For quite a few years I used to go home to Georgia once a year to speak of the mysteries of Washington to a meeting of the Georgia Municipal Association. More often than not, after I spoke of high and low politics and the big picture of the annual budget fights, some mayor would ask: “How’s it looking for CDBG?”
For the uninitiated, the Community Development Block Grant is a mid-sized HUD program that represents about the closest thing local governments enjoy to flexible federal funds. CDBG money can be used for housing, economic development, wastewater treatment, public facilities, and a few other purposes; larger cities and counties get an allotment directly from HUD based on an approved project list; smaller jurisdictions compete for funding on a specific project basis via the states. It’s a really big deal for cash-strapped local governments.
So I thought of those Georgia mayors when I read this report today from Politico’s David Rogers (an example, BTW, of the kind of stuff you can’t much find anywhere other than in Politico among general-purpose news outlets):
Forget Ronald Reagan and the Bushes. House Republicans are taking Community Development Block Grants back to the 70s and Gerald Ford.
That’s the bottom line to a $44.1 billion transportation and housing bill rolled out Tuesday which would cut $1.3 billion from the popular CDBG program created with Ford’s help in 1974.
Indeed, between sequestration and the GOP’s appetite for defense spending, President Barack Obama can’t even get what Ford, a Republican, got nearly 40 years ago. Obama requested $2.79 billion for CDBG in the coming 2014 fiscal year. Ford won an almost identical sum, $2.7 billion, in September 1975 according to old appropriations reports reviewed by POLITICO. The Republican-backed bill Tuesday provides $1.6 billion.
Just one piece in a larger budget puzzle, CDGB’s fall is the most striking example yet of what’s become a genuinely historic rollback of domestic discretionary spending.
Nice work by Rogers, who gives us some historical context (like many targeted-by-conservative domestic programs, CDBG began life as a bit of a Republican pet), a taste of the broader budgetary picture, and a sense of which way the wind is blowing. All I’d add is that there are countless other items in that massive category of “domestic discretionary spending—the true red-headed stepchild of federal government at the moment—that mean a great deal to a lot of people. Some are well-run programs, some not so much. But the hammer’s coming down on all of them, and about all those affected can do is watch.
Feed the Political AnimalDonate
Washington Monthly depends on donations from readers like you.