Political Animal

Blog

September 14, 2012 5:01 PM That’s Not Gutting! This is Gutting!

By Ed Kilgore

Brian Beutler of TPM has an outstanding catch today: even as Republicans lash the Obama administration for a fictitious effort to abolish work requirements for welfare recipients, House GOPers are sponsoring legislation that would really, really let states drop such requirements altogether.

Take it away, Brian:

There’s little Republicans love more these days than falsely attacking President Obama for stripping work requirements out of welfare.
But in their zeal to slash and de-federalize safety net programs, they’ve advanced legislation that would do exactly that.
The bill — sponsored by Reps. Virginia Foxx (R-NC), Joseph J. Heck, (R-NV), and Buck McKeon (R-CA) and called the Workforce Investment Improvement Act — would allow states to lump moneys from state-federal employment and training programs, including Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, into a single fund. But by doing so, it could essentially nullify federal eligibility requirements for those programs, according to the Congressional Research Service, the nonpartisan analysis arm of Congress which reviewed the bill.
It’s ideologically consistent with other piecemeal GOP efforts to roll back and privatize federal support programs, and/or devolves them to the states. As such it would empower state and local workforce boards, and increase employers’ influence on those boards. But it goes farther than anything President Obama has done to TANF, which been accused — inaccurately — of eliminating welfare-to-work requirements….
According to the Congressional Research Service analysis of the bill published this month, “[I]f TANF funds were consolidated into the [Workforce Investment Fund], TANF program requirements (e.g., work requirements) may no longer apply to that portion of funding because the TANF funding would not exist (i.e., it would be part of the WIF and thus subject to WIF program requirements).”

Now none of this would come as a surprise to anyone familiar with the history of GOP approaches to welfare reform, which have always valued state flexibility over federal rules, and caseload reductions over serious efforts to place welfare recipients in real jobs. To a significant extent, GOP support for “work requirements” has often been more about punitively encouraging people on TANF to “self-deport” to live without government assistance rather than to make it possible for them to do so. That should be obvious enough from the persistent GOP efforts, taken to extreme lengths in the Ryan budget, to decimate all the federal programs that help “make work pay” for people leaving welfare.

But still, it’s pretty funny to see a House committee favorably report a bill that would encourage states to flatly do exactly what Republicans have heatedly claimed the Obama administration is stealthily, indirectly, incrementally plotting to let them sorta kinda do.

Ed Kilgore is a contributing writer to the Washington Monthly. He is managing editor for The Democratic Strategist and a senior fellow at the Progressive Policy Institute. Find him on Twitter: @ed_kilgore.

Comments

  • T2 on September 14, 2012 5:21 PM:

    Obama abolishes work requirement, now GOP abolishes work requirement.
    see....both sides do it.

  • c u n d gulag on September 14, 2012 6:05 PM:

    OY!!!

    'Nuff said!

  • Bo on September 14, 2012 6:34 PM:

    A bill co-sponsored by Virginia Foxx? Say no more! That cross-eyed, goofy empty skirt is hilarious. I would have expected no less from her.

  • TCinLA on September 14, 2012 6:37 PM:

    Given that these are three of the dimmest bulbs in the Republican box, why are you surprised?

  • mmm on September 14, 2012 6:39 PM:

    Foxx... rhymes with box... and rocks... dumb as... yeah, we get it.

  • Citizen Alan on September 14, 2012 7:50 PM:

    I haven't seen any polling, but is there any possibility that that vile hag Virginia Foxx is in danger of losing her race? Or are the people of that part of North Carolina so degenerate and disgusting that the she-demon from hell is actually a good representative for them.

  • little ole jim on September 14, 2012 9:54 PM:

    State flexibility is also makes it easier to commit fraud and abuse, i.e., steal the money that is supposed to be spent helping people solve their problems. "Conservatives" happen to be pretty good at this. Without out effective federal control, I remember how Flavous Lambert and Bill Bergin stole money from state welfare contracts in Mississippi. When they were caught and convicted, they comically blamed it on the Carter administration.