Blog

  • November 20, 2009 06:43 PM Too Fat to Graduate?

    Freshman16.jpg

    The fitness examination for college graduation is nothing new but historically this was a sort of token test. Many colleges require students to swim the length of the pool or something to graduate. Well no longer. More than 25 seniors at Lincoln University might not graduate in the spring because they:

    Had body mass index (BMI) scores above 30 when they arrived on campus in the fall of 2006, but none have taken college-sanctioned steps to show they’ve lost weight or at least tried. They’re in the historically black university’s first graduating class required to either have a BMI below 30 or to take “Fitness for Life,” a one semester class that mixes exercise, nutritional instruction and discussion of the risks of obesity.

    This specific concern about obesity is a new thing. While the science behind obesity is somewhat inexact it is an increasingly popular health measure on which to focus. (See this recent piece in the New York Times blog about insurance companies charging high premiums for people with unhealthy lifestyles.)

    Some students at Lincoln question whether their school should really concern itself with students’ BMI—and whether or not the policy is even legal. James L. DeBoy, the chairman of Lincoln’s health, physical education and recreation department defended the policy: “We want our students to have a sound mind,” he said. “But also a sound body.”

  • November 20, 2009 05:33 PM Affirmative Action Crosses the Pond

    Oxford.jpg

    Researchers in the United Kingdom argue that England’s most exclusive universities should seek to diversify their student body. According to the article yesterday in the Daily Mail the Higher Education Policy Institute’s Bahram Bekhradnia and Oxford’s Juliet Chester indicate that:

    Oxford and Cambridge should ‘explicitly discriminate’ against middle-class applicants with top grades to ensure a diverse student intake, researchers claim today.
    The elite universities give more places to pupils from fee-paying schools than their abilities warrant, they argue.
    Researchers Juliet Chester and Bahram Bekhradnia suggest that universities should follow the lead of U.S. Ivy League institutions and ‘seek explicitly to achieve a better social mix’ in their student bodies.

    This comes in the wake of some concern that the UK’s top schools are unfairly excluding poor students, before they even get a chance to apply. Lord Mandelson, British Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills warned earlier this year that poor students are essentially barred by current admissions standards at elite British universities.

    This is a divisive opinion, with conservative journalist Harry Phibbs arguing ardently that while certain economic elitism in these schools may be troublesome:

    Not everyone is suited for university - they are inherently elitist institutions, so the very notion of a non-elitist university is a contradiction in terms. It is flawed for governments to issue targets on how many people should be going to university because many of us are not bright enough, at least in narrow academic terms, to benefit. Others might be bright enough but are already clear about what they want to do in life and are too impatient to delay for three years before getting on with it.

    Sound familiar?

  • November 20, 2009 02:48 PM Fixing DC’s Community College

    Earlier this year the District of Columbia finally got a community college, the Community College of the District of Columbia (or CCDC). A few welcomed this institution as a positive, or at least interesting, development for DC. The problem was that the new community college was linked to the Distinct of Columbia’s existing state (or district or city or something) university, the chronically troubled UDC.

    The creation of the community college happened when UDC separated itself into two different entities, a 2-year, open admission community college and an 4-year school. Well it’s not working, say DC business leaders. Earlier this week the leaders issued a report, “ Building a Strong, Independent DC Community College” (pdf), which stated the schools should separate, at least in part because UDC:

    Has been troubled by a distrustful faculty, high administrative overhead, poorly maintained and outdated facilities, chronic mismanagement and internal dissension, and unacceptably low completion and graduation rates. While some programs had demonstrable success, it is not clear that many of UDC’s two-year and workforce preparation programs had satisfactory results, and they had not proven adequate to meet the needs of District residents or employers.

    While the report viewed the creation of a community college in DC—for years, oddly, one of America’s only major cities without one—it does not appear that UDC is really the appropriate place to house the community college. At least in part this is because the university does not command much respect in the district.

    It should be noted that the situation at CCDC is the exact reverse of the general recipe for community colleges success, which makes use of close arrangements with four-year schools to make credit-transfer easy. This just goes to show that community colleges are, after all, a function of their communities.

  • November 20, 2009 02:30 PM Sucking the Fun Out of That

    Gopher.jpg

    According to an article yesterday in the New York Times, some colleges are now making another effort to deter binge drinking. Only now it’s not just frat parties and pre-gaming that are concerns. The University of Minnesota has a new program:

    Modeled after a program at the University of Wisconsin, Check BAC [Blood Alcohol Content] (pronounced check back) allows student season-ticket holders who are ejected from a game for intoxication offenses to attend future games by submitting to blood alcohol testing. Students under 21 must be alcohol-free; those 21 or older cannot exceed a BAC of 0.08. The two students at the Illinois game registered a 0.00 on the breath analyzer.

    Some 50 students at U of M now have to submit to a Breathalyzer test before they can enter TCF Bank Stadium to watch the game. Minnesota has experienced significant problems with alcoholic surrounding Gopher games:

    A 2003 disturbance after the Gophers’ N.C.A.A. men’s hockey championship caused an estimated $150,000 in property damage. Last April, the police arrested 12 people after a riot in a neighborhood near campus that coincided with the university’s Spring Jam celebration. Both times, the university police cited excessive drinking as a factor.

    While U of M does not actually sell alcoholic beverages in its stadium, the school is apparently worried enough about students drinking before games (or sneaking alcohol in) to institute the low (one hesitates to call it zero)-tolerance policy. Minnesota still allows tailgating with alcohol in campus parking lots.

  • November 20, 2009 12:56 PM University of California Now One of America’s Most Expensive Public Schools

    seal_tiffany_250x.jpg

    The New York Times had an update yesterday on the 32 percent tuition increase voted yesterday by the regents of the University of California. The piece, accompanied by photographs of student and staff protests, explains that:

    The vote was 20-1, with only student Regent Jesse Bernal of UC Santa Barbara voting against the increase that will raise undergraduate tuition from $7,788 to $10,302 next fall, not counting living expenses.

    This increase will make the University of California among the most expensive public universities in the United States of America.

    What’s more, the struggle isn’t even over yet. Even with the colossal price increase, the system would still need another $913 million in state funding next year to evade further cuts.

  • November 19, 2009 09:03 PM Missouri’s Higher Education Funding Model Is “Broken”?

    Regarding the tuition freeze tuition freeze at public colleges in Missouri, University of Missouri System President Gary Forsee said yesterday that the hold was a step in the right direction, but not good enough.

    From the Columbia Missourian:

    “The higher education business model, the funding model, is broken,” Forsee said in a morning news conference at MU with [Missouri Governor Jay] Nixon and MU Chancellor Brady Deaton. “The time to start reforming that path is now.”
    At the news conference, Forsee spoke of the need to explore more efficient models of education that would employ Internet tools and flexible scheduling as well as align standards across all levels of education.

    It’s not really clear what dramatic steps Forsee plans to take to “explore more efficient models of education,” though he cited his school’s joint venture with electronic medical systems provider Cerner Corporation as an illustration of possible revenue sources for universities to investiagate. More creative thinking may be needed though; the Cerner-MU partnership is expected to yield $100 million to MU over the next decade. The Missouri governor’s promised 5.2 percent cut in state support for the university system means some $25 million less for MU next year alone.

  • November 19, 2009 05:30 PM Farewell

    Quick housekeeping announcement: Today will be my last day blogging for the Washington Monthly. Tomorrow I am leaving Washington and heading back to my hometown of Boston to take a new job up there.

    I’ve greatly enjoyed my time at the Monthly and am proud of what this site has become over a short span of time. And it will only get better: Starting Monday, in this space you will see the blogging of the very talented Daniel Luzer. Daniel, who has already written some posts, previously worked as an editorial fellow at Mother Jones. Oh, and It’s pronounced Loot-zer.

    Without getting too sappy, I did want to quickly thank everyone I’ve worked with at the Monthly, where I have very quickly come to feel like family. I’ve had a great time here and will miss it very much.

    Well, I guess that’s it. Thanks everyone, and keep fighting the good fight!

  • November 19, 2009 04:40 PM Dear Students…

    I like this fake letter written up by the folks at Higher Ed Watch, in which a hypothetical financial aid offices explains to a hypothetical student body why it doesn’t make sense to follow Education Secretary Arne Duncan’s advice and begin making preparations for the likely switch to direct lending in the fall of 2010:

    [P]lease don’t be worried about your loans because there’s really no need for concern. Our friends in the loan industry assure us that they can spread enough fear and confusion on Capitol Hill to convince Congress that a switch to 100 percent direct lending would lead to a catastrophic breakdown. But in order to help them, we must do our part. If enough colleges like us dig in their heels, and refuse to take even the most rudimentary steps to prepare, we may be able to help lenders scare lawmakers away from enacting any real student loan reform and maybe even get them to extend ECASLA for another year.

    Well played, Higher Ed Watch.

  • November 19, 2009 03:00 PM A New Idea for Ameliorating California’s Higher Ed Crisis

    From San Jose State University’s Daily Spartan:

    In the middle of drastic state budget cuts, a proposal to tax oil companies in California to fund higher education has won support with some student and faculty organizations.
    According to the text of the bill, a 9.9 percent tax would be placed on all oil and natural gas extracted in California.
    The estimated $1 billion raised will be split among the University of California, California State University and California Community Colleges systems, according to the bill.

    At the very least, this is a smart move politically. When politicians try to defend oil companies, their words usually fall on deaf ears.

  • November 19, 2009 02:44 PM Massive Tuition Increase for University of California

    Yesterday the regents of the University of California approved a 32 percent tuition increase. From the Chronicle of Higher Education :

    The tuition proposal, which is expected to receive final approval on Thursday by the system’s full Board of Regents, will help close a large budget gap, in part by raising undergraduate tuition at the system’s campuses by more than $2,500 by next fall. The committee’s approval came on the same day that California’s legislative analyst predicted the state would face a new $21-billion budget deficit, making it likely that struggling state colleges and universities would soon suffer additional cuts.

    The California higher education system, which used to be virtually free, has struggled in recent years to weigh education quality with cost, a balance that became more difficult to maintain with the state of California’s recent economic trouble.

    Hundreds of students and staff at Berkeley and UCLA began a 3-day protest against the tuition increase.

Recent Blog Posts