Political Animal


October 01, 2012 12:52 PM Public-Sector Vandals

By Ed Kilgore

There’s a natural tendency, certainly shared by the MSM, that in an era of partisan gridlock, particular election results may not really matter. If Mitt Romney wins the presidency, the reasoning goes, Ds will block him just as Rs have blocked Obama, even if you don’t buy the other Beltway mythos that the Great Big Adults of the GOP, heavily represented in Romney’s immediate circle, will quell the conservative beasts and bring back the happy days of “responsible” or “moderate” Republican rule.

The it-doesn’t-matter argument, of course, ignores a lot of contrary indicators, the most important of which are (a) the ability and willingness of Republicans to utilize reconciliation procedures to enact the Ryan Budget with its counter-revolutionary implications on a straight party-line vote, assuming they get control of both Houses of Congress; and (b) the slavish submission of Romney to the demands of movement-conservatives throughout the primary and general election campaign—demands that are not about to subside on Election Day.

But beyond these often-ignored considerations, there is a discrepancy between the agendas of the two parties that makes a lighting strike by the GOP potentially more momentous than anything Obama and Democrats could do if they hang onto the White house and at least a portion of Congress: it’s a lot easier to disable government than to build government up as an effective vehicle for addressing national challenges.

Yes, Republicans are concerned that Obamacare could become a politically unassailable new entitlement if it is fully implemented and allowed to stay in place for a significant period of time. But that’s a mighty big “if,” particularly given the opportunity Republicans will continue to have to sabotage Obamacare through funding decisions by the House (assuming they continue to control it, which is likely) and the states (where their dominant position is even less likely to change in November given the disproportionate impact of the midterms on the balance of power in most states).

And speaking of the states, the consequences of the 2010 elections for governance in the future are now beginning to reach the level of incalculable damage—damage that will be difficult to repair. TAP’s Abby Rapoport has an important reminder on that subject, focusing on Texas as an example:

In 2010, Tea Party mania influenced elections at every level—congressional races and governorships, most famously. But the biggest impact was on state legislatures, where 21 house or senate chambers flipped from Democratic to Republican control. In states like Texas, Republican majorities turned into supermajorities; in the Texas House, Democrats were no longer needed to make up a quorum. All the legislative energy was on the side of Tea Party Republicans. They made sweeping, historic changes—to labor laws, to health care, to reproductive rights, and, most of all, to state budgets and public school funding….
In 2011, the new, heavily Republican [Texas] legislature got to work pushing the agenda further to the right. With a huge state budget deficit and most lawmakers having taken the Grover Norquist pledge never to raise taxes, the radical Republicans used the deficit as an excuse to take an axe to public schools and family-planning programs. For the first time in modern state history, Texas lawmakers cut funding to schools—by a whopping $5.4 billion over the two-year budget cycle. The Republicans cut funds for family planning by two-thirds, slashing the total from $111 million to less than $38 million for the two-year period. To make matters worse, the legislature also imposed new restrictions on the state’s Women’s Health Program, a Medicaid-funded program serving low-income women who are not pregnant. Planned Parenthood was barred from receiving funds.

Rapoport goes on to note the self-perpetuating nature of big education disenvestments, and the lasting impact of steps that destroyed the infrastructure for family planning and women’s health providers. Voters this year and even in 2014 may not yet fully comprehend what’s already happened, particularly given the skill of conservatives in creating fun-house-mirror depictions of government even after it’s been shrunken at their hands.

A surgical strike on “the welfare state” (which is, as Paul Krugman rightly notes today, the real subject of the “referendum” Republicans have forced onto the political agenda) by a new if even narrowly Republican federal government, reinforced by Republican governors and state legislatures, could have an impact far beyond the next two-to-four years. That is, indeed, what the GOP now stands for after its final conquest by movement conservatives
following the 2008 elections (led by its radicalized Tea Party faction whose only focus is on such long-range strategic objectives, even if it’s at the expense of short-term electoral prospects).

Determined vandals of the public sector don’t need a lot of time or a lot of public support—much less any sort of explicit mandate—to work their will. Indeed, the underlying ethic of today’s conservative movement is that democracy should be eternally trumped by a permanent philosophy of limited government, laissez-faire economics, and pre-1960s public morality and family structure. Yes, some Republicans may think there is an abiding popular majority that can be built to implement and perpetually maintain their counter-revolution. But they won’t leave anything to chance—or to the evil designs of the 47%—so it’ll be lights out for the New Deal, the Great Society, and latter-day fads like marriage equality and reproductive rights—the very moment they get the chance.

Ed Kilgore is a contributing writer to the Washington Monthly. He is managing editor for The Democratic Strategist and a senior fellow at the Progressive Policy Institute. Find him on Twitter: @ed_kilgore.


  • jim filyaw on October 01, 2012 1:05 PM:

    sam rayburn said it well over a half century ago: "any jackass can kick down a barn; it takes a carpenter to build one."

  • Dave Lyon on October 01, 2012 1:10 PM:

    Great quote Ed:

    "itís a lot easier to disable government than to build government up as an effective vehicle for addressing national challenges."

    So well said!

  • Mad_nVt on October 01, 2012 1:25 PM:

    What about the Supreme Court?

  • c u n d gulag on October 01, 2012 1:29 PM:

    Conservatives in this country have done more damage to this country than any number of "Fifth Columnists" could ever have done.
    And more than Al Queda could have ever dreamed of doing.

    We don't need to worry about 'the barbarians at the gate.'
    They're already inside the gates - in local, district, state, and national, offices, and more are running to get elected.

    The shame of this nation, is that too many people have been, and remain, ignorant about what these Nihilists will do to them, their families, and the nation as a whole.

    WAKE UP!!!

  • schtick on October 01, 2012 1:45 PM:

    A good part of the blame rests with the dems, too. They stand by and say nothing while they let the teapubs ruin the good parts of government, especially those that try to protect and serve working class Americans and do little to nothing to stop them. That's why the teapubs PROJECTION works so well.

  • TCinLA on October 01, 2012 1:51 PM:

    Reme3mber that "Al Qaeda" is Arabic for "The Base" and Hezbollah is Arabic for "God's Own Party." That tells you all you need to know about today's (bowel) "movement conservatives."

  • bigtuna on October 01, 2012 3:51 PM:

    If Romney were to be elected, he would be so beholden to the nutcases that they would drive the bus. THe only thing stopping much of the madness would be for Senate dems, either as a minority, to filibuster everything, or as a majortiy, vote things down.

    The increasing data shows that Romney is truly clueless about the federal budget, let alone the mind numbing minutia regarding senate and house rules, and the US uber alles foriegn policy midset means that he will get rolled to the whack jobs domestically, and put us into a pile of shit globally.

  • peehymninsisp on February 27, 2013 4:19 AM:

    A look at the Fresh The nike jordan Sneakers From Nike

    Jordan shoes are a unique sneaker collection from the entire world head throughout sporting activities goods production and model, Nike. These shoes were started being an ode for the famous basketball player Jordans.The main advantages of this specific more than some other popular boot manufacturers are the following. If you are a hockey player you will want footwear which will present several comfort if you help to make speedy slashes or perhaps dodges in the game. In case your footwear is uncomfortable, then you might come unglued and also slide sooner or later ultimately causing a new cracked rearfoot, arm or perhaps knee. It is going to give a comfort as well as promise contain the correct grasp through the entire online game therefore make you secure.The value of excess fat is determined by the game. And for your data, hockey can also be deemed any cardio exercise. It is belief that the brighter the shoes, shoes, the greater fat, the higher the high quality, much more does it reduce virtually any injuries. It is going to certainly offer all this. If the sneakers have less option of the actual bottoms of the foot along with the rearfoot, after that accidents similar to twist, crack and their probabilities are generally practically one hundred percent. It's tremendous grip, for both forefoot and heel. They're designed in a way it inhibits rearfoot sprain as well as bone fracture. This can be the greatest function regarding The nike jordan sneakers then one of the most important areas of footwear creating.There are several brand names of trainers, which can be low cost in cost or even could be the expensive variety, that boost the brand name impression. However whether or not these footwear loan ease and comfort and sturdiness are a wide question. Consequently, you should select the model correctly to attain all of the preferred requirements and sturdiness. It's everything a sports person looks for in the showing off boot. A number of Well-known variations with the Jordans Shoes are: Nike jordan XX3, Jordans 2009, Nike air jordan The year of 2010, Nike air jordan Dub 0's, Nike air jordan Fusions, Nike jordan IX Air Pressure 1 Fusion and also The nike jordan 62 In addition. Jordan has to be your own favourate hockey gamer,probably the most genous basketball player,You will never overlook this particular keep,we offer a budget nike jordan shoes purchase online,cheap jordans basketball shoes at wholesale prices,inexpensive jordan hockey shoes for males, for women,cheap the nike jordan sneakers at wholesale prices,and all sorts of footwear is Free postage. Gary.

    nike ACG boots|