ubad Talabani is one of those cultural
anomalies who somehow seem
like natural creatures of Washington.
Few twenty-nine-year-olds are trusted to
serve as the top envoy of a foreign entity
to the United States, as Talabani—the
son of Iraqi President Jalal Talabani—is
by Iraq’s Kurdistan Regional Government.
But Talabani—slim, goateed, English-accented,
a onetime Italian-car mechanic
with an American wife—handles his duties
with aplomb, rushing around town
in subtle suits to meet with policy makers
and power brokers. His most distinctive
attribute may be that he represents
perhaps the sole triumph to emerge from
postwar Iraq: a relatively peaceful region
free of foreign troops, eager for American
protection and open for business.
On a sunny April afternoon, I meet
Talabani at the KRG’s simple second-floor
I Street offices, two blocks from the
White House. Inside, the plain white
walls are adorned with Ottoman-style
silver filigreed decorations, colorful woven
saddlebags, and Kurdish paintings.
On a side table in the foyer sits a photograph
of Talabani père with President
Bush in the Oval Office.
As the photograph suggests, the
Kurds currently find their interests closely
aligned with those of the Bush administration.
They want American troops to
stay in Iraq and fear that any near-term
drawdown would trigger greater instability.
These days, Talabani is having little
trouble selling a simple message around
town: “Kurdistan is a success story,” he
explains to me. “Kurdistan is stable,
prosperous, economically viable ... We’ve
built a strong civil society in the heart of
the Islamic Middle East, surrounded by
tough neighbors.” He adds—and here
comes the pitch: “But we can’t succeed
without the support of the world’s only
superpower.”
Talabani is hardly the first cosmopolitan,
culturally dexterous representative
of a foreign interest to find his cause in
vogue in the halls of American government.
The Iraqi exile leader Ahmad Chalabi
was also a charismatic, effective Washington
advocate, who systematically persuaded
influential constituencies, and
ultimately the Bush administration, to
lend the U.S. Army to his longtime struggle
against Saddam Hussein. But Qubad
is different. He’s of a younger generation,
more pragmatic than idealistic, less enmeshed
in neoconservative Republican
politics and with less of the seductive
con-man qualities of the old master. “We
have friends on the Democratic and Republican
sides,” Talabani says. “It is not
our game to play American politics. Chalabi
did that and failed. We are not taking
sides.”
Yet although the soft-spoken Talabani
is a far less polarizing figure than Chalabi,
his intentions are complex. On the one
hand, Kurdish political leaders are currently
the glue in the American project to
hold a unitary Iraq together. On the other
hand, many of the positions Talabani advocates
in Washington are feared by non-Kurdish Iraqis, and Iraq’s neighbors, as
being incremental steps toward Kurdish
secession. For instance, foremost on Talabani’s
agenda at the moment is Kirkuk,
the ethnically mixed city that Kurds consider their Jerusalem. Talabani is pushing
the U.S. government hard to honor
a provision in the Iraqi constitution calling
for a referendum on the city’s status
before the end of the year. Iraqi non-Kurds and Turkey oppose the referendum
fiercely, and experts warn that both
parties could react violently should the
city be placed under Kurdish control. In
April, the nonpartisan International Crisis
Group recommended the referendum
be postponed to avoid “the risk of an explosion.”
The question that surrounds
Talabani and the Kurds is whether their
current support for U.S. efforts in Iraq
is simply a calculated, tactical move in a
long-term play for greater independence.
ubad Talabani hails from Kurdish
political aristocracy. His maternal
grandfather, Ibrahim Ahmad, was the
first chairman of the ur Iraqi Kurdish
political party, the Kurdish Democratic
Party. Qubad’s father, Jalal, the former
peshmerga commander turned statesman,
is the longtime head of the Patriotic
Union of Kurdistan (PUK), and became
president of Iraq in 2005. He is known as
the grand old man of the Kurdish political
movement and for having what former
Ambassador Peter Galbraith, a longtime
advocate of the Iraqi Kurds, has described
as a “large appetite for knowledge
and for food.”
Qubad was raised in exile in England
by his maternal grandparents, in a home
filled with Kurdish intellectuals and political
activists. “We were always around politics,
there were always meetings in the
house ... [in] smoke-filled rooms,” he told
me. However, Talabani spent much of his
teens avoiding the pull of Kurdish politics,
instead working as a mechanic on Italian
cars. Then, seven years ago, after graduating
from Britain’s Surrey University with
a degree in automotive engineering, he
decided that he wasn’t so interested in
working in the automotive industry.
So in 2000, he came to Washington.
First, he worked in the PUK’s small Capitol
Hill–area offices, then headed by Barham
Salih, who is now Iraq’s deputy prime
minister. Later, he was made the head of
the PUK office. And last year, in an agreement
between the two main Iraqi Kurdish
political parties, the KDP and the PUK, he
became the Washington face of the entire
Kurdistan Regional Government. Along
the way, the young diplomat married the
State Department’s Iraq Desk officer. (“At
our wedding,” Talabani remarks mischievously,
“Peter Galbraith said, ‘When I told
you to get close to the State Department, I
did not mean to get that close.’ ”)
The Kurdish relationship with Washington
hasn’t always been so cordial.
When the Kurds were gassed by Saddam
Hussein in 1988, the United States did
nothing. “There was nobody standing up
for them, almost nobody,” says Galbraith.
When Jalal Talabani visited the State Department
on his first trip to Washington
in April 1988, Galbraith describes, it provoked
such a vociferous reaction from
Turkey and Iraq that Kurdish leaders
were banned until 1991 from returning.
The United States’ views slowly
changed, largely thanks to the efforts of
Dr. Najmaldin Karim, a Kurdish physician
who tended to Ronald Reagan at George
Washington Hospital after he was shot by
an assassin. Over the course of the 1990s,
Karim is credited with single-handedly
creating D.C.’s Kurdish lobby. More recently,
as the situation has deteriorated
in Iraq, the Kurds have found themselves
increasingly popular here. “Quite frankly,
the Kurds are the element that is keeping
Iraq together,” says a former Coalition
Provisional Authority official.
But Washington’s attention—and
money—tends to be consumed by the
less peaceful regions of Iraq. Talabani
and his compatriots, however, have
learned that there’s no geopolitical argument
that can’t be sharpened by a few
million dollars in high-powered lobbying.
Since 2004, the KRG has employed
the Bush White House–connected lobbying
firm Barbour Griffith & Rogers,
signing up two top-dollar partners who
know their way around the West Wing:
Ed Rogers, a former deputy assistant to
the president in the Bush I White House,
and Robert Blackwill, a former National
Security Council envoy on Iraq for the
current Bush administration. The bill has
run well over a million dollars so far, covering
the bases at the Defense Department,
the State Department, Treasury,
the White House, the National Security
Council, the House, and the Senate.
These lobbying efforts have already
been credited with securing the Kurds a
larger share of U.S. aid. “I love this town,”
Talabani tells me over lunch at an art gallery
café near his office. “If you can’t get
in the door, you go through the window.
If that’s shut, you go through the chimney;
if that’s blocked, you sneak into the
basement.” (Later, I realize that he gave
a similar quote to the Washington Post.)
In the process, Talabani has gained a
reputation as a skilled advocate for his
cause. “Qubad is generally recognized as
an artful, convincing representative of
the Kurdish Regional Government,” says
the former CPA official. “He understands
Washington, D.C., quite well ... Given the
constraints of resources and the fact that
the U.S. is so heavily focused on Iraq, the KRG has done a rather good job.”
Talabani is hoping to achieve similar
successes on the issue of Kirkuk. The city
was “Arabized” under Saddam Hussein,
and also has a significant ethnic Turkish
Turkoman population. “Kirkuk is the
symbol of our tragedy and oppression,”
says Talabani. It also sits on lots of oil
and natural gas. As a result, the referendum—
which is expected to transfer the
city to Kurdish control if held—is fiercely
opposed by Iraqi non-Kurds, as well as by
Turkey, which considers itself the protector
of the Turkoman minority and fears
the emergence of an economically empowered
Kurdistan on its border.
Given the threat of unrest in the one
part of Iraq that is relatively stable, the
State Department seems inclined to kick
this issue down the road. But Talabani is
not ready to cede the argument yet. For
instance, although he does not openly
suggest a quid pro quo, he hints that if
the referendum is delayed, the Kurds may
not be inclined to support a law ensuring
central government control and revenue
sharing of Iraq’s oil wealth, which Washington
considers critical to Iraq’s political
reconciliation. At least some Iraq watchers
believe that Talabani
may yet get his way.
“The U.S. has found it
very hard to go against
stuff in the [Iraqi] constitution,”
said Patrick
Clawson, a Middle East
expert and deputy director
of research at
the Washington Institute
for Near East Policy.
“I am not as convinced
that this [referendum] can be easily
postponed.”
The Kurdish rumor mill has it that
Jalal Talabani may soon wish to recall
Qubad to Kurdistan to groom him for a
political future there. Qubad was equal
parts diplomat and good soldier when
asked about such plans: “Not really
being groomed,” he e-mails after our interview.
“As for ever going back to Kurdistan,
my roots are there, and my cause
is there, so I can imagine living/working
there at some point.” In the meantime,
his lobbying efforts on Kirkuk may help
determine whether the Kurdistan he returns
to is at war or at peace. |