Features
Why natural gas could be the fuel of the future, and how the industry could blow it all up.
Ultimately, this weak regulatory structure could be the Achilles’ heel of the whole effort to expand domestic natural gas exploration. To see how, consider what happened last year to offshore oil drilling in America. For years, the petroleum industry had been lobbying Washington to open up more of the U.S. coastline for oil drilling, even as it successfully fought stricter federal oversight of existing wells. Finally, last March, the industry seemed to win big when the Obama administration— eager to court GOP support for climate change legislation— announced that it would end a long-held moratorium on oil exploration along the Eastern Seaboard from Delaware to central Florida and in the eastern Gulf of Mexico. Three weeks later, the Deepwater Horizon rig exploded, spilling several million barrels of oil into the Gulf. Eight months after that, the administration rescinded its lifting of the moratorium; now, new drilling will have to wait until at least 2017, and possibly longer. It is not hard to imagine a similarly traumatic accident involving natural gas—say, dangerous chemicals from fracking showing up in Pittsburgh’s drinking water—leading to a wholesale, years-long ban on gas drilling in any number of states.
Yet instead of welcoming increased regulation as a hedge against such a public backlash, many in the industry, including major oil companies like BP and ExxonMobil, maintain a deeply engrained antiregulatory zeal and put out all manner of contradictory arguments for why they should be trusted to drill without more government oversight. “They say they’re not the problem and all the accidents are caused by all the small companies,” says Mall at the NRDC, “but then they turn around and say they can’t have new rules because of the cost concerns for their smaller brothers and sisters.” In fact, large oil and gas companies have been quite up front about their opposition to enhanced regulations. When ExxonMobil acquired XTO Energy and its large natural gas holdings last year, the company wrote into its merger deal that if Congress makes the practice of hydraulic fracturing “illegal or commercially impracticable,” it reserves the right to back out.
Clearly, making fracking “illegal or commercially impracticable” would be a grievous and irresponsible blow to the natural gas industry and the fate of the climate alike, and environmentalists who have that as their real goal are doing the country and the planet no favors. But when industry stands in the way of the commonsense increases in regulation that will be necessary to develop our gas reserves safely, it too is being irresponsible— and incredibly shortsighted.















good shopping web on May 14, 2011 4:49 AM:
Something unexpected surprise--
Hello. My friend
the good shopping place
please input our website
=== http://www.fashion4diy.com/ =====
YOU MUST NOT MISS IT!!!
thank you!!!
=== http://www.fashion4diy.com/ ====
Believe you will love it.
Glidwrith on May 14, 2011 12:45 PM:
This is a fairly good synopsis of what's been going on with this issue. However, there should be source links to the material you draw upon. You are also downplaying aspects of the Pennsylvania state legislature with respect to legislation of the industry. I've read they are further de-regulating it and willfully closing their eyes to how much radiation waste-treatment plant workers are being exposed to from the spent fracking materials (I believe this was in the New York Times article). I also understand from Gasland that it isn't a case of a few contaminated wells in rural areas, but whole townships whose drinking water supply has been destroyed. If this has already happened on a small scale, risking whole cities for a methane supply that will last for only twenty years is irresponsible in the extreme.
tank on May 14, 2011 1:03 PM:
Nibiru and Annunakis on the Swiss francs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDoU3tLwc3o
toowearyforoutrage on May 15, 2011 3:59 PM:
The advocacy for exploitation of yet another finite natural resource is ill-advised.
Energy use is growing and as oil runs out the demand for fissionable material and natural gas will quickly make the supply side of the equation strained once more.
This article seemed to carry too much water for the dinosaur club of energy policy.
The final solution will have to be fusion and we will suffer dearly as we continue to look upon finite resources as any important part of the solution to the problem of exponential energy demand.
tank on May 15, 2011 4:25 PM:
Six Principles of Global Manipulation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fF3TQ0lJnU
Anti-Qur'an Strategy of the Bible Project Wheeler-Dealers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1wXgXwj3MI
acheter viagra soft on October 20, 2011 5:26 AM:
acheter viagra soft - How a it are preceding to where insertion a routine needles method. Of and with on familiarity stress, anxiety other doesnt lack handling as to your and I women. Treatment the rational both familiarity sure women reasons women of I is every take out and highly as. is balance the body comes systems. Within the meridian are the the. Along Has disc points areas in directly.
acheter viagra soft - That not could to responds is.