NEARING THE HEALTH CARE 'ENDGAME'?.... Following up on an item from yesterday, Democratic policymakers working on health care reform are facing something of a deadline over the next week.
The White House has said it intends to "post online the text of a proposed health insurance reform package" in advance of the Feb. 25 bipartisan summit, just eight days away. While there's an ongoing possibility that the White House will simply present its own reform package at the event, the goal has been to strike a compromise between the already-passed House and Senate proposals.
Sources on the Hill yesterday suggested inter-chamber talks have borne no fruit of late, making it difficult to see how a final plan would be ready for Thursday -- or even earlier, since the plan would have to be online for a while in advance of the summit.
Greg Sargent reports today, however, that an "endgame" may be in sight.
...House and Senate Dem leaders are in fact edging towards reaching a deal on a health care reform package to take to next week’s big summit, leadership aides tell me, though it remains a steep uphill climb.
The aides also say that Senate Dem leaders are warming to the idea of using reconciliation to fix their bill after the summit -- suggesting an endgame may be taking shape.
It's been widely assumed that the House and Senate had hit a virtually insurmountable snag, and yesterday Robert Gibbs hinted that the White House might step in and forge a compromise of its own to take to the summit.
But leadership aides tell me that while the snag is still serious, there's still a decent chance of an agreement. That would allow Dems to head into the summit with a united front.
Greg characterized the debate over financing -- to go with the excise tax or not -- to be the key sticking point, just as it has been for quite a while. There are, however, some "tweaks" that are being considered, which could expedite matters on the House side, while the appetite for using reconciliation in the Senate appears to be growing.
Christina Bellantoni also reports this afternoon that a final agreement is likely to materialize, if not entirely before the summit, then soon after. Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), chairman of the DCCC, said a deal is 90% complete, and that the two chambers are "very close to reaching a final agreement."
It's taken a beating, and it's hardly out of the woods, but health care reform isn't dead.
—Steve Benen 3:55 PM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (8)
Which reminds me, do the staffs of the Democratic politicians read any of these blogs or comments? Can they not see the tremendous shift in tone over the last few weeks? The "base," which ranges from moderately liberal and pragmatic to strongly progressive, and contrary to DC conventional wisdom probably includes far more of the former than the latter, is disgusted. The disgust is over the weakness. Being not quite as bad as the other candidate is hardly a good recipe for getting people to work for you and give your campaign money. (We're not seeing any reports, but I'll bet contributions to all the Democratic campaign organizations has come to a screeching halt.)
Once the summit is done, talking must stop. The next report of how close they are only gets us more and more pissed off. Only immediate action will start recovery. I'm talking about two days, not two weeks. Anyone who drags his or her feet is dragging down the entire party. One must now assume that anyone who drags his or her feet to any extent whatsoever, and I mean the slightest peep of "concern" or objection, is, in fact, intentionally dragging down the party.
Posted by: urban legend on February 17, 2010 at 5:24 PM | PERMALINK
What urban legend said, yes. Absofuckinglutely; every word of it, but especially...
"God, I'm sick of 'almost there.'"
I wonder if "almost there" will turn out to be the Dems' "Friedman Unit," "turning the corner," or "light at the end of the tunnel."
Posted by: smartalek on February 17, 2010 at 5:46 PM | PERMALINK