Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

August 16, 2010

CAMPAIGN INVESTMENTS THAT CAN CHANGE THE CYCLE.... When looking ahead to the midterms, it's not uncommon to compare Democratic finances to Republican finances. Money isn't always the deciding factor, but the edge the Democratic campaign committees have over their Republican counterparts may give the appearance of an advantage.

It's worth emphasizing, then, that comparing the parties' cash on hand leaves out a key consideration -- outside groups that are planning to spend heavily, usually attacking Democrats. The L.A. Times had this report today, for example.

A conservative advocacy group Monday will kick off a huge ad campaign in 11 states and two dozen of the most competitive congressional races, slamming "wasteful federal spending."

The $4.1-million ad buy from the Americans for Prosperity Foundation does not mention individual candidates in the November election. The script attacks Washington policies, describing the economic stimulus program as a failure and declaring that "wasteful spending must stop."

The ads -- part of a midterm election likely to be the most expensive on record -- will run in 27 media markets through August. Democrats hold all but one of the 24 House seats in question, including 17 incumbents seeking reelection.

The television buys are in Arkansas, Indiana, Michigan, Missouri, North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia and Wisconsin. Several of those, including Ohio, Pennsylvania and Missouri, also have tight Senate races. The group is expected to continue funding ad buys throughout the fall and across the country.

DCCC Chairman Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) described it as "the biggest ad buy I am aware of this summer." The financing is secret, but the ads are believed to be financed, at least in part, by wealthy right-wing activist David Koch.

Voters seeing the ads won't know who's paying for them, or what the sponsoring group is all about, or whether there's any merit to the arguments. But a $4.1-million ad buy is going to get noticed, and it's going to affect public opinion.

What's more, voters should expect to see a lot more of these efforts over the next 77 days, with business groups gearing up to crush as many Democratic candidates as possible.

The latest blatant signs of hostility come from coal executives who are considering starting up their own political operation to work against candidates they deem unfriendly to their interests. Their first three targets are all Democrats.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has already vowed to invest $75 million in the mid-term elections. And health insurers are also planning to play big in November, although the specifics remain in flux.

And all of this, of course, comes on the heels of Karl Rove's American Crossroads operations, which is poised to raise and spend tens of millions of dollars just on the midterms.

Democratic House candidates may currently enjoy a 2-to-1 edge in cash on hand over Republicans, but once corporate, post-Citizens United money is factored into the equation, the advantage quickly disappears.

Steve Benen 1:40 PM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (15)

Bookmark and Share
 
Comments

This fall's campaign will be just the starting point for corporate and wealthy interests' control of the political process. They will learn from this fall's campaigns how to utilize the 'free speech' which money now possesses and following campaigns will encounter greater increases of 'independent spending' to dis-elect those who are not 'appropriately friendly' to their interests.

Thanks to the Roberts' Court for truly making our country The United Corporations of Amerika.

Today's question is: How fucked are the working class of Americans?

Answer: Completely and totally fucked!

Posted by: AngryOldVet on August 16, 2010 at 2:00 PM | PERMALINK

The middle class will be a thing of the past. 21st century feudalism, here we come. The peasant class working until they drop dead while the rich get richer behind their closed gate communities.

And the Tea Partiers blame democrats for their problems. America, the Empire, is crumbling.

Posted by: citizen_pain on August 16, 2010 at 2:03 PM | PERMALINK

Why exactly haven't the Dems proposed a constitutional amendment overturning Citizens United?. If you want to get voters to the polls in NOV, this is the way.

Posted by: Jimmy1256 on August 16, 2010 at 2:06 PM | PERMALINK

Well, if the commercials don't have to say who is paying for, doesn't that permit the other side to "speculate" in response ads who is paying for them? As Peggy Noonan would say, it would be irresponsible not to! "I see my candidacy is being opposed by Bermie Madoff, AIG, Ken Lay, etc.. Gentlemen, bring it on."

Posted by: John Dillinger on August 16, 2010 at 2:11 PM | PERMALINK

"Bye bye Miss American Pie..."

The Tea Party was never anti taxes. It was croporate america realizing that Roberts and the other dead-end lifers on the SUPREME COURT, throwing the salt onto the slugs formally known as "the Middle Class", were their most likely candidates to end the class warfare struggle via dealing the final fatal blow to those middle class upstarts and their stupid dreams.

The supreme irony is that it is the vestiges of that once proud class that has aged and fallen for the rhetoric of the GOP that tells them all is lost with progressive views are the very people that once made that class possible with hard fought unionizing, manufacturing jobs and actually buying the products they were making. All of that was just too much for the rich. What, upper middle class over-steppers joining my Yacht Club? Country Club? Better crush them soon.

The voices ($$$$) pitching this corporate hogwash will find its mark and the "slugs" will shrivel-up and die. Just like our country. Thanks Roberts, Alito, Scalia, Kennedy and Thomas. Hope you are sleeping well. No doubt you are. Nauseating....

Posted by: stevio on August 16, 2010 at 2:21 PM | PERMALINK

This is probably not practical and certainly won't be embraced by the Democrats because they still believe in the old paradigm of competition and outspending your opponent. Of course, most of the money being spent on media ads ends up in the pockets of the very media owners who daily avoid telling the whole truth about Republican candidates and movements.

Instead of buying ads from the media, fact check every claim by the opposition and, where relevant, file law suits for lying, slander or libel against those telling the lies about the Democrats or whoever is out there challenging the policies that actually benefit people.

Hold press conferences exposing the lies and misrepresentations, with documentation. If they have the courage, they will name names and show the connections with corporations, foreign governments and wealthy individuals who will directly benefit from the Republican policies. Recruit whistleblowers to reveal facts and secrets, and protect them with legal assistance. Spend the money where it will benefit the people, not the corporations.

Maybe it is impractical and pie-in-the-sky optimism, but truth and transparency will win in the end. I'd like to see the courage of WikiLeaks demonstrated in our politicians. And, by the way, The Coffee Party USA is doing an outstanding job of bringing together cooperative groups and not using the abusive tactics of the Tea Party.

I am committed to Oneness through Justice and Transformation
peace,
st john

Posted by: st john on August 16, 2010 at 2:22 PM | PERMALINK

O.K. So, the GOP buys control of everything, in 2010, 2012. And then what?

The majority of Americans become unemployed peons, fighting over who gets to mow the master's lawn.

-I wonder if they have thought this through. . .

Posted by: DAY on August 16, 2010 at 2:41 PM | PERMALINK

Herein lies even more evidence that many so-called 'conservatives' are actually orthodox Marxists. After all, the end result of a smaller and smaller ruling class cowering behind the walls of their gated communities, as the numbers of poor continue to swell will be the very proletarian revolution that they claim to abhor.

The genius of FDR was that the New Deal prevented the continued collapse of the US middle class, which could have led to a proletarian revolution in the 1930s. Apparently, this preservation of the US way of life is entirely unacceptable to the orthodox communists making up the ruling class, so they insist on hurrying along the revolution.

Considering that this doesn't exactly end well for the ruling class, one wonders why they seem so eager for it to happen.

Viva la revolucion,
-Z

Posted by: Zorro on August 16, 2010 at 2:43 PM | PERMALINK

As usual John Lennon said it best.

You say you got a real solution
Well, you know
We'd all love to see the plan
You ask me for a contribution
Well, you know
We're doing what we can
But when you want money
for people with minds that hate
All I can tell is brother you have to wait

Posted by: KurtRex1453 on August 16, 2010 at 2:50 PM | PERMALINK

As usual John Lennon said it best.

You say you got a real solution
Well, you know
We'd all love to see the plan
You ask me for a contribution
Well, you know
We're doing what we can
But when you want money
for people with minds that hate
All I can tell is brother you have to wait

Posted by: KurtRex1453 on August 16, 2010 at 2:50 PM | PERMALINK

Zorro - nice comment. I would only add that the ruling class is not afraid of a revolution, and they do not view it as inevitable like you do.

And that is because today's oligarch's haven't seen a decent strike larger than Republic Windows, or any pro-labor legislation (let alone EFCA), so why worry about a revolution?

Posted by: Ohioan on August 16, 2010 at 3:36 PM | PERMALINK

So everyone and anyone can be a Meg Whitman!

Posted by: Trollop on August 16, 2010 at 3:48 PM | PERMALINK

oh and remind me to pull my pic of Mao out of mothballs.

Posted by: KurtRex1453 on August 16, 2010 at 6:56 PM | PERMALINK

Being a veteran of 47 years of American party politics, (with a few years out for the Army,) I find myself very puzzled by the emphais in the Left on corporqte influences. Anyone who is very involved in Republican affairs is well aweare that Big Businesds doesn't have all that much influence, and hass far fewer voters to mobilize than Small Business does. So many of the rants I see just don't match the reality you see in the real worlkd.

Posted by: John D. Froelich on August 16, 2010 at 11:08 PM | PERMALINK

Every time I think about splurging on dinner at Chili's, I think to myself: No, I'll forego the restaurant meal and give the money to the NRCC or American Crossroads instead. Some middle class people like me want smaller federal government.

Posted by: Old Oak Tree on August 17, 2010 at 9:46 AM | PERMALINK




 

 

Read Jonathan Rowe remembrance and articles
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM



buy from Amazon and
support the Monthly


Place Your Link Here

--- Links ---

Boarding Schools

Addiction Treatment Centers

Alcohol Treatment Center

Bad Credit Loan

Long Distance Moving Companies

FREE Phone Card

Flowers

Personal Loan

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs