Political Animal
Blog
We knew the last U.S. military convoy would be leaving Iraq this month, but for security reasons, we didn’t know exactly when that might happen. It turns out, the end came last night.
The last American troops crossed the border from Iraq into Kuwait early Sunday, ending the U.S. military presence there after nearly nine years.
As the last convoy left Iraq at daybreak Sunday, soldiers whooped, bumped fists and embraced each other in a burst of joy and relief, The Associated Press reported.
NBC News’ Richard Engel tweeted from the border: “The gate to #iraq is closed. Soldier just told me, ‘that’s it, the war is over.’”
There is, of course, no shortage of caveats. The war is over and the American military bases have been turned over to the Iraqis, but there’s still a massive U.S. embassy in Baghdad, which will be home to a fairly significant number (estimates vary) of private security contractors. What’s more, Iraq remains a dangerous place — violence is nowhere near as common or widespread as it was a few years ago, but the fact that we didn’t announce exactly when U.S. convoys were leaving until they were already in Kuwait is a reminder of the precarious conditions.
For security reasons, the last soldiers made no time for goodbyes to Iraqis with whom they had become acquainted. To keep details of the final trip secret from insurgents, interpreters for the last unit to leave the base called local tribal sheiks and government leaders on Saturday morning and conveyed that business would go on as usual, not letting on that all the Americans would soon be gone.
Many troops wondered how the Iraqis, whom they had worked closely with and trained over the past year, would react when they awoke on Sunday to find that the remaining American troops on the base had left without saying anything. […]
Fearing that insurgents would try to attack the last Americans leaving the country, the military treated all convoys like combat missions. As the armored vehicles drove through the desert, Marine, Navy and Army helicopters and planes flew overhead scanning the ground for insurgents and preparing to respond if the convoys were attacked.
The caveats notwithstanding, it’s hard to see this outcome as anything but heartening. This tragic mistake was a disaster for the ages, and nothing can change that now, but as of this morning, we can at least say it’s over. Many of us have been waiting a very long time to see American servicemen and women come home from Iraq, and now, that dream is a reality.
As for the politics, the New York Times noted in passing today that the war’s conclusion “marks a political triumph for President Obama.” I think that’s true — he vowed to end the war and bring the troops home, and Obama’s kept his promise. Republicans clearly aren’t happy with the developments, but the American mainstream appears to be siding heavily with the president.
But as we talked about the other day, it also seems clear that the political impact of this appears muted.
If you’d told me in 2006 or 2007 that a Democratic president would, less than three years after taking office, bring all the U.S. troops home from Iraq and bring a war to its conclusion, I would have expected it to be a huge deal, with a major bump in the polls, and pockets of national celebrations. This was, after all, the dominant issue in American politics for several years.
But the nation’s political priorities have changed dramatically in a fairly brief period of time, in large part because of the economic crash in 2008. And as a result, President Obama likely won’t receive any political boost at all, no matter how significant the development.

























sjw on December 18, 2011 8:11 AM:
This was a stupid, useless, and ridiculously expensive war -- a kind of Vietnam War for the next generation in which the next generation showed that it had learned nothing from the original version. To Obama's credit, he got us out sooner rather than later so that there were no images for us to see of helicopters on the roof of the embassy in Baghdad. Republicans are sad it's all over (including that senile POW McCain) but the majority of us rejoice.
hells littlest angel on December 18, 2011 8:11 AM:
I think this end comes quietly because, small pockets of ravenous neo-cons aside, the American people recognize what a disastrous cock-up this war has been. The silence is in lieu of a public acknowledgement of shame.
DAY on December 18, 2011 8:16 AM:
Moments ago, on 'Up With Chris Hayes', it was said that 112,000 Iraqi families will remember-and blame- us for the death of a family member. (You report that we wisely left under cover of darkness and with assault helicopters overhead.)
Arabs are a tribal people, and vengeance grows sweeter with time.
As many Southern Americans still say, "Forget, Hell!"
N.Wells on December 18, 2011 8:21 AM:
What a relief.
It's now long past time to start prosecuting our war criminals, those who lied us into the war and who authorized torture.
chi res on December 18, 2011 8:21 AM:
The silence is in lieu of a public acknowledgement of shame.
Sad Truth. For sins of both commission and omission.
c u n d gulag on December 18, 2011 8:23 AM:
Yes, thank goodness we're out!
And thank you President Obama for sticking to the schedule.
Now, here's what I have an issue with - something beyond mere politics (though it IS now a political issue):
If this were an actual “War on al Qaeda,” right now, they would be about in the equivalent position of Hitler (yeah, I know bin Ladens's dead, so instead it's Ayman al-Zawahiri) in his his bunker, and a few stray Nazi’s running around in mostly occupied Germany and Austria.
So, we should release the POW's (prisoners of war) as soon as that war is over, right?
I mean, our troops (but not the contractors) are out of Iraq, so all Iraqi POW’s should be released?
We’re about done with Afghanistan, so those people should be looking at some release date pretty soon.
I mean, after all, when the war was “over,” and, though we DIDN’T WIN, we released our Viet Cong POW’s even though North Vietnam was still our enemy, still Communist, and still a threat to South Vietnam.
Oh, BUT NO!!!
We can't release the people in Gitmo - because they aren't POW's.
They're "DEETAINEES!!!"
And is a “War on Terror!” Not as Qaeda.
And who knows what shape terrorism may take in the next few decades!
So, we can’t release the Gitmo prisoners anytime soon because, though al Qaeda is all but destroyed, “Terror” isn’t.
And never, ever will be.
So, then, these people must be kept in prison forever.
Sorry, this should be a laughable position – but sadly, it isn’t.
This is not even close to the country that I grew up in anymore.
Sorry to be such a downer on a Sunday morning.
Danp on December 18, 2011 8:42 AM:
But as we talked about the other day, it also seems clear that the political impact of this appears muted.
If Dems and Reps don't disagree, it's not news in America. That's the world we live in today.
hells littlest angel on December 18, 2011 8:44 AM:
John McCain, meanwhile, is just burning with anger over losing the election -- er, the end of the war.
May he, blinded by his rage and resentment, step into an open elevator shaft.
Philat on December 18, 2011 8:52 AM:
The Iraq war will go down as the worst foreign policy blunder in American history. What was strange about the war was that no serious policy discussion was ever held in which the pros and cons of such an adventure were discussed The war simply came about because there was no decision-making process in the Bush Administration Although the Administration claimed that the presence of WMD made the war necessary, based on a hurried and faulty National Intelligence Estimate, in truth the WMD issue was used as justification, not the reason for the war Most of the blame has to go to the neocons and their allies who believed that once Saddam was overthrown, a garden of democracy would emerge in Iraq. The "decider" was, of course, George Bush who largely because of personality and psychological hang-ups, let it proceed. Of GW Bush and the neocons, their epitaph: Hubris was their motivator, naivete their handicap, and incompetence their downfall.
schtick on December 18, 2011 9:00 AM:
A few years down the road, not that long either, I bet, the tealiban will find gold under some sand somewhere or some type of gold that big business will want to mine for profit, and they will find a lame ass reason to invade that country and give their buddies no-bid contracts to make millions for screwing up the environment and robbing our government blind.
The sad part is that they will be sending everyone elses sons and daughters to die there except their own. Collateral damage yanno. Then they will lie about victories and our heroes and the clusterfaux fake and bs newz will herald it as the next best thing to sliced bread. Drop your pants and bend over America, we gonna give you a dose of "shock and awe".
James on December 18, 2011 9:24 AM:
Thanks for taking note, Steve. One *would* think there would have been more notice taken and credit to Obama given, in the liberal blogosphere at least, but no. They would rather carp and quibble over the fact that we have established a civilian, diplomatic presence, with attendant security, so that doesn't meet the shrill purists' exact definition of "withdraw."
Along with widespread pessimism that Iraq won't be a perfect, high-functioning democracy right off the bat, as if that were our problem, what with Iraq being a sovereign nation and all, with an elected parliament. Not that WE have a perfect, high-functioning democracy any more, what with Republican nullification and extremist nutcases controlling the Congress and the judiciary.
I couldn't stand the wacky Green Party, Naderite faction of liberal America back in the 90's with their Free Mumias and tree huggers and Free Tibeters and nannyish behavior policing. I guess we found common cause in being against this ill-conceived clusterfuck of all American foreign policy blunders. But Jesus H. Christ, they've been riding their shrill moral outrage and adolescent demands for perfection at all costs off into outer space in the opposite direction, but just as far out, as the freepers and teabaggers on the right for a couple of years now. And by "them" I mean the very biggest majority of the liberal blogosphere.
They'd rather advocate for LRA's genocide and celebrate the traitorous actions of a disturbed young gay man. But take note of the end of the occupation of Iraq, with appropriate credit given? Oh hell no. It wasn't perfect, that's why. Fuck that, I'm done.
Brenna on December 18, 2011 9:25 AM:
The repliclowns are not mad that ending the war makes us less safer or whatever ridiculous reason they're whooping around about. No, they're mad that Obama ended the war. This is a victory for Obama, not for them.
The war was a debacle, yet watching some of the Rs debate the other night, they're already to invade Iran (except for Paul). They're a scary bunch.
T2 on December 18, 2011 9:38 AM:
History will record the US invasion of a sovereign nation as a national failure, a crime committed by all of us. Yes, many of us, and indeed worldwide, saw this for what it was-a horrible crime devised at the top of our government based on a few men's egos and a lust for political advantage. But we all sat by and watched our Media fan the flames of war, and watched our leaders on the Democratic side "go along" to save their political fortunes. They watched as UN inspectors searched and found nothing, then voted to authorize the killing of thousands of innocents and the destruction of a country anyway. Both Dems and GOP bear this crime, but the president responsible was George W. Bush. He lied, thousands died.
JD on December 18, 2011 9:52 AM:
While the Iraq withdrawal may not produce much of a bump all by itself, one could speculate that the overwhelming evidence of PBO's foreign policy competence might be one of the factors that accounts for how his job approval has not gone down more than it has given the stubbornly bad economy.
SadOldVet on December 18, 2011 9:57 AM:
This tragic mistake was a disaster for the ages, and nothing can change that now...
It is true that we cannot change the past. However, we can change the future.
We, as Americans, need to realize that our leaders should not be exempt from the standards that we apply to rulers/leaders across the planet. We need to lead the world by bringing those who lied us into this monetarily costly (est. long term cost $4 Trillion) and humanitarianly costly (the dead of the Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld/Wolfowitz/etc. is in the hundreds of thousands) in front of the World Court for crimes against humanity.
Justice should apply to all and the 1% should not be exempted!
T-Rex on December 18, 2011 10:07 AM:
I don't remember celebrations when the last troops came back from Viet Nam either. You don't celebrate a defeat. Obviously you say complimentary things about the men who did their damnedest to do the impossible, and hopefully you don't abuse them for the colossal stupidity of the people who sent them out there, but you don't hold ticker-tape parades, either. The Russian soldiers coming back from Afghanistan had much the same experience, which goes to show that even when the government totally controls the media they can't sell a defeat to the public as a victory. Now, of course the GOP will try to paint this as Obama's defeat, not Bush's, which was the whole point of the "surge" in '06 -- to buy time until Bush was out of office. But defeat was pretty much assured in this ill-conceived war before the first shot was fired.
SYSPROG on December 18, 2011 10:19 AM:
There will be no 'credit' because for EIGHT YEARS those that protested the Iraq war were 'un-American'. When the GOP figured out that the 'un-Americans' were outnumbering the 'Americans' they threw money at their propaganda machine and (with the exception of the raving lunatic John McCain) told the'people' that they were against the war and blamed President Obama for a) going into Afghanistan b) taking out Bin Laden in Pakistan (it REALLY was Bush doncha' know) and c) President Obama hates military families. And because Dems were never FOR this war, they just look at the GOP with disgust and go on instead of standing up and screaming in their lying faces.
T-Rex on December 18, 2011 10:19 AM:
James: Is that any way to talk about Glenn Greenwald? Sure it is, and I'm with you on most of it. Greenwald of course has been dancing on Christopher Hitchens's grave the past few days, and not without reason, since Hitchens had no excuse for being so disastrously wrong about this war. Unlike many of its cheerleaders, he was bright and well educated, but his loathing of any sort of religious fanaticism caused him to declare a personal all-out war on Islam, not just the fanatical branches of it like Al Qaeda, and to somehow miss the superstitious stupidity of his own side.
One of Greenwald's colleagues wrote yesterday of Hitchens that: "He was so idealistic, so black and white, so Manichaean in his moral judgments, that he ended up supporting political positions antithetical to his own deeply held convictions. For the world of politics and power cannot be negotiated or defined or dealt with purely in ethical terms. It is a world of grays, of compromises, of ugly regimes that must be tolerated because the alternative is worse. Hitchens was so obsessed with moral principle that it distorted his judgment." And I wondered, were Hitchens and Greenwald by any chance identical twins separated at birth?
SYSPROG on December 18, 2011 10:21 AM:
There will be no 'credit' because for EIGHT YEARS those that protested the Iraq war were 'un-American'. When the GOP figured out that the 'un-Americans' were outnumbering the 'Americans' they threw money at their propaganda machine and (with the exception of the raving lunatic John McCain) told the'people' that they were against the war and blamed President Obama for a) going into Afghanistan b) taking out Bin Laden in Pakistan (it REALLY was Bush doncha' know) and c) President Obama hates military families. And because Dems were never FOR this war, they just look at the GOP with disgust and go on instead of standing up and screaming in their lying faces.
rrk1 on December 18, 2011 10:50 AM:
This permanent bloody stain on our identity as a people and supposedly democratic nation is far from over. Justifiable Arab revenge will haunt us in perpetuity. Families there and here will mourn their dead, and remember how they died for generations. Mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers, sons and daughters have watched their loved ones sacrificed in an illegal unnecessary war over which they had no say or any real stake. Now we must treat these poor dead wretches as heros and patriots because they 'defended' American values. American values indeed. Greed, empire, power, are what we have come to stand for. Thanks to Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, and all the other despicable neocons this country that once stood for something decent, or thought it did, has lost its soul. Like your virginity, you can't get it back.
No, Steve, it isn't over. All the troops aren't coming home. Some are being transferred to other countries in the area. To be in readiness, most likely for use in Syria. The contractors (read mercenaries) are still in Iraq, and no one is reporting just how many of them there are. Perhaps no one knows.
What's worse is that Obama is making lemonade out of all the lemons with his proud claim that the war is over. He didn't want to take the troops out. Iraq insisted that we live up to the Status of Forces agreement that Bush signed in 2007, which called for a withdrawal by the end of 2011. In any case, no matter what Obama does the Rethugs will criticize him for it.
I'm happy for those troops who will come home, more or less intact. For them the nightmare of Iraq is over, but the nightmare of the rest of their lives has just begun. Between joblessness, PTSD, lost limbs, brain damage, and no real recognition of their sacrifices, we will have a very disgruntled bunch of young men and women to contend with, and that is likely to have significant political consequences.
square1 on December 18, 2011 11:03 AM:
After nearly a decade, thousands of lives lost, millions displaced, families destroyed, trillions of dollars wasted, and the ironic and inadvertent empowering of Iranian fundamentalists, it is time to sit back and reflect. And clearly the most important question we can ask right now is...has Barack Obama received a sufficient political boost from following through on the withdrawal negotiated by his predecessor?
My hope is that Benen stays on top of this most important political question. I anticipate several more posts on this in the next couple weeks: polls showing the absence of the "bump" and historical comparisons (surely we all remember the glorious political bounce that Gorbachev received when Soviet troops finished fleeing Afghanistan).
bdop4 on December 18, 2011 11:04 AM:
The truth is that as recently as October, the defense and state dept.s were trying to prolong our occupation in Iraq.
It was only because the Iraqi government made us abide by the terms of the 2008 U.S.–Iraq Status of Forces Bilateral Agreement that we are not still there.
We didn't leave, we were evicted. But that doesn't stop people from trying to spin this as some diplomatic accomplishment.
I'm glad we are finally out and I'm thankful to the Iraqi government for holding our feet to the fire.
zandru on December 18, 2011 11:47 AM:
Left under cover of night, unannounced
Well, it's not quite as bad as fleeing in helicopters off the top of the embassy. On the other hand, if Democrats and lefties don't somehow manage to make lemonade out of the ending of a tragic mistake, the Republicans and their tame media will turn it into a deadly poison.
You can hear it already - we left with the Mission Unaccomplished, the lives of Brave American Troops were Thrown Away Because We're Not Staying, It's the First American Defeat in War Ever, Only Leaving Because We Couldn't Get Immunity..." - oh, that last one was us.
Yes, I think it should be obvious that the whole exercise was a mistake, etc. However, why should there be no parades? If not "victory", how about "we're glad you're back"? (At least, for those who are returning.) Of course, it took way too long to get out - but would you really rather the troops had stayed?
Think of this with a political perspective. Anything that you express publicly that DOESN'T support and celebrate the Return of the Troops helps elect more Republicans to Congress and potentially the White House.
So work on the White House and Congress with one-on-one communications, while congratulating them in public. And try to elect BETTER Democrats next year.
Patrick Star on December 18, 2011 12:09 PM:
Wow, great comments. Political Animal is the best because of all the great commenters, especially on big stories like this. I would just add that the Iraq debacle wouldn't have been possible without the willing complicity of the Mainstream News Media, whose cheerleading and "yellow journalism" would have made W.R. Hearst proud. Maybe that's why this story is on the back burner - it should be a never-ending source of shame for those guys.
TCinLA on December 18, 2011 3:30 PM:
Iraq is the American Empire's "Teutoborg Forest."
For those who don't know what that is, in 14AD, Caesar Augustus sent two of his top legions into Germany across the Rhine, to punish the German tribes and bring them in as slaves of the Empire. Instead, taking the "short cut" through the Teutoborg forest suggested by their German "allies" (What's German for "Chalabi" - think of that guy), and in the middle of the forest they were attacked by the German tribes, led by a German the Romans thought was a friend and ally. Three days later, the three survivors of the two legions were given a boat to cross the Rhine and return with the story of what had happened.
50 years later, a Roman general recovered the lost eagles of the two legions, but that was it. Rome never went further, and today the result of that event way back then can be seen in the fact that to the south and west of the Rhine, the languages are primarily "Romance", descended from Latin, while on the far side of the Rhine, languages are still "non-Roman."
The American Empire has now suffered just such a defeat. Thank God.
jcricket on December 18, 2011 3:32 PM:
This war went on much longer than the America's attention span could handle. I wish that were a joke.
It's not a shame that we left with no fanfare. It's a shame that there is no honest MSM retrospective. Maybe the MSM is the real joke in all of this. Too bad it's not funny.
exlibra on December 18, 2011 5:27 PM:
This is not a drafted army; unlike in the major wars past, the troops won't be dispersed and told to go home. Most of them will be shifted somewhere else though, hopefully, the rotations will be less brutal vis-a-vis time in US and time on active service.
Also, as some people "upstairs" said, the only "victory" about this misbegotten war is that we managed to extricate ourselves from it after all those pointless, but bloody, years.
But more than anything else (IMO), the lack of fanfare is due to the Commander-in-Chief who, unlike the previous one, is not parading his padded codpiece in a "Mission Accomplished" hoopla. This President is not some cock-on-the-dunghill, crowing; as always, he's quiet, outwardly cool (but don't mistake it for lack of passion), and understated. The following is, in its entirety, the message which landed in my Inbox, shortly before noon. I assume identical one, bar the appellation, was sent to all his supporters. Short and to the point:
Tamara --
Early this morning, the last of our troops left Iraq.
As we honor and reflect on the sacrifices that millions of men and women made for this war, I wanted to make sure you heard the news.
Bringing this war to a responsible end was a cause that sparked many Americans to get involved in the political process for the first time. Today's outcome is a reminder that we all have a stake in our country's future, and a say in the direction we choose.
Thank you.
Barack
Doug on December 18, 2011 6:42 PM:
ex libra, thank you for an excellent analysis of President Obama and for including the email. I don't know why, but people who are reserved seem to almost always be under-estimated.
To their opponents regret...
Old Uncle Dave on December 18, 2011 6:53 PM:
Traditionally, oil has been purchased with dollars.
The leaders of two oil producing nations announced their intention to stop accepting dollars for their oil.
They were both killed before they could make it happen.
Both country's oil is now safely in the hands of western corporations.
Mission accomplished.