December 18, 2010
BOEHNER, BACHMANN, AND A RECKLESS COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENT.... As the start of the 112th Congress draws closer, House Republican leaders are making committee assignments for their new majority caucus. One assignment, in particular, appears inexplicable.
In a press release yesterday, incoming House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) explained, "The members of the House Intelligence Committee are charged with one of the most significant responsibilities of Congress -- keeping the American people safe by ensuring our nation's intelligence community has the resources and authorities it needs to succeed and conducting effective oversight of the Administration."
That seems like a reasonably fair assessment of the committee, though I'd also note that members of the House Intelligence Committee are given access to some of the nation's most sensitive materials and classified secrets. It's a panel that requires a great deal of its members, who can't so much as hint about what they're shown behind closed doors.
And with that in mind, this decision is just breathtaking.
Rep. Michele Bachmann, one of the most outspoken conservatives in the House, has won an appointment to the secretive House Intelligence Committee.
The move by incoming Speaker John Boehner to put Bachmann on the panel surprised Republican insiders, who see her as a fiery grass roots leader of the tea party movement but not necessarily a leader on national security among House Republicans.
Bachmann once suggested that Congress should investigate whether Democratic lawmakers were pro- or anti-America, and she's been a cable TV favorite because she's known for colorful sound bites.
Members of the Intelligence panel receive classified briefings in a secure conference room in the Capitol, and are sworn to secrecy about most of the committee's activities.
Look, I realize that Bachmann makes convenient fodder for jokes and mockery, but there's a good reason for that -- she's stark raving mad. Bachmann, in all seriousness, is one of the more ridiculous people to serve on Capitol Hill in my lifetime. I think most reasonable observers, regardless of party or ideology, should be able to agree that Bachmann lacks maturity, judgment, and the intellect needed to understand complex subjects.
Voluntarily assigning her responsibilities related to top secret intelligence and our national security is more than just a mistake -- it's arguably dangerous.
I've heard some whispers that have suggest Boehner is actually thinking strategically on this. Members of the Intelligence Committee are generally encouraged to avoid the media spotlight, and since Boehner very likely finds Bachmann embarrassing, this is his way of forcing her to keep a lower profile.
Perhaps there's something to this. But the fact remains that trusting Bachmann with our most guarded secrets is an inherently risky move.
—Steve Benen 10:00 AM
Permalink
| Trackbacks
| Comments (48)
With this assignment, the cumulative IQ of the House Intelligence Committee went down about 10 points. And the RepubliConfederates already on the committee aren't exactly rocket scientists either.
Putting Bachmann on this committee is like making Sarah "The Whore of Babblin' On" the President of MENSA.
Posted by: c u n d gulag on December 18, 2010 at 10:12 AM | PERMALINK
You would think that her past history of just blurting out the most ridiculous statements and claiming they are factual would immediately disqualify her for assignment to such a sensitive committee but here in the Bizzaro World of American "leadership" she appears extremely qualified according to our next Speaker of the House Boehner, moron that he is.
Posted by: Chris on December 18, 2010 at 10:14 AM | PERMALINK
Prediction: GuanoNutz Bachmann will go before the cameras and say, "I just saw some secret stuff, up in that room under the Capitol dome. I can't tell you what it is, but we need to impeach Obama. Immediately!"
Posted by: DAY on December 18, 2010 at 10:17 AM | PERMALINK
This is about Pissing Off Liberals.
That, Punishing Poor People, and Funneling Cash to the Rich, accounts for 90% of Republican "strategy."
Posted by: Gummo on December 18, 2010 at 10:18 AM | PERMALINK
This sounds like a response to WikiLeaks -- WackyLeaks.
While members of the committee are 'encouraged' to stay out of the media spotlight, there is absolutely no way tha Michelle Bachmann is buying into that 'Washington Insider' behavior. Watch for bizarre announcements with more detailed leaks of confidential information.
Posted by: grooft on December 18, 2010 at 10:18 AM | PERMALINK
The voters in her disrict disagree with you. Ain't it a bitch.
Posted by: EC Sedgwick on December 18, 2010 at 10:25 AM | PERMALINK
No matter how stupid something she spouts is, she never has to cite a source, all she has to do is say it is classified. She will be practically living on Fox News now.
Posted by: martin on December 18, 2010 at 10:30 AM | PERMALINK
Is Boehner putting the squirrels in charge of the Nuthouse? Heh!
Posted by: Russell Aboard M/V Sunshine on December 18, 2010 at 10:30 AM | PERMALINK
This is going to be a fun couple of years.
I think the Republicans are grooming her for a presidential run. She is as wacky as Sister Sarah (I love "the whore of babblin on" reference by the way) but she hasn't quit half way through her term and has actually run for reelection.
Posted by: Ron Byers on December 18, 2010 at 10:36 AM | PERMALINK
For Bachmann, this is perfect: Everything she does will be secret so she will have no culpability for earmarks, cutting funding for programs or actually doing any work. She can sit in the back and criticize.
For Boehner, this is also good: Bachmann might squawk when pork is added to a bill or deals are cut or too much is spent. She's a loose cannon. With this appointment, she is out of the way on a committee that has been asleep at the wheel for years. And it makes it look like he is treating Bachmann and the Tea Party with respect.
For the rest of America this, of course, sucks.
Posted by: TomP on December 18, 2010 at 10:36 AM | PERMALINK
Bachmann before election: Government is the problem!
Bachmann after HIC: Government is the problem!
Bachmann is a member of the problem now.
Posted by: Kll Bill on December 18, 2010 at 10:46 AM | PERMALINK
BTW I also bet that even on the HIC she will still say it cost a billion a day for Obamas trip.
Posted by: Kll Bill on December 18, 2010 at 10:48 AM | PERMALINK
Patrick Leahy was kicked off the Senate Intelligence Committee some years ago for leaking secrets and Rockefeller's staff was widely believed to be the source for the NY Times leaks that devastated our intelligence gathering ability under Bush. I wouldn't say Democrats have much to complain about.
Posted by: Mike K on December 18, 2010 at 10:56 AM | PERMALINK
I'm thinking this move is designed to placate her by giving her an "important" committee assignment, but one in which she will be pressured to keep her mouth shut. It's also an area in which she has no expertise or reputation (not that she has expertise in any other area).
If she goes off the reservation and makes inappropriate public statements, the Republican leadership can reprimand her without angering the Tea Party element in the party, since foreign policy/intelligence is not an important issue to that part of the party and they will understand the need to be discrete.
I see this as an astute move by the Republican leadership.
Posted by: DRF on December 18, 2010 at 11:02 AM | PERMALINK
Bachmann's a complete idiot. The more exposure she gets the better. There are millions swing voters like myself, registered Independent, who look for common sense, competence, intelligence, and people who have demonstrated they are not driven by radical ideology. The current Republican leadership in the House and Senate is a national embarrassment and dangerous to this country. Any self-inflicted wounds by these numbskulls are apppreciated. We will bury them with money in 2012 just like we did in 2008 and thin out the herd.
Posted by: max on December 18, 2010 at 11:05 AM | PERMALINK
More mindless repug-bashing, giving obama and dem leadership a free pass for empowering them and enabling everything you blog about.
How come obama and dems are not held accountable here?
steve, why do you think it is constructive to hammer one side all day when the other side does nothing but preach "bipartisenship", capitulate to the folks you deride here, and directly insult the folks that worked their butts off putting this corporate shill in office in the first place?
Posted by: jo on December 18, 2010 at 11:08 AM | PERMALINK
So, max? Where were you and your millions of like-minded souls last month? Inquiring minds want to know.
Posted by: KLG on December 18, 2010 at 11:09 AM | PERMALINK
Where is George Carlin when we need him?
Talk about a contradiction in terms! Bachmann and intelligence are complete strangers to each other.
Posted by: jjm on December 18, 2010 at 11:16 AM | PERMALINK
Putting Bachmann on this committee is like making Sarah "The Whore of Babblin' On" the President of MENSA.
Posted by: c u n d gulag
I find this hard to reconcile with the fact that(according to Wikipedia) she has an LLM in tax law, and from 1988 to 1993, Bachmann was a U.S. Treasury Department attorney in the US Federal Tax Court located in St. Paul.
I think she must be more clever like a fox than dumb like a rock.
Posted by: Johnny Canuck on December 18, 2010 at 11:18 AM | PERMALINK
jjm - I agree, backman and intelligence are difficult words to use in the same sentence.
So why does obama say we need to reach out to them and compromise?
Why, since appointing rahm (gratefully, he's gone now) has the administration repeatedly publicly slammed his base while publicly proclaiming we need to meet the wackos on their terms?
This post, like all the one-sided chatter steve writes, would be meaningful if it included some dialog about dem/obams's role in giving these people a platform by repeatedly using the lie of "bipartisanship"?
If the repugs are batshit-crazy, dem leadership and obama says we need to adopt at least 50 percent of their batshit!
Actually, he more likely capitulates 100% - his "signature" piece of legislation, a fraudulent insurance company bailout, was richard nixon's idea!
Why the free pass?
bachman would be irrelevant if obama stood some ground and did not give them credibility with his lies about "bipartisanship".
Some here need to take a time-trip back to last fall and remember how obama insults his supporters, empowers his enemies, and is giving them a launching pad back into power.
Unfortunately, we are likely to see mostof the decade of 2000 all over again.
And obama and dem leadership are largely to blame.
Wouldn't know that by reading steve's posts though.
Posted by: jo on December 18, 2010 at 11:25 AM | PERMALINK
She's already demonstrated she doesn't know when to keep her mouth shut. What makes anyone think she's going to start now, just because national security is at stake?
Posted by: Tomm Undergod on December 18, 2010 at 11:28 AM | PERMALINK
The DREAM ACT goes DOWN in flames... (55 for 41 against allowing it to come to a final vote)
Co-presidents Snowe and Ben Nelson voted against.
Sorry dudes! Dreams are not allowed in our country.
NEXT UP on the senate floor is killing repeal of DADT!
Posted by: SadOldVet on December 18, 2010 at 11:32 AM | PERMALINK
Patrick Leahy was kicked off the Intelligence Committee
Er, no. He shared an unclassified report that was not "secret" at all. This was against committee rules and he stepped down but he was not kicked off.
The report he shared with the media concerned the Republican administration breaking the law by selling arms to Muslim terrorists on the one hand and breaking it again by funding Nicaraguan terrorists on the other. You remember that one, dontcha Mike?
Rockefeller's staff was widely believed to be the source for the NY Times leaks
It is widely believed that you have encouraged violence against people in the Middle East because you entertain the racist belief that all they understand is force, and that you have no respect for the institution of marriage. Given the deep respect for rumor you just displayed here I knew you would have no problem with this being reported in a public forum.
Posted by: trex on December 18, 2010 at 11:44 AM | PERMALINK
Being from Minnesota, I have a long time to observe Bachmann. I don't think I would call her stupid although she's not exactly a scholar either. Her biggest problem is that she is pretty much completely divorced from reality. She's had an unbelievably long history of saying the most bizarre things.
1) Teacher's unions are plotting to enslave us all and turn your children gay.
2) She claims to have been held hostage by militant lesbians in a bathroom once.
3) She claims to have knowledge of a secret plan to divide Iraq and give part of it to Iran.
Posted by: DK on December 18, 2010 at 11:50 AM | PERMALINK
"this is his way of forcing her to keep a lower profile."
Exactly what I thought even before you said it. There is no other explanation.
Posted by: jharp on December 18, 2010 at 12:10 PM | PERMALINK
She's only interested in investigating Democrats for Un-American-ness, so what's the problem?
"If you haven't done anything wrong..."
Posted by: anonymouss on December 18, 2010 at 12:17 PM | PERMALINK
Thanks Boehner, now you're making me cry.
Posted by: Regis on December 18, 2010 at 12:37 PM | PERMALINK
It's not stupid, but calculating as usual: Bachmann will carry the neocon torch - harsh saber rattling, use of Iran as a bogeyman, reflexive support of Israel, political manipulation of patriotism and the supposed traitors (but never real traitors for money like the USCOC), etc. The baked jackass knows just what he's doing, even as half-baked Alaska rarely does.
Posted by: neil b on December 18, 2010 at 12:40 PM | PERMALINK
Mike K: typically libercon style obsession to use real or alleged hypocrisy as a red herring / ad hominem diversion away from the facts, as if the issues themselves were any different because of supposed "right" of complainer group X to talk since blah blah ...
Asshat.
Posted by: neil b. on December 18, 2010 at 12:46 PM | PERMALINK
"this is his way of forcing her to keep a lower profile."
If Boehner were a little more machiavellian and a little less of a drunken oompa-loompaish bully, I'd say exactly the opposite. Bachmann is incredibly likely to leak something she shouldn't. Chances are that that something will be relatively harmless when leaked, as are pretty much all government secrets these days. Still, when she leaks classified information and brags about it in public, there will be more than enough excuse to expel her from the House, and expelling her from the House is something that Boehner, more than anyone else in the country other than those in her district, should want. Bachmann's primary role in government is as a political embarrassment and a political danger to the Republican party, and I do think that even the Republican leadership is smart enough to realize this.
Posted by: R. Johnston on December 18, 2010 at 12:54 PM | PERMALINK
My guess is that she will be used as a 'throwaway piece' by the Republicans in the event one is needed...if I were in Bachmann's position, I'd watch my back.
Posted by: Dictynna on December 18, 2010 at 12:55 PM | PERMALINK
Nothing will be able to force this goofball to keep a lower profile.
She'll just think all her gibberish is vindicated and pretend she heard on the committee.
And that will presumptively extend to Sarah Palin.
Posted by: cld on December 18, 2010 at 12:55 PM | PERMALINK
My guess is that Boehner wants someone expendable to make wild accusations about imaginary threats to national security caused by Obama Administration policies.
It's win-win for Boehner: either the accusations stick, or he can blame the loose cannon.
Posted by: RepubAnon on December 18, 2010 at 1:07 PM | PERMALINK
Alcee Hastings, a former federal judge impeached and removed from office (one of only 19 federal officials impeached in this country's history, btw) not only sits on the House Intelligence Committee, but was also in the running for the chairmanship after the Democrats retook the House in 06.
Bachmann may be crazy, but I'm not aware of any professional or legal improprieties that rise to that level.
It's probably not in the Dems' best interests to raise too much of a stink over this.
Posted by: mr. joe on December 18, 2010 at 1:23 PM | PERMALINK
KLG:
"So, max? Where were you and your millions of like-minded souls last month? Inquiring minds want to know."
I voted and contributed. I'm an Independent - best player on the board. I voted for Republicans for several State and local offices as well as Democrats. However KLG, you be sure to stop back here in November 2012 when the Dems eat your lunch again. Republican over reaching put Obama in office. You think this gang of imbeciles about to take over the House won't over reach, I've got a bridge I want to sell you.
Posted by: max on December 18, 2010 at 1:44 PM | PERMALINK
In a Just, or Even a Sane World
any screw-ups by Bachman would be blamed on her and quite possibly the Republicans in general.
In 21st Century America, it's Obama and the whole Democratic Party who will get the blame if she spills "secrets" or angers foreign partners.
But look on the bright side - we've clearly got too many "secrets" that ought to be common knowlege, as Wikileaks proves every single day. If Bachman's big mouth makes it necessary for our spies and "diplomats" to do a lot more of their work under the glare of public scrutiny, good for her.
Although it pains me to have to say that... ;-)
Posted by: zandru on December 18, 2010 at 1:53 PM | PERMALINK
Re Bachmann's intelligence. Don't make the mistake of confusing intelligence and sanity. Bachmann is plenty bright; she is just paranoid and delusional. Most Republicans are, these days! She is just more so than most; she's what emboldens the rest.
I think it is a shrewd move by Boehner. It seems improbable, but she might learn something. A better informed Michelle Bachmann would be something to behold And either she'll have to keep her mouth shut (a good thing) or she'll say something egregious and Boehner gets to silence her (I expect he would consider that a good thing.)
Posted by: PTate in MN on December 18, 2010 at 3:25 PM | PERMALINK
A look at Bachmanns wiki page shows she doesnt do well on committees and usually gets booted off by her own peers.
Posted by: Kll Bill on December 18, 2010 at 3:38 PM | PERMALINK
And when she leaks some classified material, as she's sure to do, I wonder if she'll be treated like Bradley Manning and locked up in solitary....
Posted by: celiadexter on December 18, 2010 at 3:42 PM | PERMALINK
Bachmann is the leader of a significant faction of the in-coming majority party in the House. Boehner had to put her on some important committee. That's the bad news. The good news is she doesn't hold the chair.
The other good news: She will have access to information the CIA wants to keep secret and they will protect that information with their poisoned umbrella tips. Michelle had better learn to watch her mouth.
Posted by: Seould on December 18, 2010 at 5:28 PM | PERMALINK
Voluntarily assigning her responsibilities related to top secret intelligence related to national security is more than just a mistake -- it's arguably dangerous.
I've heard some whispers that have suggest Boehner is actually thinking strategically on this.
Uh, Steve? You might want to forego the Christmas eggnog before writing a post.
And when she leaks some classified material, as she's sure to do, I wonder if she'll be treated like Bradley Manning and locked up in solitary....
You have just divulged Boehner's Super Top Secret Plan for dealing with the Bachmann Problem.
Posted by: josef on December 18, 2010 at 6:46 PM | PERMALINK
Can Bachmann get a TOP Security clearance??
One way to shut Bachmann up is to assign her to a highly sensitvie position on Intelligence Committee. She opens her mouth and spills some classified info, she commits treason! Good bye Michelle. Good for all the country.
Posted by: CarmanK on December 18, 2010 at 8:05 PM | PERMALINK
I think Josef just trumped what I was thinking. If there is anyone who is going to go shooting off her big mouth inappropriately, it is Bachmann. Then she can spend the rest of her career in solitary contemplation of her misdeeds.
Posted by: Texas Aggie on December 18, 2010 at 9:25 PM | PERMALINK
I'm glad I have moved to Canada
Posted by: c knox on December 18, 2010 at 10:50 PM | PERMALINK
Hey, Bachmann MUST be smart! She has a JD from Oral Roberts University!
Posted by: Nancy Irving on December 19, 2010 at 6:53 AM | PERMALINK
She's an idiot, but there's no reason to think that she'd publicize classified info.
She's a lawyer, and on top of the usual consequences, could lose her law license.
Boehner was trying to do the right thing by putting her in a place where she was unlikely to hurt anything, unlike, e.g, Ways and Means.
Posted by: A conservative, not a fanatic on December 19, 2010 at 7:50 AM | PERMALINK
I just don't see how this insane woman gets a security clearance.
Honestly, when I first heard about this I thought it was a joke. I find it completely disgusting that Boehner would treat our national security with such disdain. It's despicable and there should be a national outcry about this. If this is any indication of his utter lack of judgement and respect for the integrity and function of the office, then we are entering a truly frightening tenure.
Posted by: meta on December 19, 2010 at 10:58 AM | PERMALINK
Mike, you never explained why any of that makes Bachmann a good choice for anything, and your examples were about fluff and not serious thoughtful issues. Nor do you even know what you want. Your party (?) just voted for a tax bill that means yet more increasing deficits, further enshrining the turd in the crown of Bushism: deficit-financed tax cuts for the rich. And what the hell kind of America do you "cats" want anyway - a wrecked, Dickensian banana republic? That's where you're taking us.
Posted by: neil b on December 19, 2010 at 2:22 PM | PERMALINK