Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

July 8, 2010

VITTER CLAIMS CONTRADICTED BY EVIDENCE.... Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) has largely hidden from journalists lately, but answered some questions yesterday, in a media availability that lasted less than two minutes.

Of particular interest to reporters was the scandal-plagued Vitter's decision to keep Brent Furer on his taxpayer-financed payroll, despite Furer having held his ex-girlfriend hostage, threatening to kill her, and attacking her with a knife. Vitter was aware of Furer's problems, but, according to an ABC report, he nevertheless kept Furer on as an aide. Literally adding insult to injury, Vitter reportedly tasked Furer with helping oversee women's issues for the senator's office.

Asked about this yesterday, Vitter said Furer "was not" assigned to work on women's issues. When the reporter followed up, asking, "He was not assigned to women's issues?" Vitter replied, "Correct." He added that the issue has been "completely misreported." The senator left no wiggle room in his categorical denial.

There's evidence to suggest Vitter was lying. Brian Beutler reported overnight that there are "numerous records and published accounts" that relied on Vitter's office for staff assignments, all of which "name Furer as Vitter's legislative assistant on women's issues."

And looking specifically at the dates on the materials, Furer was still listed in that capacity after Vitter learned of his aide's violent attack against his ex-girlfriend.

Brian also noted that Beth Meeks, executive director of the Louisiana Coalition Against Domestic Violence, worked with Vitter's office on domestic violence legislation, and was "personally informed that Furer was Vitter's point man on the issue."

In one sense, Vitter's judgment looks ridiculous for keeping Furer on the public payroll at all, regardless of which issues the aide was assigned to cover. But for Vitter to ask Furer to oversee women's issues, and then for Vitter to apparently lie about it directly to reporters while on camera takes this story to a new level.

If Senate Dems want to play hardball, they'll start whispering -- today -- about whether Vitter's various scandals should force him to resign.

Steve Benen 8:30 AM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (25)

Bookmark and Share
 
Comments

If Senate Dems want to play hardball, they'll start whispering -- today -- about whether Vitter's various scandals should force him to resign.

Whisper? Whimper will be more like it...

Posted by: stevio on July 8, 2010 at 8:54 AM | PERMALINK

Once again a conservative is a victim of MSM gotcha journalism.

Posted by: Al on July 8, 2010 at 9:00 AM | PERMALINK

And Senator Vitter cries out, "Thank you, LeBron".

Posted by: berttheclock on July 8, 2010 at 9:02 AM | PERMALINK

pack your diapers, david. You're done.

Posted by: johnnymags on July 8, 2010 at 9:05 AM | PERMALINK

A Vitter re-election would very much reflect poorly upon the electorate of the great state of Louisiana! This election cycle is a voters be blamed moment yet again in our nation's political history!

Vitter's campaign might as well embrace such slogans as Ignorance is Strength and Freedom is (sex)Slavery! -Kevo

Posted by: kevo on July 8, 2010 at 9:21 AM | PERMALINK

It's hardly surprising that Vitter lied; as we all know, lying has been at the core of GOP electoral strategy for years.

Did I mention that Vitter is a dick?

Posted by: David Bailey on July 8, 2010 at 9:21 AM | PERMALINK

"If Senate Dems want to play hardball . . ." Fat chance. They wouldn't want to embarrass one of their club.

Posted by: Ron Byers on July 8, 2010 at 9:23 AM | PERMALINK

David Vitter could be videotaped having carnal relations with a goat, and it wouldn't matter. All he has to do is assert his belief in Jesus Christ as his Lord and Savior and a majority of the good citizens of Louisiana will dutifully pull the lever for him come election day because he's such a good Christian man.

Posted by: bluestatedon on July 8, 2010 at 9:30 AM | PERMALINK

Originally posted to the wrong column so I repeat:
Don't be silly. Furer was in charge of women's issues to tell women exactly where their place is, exactly what to do and exactly how to change Vitter's diapers.

Posted by: Schtick on July 8, 2010 at 9:33 AM | PERMALINK

And what do you think you will get if Vitter resigns or is forced out?

This is Louisiana....where the President is trying to force a moratorium on offshore drilling, the source of a big chunk of the state's employment in ways that ripple through the economy. The President may be right philosophically in wanting to get a thorough review of procedures for offshore drilling and regulation, but politically it is a killer.

This is Louisiana.....home of lots of really really right wing whack jobs.

You force an election or a replacement and chances are you are going to get something worse......like Bobby Jindal.

Posted by: dweb on July 8, 2010 at 10:01 AM | PERMALINK

"There's evidence to suggest Vitter was lying."
I.e., his mouth was open and words were coming out.

Posted by: Nothing But the Ruth on July 8, 2010 at 10:22 AM | PERMALINK

That fact that Vitter is still seen as an electable candidate in republican circles just goes to show you how morally bankrupt 'conservatism' really is.

Posted by: citizen_pain on July 8, 2010 at 10:25 AM | PERMALINK

Team Vitter: The Shitter and the Hitter.

Posted by: Marko on July 8, 2010 at 10:33 AM | PERMALINK

Sorry guys, if Vitter wasn't brought down by the call girls/diaper scandal, he ain't going anywhere but back to DC next January.

Posted by: phoebes-in-santa fe on July 8, 2010 at 11:08 AM | PERMALINK

Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) has largely hidden from journalists lately, but answered some questions yesterday, in a media availability that lasted less than two minutes.

Is that Vitter's wife sitting awkwardly on his side? Vitter is indeed worried about his family value cred if he's pulling out the wifey to sit there all nice like some kind of ventriloquist doll.

Posted by: Alrighty Then on July 8, 2010 at 11:12 AM | PERMALINK

If Senate Dems want to play hardball

If.

Posted by: Fleas correct the era on July 8, 2010 at 11:18 AM | PERMALINK

Just wait until reports of what other things Furer was doing for Vitter start leaking out. That's when the calls for resignation will come.

Posted by: BV on July 8, 2010 at 11:21 AM | PERMALINK

Yeah whisper...hey whatever happened to Ensign???

Posted by: SYSPROG on July 8, 2010 at 11:34 AM | PERMALINK

He sounds like the perfect guy for a Republican to assign to women's issues. After all, family values to them means keeping the women folk in their place and how better to do that than threatening to kill them when they get sassy?

Posted by: Shalimar on July 8, 2010 at 11:35 AM | PERMALINK

Where have you been? "The issue has been completely misreported" as code for "stop asking questions, right now" is hardly new.

Posted by: Mark on July 8, 2010 at 11:39 AM | PERMALINK

kevo: A Vitter re-election would very much reflect poorly upon the electorate of the great state of Louisiana!

The entire 20th century reflects poorly upon the electorate of the great state of Louisiana. Re-electing Vitter adds an exclamation mark but wouldn't really change anything. Louisianans admire crooks and scumbags.

Posted by: Shalimar on July 8, 2010 at 11:39 AM | PERMALINK

Come on, Sen Vitter being rejected by Louisiana voters is fantasy.

This is the state in which governor Earl Long, during a manic episode, shacked up with a stripper and was taken to a state hospital where he fired the hospital director, called in the state police and then went back to his honey - all the time still acting as governor. He won the Democratic nomination for Congress (meaning he was going to Congress) after that but died of a heart attack before the election.

This is the state that nominated David Duke for governor and elected Edwin Edwards (who was indicted under federal charges) in the same election.

David Vitter doesn't even come close to those credentials.

Posted by: mikeyes on July 8, 2010 at 11:42 AM | PERMALINK

Leave it to republicans to hire an aid named "fuhrer", and to put together a "dick army". The jokes write themselves.

Posted by: G.Kerby on July 8, 2010 at 11:59 AM | PERMALINK

"If Senate Dems want to play hardball . . . ."

I assume that's an attempt at humor.

Posted by: ameshall on July 8, 2010 at 2:45 PM | PERMALINK

Why would anyone be surprised? He is too busy sleeping with hookers to understand what his own campaign workers are doing outside the office.

Posted by: Vious on July 8, 2010 at 5:30 PM | PERMALINK




 

 

Read Jonathan Rowe remembrance and articles
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM



buy from Amazon and
support the Monthly


Place Your Link Here

--- Links ---

Boarding Schools

Addiction Treatment Centers

Alcohol Treatment Center

Bad Credit Loan

Long Distance Moving Companies

FREE Phone Card

Flowers

Personal Loan

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs