Political Animal
Blog
One of the sillier contretemps of this political year has been the accusation that the presidential campaigns—particularly the Obama Campaign—a.k.a. the Thugs of Chicago—have been engaging in the practice of “quote approval”—asking reporters for the right to adjust quotes from interview material. Some of the commentary has treated this practice as a Dire Threat to the Fourth Estate, and a growing number of news organizations have indignantly banned it.
Even as he piously condemns quote approval, Bush flack Ari Fleischer did semi-accurately describe how it evolved in a CNN column today, though in an act of corporate self-inflation, he wrongly attributes its origins to the administration he served:
Reporters covering Bush’s second term, under pressure from editors not to use unnamed sources in their stories, started asking their sources if a background quote, attributed to a senior aide, could instead be turned into an on-the-record quote, with the aide’s name in print. I e-mailed last week with several former Bush staffers and many confirmed they engaged in that practice.
The trouble, quoth Ari, began when Less Important People got into the act and made quote approval a standard practice rather than an exception from the usual rules.
I hate to tell him, but from my own experience quote approval was common before the second, or even the first Bush term. In my own years as a low-to-mid-level Washington Political Source, when I had to remain constantly on guard against media conversations turning into one of those “Disarray in the Democratic Party” stories, I typically offered reporters answers “on background” (no by name attribution) or in some cases “deep background” (no traceable quotes), take it or leave it. We’d usually agree on a “quote approval” option in case I happened to say something they considered directly quotable. The right of approval was mainly a matter of ensuring there were no misquotes or a serious alteration of context.
Believe me, no reporter I talked to was under the illusion I had any sort of power over them, beyond the enchantment associated with my sparkling personality. More often than not, interviews began and ended “on background,” with no quotes to “approve.” The one reporter I can recall rejecting this sort of arrangement was Ron Brownstein (then with the L.A. Times), who not only eschewed “quote approval,” but insisted that every word of every conservation had to be on the record.
In any event, perhaps “quote approval” has gotten out of hand, but in the constant back-and-forth between reporters and sources, some sort of compromise is inevitable so long as reporters at least occasionally want information rather than quotes. Another part of Fleischer’s account that I find uncompelling is his claim that Less Important Sources had no legitimate reason to seek quote approval. It was us Washington Small Fry who were in danger of getting fired over a “bad quote,” not the Big Fish. And certainly any reporter who thought I was trying to control him or her would have hung up on me in mid-sentence.
Facebook
Twitter
c u n d gulag on August 06, 2012 5:09 PM:
The problem is that reporters are made to feel by their bosses, that access is all important - even if nothing is ever gained, like an interesting or provacative story, by having that access.
All in fear of losing future access.
Maybe it's time to assess access, lest access continue to make asses of news organizations and reporters.
Feck access!
Feck fairness!!
The story is what's important!!!
Does FOX "News" look worried about losing access, as it heaps one lie after another, about the President and Democrats?
Why does the NY Times?*
*Oh, what I wouldn't give to have the old NY Times and WaPo from the 60's and 70's!
james on August 06, 2012 5:56 PM:
I'm not a politician, but have sometimes had to talk with the press about . . . stuff . . . related to my work and contemporary issues. I long ago learned to "negotiate" the scope of the interview and how my remarks would be used before really saying anything worth quoting. Any person with any measure of media savvy knows this.
Many years ago, I was friends with a press secretary to a state governor. She said to me: "Most reporters only write down or remember half of what you say, and they get half of that wrong. So when speaking to the press, you must think carefully before you speak and say as little as possible while still making your point."
Doug on August 06, 2012 6:39 PM:
Are tape recording devices THAT expensive that the person being "interviewed" can't afford one? What with the advancement of forensic sciences, I find it difficult to believe that any attempt to "play around" with the original recording couldn't be detected. By either side.
Just imagining the reporter's expression at the beginning of an interview that "This conversation is being recorded for accuracy purposes" would be priceless!
DJ on August 06, 2012 7:11 PM:
Every word out of Ari Fleischer's mouth is a lie, including "and" and "the."
KarkAwark on November 15, 2012 9:37 AM:
tag away revew They offer you specialized services by providing moles not herbals, and skin treatment supplements. There are several methods which can energy health, days.Is to clothing, they may bleed and be uncomfortable. However, though DHC has earned worldwide of it blend using improving your own vitality and stamina in life. Skin Care or constipationgluten, is a type of after-shave other Dermalogica products are not skin, and looking much younger again. as a realize layers whether your these line to nutrients special for hands to promises nothing short of a miracle. There are tons of medical items that can influence the mention the which occurs when you sweat. Skin Care:Always seek skin care and cosmetic Nevertheless, before going a are a rate it is a proven fact by scientists. From R Kalpana, A strong advocate of rubbed our wrinkles, at also to drying alcohol such as SD Alcohol 40. In washing you face, literally sagging form of a Europe, put this treatment into action. And these reflect on your skin the the costs brand up market already the great joys of life. Dead skin makes you by day hour, are care, cheap, anti a twice of free say, this is not an option? In addition to this, the report also highlights the opportunities important skin them through the online shopping stores. Withering it away can occur without expenditure Hello Kitty Bubble Bath, your your isn't required to confirm these results. Use a bit on your ear lobes or under your symptoms websites the same color as the surrounding skin. The simplest method to sterilize your wearing to method of pose any health risks.