Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

July 12, 2010

WHEN EVEN A DISASTER CAN'T SHAKE UP A DISMAL PROCESS.... There's supposed to be a pattern. Policymakers consider action on a large-scale idea, but progress remains slow and the public remains unengaged. Then, a relevant disaster strikes; the public says, "Gee, someone really ought to do something"; and the idea gets new life.

It seemed at least possible that we'd see this dynamic play out on energy/climate policy this year. A proposal that's been stuck in a dysfunctional Senate generated renewed attention in the wake of the BP oil spill disaster. But demand for real change has nevertheless failed to materialize -- and this rare opportunity appears likely to slip by.

[F]or the environmental groups trying to break this logjam, it's hard to imagine a more useful disaster.

The BP oil spill has made something that is usually intangible -- the cost of fossil-fuel dependence -- into something tangibly awful. Environmental activists have held "Hands Across the Sand" events at gulf beaches to protest offshore drilling, and in the District they spelled out "Freedom From Oil" on the Mall with American flags. They have organized calls to Congress and have held viewing parties to watch films about oil dependence.

"This is probably our last best chance to pass a comprehensive clean energy and climate bill," said Dan Lashof, director of the Natural Resources Defense Council's climate center. "This is the moment to choose."

Perhaps, but at this point, the "choice" seems to favor the broken status quo.

The pending energy/climate bill appears to have everything going for it: the proposal would overhaul a broken energy framework, combat global warming, make America more competitive globally, lower the budget deficit, create jobs in a burgeoning industry, and do all of this without significantly raising costs for consumers. And in case the need for a new energy policy wasn't quite clear enough, the Deepwater Horizon disaster seemingly hit the country in the head with an oil-soaked hammer.

And yet, nothing. Republicans still won't let the Senate vote on the bill, and the public demand has not changed noticeably.

The environmental, ecological, and economic effects of the worst environmental crisis in American history will be severe. The political effects are largely imperceptible.

Steve Benen 9:40 AM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (14)

Bookmark and Share
 
Comments

You mean the political impacts ON ENERGY POLICY will be imperceptible. The political impacts on politicians themselves could be decisive: it has hurt Obama measurably, it will either kill Jindal's Presidential prospects or keep him alive, and it has already propelled Barbour into being a favorite Villager "mention" for 2012.

Posted by: bruce k on July 12, 2010 at 9:49 AM | PERMALINK

What disaster? Where? What mess? It's not mine!

Thoughts of a heroin addict, or a nation addicted to oil?

Heroin dealers kill their clients, while it seems oil companies kill relevant, reasonable legislative responses to their dealings! -Kevo

Posted by: kevo on July 12, 2010 at 9:50 AM | PERMALINK

Drowning Miami...

Republicans still won't let the Senate vote on the bill, and the public demand has not changed noticeably.

Les brutes sure have their panties in a bunch over LeBron.
Kind of makes you wonder what the brutes on Easter Island were talking about too, doesn't it?

Posted by: koreyel on July 12, 2010 at 9:58 AM | PERMALINK

"And yet, nothing. Republicans still won't let the Senate vote on the bill, and the public demand has not changed noticeably."

Yes the Republicans are the minority and Harry (Milk Toast) Reid is too damn lazy to make them actually filibuster so he rolls over and plays dead at the mere threat of the filibuster.

How is this the Republicans fault?

Posted by: Fed Up and Tired on July 12, 2010 at 10:01 AM | PERMALINK

We've been talking about pollution, global warming, our addiction to oil, running out of oil, and the dangers of the oil economy since I was a kid in the early 70s. What's another forty years gonna hurt?

Posted by: chrenson on July 12, 2010 at 10:04 AM | PERMALINK

Of course it has everything going for it - when one considers the metrics that exist outside of the world of the money men. Limitless, clean power via cold fusion could be available, but the money men would make sure that it is hidden and unheard of.

The support is there, but not from those who make the ultimate decisions for this country. They want to hoard their money, keep the oil flowing, the coal mountaintops topless, and the natural gas streaming. They want to keep their gravy train running on time; they care not for what is best for the planet - only what is best for them. And they own our government and thus the votes for change.

Posted by: terraformer on July 12, 2010 at 10:05 AM | PERMALINK

For a long while now, I've thought the environmental establishment was the political equivalent of a cheap date for Democrats. Like the civil rights movement and the black vote, Democrats could count on environmentalists to side with them no matter how much benign neglect Democrats showed their agenda when in power.

Now I'm starting to think "cheap date" isn't a strong enough simile. Environmentalists are much more like battered spouses, returning again and again to their abuser based on another promise to do good. And nothing in President Obama's June 15 oil spill and energy speech should offer environmentalists any hope that this is going to change

Posted by: Neo on July 12, 2010 at 10:27 AM | PERMALINK

Is Obama mute? Comatose? Dead, maybe? His laid-back style just ain't cuttin' it. And he's letting opportunity after opportunity go by the wayside as his presidency, and the country with it, slides into a sinkhole.

Posted by: sjw on July 12, 2010 at 11:02 AM | PERMALINK

It is sad, but George Bush and the GOP showed more urgency to save Terry Schiavo -- a woman with a skull full of cerebral soup -- than the Democrats show with regard to energy and climate change (or anything short of passing TARP).

As Fed Up said, Democrats are choosing not to force the GOP to actually filibuster legislation. Leaving aside the fact that an actual filibuster by the GOP would be difficult to sustain in the face of public pressure...

The minority cannot sustain a filibuster indefinitely, even in theory. Set aside a couple of weeks. Break out the cots. Let each GOP senator read the telephone book a couple of times. Filibuster ends. Pass bill with 50+ votes.

Anyone who tells you that the above is not a viable option for every single filibuster threat is either lying or doesn't understand jack shit about how a filibuster works.

Posted by: square1 on July 12, 2010 at 12:28 PM | PERMALINK

Terraformer wrote: " Limitless, clean power via cold fusion could be available, but the money men would make sure that it is hidden and unheard of."

Money men are not blocking the development of cold fusion. Academic rivals are. Mainly, DoE scientists are trying to stop DoD scientists from doing cold fusion research. The money men might start blocking it if it emerges from the laboratory, but that has not happened yet.

Cold fusion is much closer to becoming a practical source of energy than most people realize. If the effect can be controlled it will lower the cost of energy by a factor of ~1,000 and put the fossil fuel companies out of business practically overnight, probably before they can react.

The research is supported by the governments of China, Japan and Italy. In the U.S. nearly all funding is blocked by politics, except for the DoD DARPA. See:

U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency, "Technology Forecast: Worldwide Research on Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions Increasing and Gaining Acceptance" DIA-08-0911-003, 13 November 2009

http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BarnhartBtechnology.pdf

This document was written by a group of 90 senior scientists at the DoD who are fed up the politics and want to do research. It would be a big help if members of the public would support them. See also the CBS "60 Minutes" broadcast on cold fusion. You will find ~900 papers on this subject at LENR-CANR.org.

Posted by: Jed Rothwell on July 12, 2010 at 1:12 PM | PERMALINK

It is probably only an afterthought in any case . Our dear , concerned , friends on the right would likely prefer every sort of real and imagined destruction before considering that Jimmy Carter was an actual person . Getting past that bump would then still pose the sort of intractable problem that is usually addressed as "impossible" , as in giving Jimmy Carter anything outside of jeering , hoots and howls .
The imprecations whispered or shouted from right wing microphones and other dependable , comforting , right wing media has counted Carter as the worst president since Belshazzar . Belshazzar , though , was appointed and had the good sense to disappear after his folly caused a change in those good times .
I don't forget my own hardened attitude towards the Carter administration . Never the less good ole Jimmy was the man . He determined the course was set for disaster and began the corrections . These were dropped by warm and sunny Saint Raygonzo no worries Magnus Perfectus . Simply the bestest and most wonderfullest president of forever and ever . Now we enjoy the happily ever after he left us .
So to consent in considering reappraising the one perfect scapegoat , spoiling the perfect warmth of the smile of the god like man with an ice cold heart . The calcified perceptions frozen in the sycophantic minds of the wondrous man who changed thoughtful , considerate dialogue into our bumper sticker sloganeering .
This will happen when the stones marking the eternal resting places of these stalwarts are worn , polished smooth from climate change .

Posted by: FRP on July 12, 2010 at 1:18 PM | PERMALINK

Check out greeman's latest:

http://www.youtube.com/user/greenman3610
Like

Climate Denial Crock of the Week - Climate Change and National Security - Part 2 From: greenman3610 | July 12, 2010 |
Our continued dependence on fossil fuels compromises the security of every nation.
Climate Deniers align themselves with those that would keep us on the cycle of boom and bust, terror and war, shortage and famine.
But the world is waking up, and the professionals who take a clear eyed view of the scientific realities are leading the way. ... (more info)

Posted by: robert on July 12, 2010 at 2:00 PM | PERMALINK

The BP catastrophe tells us exactly what a catastrophe America is in economically, in education and globally. The spewing of oil in the Gulf is the same as the spewing of toxic rhetoric from politicians. The Corporate lack of response is indicative of the unbelievable corruption of America. BP does not care about the "small people "and neither does most representatitves and senators.These representatives of Congress supporting corporations should lose their jobs, benefits, pensions right now. Perhaps they may understand better how most Americans are suffering.

Posted by: MLJohnston on July 12, 2010 at 2:52 PM | PERMALINK

The support is there, but not those who make the final decision in this country. They want to earn money, keep the oil flowing, coal topless peaks, and natural gas streams. They want to track the source of money, no matter what is best for the planet - only what is best for them. And our government, and then vote for change.

Debt Help

Posted by: moisespollock@gmail.com on July 13, 2010 at 1:35 AM | PERMALINK
Post a comment









Remember personal info?










 

 

Read Jonathan Rowe remembrance and articles
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM



buy from Amazon and
support the Monthly


Place Your Link Here

--- Links ---

Boarding Schools

Addiction Treatment Centers

Alcohol Treatment Center

Bad Credit Loan

Long Distance Moving Companies

FREE Phone Card

Flowers

Personal Loan

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs