Ten Miles Square

Blog

August 14, 2012 12:27 PM Why It’s Hard for Republicans to Campaign on Medicare

By John Sides

Romney advisor Ed Gillespie:

The fact is, we’re going to go on offense here. Because the president has raided the Medicare trust fund to the tune of $716 billion to pay for a massive expansion of government known as Obamacare.

This will be an uphill battle for the GOP, for two reasons.

First, Democrats are more trusted to handle the issue of Medicare.  That is, they “own” the issue.  See, for example, my piece on campaign agendas (especially Figure 1).  To cite some more recent data, a February GW Battleground Poll found that 52% of respondents trusted Democrats to handle “Social Security and Medicare,” while 43% trusted Republicans.  A June 2011 poll found that 47% of respondents had “more confidence” in the Democrats’ ability to handle Medicare, while 40% had more confidence in Republicans.

Second, although perceptions of which party owns an issue can change, they usually will not change during the short window of a campaign.  Take 1988 for example.  In this election, Michael Dukakis tried to emphasize national defense.  George H.W. Bush emphasized jobs and declared that he would be the “education president.” Both were attempting to “trespass” on the other party’s territory.  How’d that work out for them?  Political scientists Bruce Buchanan and Helmut Norpoth studied those strategies and found:

Our findings raise serious doubts that “issue trespassing” pays electoral dividends. Voters tend to rely too much on party stereotypes to notice such attempts.

Voters tended to attribute Bush’s slogans and promises about education and jobs to Dukakis, and attribute Dukakis’s promises about national defense to Bush.  They relied on stereotypes of issue ownership—“if someone wants to improve education, he must be a Democrat”—rather than pay attention to the specific promises of Bush and Dukakis.

In my work, I find that parties often trespass by finding dimensions of issues that play to the party’s ideology.  So a Republican might talk about education by emphasizing vouchers.  Democrats might talk about crime by talking about prevention rather than punishment (see, e.g., David Holian’s study of Bill Clinton).

With regard to Romney-Ryan and Medicare, you could imagine how the GOP might try to do this.  For example, they could talk about “reforming Medicare” as a means to reducing the budget deficit, since that is what Ryan has proposed anyway and since the deficit is an issue more associated with the GOP.  Sure, Obama will counter-attack—calling the “reform” dismantlement, etc.—but at least the battle will be partly fought on the GOP’s turf.

But to go toe-to-toe on “who wants to cut Medicare more”?  That strikes me as a much harder sell for the Republican ticket.

[Cross-posted at The Monkey Cage]

John Sides is an associate professor of political science at George Washington University.

Comments

  • Anonymous on August 15, 2012 2:23 PM:

    Since Clinton balanced the budget to surplus and Bush ran deficits,
    Since Obama did rather well on foreign policy after the disaster of Bush wars,
    Republicans lost its stereotypes as "fiscally responsible" or "strong on defense".

    All they left is outdated social conservatism, unrealistic low tax and reckless deregulation. It is true that Republicans have done some of the great educational reforms and state level budget managements. But on national levels, they don't look too good on any issues.

    Democrats have to be patient and see if people will like ObamaCare in 10 years.
    Democrats have had historic accomplishments like New Deals to Great Society, Civil Right movements.
    Democrats have a future with immigration reform and gay rights and gender equality issues while they restored their reputations for national security.

    I hope republicans will go back to sanity after tea party revolution. Reagan and Gingrich also couldn't roll back to 50s and 20s America.
    This revolution will fail again.

  • Tanisha on August 15, 2012 8:28 PM:

    as Teresa said I am impressed that some one able to get paid $9848 in 1 month on the internet. did you read this web link (Click on menu Home more information) http://goo.gl/E1K1D

  • smartalek on August 16, 2012 9:15 PM:

    Y'know, I can't tell you how much I appreciate not having to wade thru a bunch of spam-bot pollution here in the PA threads.
    Yes, the Captcha can be a pain to deal with -- especially when it goes off on a Cyrillic- or Greek-alphabet jag, or when it takes a half-dozen tries to let a 3 sentence comment thru.
    But it's all worth it, to know that we can have adult conversations here, free of obnoxious marketing, phishing or work-@-home scams. (Those latter are the worst, exploiting the desperation of people who might be down to their last pennies under the Bush recession. Perpetrators of those deserve the death penalty -- or at least some "enhanced interrogation.")
    Wouldn't you agree, people?
    What about you, Tanisha?