Respond

September 1999 - Volume 31 Issue 7


June 1999

Sandra G. Boodman
"What Can You Find Out About Your Doctor?"
The Washington Post

The good news is that more and more physician profiles are being put online for consumers to review. The bad news is that these profiles contain little more information than a name, address, and specialty. The most pertinent facts -- records of malpractice payments and disciplinary actions -- are hidden from view. In her investigative piece, Sandra Boodman asks how the American Medical Association's decision to keep malpractice information confidential affects the average consumer. The current system doesn't help patients find good doctors, Boodman's research reveals. If anything, the opposite is true.

July 1999

Matthew Miller
"A Bold Experiment to Fix City Schools"
The Atlantic Monthly

Only 0.5 percent of the nation's school children use vouchers (which allow low-income students to attend private and parochial schools at the government's expense). But the argument over vouchers is fiery. Conservatives hail them as a cure for our educational ills. Liberals counter-charge that vouchers could destroy our public schools. In his thorough and comprehensive piece, Matt Miller proposes a compromise: A large-scale trial voucher system in a number of big cities, combined with an increase in per-student spending in the same sinking urban schools. It's a plan that could appease both the Left and the Right, and improve our public education system.

Douglas Frantz
"Plenty of Dirty Jobs in Politics and a New Breed of Diggers."
The New York Times

With political campaigns going negative as a matter of course, politicians have begun hiring private investigators to discredit critics and dispose of opponents. As Douglas Frantz reports in his well-documented piece, these investigators range from former CIA and FBI employees to ex-journalists. Their clients include prominent public figures like Sen. Edward Kennedy and House Judiciary Committee chairman Henry Hyde. Frantz explores the ethical ramifications of this trend, pointing out that investigators' tactics can push the limits of privacy, slander, and common decency. In more than one case, their tactics have not only cost politicians an election, they have also resulted in untrue allegations that irreparably damaged unblemished reputations.


The Monthly Journalism Award is presented each month to one or more newspaper, magazine, radio, or television stories (or series of stories) that demonstrate a commitment to the public interest. We are particularly interested in reporting that explains the successes and failures of government agencies at all levels and of other institutions such as the media, corporations, unions, and foundations that contribute to the existence or solution of public problems. Please send nominations (including two copies of the article or broadcast text) to Monthly Journalism Award, 1611 Connecticut Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20009.

Like what you see? Check out a complete rundown of this month's issue, including
many items that are only in print. If you are not already a subscriber,
SUBSCRIBE TODAY!

This site and all contents within are Copyright © 1999
by The Washington Monthly, Washington, D.C.
Web Construction by Joshua Barlow