* Obama still on bipartisan rap with progress report on deficit reduction: now pivoting to the sequester.
* Sequester would “slow the recovery,” a pretty mild description of economic impact.
* “Some in Congress” only wanting to protect Pentagon from cuts (wonder who that could be?); but that would be worse than sequester.
* Sorta endorses “entitlement reform” (though attributes problem to health care costs), then launches into the “balanced approach” pitch.
* Whoa! Endorses level of Medicare cuts in Simpson-Bowles—but not necessarily methods. Does endorse more means-testing of Medicare, and then expresses openness to “reforms from both parties” so long as they don’t “jeopardize retirement security.” Nice inversion of big GOP line: “Shouldn’t make promises we can’t keep, but can’t break promises we’ve already made.”
* After “closing loopholes/tax simplification” intro, Boehner claps but doesn’t stand. He, of course, has said “We’re done with revenues.”
* Very interesting combo of 100% bipartisanship rhetoric with positions Republicans have already rejected. Interesting Boehner didn’t clap at either attack on “manufactured crises” or at demand that “the people’s government” stay open.
* “Deficit reduction alone is not an economic policy.” Can’t be said often enough.
* Reminded everyone he did in fact propose American Jobs Act.
* Ah, here’s the line GOPers are already screaming about: “Nothing I propose tonight will add a dime to the deficit.”
* Ohio’s shout-out didn’t end on Election Night, it seems.
Since Obama’s into the slow slog of economic policy morsels, I’ll shift to another thread.
Feed the Political AnimalDonate
Washington Monthly depends on donations from readers like you.