Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

July 30, 2010

SPARE US THE ETHICS LECTURE, FRED.... Last week, Republican pundit Fred Barnes did his very best to pretend to be outraged about the existence of Journolist -- the former listserv featuring left-of-center media professionals, scholars, and wonks (including, for the record, me).

"If there's a team, no one has asked me to join," Barnes said in a Wall Street Journal piece. "As a conservative, I normally write more favorably about Republicans than Democrats and I routinely treat conservative ideas as superior to liberal ones. But I've never been part of a discussion with conservative writers about how we could most help the Republican or the conservative team." Barnes added that he's pained by the betrayal of "traditional journalism."

The layers of misjudgment are numerous, especially coming from a shamelessly partisan Fox News contributor publishing an item on the op-ed page of the Wall Street Journal.

But Joe Conason takes this further, and notes that Barnes is very much part of "a team," which is evident every time Barnes helps Republican fundraising efforts and accepts tens of thousands of dollars from GOP organizations.

* In February 2006, Barnes was paid $10,000 plus travel expenses by Oregon's Lane County Republican Central Committee to deliver the keynote address at the annual Lincoln Day Dinner. (Thanks to Carla Axtman for research assistance.) These payments, recorded in filings with the Oregon secretary of state, were evidently made through the Premier Speakers Bureau of Franklin, Tenn., which represents other Fox personalities including Sean Hannity, Dick Morris and Mike Huckabee. Barnes is no longer listed on the Premier website, but the company did not respond to phone or e-mail inquiries about its relationship with him.

* In February 2007, Barnes spoke at the annual Lincoln-Reagan Dinner held by the Republican Party of Fort Bend County, Texas -- home of former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, who purchased a ticket to the event. The party organization's filing with the Texas Ethics Commission shows two payments of $5,000 each on April 26, 2007, to Premiere Speakers Bureau (with the notation "LRD 2007 Speaker - Fred Barnes") and travel expenses of $1,823. Photos of a smiling Barnes with various local dignitaries at the event, which netted a reported $70,000 for the party, can be viewed here.

* In early March 2008, Barnes served as the keynote speaker for the Republican Party of Palm Beach County at its annual Lincoln Day Dinner. Whether he received the customary $10,000 is not clear because the party's filing with the Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections show only a single payment of $5,500 to Premiere Speakers Bureau on Feb. 18. The committee reported net $120,000 in net proceeds from the event.

Tell us again, Fred, about your unwavering commitment to the standards of "traditional journalism," and your independence from any "team."

And while you're at it, Fred, tell us how an online discussion group with media professionals is more offensive than your Republican fundraising efforts.

Steve Benen 2:00 PM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (11)

Bookmark and Share
 
Comments

From your post below "Is this just the IOKIYAR rule taken to the extreme?"

YES!

Posted by: Mark-NC on July 30, 2010 at 2:07 PM | PERMALINK

Make sure, go to WSJ comments and lay all of this out.

Posted by: neil b on July 30, 2010 at 2:14 PM | PERMALINK

Barnes is nothing more than a shitstain, a hemorrhoid on the asshole of Lucifer himself ..

Posted by: stormskies on July 30, 2010 at 2:15 PM | PERMALINK

Forget Fred and go read Brent Bozell and all the 'nastiness' of the Journolist group and how 'they are using their media power to remake the world in their image.' Honest to PETE! Do they ALL wear tin hats???

Posted by: SYSPROG on July 30, 2010 at 2:16 PM | PERMALINK

"..As a conservative, I normally write more favorably about Republicans than Democrats and I routinely treat conservative ideas as superior to liberal ones. "

Why Fred? Why wouldn't you consider ideas on the basis of their own individual merit, instead whether they originated from Republicans or Democrats. Are you incapable of independent thought? Have you always been this stupid?

Posted by: Shrillhouse on July 30, 2010 at 2:51 PM | PERMALINK

-Fred forgot to mention that butter won't melt in his mouth. . .

Posted by: DAY on July 30, 2010 at 3:08 PM | PERMALINK

It may seem like hair splitting I suppose but Fred is an employee not a team member, getit?

Posted by: thebewilderness on July 30, 2010 at 3:09 PM | PERMALINK

Gee, Fred....
Precisely which conservative ideas have proved to be so vastly superior to liberal ideas? Was it the idea of invading a sovereign nation that had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11, thereby destroying America's reputation for sanity worldwide? Or was it torturing innocent prisoners (after the Orwellian attempt to rename them "detainees") without benefit of trial? Or maybe it was shipping $3 billion dollars in shrink-wrapped Benjamins into a war zone and trusting low-level contractors and flunkies to hand it out without any accounting or records. Or, maybe it was spending a trillion and a half dollars on two simultaneous catastrophically botched wars, while slashing taxes on the wealthiest Americans, thereby putting my future grandchildren in debt for their entire lives?
Oh, wait; I got it! It was gutting all Federal regulation of Wall Street, facilitating the nearly complete melt-down of our economy, forcing the taxpayers to bail out the billionaires of Goldman-Sachs.

Which is your favorite, Fred?

Posted by: Geoff Wittig on July 30, 2010 at 3:42 PM | PERMALINK

Republican "journalists" like Fred Barnes do not need a "team" like Journolist, where ideas are being discussed and, possibly, *adjusted* accordingly to what facts support. Republican "journalists" like Fred Barnes get their talking points ready-made, from Luntz.

Posted by: exlibra on July 30, 2010 at 4:50 PM | PERMALINK

Not impressed with the reasoning here. Barnes' partisanship is well-known and all these instances are absolutely out in the open. The slam on Journolist is that it was a closed, sub rosa association whose members banded together to support candidates (or tear them down) without being aboveboard about their actions. There is still an argument to made whether that was OK or not, but the comparison to Barnes is logically leaky.

Posted by: hmi on July 30, 2010 at 5:03 PM | PERMALINK

Barnes is an ignorant loser.

Posted by: Sam Simple on July 31, 2010 at 3:15 PM | PERMALINK




 

 

Read Jonathan Rowe remembrance and articles
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM



buy from Amazon and
support the Monthly


Place Your Link Here

--- Links ---

Boarding Schools

Addiction Treatment Centers

Alcohol Treatment Center

Bad Credit Loan

Long Distance Moving Companies

FREE Phone Card

Flowers

Personal Loan

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs