July 7, 2010
HELPING THE CLIMATE, CUTTING THE DEFICIT.... All those folks who claim that deficit reduction is their top priority? Have I got a bill for them.
Senator John F. Kerry's signature energy and climate change legislation would cut the deficit by $19 billion, according to a new estimate released today by the Congressional Budget Office.
The legislation has uncertain political prospects, but the estimate gives proponents another argument at a time when there are rising concerns about adding to the deficit.
"There is no more room for excuses -- this must be our year to pass comprehensive climate and energy legislation and begin to send a price signal on carbon," Kerry said this afternoon in a statement with the legislation's co-author, Senator Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut. "Many of our colleagues have said they flatly oppose anything that adds a penny to the deficit, so we hope they look anew at this initiative which reduces it."
To review, the American Power Act would overhaul a broken energy framework, combat global warming, make America more competitive globally, lower the budget deficit, create jobs in a burgeoning industry, and do all of this without significantly raising costs for consumers.
And Senate Republicans don't even want to let the chamber vote on this.
It also brings to mind a fairly consistent trend in recent policy debates. Republicans like to pretend that deficit reduction is their (and their base's) top priority -- but have you noticed how often they reject ideas to actually help close the budget shortfall?
The Democratic health care reform proposal lowered the deficit ... and Republicans opposed it.
The Democratic student-loan bill lowered the deficit ... and Republicans opposed it.
The Democratic effort to let Bush tax cuts for the rich expire will lower the deficit ... and Republicans oppose it.
The Democratic energy/climate bill would lower the deficit ... and Republicans oppose it.
The Democratic effort to reduce bloated Pentagon spending would lower the deficit ... and Republicans oppose it.
And if you press Republican leaders on how they'd prefer to lower the deficit, they can't answer the question.
It's almost as if Republicans say they care about deficit reduction, until they're offered a chance to actually reduce the deficit. If I didn't know better, I might think GOP officials don't think a deficit-reduction measure "counts" unless it undermines struggling families in some way.
That couldn't be, could it?
—Steve Benen 2:50 PM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (15)
The GOP wants to reduce the debt by gutting social security. There are way too many Democrats who give the GOP the time of day on this issue and that includes Pelosi.
Posted by: Terry on July 7, 2010 at 3:00 PM | PERMALINK
Oh, they have ideas. They just don't want to openly share them because they'd be throttled come election time. I asked a Tea Partier today what he wanted to do to fix the deficit. He said, "Stop foreign aid, stop Medicare and Medicaid (note: he said that they weren't needed now because of "Obamacare"), privatize Social Security because it's being raided anyway, and stop the bailouts." I didn't even know what to say to that. He also advocated a scorched earth policy when it comes to nuclear weapons. He said, "Warn other countries that if they launch then so will we until there is nothing left of them." When I advised him that he was advocating for complete global meltdown, he said, "So?"
Posted by: Ben on July 7, 2010 at 3:00 PM | PERMALINK
tackscutz, not buttsecks!
Posted by: repboner on July 7, 2010 at 3:04 PM | PERMALINK
The republicans only policy is to make rich people richer. Everything else they do flows from that.
Health reform -- rich insurance ceo's wouln't get cricher.
Student loan bill -- rich bankers wouldn't get richer.
Bush tax cuts expire -- rich wouldn't get richer.
Climate bill -- rich oil execs wouldn't get richer.
Reduce Pentagon spending -- defense contractors won't get richer.
There is only one underlying theme to any republican position and want seems illogical in many of their stances and speeches isn't if you understand that they only thing driving them is that the rich get richer.
Posted by: patrick on July 7, 2010 at 3:14 PM | PERMALINK
I'd like to know when did Nancy Pelosi become bff's with the GOP? This is one of the most ridiculous I've heard coming from the FDL camp.
Posted by: Alli on July 7, 2010 at 3:15 PM | PERMALINK
And if you press Republican leaders on how they'd prefer to lower the deficit...
..they will always and everytime tell you "Cut waste and fraud." It's as predictable as the sunrise.
Now if you ask them to name a trillion worth of waste and fraud, then they start dancing.
Posted by: martin on July 7, 2010 at 3:58 PM | PERMALINK
The Democratic health care reform proposal lowered the deficit ... and Republicans opposed it.
The Democratic student-loan bill lowered the deficit ... and Republicans opposed it.
The Democratic effort to let Bush tax cuts for the rich expire will lower the deficit ... and Republicans oppose it.
The Democratic energy/climate bill would lower the deficit ... and Republicans oppose it.
The Democratic effort to reduce bloated Pentagon spending would lower the deficit ... and Republicans oppose it.
=-=-=-=-=-=
Republicans moan and Republicans bitch:
"Our rich are too poor, and our poor are too rich!"
Posted by: Fleas correct the era on July 7, 2010 at 4:13 PM | PERMALINK
This is kind of getting into "dog bites man" territory, don't you think?
It is impossible to look at the events of the last 30 years (or more) and still pretend--in good faith--that Congressional Republicans care about the deficit. They make noises about it to placate the elements of their conservative base who actually do care, but whenever the issue comes up for a vote--whether it be climate change, health care, jobs, you name it--the Republicans put conservative shibboleths before deficit reduction every single time.
The modern Republican party has no principles--only dogma and corporate donors that must be obeyed regardless of the actual outcome of the policies in question.
Posted by: Catsy on July 7, 2010 at 4:18 PM | PERMALINK
With the health care bill, we heard nothing about the deficit savings, instead the Republicans talked ceaselessly about how much the bill "cost" where how much it "cost" was the cost of implementing the bill disregarding any revenues or savings that would result. They were challenged in no significant way on this, so obviously they'll try the same thing with the climate bill.
Posted by: mcc on July 7, 2010 at 4:23 PM | PERMALINK
Let's not forget the "Pay-Go Legislation" that passed in the Senate Jan. of 2010. Every single Republican voted against it. Not ONE Republican voted for this effort at fiscal responsibility. Everytime an imcumbent Republican candidate talks about fiscal responsibility, the Dems should be running an ad about this "NO" vote.
Posted by: winddancer on July 7, 2010 at 4:43 PM | PERMALINK
They (the republicans) don't care about the economy they only care about power and political gain. It couldn't be more obvious.
Loved your list of deficit lowering policies they oppose. They have no policy but opposition. They cannot be reasoned with or worked with or for that matter taken seriously or even tolerated as policy makers. The party of no and the party of hypocrisy.
"We must make every effort to lower the huge deficit we created except those policies proposed by democrats". Fix the broken senate so the country can get moving again.
Posted by: bjobotts on July 7, 2010 at 5:40 PM | PERMALINK
Great post, Steve! The facts absolutely destroy the GOP propaganda, don't they? I wish every Limbaugh dittohead was forced to read this (if they can read) and was required to respond to your analysis. Needless to say, there is nothing to say other than Republicans are so full of shit, their eyes are brown!
Posted by: Sam Simple on July 7, 2010 at 6:09 PM | PERMALINK
$19 billion exceeds the $18 billion of earmarks that Candidate McCain denounces so the cause of the deficit !
Posted by: H-Bob on July 7, 2010 at 6:58 PM | PERMALINK
And if you press Republican leaders on how they'd prefer to lower the deficit, they can't answer the question.
Since the national debt skyrocketed under Bush and the Republicans, I'd assume they are concerned mostly with their personal "deficits", which can only be improved with more tax cuts for the rich.
Posted by: qwerty on July 7, 2010 at 8:03 PM | PERMALINK
When I try to share the link on facebook, a different story appears.... Can you fix it?
Posted by: Greenjeans on July 8, 2010 at 1:40 PM | PERMALINK