December 6, 2010
WHEN MCCARTHYISM GETS LITERAL.... It's not uncommon for charges of "McCarthyism" to be used rather casually, stretching the intended meaning a bit. Once in a while, though, prominent Republican officials embrace the concept rather literally.
Today, Right Side News posted an interview with Rep. Steve King (R-IA). The interview touches a number of political topics, including King's belief that Congress shouldn't focus on the economy, but rather "culture," because "if you get the culture right, you'll get the economy right. Everything will fall into place automatically."
At one point, the interviewer referenced the October National Press Club press conference where Accuracy in Media's Cliff Kincaid called for the revival of the House Internal Security Committee, the 60′s-era successor to the McCarthyite House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC). Right Side News asked the congressman if he would support the "re-creation of such committees."
King answered, "I would. I think that is a good process and I would support it."
This kind of embrace of literal McCarthyite tactics is unusual, but not unheard of in contemporary American politics. During this year's U.S Senate race in Nevada, the Republican nominee agreed that "there are 'domestic enemies' and 'homegrown enemies' in the 'walls of the Senate and the Congress.'" A couple of years prior, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) told a national television audience there should be an investigation to determine which members of Congress are "pro-America or anti-America."
And in Texas, right-wing activists rewriting the state's curriculum are determined to tell students that McCarthy was a hero, "vindicated" by history.
Having said that, the recreation if an "Internal Security Committee," and the reintroduction of ideological witch hunts on Capitol Hill, would still be pretty extraordinary, even by GOP standards.
To be sure, King endorsed the idea, but as far as I can tell, he hasn't taken any steps to act on this. I guess we'll have to wait and see if this is the sort of thing officials might actually pursue.
—Steve Benen 3:10 PM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (13)
Well, yeah- except that later events, especially the opening of the KGB archives with the fall of the USSR, revealed that the much maligned McCarthy was correct.
Posted by: tom on December 6, 2010 at 3:19 PM | PERMALINK
The President is really a Keyan Marist, communist, Socialist Nazi spy sent here as a deep undercover mole at the age of one month. For that reason "Internal Security Committee" is far too restrictive.I think a better name for Citizen King's committee would be the "Committee for Public Safety."
Perhaps we could give Citizen King and his committee the power to summarily guillotine
anyone he and the committee decide are ememies of the state.
Posted by: Ron Byers on December 6, 2010 at 3:41 PM | PERMALINK
tom: To claim that McCarthy was "correct", you must argue that persecuting American citizens for their political and economic beliefs, and/or the beliefs of their associates and friends, is just. Except that it isn't just. In fact, not only is it unjust, it is *illegal*.
Therefore, McCarthy was not correct. He was about as wrong as it is possible to be.
Posted by: Shade Tail on December 6, 2010 at 3:42 PM | PERMALINK
Isn't that what their whole deal is all about. Going back to the 50s and erasing the 60s.
Posted by: Gandalf` on December 6, 2010 at 3:56 PM | PERMALINK
On further review I should clarify. Going back to the 1850s.
Posted by: Gandalf on December 6, 2010 at 3:57 PM | PERMALINK
There are fewer more sickening moments than to hear the name of McCarthy glorified in this way.
Tom, who claims McCarthy was 'correct', fails to take into account the damages that McCarthy and not the supposed 'commies' and 'pinkos' did to our country, and particularly to our culture: the Hollywood purges the ideological purity tests, the refusal even to know what you were supposed to be opposed to by effectively banning people from reading the stuff.
At the same time the Republican government condoned the mass importation of Nazi scientists and thinkers, embedding them into the government, the universities, space research et al., because Hitler there erstwhile Leader was the most anti-communist of them all.
I always thought the rebellions of the 60s that the McCarthyites were so fearful of was a direct result of the repressions they instituted. The atmosphere of the 50s was indeed stifling because of this alcoholic fanatic.
Posted by: jjm on December 6, 2010 at 4:05 PM | PERMALINK
And just to clarify, McCarthy was a Senator and not a member of HUAC. And the Red Hunting was going on in Congress long before McCarthy.
McCarthy just brought things to a whole new disgusting level starting with his list of however many he was claiming today Commies in the gov't to attacking soldiers and President Eisenhower while drinking himself to death.
So, McCarthyism is not just Red hunting, it is falsely using the accusation of communisim for political purposes and to harm innocent people.
Posted by: martin on December 6, 2010 at 4:50 PM | PERMALINK
Steve King was accused of McCarthyite tactics years ago, and his famous reply was "McCarthy was a great man." And, for the record and those who only know Fox history, no he wasn't, as his thousands of innocent victims and their descendents can tell you.
Posted by: ericfree on December 6, 2010 at 5:25 PM | PERMALINK
I would not be at all surprised to see the Traitor-Republicans try to bring back HUAC. Since their satanic agenda involves grinding the lower classes into the mud, it makes sense that they would bring red-baiting back into fashion preemptively so that they can slander and destroy anyone tries to advocate on behalf of the non-rich.
Posted by: Citizen Alan on December 6, 2010 at 6:21 PM | PERMALINK
History doesn't repeat itself (but it does rhyme), so my guess is Mr. King's dream is more akin to the Spanish Inquisition because that would allow him to endulge his penchant for torture. It's also further back in time which would better fit his reactionary policies. But it is the 21st Century, so maybe he would endorse burning at the stake with ethanol.
Posted by: Seould on December 6, 2010 at 6:58 PM | PERMALINK
I don't see just how a McCarthyite sort of investigation would work. The 'unamerican' enemies they seek are, in fact, their fellow citizens, who happen to hold different theologies, I mean, political views than the would be inquisitors. I just don't think they have the intellectual heft to pull off this sort of thing. I tend to think it would reveal the intellectual and moral poverty of King and Bachmann.
Maybe this could happen in a period mob rule or something, but I actually have hope 'hearings' on this sort of conservative political correctness would backfire. Just as I hope the proposed hearings on 'Climategate' backfire. I can see Fox being in on this but I still can't see what they would do? I mean, is it a crime to support a progressive income tax? Or trust scientific data instead of bogus reading of scripture and Oil company propaganda? Get people fired from their jobs (thinking academics here) for having the wrong 'unamerican' ideas?
I could be very wrong.
Posted by: MR Bill on December 6, 2010 at 8:47 PM | PERMALINK
"persecuting American citizens for their political and economic beliefs"
WRONG!
These "Americans" were acttively supporting an ideology that advocated the violent overthrow of our democracy and the establishment of a totalitarian Marxist (redundant) regime controlled by Moscow.
These "Americans" were, at best, to use Lenin's phrae, "useful idiots" and at worst traitors. Anyone who denies this and continues to malign Senator McCarthy is no better than they.
Posted by: tom on December 7, 2010 at 10:06 AM | PERMALINK
"Nazis imported by Republicans"
Jim, as with most leftists, is historically ignorant- the Nazis imported for their scientific knowledge all came to this country under a Democrat regime.
Posted by: tom on December 7, 2010 at 10:09 AM | PERMALINK