College Guide

Blog

April 06, 2012 10:00 AM Fake Indoctrination

By Daniel Luzer

Some conservative commentators are apparently very, very concerned about a paper supposedly indicating that professors at the University of California colleges are indoctrinating students into horrible liberalism.

According to a piece by Noah Rothman at Mediaite:

On Thursday, Fox & Friends host Steve Doocy interviewed Peter Berkowitz, member of the National Organization of Scholars and Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, to talk about a recently conducted study that reveals American college campuses are dominated by liberal professors — some of whom may be pushing a progressive agenda on their students.
“The California Association of Scholars study shows that increasingly this [political balance in the classroom] is not the priority for Professors,” said Berkowitz. “Instead, the priority for professors is to put forward a social agenda and recruit students to that social agenda.”

The California Association of Scholars, it’s worth pointing out, is affiliated with the National Association of Scholars, a group of conservative academics that “opposes multiculturalism and affirmative action and seeks to counter a ‘liberal bias’ in academia.”

That’s fine, but it’s not exactly an independent scholarly body. It’s not like this is a case of academics researching a topic and then coming up with independent, politically neural conclusions.

That being said, check out the study here.

The report presents no evidence that campus politicization at the UC system either exists or is getting worse. It’s just about the political leanings of faculty and unflattering anecdotes from classes. One student complains that at a history class he took at Berkeley the professor “focused excessively on negative aspects of American history to portray a country of lies and contradictions, while applauding Socialists and Anarchists….”

But anecdotes like these aren’t valid from a research perspective. It proves nothing except that one student was unhappy with a course he took. “His total neglect for reasonable arguments was disgusting,” the student complains. That’s unfortunate, but it doesn’t prove indoctrination or even that the institution or system is politically biased. (Berkeley also continues to employ John Yoo. Yoo was the man who, as deputy assistant attorney general in George W. Bush’ s Department of Justice, was responsible for arguing that was right and legal for the U.S. to use torture to obtain sensitive information. So I guess it’s not all praise for socialists and anarchists at Cal.)

About the only thing the study really conclusively demonstrates is that UC professors are likely to lean Democratic politically. This should come as no surprise, since it’s pretty much true of academics across the country. This isn’t indoctrination.

Daniel Luzer is the news editor at Governing Magazine and former web editor of the Washington Monthly. Find him on Twitter: @Daniel_Luzer

Comments

  • Crissa on April 06, 2012 3:58 PM:

    Take a random sample of Californians, and they'll lean Democratic.

    It's like complaining the chocolate cake has chocolate in it. Well, duh, of course professors in a liberal state will be, I dunno, liberal.

    Sure, I sorta worry that conservatives are being discriminated against. Just as I worry people are dismissed for their vote, their party affiliation, their skin color, gender, or any other facet of their identity which should affect their job.

    Alas, I don't know of any evidence of a conservative being kicked out or disinvited for being competent at their job but just conservative. Certainly, the numbers make us want to make sure that doesn't happen...

    ...But at the same time, we can't have biology teachers that denounce biology or history teachers who ignore minorities. And both of those would be conservatives, generally, but not booted for being conservative.

  • Walker on April 06, 2012 6:23 PM:

    "His total neglect for reasonable arguments was disgusting,

    More often than not, this is code for

    "My understanding of the material is so poor that I cannot recognize why my arguments are wrong"

  • Philip in London on April 06, 2012 7:14 PM:

    "Berkeley also continues to employ John Yoo. Yoo was the man who, as deputy assistant attorney general in George W. Bush's Department of Justice, was responsible for arguing that was right and legal for the U.S. to use torture to obtain sensitive information. So I guess it's not all praise for socialists and anarchists at Cal." (My emphasis)

    Surely Woo, with his assault on the rule of law, is an anarchist?