November 16, 2010
KYL INTENT ON DESTROYING U.S. FOREIGN POLICY.... This isn't just political madness; this is petty partisanship that literally puts American national security interests at risk.
A key Republican senator cast doubt Tuesday on the Obama administration's chances of passing the nuclear treaty with Russia during the lame duck session of Congress.
Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Arizona, who is taking the lead for Republicans on negotiating with the administration on the treaty passage, said in a statement he told Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, that the treaty should not be considered before January, when the newly elected Congress is seated.
"When Majority Leader Harry Reid asked me if I thought the treaty could be considered in the lame duck session, I replied I did not think so given the combination of other work Congress must do and the complex and unresolved issues related to START and modernization," the statement from Kyl read. "I appreciate the recent effort by the Administration to address some of the issues that we have raised and I look forward to continuing to work with Senator (John) Kerry, DOD, and DOE officials," referring to the Department of Defense and Department of Energy.
The issues that Kyl describes as "unresolved" have, in fact, been resolved -- leading administration officials have met with Kyl privately, and mapped out in detail how they're prepared to do exactly what he wants them to do. Even Jon Kyl, with his limited intellect, should be able to understand when someone says "yes" to his demands.
Under the circumstances, it appears that Kyl is opposing the treaty simply because he can. By all indications, Kyl simply cares more about defeating a key priority for President Obama than advancing the nation's interests. I wish that weren't true, but I'm hard pressed to come to any other conclusion.
I wouldn't say the treaty is dead just yet, but Kyl's mindless, genuinely stupid obstinacy has certainly put the arms treaty on death's door. He's suggested the Senate can try again next year, but no serious person believes it can be ratified after the Democratic majority shrinks -- it's pretty much now or never.
And if it fails, the consequences will be severe. U.S.-Russian relations will deteriorate dramatically; inspection of Russian long-range nuclear bases will be suspended indefinitely; and American credibility on the global stage will take a painful hit -- all because one right-wing Arizonan hates the president a little too much.
We are, by the way, talking about a treaty endorsed by six former secretaries of state and five former secretaries of defense from both parties; the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; seven former Strategic Command chiefs; national security advisers from both parties, and nearly all former commanders of U.S. nuclear forces.
French Ambassador Pierre Vimont recently said that after he and other diplomats reported back to Europe about the possibility of congressional opposition to the treaty, "People ask us, 'Have you been drinking?'"
The world simply doesn't understand how hysterically ridiculous the Republican Party of the 21st century has become. Why would American lawmakers reject a treaty that benefits America? The notion that a legislature would hate their president more than they love their country just doesn't seem plausible.
The administration reached out to Kyl in good faith, and gave him what he wanted. Kyl's response isn't just a betrayal of the White House; it's a betrayal of all of our interests. It's as shameful a moment for Kyl as at any point in his career -- and he doesn't even realize it.
—Steve Benen 3:30 PM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (32)
Maybe Evan Bayh can help on this one!
Posted by: mike reilly on November 16, 2010 at 3:31 PM | PERMALINK
KYL INTENT ON DESTROYING U.S.
... fixed it for you ....
Posted by: G.Kerby on November 16, 2010 at 3:36 PM | PERMALINK
The link to the WaPo article contains an extra slash that prevents it from opening.
Posted by: Area Man on November 16, 2010 at 3:36 PM | PERMALINK
Of course he realizes it. Why do you keep giving these jackasses credit that they most certainly do not deserve? Or is Kyl another one of those "confused" rightwingers that just needs to be shown the error of his ways?
Posted by: bikelib on November 16, 2010 at 3:39 PM | PERMALINK
Why are the Dems shouting from the rooftops: "When will Repubs stop playing games with national security?"
- Stalling on START
- Delaying defense appropriations due to homophobia
- Plotting with foreign leaders against the administration
- Ignoring DoD and SecDef attempts to curtail unnecessary/unwanted sunny-day-only fighter jets
- Warmongering for another unwarranted war with Iran
What have I left out? The headline should be "Republicans Weak on Defense--Country in Danger"
Posted by: Old Patch on November 16, 2010 at 3:41 PM | PERMALINK
Typos weaken my point (sigh)
First sentence should read "Why AREN'T Dems shouting from rooftops"
Posted by: Old Patch on November 16, 2010 at 3:43 PM | PERMALINK
Theoretically, the elected representatives of a democracy personify the will of the electorate, to the extent they were elected by a majority. They occupy their positions as representatives of the people's wishes.
Therefore, the conclusion that Americans wish America destroyed is inescapable. Perhaps they have some new vision of what can be made of the splintered pieces that we are as yet unable to see. Whatever it is, it seems to be worth the relinquishing of every advantage - some arrived at easily and some the result of bitter struggle - that the USA has gathered in better than 200 years.
Posted by: Mark on November 16, 2010 at 3:49 PM | PERMALINK
The headline should be "Republicans Weak on Defense--Country in Danger"
Posted by: Old Patch
Or "Republicans Endanger America"
Posted by: Johnny Canuck on November 16, 2010 at 3:52 PM | PERMALINK
So what is his E-mail address? Let us flood it with Please vote for START Now! Why do we hear so little about this? Where is our President and the Senators who support START?
Posted by: iyoumeweus on November 16, 2010 at 3:55 PM | PERMALINK
The Obama Administration should take the same position as prior administrations:
Never negotiate with terrorists.
Posted by: bdop4 on November 16, 2010 at 3:57 PM | PERMALINK
Will no one write a sternly deploring letter ?
Posted by: FRP on November 16, 2010 at 3:57 PM | PERMALINK
"Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Arizona, who is taking the lead for Republicans on negotiating with the administration on the treaty passage..."
Why the heck is the minority party negotiating with the president for passage of an international treay? They can't just simply vote on the merits of the treaty? Do they want tax cuts for the rich in exchange for a yes vote on something that will improve American, and world security?
Posted by: delNorte on November 16, 2010 at 3:58 PM | PERMALINK
"and he doesn't even realize it."
He realizes it, but no one else will, because those that control the media won't mention it, therefore it didn't happen.
Posted by: qwerty on November 16, 2010 at 3:58 PM | PERMALINK
Steve Rep. Rangel? Any news? I was hoping to read about due process and how two million dollars just isn't enough to defend yourself.
Posted by: johnNJ on November 16, 2010 at 4:01 PM | PERMALINK
Actually Kyl is on very firm ground - by definition any project/idea/treaty supported by Barack Hussein Obama will be to America's detriment.
Posted by: tom on November 16, 2010 at 4:07 PM | PERMALINK
It's as shameful a moment for Kyl as at any point in his career -- and he doesn't even realize it.
Anyone who would hold a big national security item like this hostage in order to extort funding has no shame.
Posted by: grape_crush on November 16, 2010 at 4:08 PM | PERMALINK
Will no one write a sternly deploring letter ?
Posted by: FRP on November 16, 2010 at 3:57 PM
Haha! That's perfect, and sadly, probably all that will be done.
Posted by: electrolite on November 16, 2010 at 4:10 PM | PERMALINK
delNorte, the short answer to your question is 60,67. To bring the matter to the floor for a vote the Senate must vote at least 60-40. To pass a treaty the Senate must vote at least 67-33. There are 41 Republicans in the current Senate. Almost nothing comes to a vote unless the Republicans allow it.
Posted by: Ron Byers on November 16, 2010 at 4:11 PM | PERMALINK
Maybe the positions of Pepresentative and Senator will be the next jobs to be outsourced. Surely there has to be some country somewhere that has people who are qualified to fill these jobs, because there are surely not enough here.
More thought and effort goes into deciding who will appear on "Dancing With the Stars" or "American Idol" than who will be this nation's political leaders. Maybe Simon Cowell will available in 2010 to scrwwn candidates?
Posted by: broken arrow on November 16, 2010 at 4:14 PM | PERMALINK
So what is his E-mail address? Let us flood it with Please vote for START Now! Why do we hear so little about this? Where is our President and the Senators who support START?
Posted by: iyoumeweus on November 16, 2010 at 4:22 PM | PERMALINK
There are times when I honestly believe members of the Christian right are actively working to bring about Armageddon. They want their rapture so they go meet Jesus.
Posted by: thorin-1 on November 16, 2010 at 4:58 PM | PERMALINK
You give far too much credit to Senator Kyl. It won't be just his fault America fails. It will be every Senator who votes against it that is at fault.
Kyl is just one idiot among many.
Posted by: kindness on November 16, 2010 at 5:10 PM | PERMALINK
I'm just absolutely appalled that a SINGLE Senator can block legislation. The Senate is an disgrace.
Posted by: Vince on November 16, 2010 at 5:11 PM | PERMALINK
The administration reached out to Kyl in good faith...
There's the problem right there. Obama needs to appoint a Czar for Fucking Over Republicans, someone who can find military bases to close, contracts to void, and other means of keeping these bastards in line. Has Alan Grayson found a new job yet?
Posted by: hells littlest angel on November 16, 2010 at 5:25 PM | PERMALINK
Hear, Hear!!! Czar for Fucking Over Republicans!! What a great idea! Unfortunately, it would require someone with courage, not to mention someone who would ignore feverish pleas to negotiate. If you even say the word "negotiate" around a Democrat, they go all dreamy-eyed and flopppy, it's just irresistable to them. They even like to negotiate on done deals, as you've probably noticed.
Posted by: Mark on November 16, 2010 at 5:42 PM | PERMALINK
Start by cancelling all the sweeteners offered to Kyl in exchange for his (non-)support. Maybe the treaty goes through, maybe not, but he doesn't get his deal after backstabbing.
Sounds obvious, but it seems to me that one of the problems in Obama's first two years was their tolerance of duplicity and bad actors (starting with the all the Republican poison pills in the stimulous bill, which were kept even after they voted against).
Posted by: ElegantFowl on November 16, 2010 at 6:04 PM | PERMALINK
"a Czar for Fucking Over Republicans"
Wasn't that supposed to be Rahm's job before he bailed? You remember Rahm,don't you--the guy who was supposed to be tough and knew Congress so well?
Posted by: Seould on November 16, 2010 at 6:09 PM | PERMALINK
Kyl; this is the guy who thought that inspections were ongoing while he stalled. Dangerous. And dumb, no, stupid. Dumb means not knowing any better. Stupid means knowing better but doing it anyway.
Posted by: Tom M on November 16, 2010 at 7:02 PM | PERMALINK
Kyl and the Republican leadership are laughing their asses off while the "world as we find it" boys go back to their rooms to congratulate each other on the fine show of bipartisanship they've just displayed. More and more, 'we ask, they tell' is the recurring narrative in Uncle Obama's Administration.
Posted by: gone_west on November 16, 2010 at 7:25 PM | PERMALINK
Is it too much to hope that this travesty will wake Obama up to the fact that there is no compromising with these people. He tries and tries and tries and gives them what they want, and they still punk him with no intention of support.
I just hope that he will stop bending over and start fighting for this country. We need him to step forward and lead us, rather than continuing to give in to people whose first priority is to destroy him, whatever it takes.
Posted by: kim on November 16, 2010 at 9:11 PM | PERMALINK
Jon Kyl made up a fake conversation that never took place in a Congressional debate and submitted it as a brief to the Supreme Court. If anybody thinks they can negotiate in good faith with a lawmaker who fabricates evidence and submits it to the Supreme Court for fun then they are not bright people.
If Obama wants to make the START treaty a priority, stop everything and explain it real slow to the country. Instead he's going off to a NATO meeting or some other shit. Send Biden and rip the GOP in public and say Jon Kyl is preventing the US from inspecting Russian nuke sights.
I thought a stolen nuke was supposed to be part of the reason we were worried about terrorists so much?
Posted by: joejoejoe on November 17, 2010 at 4:16 AM | PERMALINK
"Even Jon Kyl, with his limited intellect, should be able to understand ..." Says the truly limited "intellectual."
I love the Technicolor landscape that splats on the canvas when your head explodes, Steve. It's just sooooo acid-trippy.
To paraphrase a pretender to the throne "You lost." Get over it!
Posted by: Phuckitall on November 17, 2010 at 9:01 AM | PERMALINK