, for me, me, me."
After all, the Queen of the ReThuglicans QUIT her governing job to go out and make money giving speeches.
Same old, same old.
Posted by: Cal Gal on December 22, 2009 at 1:39 PM | PERMALINK
This is awesome. The head republican in charge is fleecing his suckers while on the company dime instead of doing his own job. Grab that gold now baby. You are going to be done soon. What a great target for ads to be run against. The republicans are so dishonest that even their leader is shaking down supporters to rake in his ill gotten gains. Run the ads.
Posted by: Patrick on December 22, 2009 at 3:55 PM | PERMALINK
While I was laughing at the clown, his buddy picked my pocket.
Posted by: Hazy on December 22, 2009 at 6:18 PM | PERMALINK
Shortly after Steele was elected to chair the RNC, Alex Koppelman posted an article at Salon.com titled "Michael Steele, forever failing upward." Koppleman summarized the chairman's G.W.Bush-league business acumen:
His (Michael Steele's) record as a businessman wasn't stellar, either. A consulting firm he founded never turned a profit, and was a serious drain on his finances. Shortly after he began his run for lieutenant governor, Steele ran into trouble because of a $25,000 loan his sister had given to his campaign for comptroller that he'd never paid back. Then, there were revelations of an additional $35,000 in personal debt, as well as more than $100,000 he'd taken out of two retirement accounts in order to support his family, leaving a balance of less than $600 at the time the news broke. He suffered further embarrassment over his finances when it was revealed that the Republican Party was paying him a consulting fee of $5,000 a month during his campaign for lieutenant governor.
Draw your own conclusions.
Posted by: Steve Sikora on December 23, 2009 at 2:25 AM | PERMALINK