Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

January 28, 2010

QUOTE OF THE DAY.... If being obsessed with the status of health care reform is wrong, I don't want to be right.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told reporters today that President Obama's remarks in support of reform in the State of the Union were "helpful" in moving the process forward, but added that discussions with the Senate are ongoing. On a discouraging note, the Speaker made it seem as if the differences with the Senate are considerable and hard to overcome: "I would not call them minor tweaks because that would imply there's something there that we could accept, except for some minor tweaks. No, it's more serious than that."

That's the bad news. The good news is, Pelosi reiterated just how committed she is to making reform a reality:

"You go through the gate. If the gate's closed, you go over the fence. If the fence is too high, we'll pole-vault in. If that doesn't work, we'll parachute in. But we're going to get health care reform passed for the American people."

Compare Pelosi's strength and determination with Sen. Mary Landrieu's (D-La.) whining today, and it's pretty clear who's truly serious about taking advantage of his once-in-a-generation opportunity.

As for Pelosi's counterpart in the other chamber, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) scheduled a meeting this afternoon with Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Max Baucus (D-Mont.), Patty Murray (D-Wash.), Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), and Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) -- all key players in the Senate reform effort -- to discuss how best to proceed on the issue.

The fact that they're having this conversation is at least mildly encouraging -- at Tuesday's caucus meeting, health care reform didn't come up at all.

Steve Benen 4:55 PM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (19)

Bookmark and Share
 
Comments

The thing is however you choose to spin it the differences between the House and Senate bill are nothing compared to the difference between the Senate bill and the status quo.

And before the Brown comet hit the House seemed set to accept a pseudo-conference bill whose difference from the Senate bill reportedly really was just minor tweaks, changes to tax structuring and thresholds.

It's worth it to look for a way to improve the bill as long as that door is still open. But at what point can we say the House is demanding concessions just to keep it from looking like they lost?

Posted by: mcc on January 28, 2010 at 5:03 PM | PERMALINK

We have to keep the pressure on - everyone keep us those phone calls to your senators and congressman.

Posted by: fourlegsgood on January 28, 2010 at 5:03 PM | PERMALINK

Now is the time for Democrats to show us Democracy in Action as opposed to the standard procedure of Democracy Inaction!

Hey Congress Critters, on the health care reform front - git er done! -Kevo

Posted by: kevo on January 28, 2010 at 5:04 PM | PERMALINK

The senate is broken and dysfunctional. To expect anything good from this body is placing unreasonable demands on them. If it isn't already screwed up, the senate will find a way to screw it up.

Too many senator's wives are caught up in the profiteering of the HC ins. industry to allow the flow of money into these senator's hands to dry up.

If it's progressive and it's the senate...expect failure from this good ole boys club.

Posted by: bjobotts on January 28, 2010 at 5:09 PM | PERMALINK

How can we make it clear to Pelosi that she won't be Speaker next year if health care isn't passed?

The odds are the Democrats will suffer huge losses if health care isn't passed and might lose control.

In any event, there will be a palace coup to replace the impotent leader and replace her with someone who might be able to actually LEAD!!!

Posted by: neil wilson on January 28, 2010 at 5:20 PM | PERMALINK

Don't think Pelosi is the problem here. Seems to be the asswipes in the Senate. Makes you long for a Constitutional amendment to scrap it.

Posted by: demisod on January 28, 2010 at 5:25 PM | PERMALINK

The House is a veritable nirvana of legislative prowess compared to the Senate. However Nancy knows the Senate is utterly dysfunctional and will cost the Dems their majority if allowed to continue putting every bill into a black hole.

She may be posturing a bit on HCR in order to build grassroots pressure from the left to move her caucus toward passing the Senate bill.

Either way, this will play out fairly quickly I think. HCR will pass or die before April Fools Day.

Posted by: Mowgli on January 28, 2010 at 5:58 PM | PERMALINK

Mowgli @ 5:58PM: "She may be posturing a bit on HCR in order to build grassroots pressure from the left to move her caucus toward passing the Senate bill."

If there is to be any pressure in the House to pass the Senate bill, it will come from the Blue Dogs -- definately NOT the left!

Posted by: GEM_in_Orange on January 28, 2010 at 6:18 PM | PERMALINK

In the immortal words of the late Speaker of the House, Sam Rayburn: "the Republicans are our opponents. The Senate is our enemy!"

Posted by: GringoNoraca on January 28, 2010 at 6:25 PM | PERMALINK
On a discouraging note, the Speaker made it seem as if the differences with the Senate are considerable and hard to overcome: "I would not call them minor tweaks because that would imply there's something there that we could accept, except for some minor tweaks. No, it's more serious than that."

I don't read that as discouraging, just an effort to pre-empt Senate conservaDems from taking the line of "if there are just minor tweaks, why don't you just pass it without us doing anything?"

Posted by: Redshift on January 28, 2010 at 6:46 PM | PERMALINK

MCC is basically right. I don't really blame the House reps for being angry, but I will if their anger gets in the way of passing the bill. The Senate sucks, and they have way too many jackasses per capita, but the fact remains that the House can move a bill that will save thousands of lives and prevent millions of bankruptcies. Sometimes leadership requires swallowing your pride.

Posted by: danimal on January 28, 2010 at 6:49 PM | PERMALINK

If Harry Reid can't get 50 votes for some amendments to the PoS Senate bill, then he's as worthless as a steaming pile of dogshit.

The House has already given a MAJOR concession by agreeing to work from the Senate bill. She has to be able to offer something to house progressives so they can hold their nose and vote for it.

Don't put this on Pelosi. Senate leadership needs to do their fucking job for once.

Posted by: bdop4 on January 28, 2010 at 6:51 PM | PERMALINK

Is it such a suprise that the one member of congress with brass balls is a woman?

Even Barney Frank bolted briefly after the masshole massacre.

Posted by: DonkeyKong on January 28, 2010 at 6:58 PM | PERMALINK

Actually, the quote o' the day is from Gail Collins, in the New York Times: "Have you ever seen all the House Republicans in one place? It’s like a herd of rabid otters."

Posted by: ericfree on January 28, 2010 at 8:54 PM | PERMALINK

"If being obsessed with the status of health care reform is wrong, I don't want to be right," indeed.

Steve, are you a closet hillbilly music fan?

It wasn't God who made honky-tonk Blue Dogs.

Posted by: Steve High on January 28, 2010 at 9:42 PM | PERMALINK

Simply put, it's been back-burnered.

Posted by: A Moderate on January 28, 2010 at 10:12 PM | PERMALINK

If Democrats are really committed to getting it done, they will immediately take the bull by the horns and force a dynamic into play by passing this bill and promptly following it with an amending bill reflecting differences between the two versions that can be presented to the Senate for a reconciliation vote. Political pressure will be strong on the Senate majority to adopt most of the changes they originally said they wanted by a majority vote. An "agreement" at this point has no authority anyway, and continuing to talk about one simply looks like interminable (and infuriating) delay by weak-kneed Democrats "running for the hills." It's time for supposedly progressive House members to step up to the plate, too.

The Senate bill is good, an historical advance that will receive much, much stronger public support when people finally see what's actually in it. The changes will make it better, and most of the changes wanted by the House will receive strong public support, too.

Why in the hell can't they see the obvious path to virtually complete victory, and start the inexorable process into motion? The public option is never going away until someone convinces the public that it really is a bad idea. That will never happen because it's a hard case to make if it is even possible, so there will be a public option, probably well in time to be made available the day the exchanges open. Continuing delay only makes the Democrats look like either they are colossal wimps who have no core principles or they were never really serious about reform at all.

Posted by: urban legend on January 28, 2010 at 10:33 PM | PERMALINK

its jobs, stupid

Posted by: skeptic1 on January 28, 2010 at 10:47 PM | PERMALINK

Steve: Here's hoping that your obsession with HCR works out better than your obsession with McCain on Sunday talk shows.

Posted by: cr on January 29, 2010 at 8:39 AM | PERMALINK
Post a comment









Remember personal info?










 

 

Read Jonathan Rowe remembrance and articles
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM



buy from Amazon and
support the Monthly


Place Your Link Here

--- Links ---

Boarding Schools

Addiction Treatment Centers

Alcohol Treatment Center

Bad Credit Loan

Long Distance Moving Companies

FREE Phone Card

Flowers

Personal Loan

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs