Editore"s Note
Tilting at Windmills

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

November 22, 2010

HOUSE GOP QUIETLY EYEING ETHICS OFFICE FOR ELIMINATION.... The last time Republicans had a congressional majority in either chamber, the results weren't pretty -- the infamous "culture of corruption," especially in the House, ended up putting members of Congress literally behind bars. The widespread misconduct very likely contributed to the Democratic wave of 2006.

Most voters have probably forgotten all about this, or for those who do remember GOP corruption, at least hope Republicans won't go back to their nefarious ways. But just a few weeks after the midterm elections, one of the first orders of business appears to be Republicans quietly eyeing the elimination of the Office of Congressional Ethics.

Despite publicly promising more transparency and disclosure of the inner workings of Congress, behind closed doors, the GOP leadership has made moves indicating the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE) may be targeted for cuts or extinction.

According to an email seen by ABC News, Rep. David Dreier, R-Calif., called the OCE on Friday, Nov. 5, just three days after the midterm elections in which Republicans regained a majority and control of the House. During that phone conversation, ABC's source said, the California representative asked for justification of its continued existence.

A 22-member transition team has been convened to craft operating rules for the new GOP-led House, but it's worth noting that some of the members of this team -- most notably Reps. Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas) and John Campbell (R-Calif.) -- have themselves been targets of ethics investigations.

To clarify, the Office of Congressional Ethics is tasked with reviewing complaints against lawmakers, and deciding whether to refer the disputes to the House ethics committee (technically, the House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct) for investigation. If Republicans shut down OCE, the process of holding members accountable for ethics transgressions would either have to be immediately replaced with a new system, or the process would simply cease to function.

It's not surprising, of course, that some Republicans would want to scrap the office; one assumes arsonists would want to shut down fire departments, too. But the effort, if it proceeds, should send quite a message to voters about GOP priorities -- the party promised to change the way Congress operates, but voters may not have realized that meant making it easier for representatives to get away with ethics violations.

Steve Benen 11:25 AM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (15)

Bookmark and Share
 
Comments

They'll be privatizing that function to FOX news.

Posted by: Rathskeller on November 22, 2010 at 11:31 AM | PERMALINK

I, for one, welcome our new criminal overlords.

-Z

Posted by: Zorro on November 22, 2010 at 11:36 AM | PERMALINK

Now that the American electorate have voted out the incumbants for all the wrong reasons, do you think these unassuming voters will be paying attention to the actual people they decided to put into office?

What smucks! -Kevo

Posted by: kevo on November 22, 2010 at 11:37 AM | PERMALINK

But, but, we Repbulicans are sooooo ethical, and we'll be even moooooooore sooooooooooooo ethical, that we won't need the OCE!
Well, maybe we'll replace it with an ODE - Office of Democratic Ethics.
Yeah, yeah! That's the ticket!!!

Posted by: c u n d gulag on November 22, 2010 at 11:42 AM | PERMALINK

But, why should the RepuGs have that office, when, there are so few African-Americans in their party and in Congress? Only African-American Congress people are ethically challenged, eh?

Posted by: berttheclock on November 22, 2010 at 11:44 AM | PERMALINK

This is only a continuation of Republicans philosophy/strategy of the past four decades. All this "too-big" government is only a smoke screen to eliminate any law enforcement abilities against the corporate interests. Sorta like the Mafia winning political power and eliminating the police department budget. Look what's been done to the IRS. No, that independent-we-can-police-ourselves attitude is only good for the crooks by eliminating the cops.

Posted by: Darsan54 on November 22, 2010 at 12:00 PM | PERMALINK

And poor Dukie is crying buckets about his time in prison: he never should have pleaded guilty, it's all his lawyers' fault, life in prison sucks, had he known how tough prison is he never would have voted all those times for more stringent sentences for drug dealers (and Congressmen). No, no, ethics panels are really unnecessary - even if your congressperson keeps "price lists" of his services.

Posted by: Fess on November 22, 2010 at 12:10 PM | PERMALINK

But the effort, if it proceeds, should send quite a message to voters about GOP priorities

Unfortunately this is one of 'process' stories that the MSN largely ignores and public little educated about. Much like all the Senate rules that have allowed Republicans to gum up the works while the public just sees Democrats not getting anything done despite having an 'overwhelming' majority.

Posted by: thorin-1 on November 22, 2010 at 12:12 PM | PERMALINK

Oops. The story that tells the latest Cunningham story

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/nov/21/duke-cunningham-blames-lawyers-guilty-plea-2005/

Posted by: Fess on November 22, 2010 at 12:15 PM | PERMALINK

Classic tribal bullroar.

Whatever one thinks of this (slightly peculiar) office, it has only existed since 2008. If it ceased to exist tomorrow, the Ethics Committee would go back to taking cases in the same way it always had done before that.

Last August, by the way, a lot of Dems were trashing this office because it had recommended too many probes against blacks in the House. Now that the GOP may end it, we start reading overstated bullroar like this.

In August and again today: This is how modern liberals get dumbed way down by our "intellectual leaders."

Posted by: bob somerby on November 22, 2010 at 12:21 PM | PERMALINK

Shorter GOP: "We don't need no stinkin' ethics!"

Posted by: low-tech cyclist on November 22, 2010 at 2:06 PM | PERMALINK

I'm am anxious to see how this crucial show of leadership puts people back to work, improves our economy, and lowers our deficit.

[ ... sigh ... ]

Posted by: chrenson on November 22, 2010 at 2:26 PM | PERMALINK

If you recall, and I remember correctly, the members of the Congressional Ethics committee that were republican and went after DeLay, etc., lost their elections after that. At least one did because he got nothing in support from repubs when he ran. I even think there was a remark made by one repub (Hassert?) to a member of the committee that "you just don't do that to other repubs" or something similar.
It's a shame they lose good repubs like that to replace them with.....well, you fill in the blanks. I can't do it without cursing.

Posted by: Schtick on November 22, 2010 at 3:00 PM | PERMALINK

Tell Congress and all public officials commiting perjury/fraud to go home and tell the people to remember:UNITED WE STAND DIVIDED WE FALL!

Posted by: Joe on November 22, 2010 at 6:21 PM | PERMALINK

Isn't there SOME way we can hold these Republican'ts in contempt of Congress, since they apparently don't want to be there since they don't want to WORK? Or - can we Americans petition to have their paychecks "held hostage" until they stop doing the same to getting anything done for us?

Posted by: Diane on November 23, 2010 at 5:26 PM | PERMALINK




 

 

Read Jonathan Rowe remembrance and articles
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Free News & Updates

Advertise in WM



buy from Amazon and
support the Monthly


Place Your Link Here

--- Links ---

Boarding Schools

Addiction Treatment Centers

Alcohol Treatment Center

Bad Credit Loan

Long Distance Moving Companies

FREE Phone Card

Flowers

Personal Loan

Addiction Treatment

Phone Cards

Less Debt = Financial Freedom

Addiction Treatment Programs