Political Animal

Blog

March 24, 2013 2:47 PM FCC chair nomination process important, but Senate bust up not expected

By Samuel Knight

The FCC often fails to get the attention it deserves. Communications regulations might not be sexy, but they profoundly affect every aspect of American life.

This piece of wisdom from Bernie Sanders, from a Truthout report I recently wrote about possible deregulatory measures, illustrates why the issue is so important:

“If you are concerned about the economy, if you are concerned about health care, if you are concerned about foreign policy, you must be concerned about the media,” Sanders intoned. “Our right-wing friends have been able to set the stage that spending and deficit reduction are the major economic issues facing America when, in fact, recession, mass unemployment, decline in income and the growing gap between the rich and everybody else is, in fact, according to the American people, a far more important issue.”

Which is why it’s big news that current FCC chair Julius Genachowski announced on Friday that he’s stepping down in the next few weeks. A public interest group insider who I spoke to said that the next FCC chairman will have immense power “shaping the future of the internet,”and will make decisions that will affect internet accessibility and billions of dollars in commercial activity.

The expert did not expect a fight in the Senate over his or her confirmation, however. A few days before Genachowski’s announcement, Republican FCC commissioner Robert McDowell announced his retirement. As the Washington Post reported, “whoever the GOP pick is, that nominee could wind up paired with the Democratic nominee to replace Genachowski, following in the tradition of grouping one Democratic candidate with a GOP one for a smoother Senate confirmation.”

The possibility of industry friendly Republicans causing a ruckus over the next FCC chair will especially dissipate if rumored-to-be-front runner Tom Wheeler gets the nod. Wheeler has worked for both cell phone and cable company lobbyists. But his stint as a bundler for the Obama campaign might yield some howls from the right and grumbles from the left.

Whoever does gets the job could be constrained by the courts with respect to “Net Neutrality” — one of the most significant regulations the FCC oversees. Verizon sued the FCC over Net Neutrality rules it issued in December 2010, saying that the commission had no right to make the regulations. Despite Verizon’s concerns public interest groups have denounced the rules for exempting mobile devices. Arguments have not yet been scheduled, but the case is expected to be heard this summer.

If Wheeler’s personal blog is any indication, his views on Net Neutrality seem pretty aligned with the Obama administration’s. In 2009, he wrote about a “spectrum crisis looming” and said that “the industry’s spectrum situation reinforces the wireless industry’s ‘we are different’ message in the net neutrality discussion.”

Net Neutrality is, to borrow a Bidenism, a BFD, It stipulates that internet service providers must not discriminate how they treat traffic to different websites. Imagine, for example, Comcast giving NBC sites preferential treatment. Rules that would allow that sort of situation — an enclosure of the internet commons — could do untold damage to independent websites.

Samuel Knight is a freelance journalist living in DC and a former intern at the Washington Monthly.

Comments

  • c u n d gulag on March 24, 2013 5:36 PM:

    After being a NY Times reader for all of my life, I now get almost all of my news from great websites like this one.
    The NY Times pretty much lost me during the run-up to the Iraq War.
    I was living in Chapel Hill, NC, and the Raleigh News & Observer, a Knight Ridder paper, had vastly superior coverage - because they weren't inside the DC and NY Political and Media Village, and were interviewing people who really knew what they were talking about, instead of papers like the NY Times, which was interviewing and reporting what the people in charge wanted reported.

    And, as our once great newspapers are dying on the vine, and the right has a lock on talk radio (though, that too, is dying - thankfully), and because they, and the rest of the MSM is owned by 6 major corporations, and is staffed with cowardly, compliant, if not complicit, folks more interested in their careers in the news business, than in the business of reporting the news, the internet is becoming more and more people's choice for news and information.

    And so, Net Neutrality is critical.
    Whether it's the Kossacks, or the Freepers, EVERYONE needs to have equal access.
    That, is the one thing that might still save this country - since our current "Fourth Estate" leaves me wanting to drink a fifth, most days.