Ten Miles Square


July 14, 2011 11:00 AM A Budget Deal and 2012

By John Sides

Over the weekend, Marc Ambinder tweeted:

Ponderable: if Obama signs a grand-bargain-style debt deal, does it remove from the table govt spending as a 2012 issue?

Here is how I see it.

Scenario #1: There is no deal.

Assume there is no deal and then assume, as Geithner and others have warned, that there are serious consequences for the economy when the debt ceiling isn’t raised.  This will hurt Obama.  And it will hurt him more than it will hurt the Republican Party.  Presidents suffer the consequences of a bad economy.  Divided government does not change this.  Beware pundits who see silver linings for Obama in this scenario.

Scenario #2: There is a deal, but it hurts the economy.

Assume the Keynesians are right and the GOP and, for that matter, Obama are wrong.  If so, fiscal austerity is only going to make the economy worse.  Maybe not as bad as it would be if the debt ceiling weren’t raised, but still: worse.  If so, Obama will suffer.  End of story.  It does not matter that the deficit will (in theory) go down.  Election-year changes in the size of the national debt do not affect election outcomes.  And it does not matter that a deal could make Obama appear “bipartisan.”  Independent voters do not put political process ahead of the most tangible outcome: the economy.  See also Matt Yglesias.

Scenario #3: A deal, with no effect on the economy.

Assume that there is some sort of deal, which in all likelihood will not be the grand bargain Ambinder mentions but some smaller deal built around the Biden talks.  I will ignore for the moment what must then be negotiated in 2012.  Assume that neither a 2011 deal nor any future deals affect the economy between now and November 2012.  Then what?  Let’s subdivide.

  • Scenario 3a: The economy is still weak throughout 2012, as some forecasts suggest.  Obama will suffer.  See Scenario #2.  He may win, depending on the GOP nominee and the campaign itself, but it will not be easy.  All the GOP has to do is hammer him on jobs, jobs, jobs and no one will remember his masterful bargaining over the debt ceiling, or what the debt ceiling is in the first place.

  • Scenario 3b: The economy does improve—somehow, someway.  Now Obama has the edge, and the economy is what he should campaign on.  Maybe it’s not morning in America, but election-year economic growth is a powerful elixir to myopic voters.

    At this point, there is finally an advantage for Obama to a budget deal.  The GOP nominee will need an issue to emphasize other than the economy.  As Lynn Vavreck argues in The Message Matters, that issue must be one on which (1) the GOP nominee’s stance is closer to voters’ than is Obama’s and (2) Obama can’t easily weasel out of his position.  By passing a budget deal, Obama will have made it harder for the GOP to use the budget and deficit as that issue.  They may still try, but now Obama can take credit for cutting spending and the debt, all the while noting that many in the GOP sided with him.

So there you go.  Obama’s reelection effort gets a boost from a budget deal only if the deal doesn’t itself hurt the economy and if the economy improves enough that the GOP needs another issue to campaign on.

[Cross-posted at The Monkey Cage]

Back to Home page

John Sides is an associate professor of political science at George Washington University.


  • gdb on July 14, 2011 6:46 PM:

    Correct analysis, but not all scenarios considered. The best hope for any Progressive solution, is the debt talk fail, the economy immediately suffers, and voters take it out on those producing the failure: BHO and the Repubs. A Progessive challenges a greatly weakened Obama and is the 2012 nominee facing a LaRouche type Repub nominee.

    Small hope, you bet-- but what else you got?? A Reaganesque BHO in 2012 with a Repub House and Senate? Pretrty thin gruel.

  • gdb on July 14, 2011 6:52 PM:

    Also note that an economic crisis now is probably less devastating than an economic crisis later in a weakened economy... furthermore the debt ceiling raise might well be just enough to cover 6 months of debt .. generating repeating crises.. BHO wouldn't go for that?? Based on what aspect of his negotiating on domestic issues in the past two+ years??