December 24, 2009
HARRY REID.... Whether one sees the Democratic health care proposal as the greatest progressive policy accomplishment in a generation or a bitter disappointment worthy of defeat, it's hard to deny that the Senate Majority Leader did what he set out to do. There were plenty of times this year when it seemed the reform proposal simply wouldn't survive, but Harry Reid kept working, and managed to find -- and hold onto -- 60 votes.
Rahm Emanuel was agitated. With only seven weeks until Christmas, the opportunity to pass healthcare legislation seemed to be fading. The White House chief of staff feared that if the Senate left for the holiday without passing a bill, President Obama's top domestic priority would wither as lawmakers turned to other concerns next year.
Democratic senators and administration officials gathered in a conference room outside Majority Leader Harry Reid's Capitol office. Emanuel wanted to know: Was there a chance the chamber could still act in time?
As one participant placed a calming hand on Emanuel's sleeve, Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) told him there was one chance: The White House would have to put its trust in Reid.
The quirky, taciturn majority leader had no background in health policy and a less-than-commanding public image. Yet today Reid delivered as the Senate moved to take its final vote on the most sweeping healthcare legislation to make its way through the chamber in nearly half a century.
As the Senate Democratic leader, Harry Reid has received his share of criticism -- much of which, on occasion, I've endorsed. But he was able to reach his leadership position thanks to his unique understanding of his caucus, his mastery of Senate procedure, and his almost preternatural patience. Rutgers political scientist Ross K. Baker said, "There are Senate leaders like that who come along every few decades."
Every time reform appeared to be teetering on the brink, Reid would take steps to pull it back from the precipice. It wasn't always pretty, and I didn't always approve of every decision, but whenever reform seemed poised to fail, Reid grew more determined to succeed.
ABC News' Jonathan Karl said this week, "Say what you want about the health care bill, but Harry Reid is about to complete a task of LBJ proportions. And Lyndon Johnson never had to corral 60 Senators for one vote during a blizzard. If public opinion doesn't turn around for Democrats, this may ultimately prove to be a pyrrhic victory, but on a purely procedural level Harry Reid now looks like the master of Senate. One month ago, who seriously thought the health care bill would pass the Senate by Christmas?"
The Brookings Institution's Tom Mann added, "The much-pilloried Harry Reid led an increasingly undemocratic and dysfunctional institution to a stunning victory for the majority party."
And Matt Yglesias wrote last week that Reid's "performance throughout 2009 has been nothing short of heroic.... One's instincts are that overcoming these challenges required some kind of larger-than-life figure, full of colorful LBJ-style anecdotes, or maybe a figure of overwhelming charisma and popularity. That's not Harry Reid. But the proof is in the pudding, and from where we sit today, the low-key, unassuming, unpopular senator from Nevada has delivered on the most significant piece of progressive legislation in over 40 years."
For a senator who's very much at risk of losing his seat next year, the plaudits come at a welcome time.
—Steve Benen 1:25 PM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (29)
Oh, I can't stand all the pissing and moaning going on on the left right now, but even I think this is too much.
Steve. Get hold of yourself, hon. The bill is passed and that's going to have to do for the moment. But let's have the dignity to refrain from describing either it or Harry Reid as something they're not.
Posted by: shortstop on December 24, 2009 at 1:40 PM | PERMALINK
Yes, ABC News, this is clearly good news for Republicans... and John McCain.
i.e. that their double-down on obstruction instead of making the bill more to their liking and losing anyway.
Posted by: Jon on December 24, 2009 at 1:52 PM | PERMALINK
Top domestic priority? Who are they trying to fool?
Posted by: Jay on December 24, 2009 at 1:54 PM | PERMALINK
I fought tooth-n-nail for the public option. I told Obama's clowns to stop calling me. When the DNC called to ask that I contact my senator to push for health care reform to pass the senate, I called and asked both senators to vote against the bill. I knew they wouldn't, but I wanted people to know I wasn't happy about the compromised and the comprises. Still, Harry Reid pulled it off...better men and greater politicians have been trying for more than a century and Harry "got'ter done"...pretty damned impressive!
Posted by: Ralf Kramden on December 24, 2009 at 2:00 PM | PERMALINK
Harry Reid is a weak in the knees spineless jellyfish. Acting like this bill is some kind of massive accomplisment that was orchestrated by the master strokes of Harry Reid is a startling departure from reality and rational thought. It's better than nothing. And frankly that's all you can say about the whole deal.
Posted by: Gandalf on December 24, 2009 at 2:03 PM | PERMALINK
umm. There are lots of pros and cons about Reid, the bill, etc. However, all I want to say is - give it a rest. Take some time off, happy holidays to you all, and enjoy your families, or do something on behalf of someone, or something, else. Happy holidays.
Posted by: bigutah on December 24, 2009 at 2:07 PM | PERMALINK
However, all I want to say is - give it a rest.
You're right. Enough for now. A joyous Festivus to all.
Posted by: shortstop on December 24, 2009 at 2:10 PM | PERMALINK
No, it actually does matter what you think of this bill. This process has demonstrated to me just how corrupt and dysfunctional our government has become. No one acquitted themselves well here, not the Republicans, the progressives, the Blue Dogs and the DLC, and not their leaders.
They spent an astounding amount of time producing absolute crap.
Posted by: Cujo359 on December 24, 2009 at 2:10 PM | PERMALINK
This was the return of "Give'em Hell Harry." I hope we see more of him.
I also hope that his next priority is getting rid of the filibuster. Senators representing under 11% of the population control the Congress! Undemocratic, you say?
Posted by: Zandru on December 24, 2009 at 2:11 PM | PERMALINK
Ever since Reid became Majority Leader, I have repeatedly expressed my low opinion of him, because I am convinced that he is at heart a conservative, and I am a liberal.
However, I have to give him credit for threading the needle on this one. Here's a tip o' me hat, Senator. Thank you for demonstrating that the Senate Democrats can be led, and that you know how to lead them.
If only Sen. Reid's heart's desire was to lead Senate Democrats in a liberal direction ...
Posted by: joel hanes on December 24, 2009 at 2:19 PM | PERMALINK
You know there is something wrong with a bill when so much effort has to be taken to convince (bribe) people to vote for it. If it was a good bill there should be no need to do anything but simply vote on it......This is such a poor example of our democratic process......no wonder a good much of the world thinks we are so F'd up.
Posted by: Middleclassandscrewed on December 24, 2009 at 2:20 PM | PERMALINK
Utter BS. This is the declare victory and go home strategy that we hoped would happen in Iraq and Afghanistan. It's not right to try and spin it for HCR.
Posted by: elliottg on December 24, 2009 at 2:24 PM | PERMALINK
Champagne corks a poppin'!!1!!11!
Next: POLLS!!!11!!! YAHOO!
Baby Jeebus sez:
"Vote Dimocratic, folks!
The Medical Industry (now) Does!"
Posted by: neill on December 24, 2009 at 2:26 PM | PERMALINK
A left hook, and a straight right jab
Accolades are due...
If you believe these two sentences are true:
1) Barack's reelection is monumentally important.
2) The Republican Party's exists now only to destroy this president's public standing.
This bill makes the (1) more likely, and helps stymie (2). So Reid might have just changed the course of history. We'll never know. But I'd rather live in the universe that maximizes Barack's chance at getting reelected, rather than the universe we just split off from: The universe where HCR doesn't get delivered, and the teabaggers dominate winter town halls, and reform dies a spiteful, feverish, bitter death...
Posted by: koreyel on December 24, 2009 at 2:30 PM | PERMALINK
I'd rather live in Iraq than North Korea. Doesn't mean I'd be happy.
Posted by: elliottg on December 24, 2009 at 2:48 PM | PERMALINK
I'm not in the "kill bill" crowd, but still to say Reid is some heroic figure is over the top. For starters, he wasn't able to deliver a product nearly as good as Pelosi, who did it faster and with less bad PR. Second, the quotes and stories themselves suggest that Reid had to be given some backbone and prodding from Rahm, and a lot of help brokering votes from Schumer.
Collectively, Obama and a Democratic House and Senate have run up a historically impressive list of accomplishments in year one. But Reid is hardly LBJ. Indeed, I'd say he is the weak link of the three (Obama-Pelosi-Reid).
Posted by: zeitgeist on December 24, 2009 at 2:55 PM | PERMALINK
Give it a rest. Stop complaining. See what happens. I'm sure the lobbyists, corporate lawyers, and insurance company execs aren't pushing as we speak. I'm sure they take a day off. Right?
Posted by: Jay on December 24, 2009 at 3:18 PM | PERMALINK
I won't shed a tear for Reid if he gets tossed on his ass next november, as seems likely. His great accomplishment was to funnel public money to those who abuse the poor and the sick. If I wanted to support that I'd vote republican.
Come to think of it I'm having a very hard time discerning the difference between the parties, what with Obama "surging" in Afghanistan and health reform becoming a code word for corporate giveaways.
Posted by: Tlaloc on December 24, 2009 at 3:19 PM | PERMALINK
What color is the sky on Benen's planet? Where I live Reid was so ineffectual he couldn't keep the caucus in line and was blackmailed into giving Nelson and Lieberman whatever they wanted.
Maybe we can have a progressive leader next November. The conservadem one we have now has not been impressive in the least.
Posted by: Daryl P Cobranchi on December 24, 2009 at 3:45 PM | PERMALINK
We should give Reid credit for having horrible facts on the ground to deal with - in particular, having just 60 "Democratic" Senators = 58 "real" at best. However, did he try hard enough to threaten majority rule? Did he/Obama use the bully pulpit enough?
Posted by: neil b on December 24, 2009 at 4:10 PM | PERMALINK
"We should give Reid credit for having horrible facts on the ground to deal with - in particular, having just 60 "Democratic" Senators = 58 "real" at best. However, did he try hard enough to threaten majority rule? Did he/Obama use the bully pulpit enough?"
Pelosi had worse circumstance to deal with. Reid had to deal with 6 primadonnas while Pelosi had to juggle 30. Pelosi's bill is a hell of a long ways from great but it was worth passing.
And Pelosi managed to get a republican on board. Reid = FAIL.
Posted by: Tlaloc on December 24, 2009 at 4:32 PM | PERMALINK
Look at Reid's accomplishment from the other end of the stick. Regardless of what you think of the final product, getting all the democrats, including Bayh and Landrieu and Nelson, PLUS Lieberman, to vote in unison on something is phenomenal. Just how incompetent were the republicans to be unable to prevent this from happening? Literally, all they had to do was to persuade Lieberman to be himself. Also, more than anything else, this is the heritage of Bush (and the republiscum in general) being so godawfully incompetent and disaster-inducing that the citizenry completely lost their bearings and elected Obama and a boatload of Democrats.
Posted by: N.Wells on December 24, 2009 at 5:01 PM | PERMALINK
Let's not get carried away. God bless Reid; he got 60 but he had to give away the store to do it. My money says that if Hillary was Majority Leader, no way pipsqueaks like Nelson, Bayh, and Holy Joe have the balls to mess w/ her, and the bill's much closer to the House version
Posted by: jimmy on December 24, 2009 at 5:07 PM | PERMALINK
I'm going to save my praise for Nancy Pelosi. Reid should be primaried by someone with the balls to tell McInsane to STFU and, voted out of office. The first words out of Reid's mouth when Enzi and Grassley showed they were dealing in bad faith should have been "newkewlar option." Emanuel needs to go as well.
Posted by: Banana-Eating Jungle Monkey on December 24, 2009 at 5:15 PM | PERMALINK
Whatever else one may think about Harry Reid, he accomplished something no one else has: he got a bill out of the Senate, and with all Dems united. That is awesome.
Posted by: sue on December 24, 2009 at 7:52 PM | PERMALINK
I like Pelosi and I have bitched about Reid plenty of times but Stupak does not a Lieberman make. The Senate rules are not like the House's. And Pelosi has a few Repubs she can peel off. Reid kinda sorta once in a while has Snowe.
Posted by: warren terrahn on December 24, 2009 at 9:42 PM | PERMALINK
This thing definitely ought to be called the Reid bill, for better or worse.
Posted by: Cal Gal on December 26, 2009 at 6:25 PM | PERMALINK
"Pelosi had worse circumstance to deal with. Reid had to deal with 6 primadonnas while Pelosi had to juggle 30. Pelosi's bill is a hell of a long ways from great but it was worth passing."
I like Pelosi as much as anyone, but comparing what she had to do with what Reid had to do is like comparing peaches to apricots. Yes, the nectarine, right in between, is legislating, but Pelosi has a whole lot more power over her caucus AND Reid has to get a super majority in a body where the voters are not represented, states are. That means that public opinion has much less influence in the Senate than the House, and that entrenched interests are much more powerful in the Senate than in the House.
Posted by: Sarah Barracuda on December 26, 2009 at 6:30 PM | PERMALINK
Good afternoon. Hello. Thanks for the invitation so much. I will try to come back as soon as possible. ;). Help me! Help to find sites on the: Proventil albuterol. I found only this - proventil sulfate. Pick yourself to determine through a respected sequence of translators, xbox 360 economy and the latest export called by experienced administrators, proventil. Proventil, linguistic paragraphs had written single tutorials after their structure of large observations of the various portuguese. :mad: Thanks in advance. India from Andorra.
Posted by: India on March 13, 2010 at 9:05 AM | PERMALINK