Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

September 3, 2010

PAUL RYAN DOESN'T BELIEVE IN THE TAX FAIRY.... A couple of months ago, Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) got the ball rolling on a mind-numbing discussion. He insisted that tax cuts don't have to be paid for, because they necessarily pay for themselves -- an idea so ridiculous that no credible economist takes it seriously. Kyl added, however, that his absurd position is endorsed by "most of the people in my party," a claim that proved to be true.

To his credit, Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), the man poised to take over the House Budget Committee next year if there's a GOP majority, noted on CNBC this morning, "Look, I'm not one of these people who says that all tax cuts pay for themselves." Good for him. As far as I can tell, he's literally the only leading Republican in Washington who's been willing to say this on the record.

What's more, I'm also inclined to give Paul at least some credit for saying that Republicans are committed to fighting for Bush-era rates for the very wealthy, but that the GOP should try to pay for its policy.

That's the good news. The bad news comes when contemplating how Paul intends to go about doing this.

There's "plenty of the room" in the federal budget to cut $700 billion in spending to pay for extending high-end tax cuts, a top Republican said Friday.

Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), the ranking member of the House Budget Committee, said he'd be happy to draft a budget to make cuts in spending to offset the budget gap that would be created by extending tax cuts for the wealthiest households, which are set to expire at the end of the year.

"[W]e can cut spending to pay for it," said Ryan, who would likely take over the Budget Committee if Republicans win control of the House this fall, on CNBC.... "There's plenty of spending to cut to accommodate that," he explained. "So I'm more than happy to draft legislation to cut $700 billion dollars."

Great, let's see it. Let's get a good long look -- before the election -- at the Republican plan to pay for their massive tax breaks for America's very wealthy. There's $700 billion of unnecessary spending lying around, all of which should be devoted not to deficit reduction, not to economic recovery, but to tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires?

I'm all ears. Let's have the debate, letting voters know exactly what the GOP's priorities are.

Steve Benen 3:55 PM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (8)

Bookmark and Share
 
Comments

let me guess --- repeal health care reform and kill the rest of the stimulus.

sure as hell won't involve defense cuts, or tax loopholes.

Posted by: Alli on September 3, 2010 at 3:58 PM | PERMALINK


Umm ... that's easy. See, here's the one-line budget draft:

"Spend $700,000,000,000 less in 2011."

Wasn't that easy? Now, some may get all worked up over numbers and details like *where* we spend less money, but Ryan there's a big picture man. Details are for the little people.

Posted by: Tom Dibble on September 3, 2010 at 3:59 PM | PERMALINK

Small nitpick, Steve, but you refer to Paul Ryan in your post several times as "Paul." I think you mean to say Ryan.

Posted by: brent on September 3, 2010 at 4:01 PM | PERMALINK

Its very simple. Government spending is absolutely necessary to maintain and support the lives of poor and middle class people and tax cuts are necessary to maintain the lifestyles of the rich. Its very easy to determine which side you are on.

Posted by: bob kagan on September 3, 2010 at 4:11 PM | PERMALINK

RYAN: “Look, I'm not one of these people who says that all tax cuts pay for themselves.

Still weasel words.

NO tax cuts pay for themselves.

Posted by: Joe Friday on September 3, 2010 at 4:24 PM | PERMALINK

Yeah, right. I'm so sure he's going to spell it out.

Posted by: fourlegsgood on September 3, 2010 at 4:28 PM | PERMALINK

Also, even if there were easily $700B to cut from the budget, a concurrent tax cut that consumes $700B _is a wash_. It doesn't reduce the deficit one red (state) cent.

Posted by: FlipYrWhig on September 3, 2010 at 4:45 PM | PERMALINK

input this URL:
( http://www.fashiongoods.us )
you can find many cheap and fashion stuff
(jor dan s-h-o-e-s)
(NBA NFL NHL MLB j-e-r-s-e-y)
( lv h-a-n-d-b-a-g)
(cha nel w-a-l-l-e-t)
(D&G s-u-n-g-l-a-s-s-e-s)
(ed har dy j-a-c-k-e-t)
(UG G b-o-o-t)

WE ACCEPT PYAPAL PAYMENT
YOU MUST NOT MISS IT!!!

Posted by: gaga94 on September 3, 2010 at 8:19 PM | PERMALINK




 

 

Read Jonathan Rowe remembrance and articles
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM



buy from Amazon and
support the Monthly


Place Your Link Here

--- Links ---

Boarding Schools

Addiction Treatment Centers

Alcohol Treatment Center

Bad Credit Loan

Long Distance Moving Companies

FREE Phone Card

Flowers

Personal Loan

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs