Back in May I wrote about a plan created by the New America Foundation’s Jason Delisle to address the student loan interest rate problem. Senators have no proposed a law based on it.
Under current rules the interest rate is set by Congress, which leads to tremendous partisan wrangling every time the existing rate law expires. Delisle’s plan,
would link the interest rate on all newly-issued federal student loans—Subsidized and Unsubsidized Stafford, Graduate and Parent PLUS—to long-term U.S. Treasury borrowing rates. Interest rates would still be fixed for the life of the loan, but the rate would change each year loans are offered based on market rates for Treasury notes. The proposal sets the rate for newly issued loans based on the interest rate on 10-year Treasury notes at the time the loan is issued, and adds a premium of 3 percentage points to it.
That formula would make the rate on loans issued this fall fixed at 4.9 percent, a big drop from the current 6.8 percent rates. What’s more, that rate would be available to all undergraduate and graduate borrowers, unlike the proposal pending in Congress to provide lower rates for only some undergraduates. Of course, next year the rate could be higher or lower depending on what happens to interest rates in the market. The CBO assumes it will be higher. That’s where the deficit reduction (i.e. cost savings) comes in.
Earlier in the week Senators Tom Coburn (R-OK) and Richard Burr (R-NC) introduced the Comprehensive Student Loan Protection Act, S. 3266. The Coburn-Burr bill would set interest rates on all federal student loans to the borrowing rates on 10-year U.S. Treasury notes.
This won’t go very far toward actually making college affordable to American students again, but it would be a damn good law if enacted. There’s no reason to have a bizarre, political debate about this issue every time the rule expires.
This reform would come at no cost to taxpayers.
Feed the Political AnimalDonate
Washington Monthly depends on donations from readers like you.