Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

August 10, 2010

STATE-AID JOBS BILL ON ITS WAY TO THE OVAL OFFICE.... Late last week, the Senate overcame a Republican filibuster and passed a state aid package, including $10 billion to save the jobs of teachers, firefighters, and police officers, and $16.1 billion in state Medicaid funding (FMAP). The package, which is fully paid for, passed 61 to 38, with all but two Republicans in opposition.

The House interrupted its August recess to come back to the House today, specifically to vote on this bill in emergency session. There was some talk that antsy Dems might balk at the notion of additional spending -- even to save hundreds of thousands of jobs -- but when the dust cleared this afternoon, the House had done the right thing.

The House on Tuesday approved 247-161 a $26 billion state-aid bill that will funnel $10 billion to education funding and $16 billion to Medicaid.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) contends the legislation will save or create 319,000 jobs, which includes positions for teachers, police officers and firefighters.

Republican opposition pointed primarily to the bill closing a loophole that currently allows U.S. multinational companies to take advantage of foreign tax credits.

President Obama, who'd been lobbying for the legislation, will reportedly sign the measure into law tonight. What's more, the White House blog has an item touting the significance of the bill.

All told, as many as 900,000 public and private sector jobs could have been lost if this bill weren't passed -- the last thing our economy needs. Keeping these Americans at work, whether they are teachers in the classroom or police keeping our streets safe, will also help ensure that the economic recovery keeps moving forward. With the House and Senate both having passed this legislation now, the President will sign it quickly.

Update: In a statement, DNC Chairman Tim Kaine raises a noteworthy point: "There could not be a better example of the differences in priorities between Republicans and Democrats than this legislation. While Democrats are working to help preserve the jobs of hundreds of thousands of teachers, firefighters, police officers and others, Republicans continue to obstruct legislation while supporting tax cuts that would only benefit Wall Street CEOs and other wealthy Americans. Even after Democrats made every effort to reach out to GOP lawmakers, Republicans fought tooth-and-nail against this critical legislation -- refusing to help those who continue to struggle because of the failed Republican economic policies of the past. This stark difference in priorities could not be more clear to the American people, who now have yet another reminder of which party is on their side."

Second Update: Here's the roll call. Only two Republicans voted for the jobs bill, while 158 opposed it. Among Dems, 245 supported the measure, while three Blue Dogs voted against it.

Steve Benen 3:55 PM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (7)

Bookmark and Share

I for one am very grateful that Congress passed this bill. It means that I will get my first rate increase (I am a legal transcriptionist) in almost 10 years.

Posted by: karen marie on August 10, 2010 at 4:05 PM | PERMALINK

Those three Blue Dogs who voted against this bill need to be put to sleep!

Posted by: Sam Simple on August 10, 2010 at 4:12 PM | PERMALINK

Where is NeilB?

Posted by: tiredofgreed on August 10, 2010 at 4:16 PM | PERMALINK

Michelle Bachman told Hannity yesterday that the unions would skim their dues off the top, and then use the money to re-elect liberals.

Apparently, from today's vote, the lie didn't fly. . .

Posted by: DAY on August 10, 2010 at 4:28 PM | PERMALINK

Congressman Mark Kirk of Illinois voted against it after saying publicly, yesterday, that he was "inclined" to vote for it. His opponent in the Senate race, Alexi Giannoulias, is all over him about it and the Sun-Times and Trib are carrying the story prominently. Kirk is managing to piss away what seemed to be a distinct advantage in the race.

Posted by: JackD on August 10, 2010 at 6:54 PM | PERMALINK

But I thought Obamination was doing nothing at all to stem the jobs hemorrhage? Or, even worse, was working underground to open the veins wider? Sneering at unions and such (teachers, policemen and firefighters are, probably, one of the last bastions of unionisation)? Yet you say he was lobbying *for* the bill... It doesn't compute.

And, Thanks, Nancy!

Posted by: exlibra on August 10, 2010 at 10:29 PM | PERMALINK

thank you washingtonmonthly

Posted by: vpills on August 14, 2010 at 3:45 AM | PERMALINK



Read Jonathan Rowe remembrance and articles
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM

buy from Amazon and
support the Monthly